98-32104. Regulations for the Publication, Posting and Filing of Tariffs for the Transportation of Property by or with a Water Carrier in the Noncontiguous Domestic Trade  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 231 (Wednesday, December 2, 1998)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 66521-66522]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-32104]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Surface Transportation Board
    
    49 CFR Part 1312
    
    [STB Ex Parte No. 580]
    
    
    Regulations for the Publication, Posting and Filing of Tariffs 
    for the Transportation of Property by or with a Water Carrier in the 
    Noncontiguous Domestic Trade
    
    AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board (Board or STB) proposes to 
    modify its tariff filing regulations to eliminate the option of filing 
    tariffs with the Board electronically through the Federal Maritime 
    Commission (FMC) Automated Tariff Filing and Information System (ATFI), 
    which is being phased out effective May 1, 1999. The Board will, 
    however, entertain special tariff authority requests by individual 
    carriers seeking to file their tariffs electronically.
    
    DATES: Comments are due January 4, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send comments (an original and 10 copies) referring to STB 
    Ex Parte No. 580 to: Surface Transportation Board, Office of the 
    Secretary, Case Control Branch, 1925 K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 
    20423-0001.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    James W. Greene (202) 565-1578. [TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 
    565-1695.]
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ICC Termination Act of 1995, Public Law 
    104-88, 109 Stat. 803 (1995), transferred from the FMC to the Board the 
    responsibility for regulating port-to-port water carriage in the 
    noncontiguous domestic trade. In connection with the
    
    [[Page 66522]]
    
    transfer of jurisdiction, the Board entered into an interagency 
    agreement with the FMC and modified its requirements to allow carriers 
    to continue to utilize the FMC's ATFI system to file their tariffs with 
    the Board. This action permitted the transfer of jurisdiction to occur 
    without requiring the carriers to make any new tariff filings, and 
    comported with Congress' suggestion that the Board continue the FMC's 
    practice of allowing carriers to file their tariffs electronically.\1\ 
    The recently-enacted Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 
    105-258, 112 Stat. 1902 (1998) (OSRA) will, however, eliminate the 
    requirement that ocean carriers file their tariffs with the FMC 
    effective May 1, 1999, and in these circumstances, the FMC will not be 
    accepting new ATFI tariff filings on or after that date.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ H.R. Rep. No. 422, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 206 (1995).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        While ATFI has served well as an electronic filing option for STB 
    tariffs, its feasibility has always been predicated upon the basic 
    system being operated and maintained by the FMC to support its own 
    tariff filing requirements. STB tariff filings constitute less than 5% 
    of total ATFI tariff filings, and absent the 95-plus percent of the 
    filings accounted for by the FMC's requirements, it will not be 
    economically feasible to operate and maintain the ATFI system or any 
    similar system solely for STB tariffs.
        Under the interagency agreement between the FMC and the Board, the 
    Board pays an annual fee to FMC to cover the Board's portion of ATFI 
    contract costs and certain in-house services provided by FMC, and FMC 
    remits to the Board the filing and access fees attributable to STB 
    tariffs. However, the Board's share of ATFI costs and fees is minuscule 
    in terms of total system cost and fees. While the drastic reduction in 
    tariff filings would undoubtedly reduce certain variable costs, the 
    fixed costs of ATFI, spread over solely STB tariffs, would require the 
    imposition of prohibitive tariff filing and access fees in order for 
    the Board to recover any reasonable portion of its out-of-pocket 
    costs.\2\ In these circumstances, it is clear that ATFI would not be 
    viable solely for STB tariff filings. Similarly, it would not be 
    feasible for the Board to undertake an effort to design, develop and 
    implement a new electronic tariff filing system geared solely to STB 
    requirements, given the limited scope of the Board's remaining tariff 
    filing requirements and the extensive staff and monetary resources that 
    would be required.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ We are aware that the FMC's Notice of Inquiry concerning the 
    implementation of OSRA (63 FR 37088) raised the possibility of 
    continuing to operate some portion of ATFI to provide for the 
    electronic filing of service contracts. An electronic filing system 
    geared to the requirements of service contracts, however, would not 
    fulfill the requirements for an electronic tariff filing system
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Although the Board's regulations will no longer routinely provide 
    for electronic tariff filings if the proposed revisions are adopted, we 
    will not rule out, and indeed will encourage, electronic tariff filing 
    proposals from interested carriers. ATFI filings were initially 
    accepted pursuant to special tariff authority granted by the Board,\3\ 
    and we are amenable to special tariff authority requests for individual 
    electronic tariff filing proposals submitted by carriers. By way of 
    illustration in this regard, we would point out that our predecessor 
    organization, the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), issued a 
    decision several years ago granting a rail carrier's request to file 
    certain tariffs on computer diskettes.\4\ Parties proposing alternative 
    tariff filing systems must, of course, explain how the proposed systems 
    will fulfill all of the various needs for tariff information.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ STB Special Tariff Authority No. 4, served October 1, 1996,
        \4\ Special Tariff Authority No. 93-12, ICC served July 25, 
    1994.
        \5\ Our staff is available to consult informally with carriers 
    in this regard.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Request for Comments
    
        We invite comments on the proposed regulations. We encourage any 
    commenter that has the necessary technical wherewithal to submit its 
    comments as computer data on a 3.5-inch floppy diskette formatted for 
    WordPerfect 6.1, or formatted so that it can be readily converted into 
    WordPerfect 6.1. Any such diskette submission (one diskette will be 
    sufficient) should be in addition to the written submission (an 
    original and 10 copies).
    
    Small Entities
    
        The Board preliminarily concludes that these rules, if adopted, 
    would not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of 
    small entities. The proposed regulations will eliminate the existing 
    option to file tariffs electronically through the FMC's ATFI system, 
    but many carriers already opt to file printed tariffs, and any cost 
    differences for alternative tariff filing methodologies that carriers 
    may propose are unlikely to be significant.
    
    Environment
    
        This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
    human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
    
    List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 1312
    
        Motor carriers, Noncontiguous domestic trade, Tariffs, Water 
    carriers.
    
        Decided: November 24, 1998.
    
        By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
    Vernon A. Williams,
    Secretary.
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board proposes to 
    amend part 1312 of title 49, chapter X, of the Code of Federal 
    Regulations as follows:
    
    PART 1312--REGULATIONS FOR THE PUBLICATION, POSTING AND FILING OF 
    TARIFFS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF PROPERTY BY OR WITH A WATER 
    CARRIER IN NONCONTIGUOUS DOMESTIC TRADE
    
        1. The authority citation for part 1312 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 721(a), 13702(a), 13702(b) and 13702(d).
    
    
    Sec. 1312.1  [Amended]
    
        2. In Sec. 1312.1(c), the definition of ``ATFI'' is removed.
        3. Section 1312.6 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 1312.6  Advance notice required.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) Receipt of tariffs by the Board. The Board will receive tariff 
    filings between the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. Eastern time, on 
    workdays. Tariff filings delivered to the Board on other than a 
    workday, or after 5:00 P.M. on a workday, will be considered as 
    received the next workday.
    * * * * *
        4. Section 1312.17 is removed.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-32104 Filed 12-1-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-61-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/02/1998
Department:
Surface Transportation Board
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
Document Number:
98-32104
Dates:
Comments are due January 4, 1999.
Pages:
66521-66522 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
STB Ex Parte No. 580
PDF File:
98-32104.pdf
CFR: (2)
49 CFR 1312.1
49 CFR 1312.6