98-32096. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to Amendment No. 2 to the Proposed Rule Change by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 231 (Wednesday, December 2, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 66619-66621]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-32096]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-40716; File No. SR-NASD-98-63]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule 
    Change and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to 
    Amendment No. 2 to the Proposed Rule Change by the National Association 
    of Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to Fees for Nasdaq's Workstation 
    II Service for Those Subscribers Who Are Not Members of the NASD
    
    November 25, 1998.
    
    I. Introduction
    
        On August 20, 1998, the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
    Inc. (``NASD''), through its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Nasdaq 
    Market, Inc. (``Nasdaq''), filed with the Securities and Exchange 
    Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of 
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 
    thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to modify the fees that the NASD 
    charges non-NASD members receiving Nasdaq Workstation II (``NWII'') 
    service. Nasdaq amended the filing on September 10, 1998.\3\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
        \3\ See Letter from Robert Aber, Senior Vice President and 
    General Counsel, Nasdaq, to Richard Strasser, Assistant Director, 
    Division of Market Regulation (``Division''), Commission, dated 
    September 10, 1998 (``Amendment No. 1'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission published notice of the proposed rule change, in the 
    Federal Register on October 14, 1998.\4\ The Commission received no 
    comments specifically directed toward this proposal.\5\ Nasdaq filed a 
    second amendment on November 17, 1998.\6\ For the reasons discussed 
    below, the
    
    [[Page 66620]]
    
    Commission is approving the proposed rule change as amended.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 40521 (October 5, 1998), 
    63 FR 55167 (October 14, 1998).
        \5\ As discussed below, the Commission received comments that 
    were directed toward a parallel proposal, File No. SR-NASD-98-62, 
    which proposed to modify the fees Nasdaq charges NASD members 
    receiving NWII service.
        \6\ See Letter from Robert Aber, Nasdaq, to Richard Strasser, 
    Division, Commission, dated November 17, 1998 (``Amendment No. 2''). 
    Amendment No. 2 deleted language, appearing in the Federal Register 
    notice, stating that if non-NASD member subscribers received EWN II 
    technology prior to approval of this proposed rule change, then 
    after approval Nasdaq would bill the non-member subscribers in an 
    amount equal to the differential under the EWN I and the EWN II fee 
    structures.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Description of the Proposal
    
        The NASD filed this proposed rule change in conjunction with a 
    parallel proposal to modify the fees charged NASD members, File No. SR-
    NASD-98-62.\7\ The fee schedule set forth in that proposal became 
    effective upon filing in accordance with Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the 
    Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 40434 (September 11, 
    1998), 63 FR 49937 (September 18, 1998).
        \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This proposed rule change would increase the monthly fees for NWII 
    service as follows: the monthly Service Charge would increase from $100 
    per ``server'' to $1500 per ``service delivery platform'' (``SDP''); 
    the monthly Display Charge would increase from $500 to $525 per 
    presentation device (``PD''); and the monthly ``Additional Circuit/SDP 
    Charge'' (formerly the ``Additional Circuit Charge'') would increase 
    from $1150 to $2700. This proposed rule change also clarifies that the 
    fee schedule applies to subscribers who access NWII service through an 
    application programming interface (``API''). Finally, the proposal 
    eliminates the Digital Interface Service fee schedule because Nasdaq no 
    longer provides that service.
        Nasdaq proposed this fee change in conjunction with the 
    construction of EWN II, a new network for delivering NWII service. 
    Nasdaq is in the process of converting existing subscribers to the EWN 
    II network. During this process, some NWII subscribers will continue to 
    utilize the existing EWN I network and pay the fees for that service, 
    until they are upgraded to EWN II.
        To access NWII service, each subscriber location has at least one 
    SDP, or server, that resides on the network and connects to Nasdaq by a 
    dedicated circuit. Under the EWN II network, each dedicated circuit 
    (``T1 circuit'') will be capable of supporting up to six SDPs. Each SDP 
    can support up to eight PDs, or Nasdaq Workstation IIs, although a firm 
    may elect to have fewer than eight PDs on a single SDP. A subscriber 
    may also obtain NWII service through an API, which allows a firm to 
    obtain NWII Service using the firm's own hardware (e.g., personal 
    computer) and software systems.
        Under the new fee structure, a firm with one SDP ($1500) and eight 
    PDs (8  x  $525 = $4200) would be charged a monthly fee of $5700 
    (compared to $4100 under the existing schedule). A firm with one SDP 
    ($1500) and two PDs (2  x  $525 = $1050) would be charged a monthly fee 
    of $2550 (compared to $1100 under the existing schedule). If a 
    subscriber chooses to access NWII through an API, the subscriber would 
    be assessed the service charge for each SDP, the display charge for 
    each of the subscriber's linkages (e.g., NWII substitute, quote-update 
    facility), as well as the additional circuit charge. The Additional 
    Circuit/SDP charge will apply if a subscriber obtains additional SDPs 
    and/or T1 circuits without first maximizing the capacity on its SDPs 
    and T1 circuits.
        Nasdaq justifies the proposed fee structure on the grounds that it 
    is derived from the fee structure in the contract that Nasdaq and MCI 
    Communications Corporation (``MCI'') entered into in 1997, under which 
    MCI would build and maintain the new network. Nasdaq represents that 
    the proposed fee structure subsidizes its subscribers, in that the 
    proposed Service Charge does not pass on all of the SDP/server costs 
    that Nasdaq incurs under the contract. Nasdaq also represents that the 
    proposed fee schedule's Display Charge in part helps the NASD recoup 
    its subsidy of the SDP/server costs and other expenses associated with 
    the development and the maintenance of NWII.
        Although the Commission received no comment letters specifically 
    addressing this filing, Nasdaq's proposal to change the fee schedule 
    applicable to NASD members generated three comment letters.\9\ The 
    three letters criticized the proposed fee schedule applicable to NASD 
    members on a number of issues, including: that it disproportionately 
    affects smaller subscribers, that it is unfair to market makers, that 
    it does not adequately place the EWN II network's costs upon the 
    network's beneficiaries, and that Nasdaq has not adequately justified 
    various components of the fee structure and related fees. One letter 
    requested that the Commission review the bidding process and the costs 
    associated with the contract for the new network, to determine a fair 
    cost.\10\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ See Letter from Douglas Ralston, President, Sherman Ralston, 
    Inc., to Jonathan Katz, Secretary, Commission, dated October 8, 
    1998; Letter from David Rich, Associate Compliance Director, 
    Jefferies & Company, Inc., to Jonathan Katz, dated October 9, 1998; 
    Letter from Marge Ferguson, President, Wall Street 
    Telecommunications Association, to Jonathan Katz, dated November 4, 
    1998 (not specifically identifying a file number, but focusing its 
    comments on Nasdaq Level III service, which is available only to 
    NASD members) (``WSTA letter'').
        \10\ See WSTA letter.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Discussion
    
