[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 20, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-31165]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: December 20, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-118-000]
East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Application
December 14, 1994.
Take notice that on December 12, 1994, East Tennessee Natural Gas
Company (East Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252, filed in
Docket No. CP95-118-000 an application pursuant to Section 7(c) of the
Natural Gas Act for a certificate of public convenience and necessity
permitting it to construct and operate certain pipeline loop and
compression facilities to ensure continued transportation service to
its shippers, all as more fully set forth in the application which is
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
East Tennessee proposes to construct and operate 2.14 miles of 12-
inch pipeline loop and 3.02 miles of pipeline loop, both in Washington
County, Virginia as well as uprate three existing turbines at its
Compressor Station No. 3110, in Morgan County, Tennessee to Solar
Saturn Model T-1300's, each with an I.S.O. rating of 1360 horsepower,
resulting in an increase of 960 horsepower. East Tennessee estimates a
construction cost of $4,264,978, which would be financed initially with
funds on hand, funds generated internally, borrowing under revolving
credit agreements or short-term financing and which would be rolled
into permanent financing.
East Tennessee states that its current total firm contractual
commitment is approximately 476,507 dt equivalent of natural gas per
day. It is indicated that since 1988 East Tennessee's system has been
designed to meet this obligation in part by receiving approximately
5,000 dt equivalent of natural gas per day from Columbia Gas
Transmission Corporation (Columbia Gas) and delivering it to Roanoke
Gas Company (Roanoke) via an interconnect between Roanoke and Columbia
Gas. It is stated that in 1988 East Tennessee and Roanoke entered into
an operating agreement specifically providing that approximately 5,000
dt equivalent of natural gas per day of Roanoke's total transportation
quantity of 9,789 dt equivalent of natural gas per day could be
delivered to Roanoke at the Columbia Gas interconnect. It is stated
that this arrangement enabled East Tennessee to reduce the volumes that
it was required to transport on its system to Roanoke and thus make
those volumes available for East Tennessee's other customers.
East Tennessee states that the operating agreement has expired by
its own terms and that Roanoke has advised that it was not interested
in extending the agreement. It is indicated that, as a result of
terminated agreement, East Tennessee now proposes to construct and
operate the above-described facilities.
Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with
reference to said application should on or before January 4, 1995, file
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426,
a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10).
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
Commission's Rules.
Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter
finds that a grant of the certificate is required by the public
convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely
filed, or if the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal
hearing is required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised,
it will be unnecessary for East Tennessee to appear or be represented
at the hearing.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-31165 Filed 12-19-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
