97-31521. Finis Scott Bandy; Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 63731-63732]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-31521]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [IA 97-087]
    
    
    Finis Scott Bandy; Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed 
    Activities (Effective Immediately)
    
    I
    
        Finis Scott Bandy was formerly employed by Omaha Public Power 
    District (OPPD) as an instrumentation and control technician at OPPD's 
    Fort Calhoun Station nuclear power plant, Blair, Nebraska. OPPD holds 
    license No. DPR-40, issued August 9, 1973, by the Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50. The license 
    authorizes the operation of the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) in 
    accordance with the conditions specified therein.
    
    II
    
        In August 1996, the NRC inspected access authorization files during 
    an NRC security inspection at FCS. The NRC raised a question about 
    arrest information that Mr. Bandy had supplied to OPPD during the 
    course of 1993, in connection with his application for unescorted 
    access to the plant. The information in question pertained to whether 
    Mr. Bandy had been arrested for theft of personal property, as certain 
    documents in his file appeared to indicate, or had been arrested for 
    excessive speed while driving, as Mr. Bandy claimed. As a result of the 
    NRC's questions, OPPD agreed to interview Mr. Bandy in the presence of 
    the NRC inspector. During the interview, Mr. Bandy denied that he had 
    been arrested for theft and asserted that the only charge he was aware 
    of involved excessive speed while driving.
        Based on further questions about the accuracy of Mr. Bandy's 
    statements and the information provided by him, Mr. Bandy's unescorted 
    access to FCS was temporarily suspended on August 22, 1996. On August 
    26, 1996, OPPD terminated Mr. Bandy's employment and revoked his 
    unescorted access to FCS. OPPD then conducted an investigation and 
    determined that: (1) The only charge brought against Mr. Bandy in 1991 
    was a charge of theft of personal property; (2) copies of court records 
    provided to OPPD by Mr. Bandy had been altered to make it appear that 
    the charge had been for speeding; and (3) Mr. Bandy made false 
    statements when questioned about his criminal history in 1993 by OPPD 
    and in 1996 when questioned by OPPD and the NRC during its inspection. 
    The NRC's investigation of this matter concluded that Mr. Bandy 
    deliberately falsified criminal history information submitted to OPPD 
    in 1993, and provided false information to OPPD and an NRC inspector 
    when questioned about this in August 1996.
        On July 22, 1997, the NRC issued a Demand for Information to Mr. 
    Bandy, seeking information as to why the NRC should not conclude that 
    he engaged in deliberate misconduct and, if so, why the NRC should not 
    prohibit his involvement in NRC-licensed activities. On July 29, 1997, 
    Mr. Bandy contacted the NRC's Office of Enforcement, indicated that he 
    had no interest in being involved in NRC-licensed activities, and 
    indicated that he would be willing to consent to an order prohibiting 
    his involvement in NRC-licensed activities. On August 19, 1997, the NRC 
    sent a letter to Mr. Bandy formally seeking his consent to a 
    confirmatory order prohibiting his involvement in NRC-licensed 
    activities for five years. Mr. Bandy failed to respond to this letter 
    or to NRC efforts to contact him.
    
    III
    
        Based on the above, the NRC has concluded that Mr. Bandy engaged in 
    deliberate misconduct in 1993 and in August 1996, by: (1) Deliberately 
    falsely stating to OPPD during the course of 1993 that he had been 
    convicted in 1991 of excessive speeding while driving when, in fact, he 
    had been convicted of theft of personal property, and by deliberately 
    altering copies of court records that were provided to OPPD; and (2) 
    deliberately falsely stating in August 1996 to OPPD and an NRC 
    inspector that he had been convicted in 1991 of excessive speeding 
    while driving. These actions constituted a violation of 10 CFR 
    50.5(a)(2), which prohibits an individual from deliberately submitting 
    to the NRC or a licensee information that the person submitting the 
    information knows to be incomplete or inaccurate in some respect 
    material to the NRC. In this case, the information that Mr. Bandy 
    provided regarding his personal history was material because licensees 
    are required to consider such information in making unescorted access 
    determinations in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 73.56.
        The NRC must be able to rely on the licensee and its employees to 
    comply with NRC requirements, including the requirement to provide 
    information that is complete and accurate in all material respects. Mr. 
    Bandy's actions in deliberately providing false information to the 
    licensee and to the NRC constitute deliberate violations of Commission 
    regulations. His conduct raises serious doubt about his trustworthiness 
    and reliability; particularly whether he can be relied upon to comply 
    with NRC requirements and to provide complete and accurate information 
    to NRC licensees in the future.
        Consequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that 
    licensed activities can be conducted in compliance with the 
    Commission's requirements and that the health and safety of the public 
    would be protected if Mr. Bandy were permitted at this time to be 
    involved in NRC-licensed activities. Therefore, the public health, 
    safety and interest require that Mr. Bandy be prohibited from any 
    involvement in NRC-licensed activities for a period of five years from 
    the date of this Order. Additionally, Mr. Bandy is required to notify 
    the NRC of his first employment in NRC-licensed activities following 
    the prohibition period. Furthermore, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202, I find 
    that the significance of Mr. Bandy's conduct described above is such 
    that the public health, safety and interest require that this Order be 
    effective immediately.
    
