94-31199. GPU Nuclear Corporation; Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 20, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-31199]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: December 20, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-219]
    
     
    
    GPU Nuclear Corporation; Consideration of Issuance of Amendment 
    to Facility Operating License, Proposed No Significant Hazards 
    Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No. 
    DPR-16, issued to GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPUN/the licensee) for 
    operation of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OCNGS) 
    located in Ocean County, New Jersey.
        The proposed amendment would revise Technical Specification 5.3.1.E 
    to allow 2645 fuel assemblies to be stored in the fuel pool. This is an 
    increase of 45 fuel assemblies from the current limit of 2600. The 45 
    additional storage location currently exist in the racks in the fuel 
    pool. They were included in the re-racking project allowed by License 
    Amendment No. 76 but were not incorporated in the Technical 
    Specifications since, at the time, it was believed they would not be 
    needed.
        Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission 
    will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
    amended (the Act) and the Commission's regulations.
        The Commission has made a proposed determination that the amendment 
    request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the 
    Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of 
    the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) 
    involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an 
    accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new 
    or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; 
    or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As 
    required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of 
    the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented 
    below:
    
        1. The operation of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, 
    in accordance with the proposed amendment, will not involve a 
    significant increase in the probability or consequences of an 
    accident previously evaluated.
        There are no changes in the existing provisions for load 
    handling in the vicinity of the spent fuel pool associated with the 
    proposed increase in licensed storage capacity. OCNGS Technical 
    Specification 5.3.1.B limits the loads carried over the spent fuel 
    pool to no greater than the weight of one fuel assembly. Therefore, 
    accidents involving the mispositioning or drop of a fuel assembly 
    establish the extent of accident probability or consequences. The 
    Abnormal Positioning of a Fuel Assembly Outside the Storage Rack and 
    the Dropped Fuel Assembly accident scenarios are addressed as 
    follows:
        a. The probability of occurrence of the above accidents is not 
    affected by the racks themselves or the stored fuel. Since no 
    physical changes are being made to the racks, an increase in 
    licensed storage capacity cannot increase the probability of these 
    accidents.
        b. The consequences of abnormal positioning of a fuel assembly 
    outside the storage rack were evaluated. Since the storage rack 
    criticality calculations were made using an infinite array of 
    storage cells with no neutron leakage, positioning a fuel assembly 
    outside and adjacent to the actual finite rack can add reactivity, 
    but would, because of neutron leakage, result in a lower Keff 
    than the Koo calculated for the infinite array. Thus, 
    additional stored fuel assemblies will not increase consequences of 
    this type of accident than those previously evaluated.
        c. The consequences of a dropped fuel assembly striking either 
    the base of the rack or the top of a storage location and the 
    reactivity effects were also evaluated in the licensing report 
    supporting Amendment 76. In all cases, the evaluated integrity of 
    the racks was not exceeded. Also, the dropped fuel assembly did not 
    constitute a criticality hazard because the infinite multiplication 
    factor of the fuel storage racks was not materially altered. An 
    increase in fuel enrichment does not increase consequences since the 
    GE-9 assemblies' mechanical specifications are bounded by previous 
    designs and consequences are not dependent on U-235 enrichment. 
    Thus, since no physical alteration of the storage racks is necessary 
    to store 45 additional fuel assemblies the consequences of this type 
    of accident are not increased.
        2. The operation of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, in 
    accordance with the proposed amendment, will not create the 
    possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident 
    previously evaluated.
        The increase in licensed spent fuel pool storage capacity 
    involves the addition of 45 fuel assemblies. The increased 
    structural loading has already been accounted for in the analyses 
    reviewed by the NRC staff in support of Amendment 76. There are no 
    physical changes to the fuel pool cooling. These systems are capable 
    of handling the additional duty originating from the additional 
    fuel. Criticality accidents or malfunctions also do not change 
    because the analysis assumes an infinite array of fuel and Boraflex 
    gaps have been conservatively accounted for. Therefore, there is no 
    possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than 
    previously evaluated.
        3. The operation of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, in 
    accordance with the proposed amendment, will not involve a 
    significant reduction in a margin of safety.
        The margin of safety, when applied to a storage expansion, needs 
    to address nuclear criticality, thermal-hydraulic, mechanical, 
    material and structural adequacy.
    