        The Commission finds that the proposed fee schedule for non-NASD 
    members is consistent with the requirements of Section 15A(b)(5) of the 
    Act.\11\ Section 15A(b)(5) specifies that the rules of a registered 
    securities association shall provide for the equitable allocation of 
    reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and 
    other persons using any facility or system that the NASD operates or 
    controls.\12\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(5).
        \12\ In approving this rule, the Commission has considered the 
    proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and capital 
    formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This proposed rule change provides that NASD members and non-NASD 
    members who subscribe to NWII service will pay the same rates, 
    suggesting that the burden of the new fees was allocated fairly. 
    Moreover, by basing the SDP rates on the costs that Nasdaq pays under 
    the contract to implement the EWN II network, but reducing the impact 
    on smaller users by not passing on all of the SDP costs that Nasdaq 
    incurs, the Commission believes that Nasdaq has sought to minimize the 
    adverse impact of those increased fees on non-NASD members, suggesting 
    that the fees are reasonable under the circumstances.
        The Commission is not persuaded by the commenters' criticism (in 
    the parallel rule filing regarding the fees Nasdaq charges NASD 
    members) that the costs were not allocated fairly or that the costs are 
    not justified. None of the commenters disputes the issue that Nasdaq's 
    technical modernization efforts are intended to improve Nasdaq's 
    capacity and to enhance services provided to NASD members and non-
    members alike. Nor do the commenters dispute Nasdaq's contention that 
    the increased Service Charge is intended to offset the costs associated 
    with the technology modernization efforts. Finally, the commenters do 
    not dispute Nasdaq's representation that Nasdaq has chosen not to pass 
    on the entire cost of each SDP slot to members and non-members. 
    Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with 
    the Act.
        The Commission finds good cause for approving Amendment No. 2 prior 
    to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of notice thereof in 
    the Federal Register. Amendment No. 2 merely clarifies that Nasdaq will 
    not attempt to impose the monthly fee changes on non-NASD member 
    subscribers who receive EWN II technology prior to this Order.
    
    [[Page 66621]]
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning Amendment No. 2, including whether it is 
    consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file 
    six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange 
    Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Copies of the 
    submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with 
    respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, 
    and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change 
    between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be 
    withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 
    552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's 
    Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD. All 
    submissions should refer to File No. SR-NASD-98-63 and should be 
    submitted by ?????.
    
    V. Conclusion
    
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
    that the proposed rule change SR-NASD-98-63, including Amendment No. 2, 
    is approved.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \13\ See 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-32096 Filed 12-1-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/02/1998
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-32096
Pages:
66619-66621 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-40716, File No. SR-NASD-98-63
PDF File:
98-32096.pdf