    [[Page 63732]]
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 103, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 
    186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
    regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR Part 50, It is hereby ordered, 
    effective immediately, that:
        1. Finis Scott Bandy is prohibited from involvement in activities 
    licensed by the NRC for a period of 5 years. NRC-licensed activities 
    are those that are conducted pursuant to a specific or general license 
    issued by the NRC, including, but not limited to, those activities of 
    Agreement State licensees conducted pursuant to the authority granted 
    by 10 CFR 150.20.
        2. If Finis Scott Bandy is currently involved with another employer 
    in NRC-licensed activities, he must immediately cease such activities, 
    and inform the NRC of the name, address and telephone number of the 
    employer, and provide a copy of this Order to the employer.
        3. For the five-year period after the above period has expired, Mr. 
    Bandy will notify the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555, within 20 days of the 
    first time he accepts employment in NRC-licensed activities, as defined 
    in Paragraph IV.1 above. In the notification, he will include a 
    statement of his commitment to comply with regulatory requirements and 
    address why the NRC should have confidence that he will comply with 
    regulatory requirements, and the name, address and telephone number of 
    his employer or entity where he will be involved in licensed 
    activities.
        The Director, Office of Enforcement, may relax or rescind, in 
    writing, any of the above conditions upon a showing by Mr. Bandy of 
    good cause.
    
    V
    
        In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Mr. Bandy must, and any other 
    person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an answer to this 
    Order, and may request a hearing within 20 days of its issuance. Where 
    good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the time 
    to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be made in 
    writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, and include a statement of good 
    cause for the extension. The answer may consent to this Order. Unless 
    the answer consents to this Order, the answer shall, in writing and 
    under oath or affirmation, specifically admit or deny each allegation 
    or charge made in this Order and shall set forth the matters of fact 
    and law on which Mr. Bandy, or any other such person adversely 
    affected, relies and the reasons as to why the Order should not have 
    been issued. Any answer or request for a hearing shall be submitted to 
    the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Chief, 
    Docketing and Service Section, Washington, D.C. 20555. Copies also 
    shall be sent to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, to the Assistant General 
    Counsel for Hearings and Enforcement at the same address, to the 
    Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, 
    Arlington, Texas 76011, and to Mr. Bandy. If a person other than Mr. 
    Bandy requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with 
    particularity the manner in which his or her interest is adversely 
    affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 
    CFR 2.714(d).
        If a hearing is requested by Mr. Bandy or a person whose interest 
    is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating 
    the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to 
    be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Order should be 
    sustained.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), Mr. Bandy may, in addition to 
    demanding a hearing, at the time the answer is filed or sooner, move 
    the presiding officer to set aside the immediate effectiveness of the 
    Order, on the ground that the Order, including the need for immediate 
    effectiveness, is not based on adequate evidence but on mere suspicion, 
    unfounded allegations, or error.
        In the absence of any request for a hearing, or written approval of 
    an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of 
    this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of 
    time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a 
    hearing request has not been received. AN ANSWER OR A REQUEST FOR 
    HEARING SHALL NOT STAY THE IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS ORDER.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 19th day of November 1997.
    
        For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    James Lieberman,
    Director, Office of Enforcement.
    [FR Doc. 97-31521 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/02/1997
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-31521
Pages:
63731-63732 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IA 97-087
PDF File:
97-31521.pdf