    Nuclear Criticality
    
        The acceptance criterion for criticality as established in 
    Technical Specification 5.3.1.A, is that the neutron multiplication 
    factor shall be less than or equal to 0.95, including all 
    uncertainties.
        Since the increase in licensed capacity to 2,600 storage 
    locations, the maximum allowable average enrichment was increased 
    twice. The original analysis was for 3.01% U-235 enrichment fuel 
    with no credit for Gd203. Subsequent analyses increased 
    the maximum allowable enrichment to 3.8% and then 4.0% U-235. Both 
    analyses take credit for Gd203 requiring a minimum of 7 
    (seven) rods containing 3.0% or more Gd203.
        Subsequent to the rack installation, an industry concern was 
    raised with the discovery of the formation of gaps in Boraflex 
    panels. The problem of gap formation in the boraflex and its impact 
    on criticality has been addressed. The criticality analysis was 
    updated to take into account the presence of gaps, including 
    projected gap formation is coplanar. The fuel pool Keff for the 
    4.0% U-235 enriched fuel with at least 7 (seven) Gd203 
    rods at peak reactivity is 0.9174 and increases to 0.945 with 3.9 
    inch coplanar gaps in the Boraflex which is below the 0.95 limit. 
    Oyster Creek maintains a Boraflex surveillance program to ensure the 
    assumptions used in the analysis remain valid.
        Since all criticality analyses were performed with an infinite 
    lattice, it is valid for a spent fuel pool capacity of 2,645 fuel 
    assemblies. Therefore, there is no decrease in the margin of safety.
    
    Thermal-Hydraulic
    
        The heat load analysis performed for the expansion to 2600 
    licensed storage locations considered all 2,645 actual storage 
    locations filled. Therefore, the initial conclusions are not changed 
    and no re-analysis is required. The thermal-hydraulic calculations 
    which used 125 deg. F pool water temperature, have shown that the 
    cladding temperatures (<219 deg.="" f)="" will="" be="" well="" below="" the="" local="" fuel="" pool="" water="" saturation="" temperature="" of="" approximately="" 240="" deg.="" f.="" the="" maximum="" cladding="" temperatures="" will="" be="" low="" enough="" to="" preclude="" nucleate="" boiling.="" analysis="" has="" demonstrated="" that="" with="" an="" abnormal="" heat="" load="" from="" 2,732="" fuel="" assemblies="" in="" the="" spent="" fuel="" pool,="" the="" temperature="" of="" the="" pool="" will="" be="" maintained="" within="" the="" technical="" specification="" limit="" to="" 125="" deg.="" f.="" therefore,="" since="" this="" limit="" will="" be="" maintained,="" other="" restrictions="" such="" as="" the="" temperature="" differential="" of="" the="" spent="" fuel="" pool="" liner="" will="" also="" be="" maintained.="" thus,="" there="" is="" no="" reduction="" in="" the="" margin="" of="" safety="" from="" a="" thermal-hydraulic="" point="" of="" view.="" mechanical="" and="" structural="" the="" additional="" 45="" storage="" locations="" were="" part="" of="" the="" fuel="" pool="" expansion="" of="" which="" only="" 2,600="" fuel="" assemblies="" were="" licensed="" for="" storage.="" the="" fuel="" storage="" racks="" are="" designed="" to="" maintain="" the="" spent="" fuel="" assemblies="" in="" a="" safe="" configuration="" through="" all="" environmental="" and="" abnormal="" loadings,="" such="" as="" an="" sse="" or="" impact="" due="" to="" spent="" fuel="" assembly="" drop.="" structural="" and="" seismic="" analyses="" of="" the="" racks="" have="" established="" margins="" against="" tilting,="" deflection="" or="" movement="" to="" preclude="" impact="" of="" the="" racks="" with="" each="" other="" or="" with="" the="" pool="" walls.="" it="" is="" shown="" that="" the="" rack="" modules="" will="" undergo="" infinitesimal="" rotations="" if="" seismic="" excitation="" 50%="" over="" the="" sse="" loading="" are="" imposed.="" the="" threshold="" of="" kinematic="" instability="" is="" not="" even="" approached.="" analyses="" performed="" to="" arrive="" at="" the="" above="" conclusions="" indicate="" that="" margins="" in="" all="" areas="" of="" structural="" concern="" exist.="" the="" racks="" are="" placed="" in="" the="" pool="" as="" individual="" stand-alone="" structures,="" do="" not="" load="" pool="" walls="" directly,="" and="" are="" uncoupled="" from="" pool="" liner="" temperature="" rise.="" to="" limit="" the="" out-of-phase="" motion="" of="" adjacent="" racks="" due="" to="" non-="" symmetric="" loading="" of="" the="" racks,="" oyster="" creek="" procedures="" for="" loading="" spent="" fuel="" pool="" racks="" require="" the="" racks="" to="" be="" loaded="" symmetrically,="" i.e.="" the="" total="" fuel="" assemblies="" stored="" in="" any="" one="" quadrant="" of="" a="" rack="" will="" not="" deviate="" by="" more="" than="" 10%="" of="" the="" average="" of="" the="" four="" quadrants.="" this="" limitation="" will="" remain="" in="" effect="" for="" storage="" of="" 2,645="" fuel="" assemblies.="" in="" summary,="" the="" additional="" 45="" fuel="" bundles="" in="" storage="" will="" not="" decrease="" structural="" margins="" since="" there="" is="" no="" associated="" physical="" change="" to="" the="" storage="" facility="" and="" the="" 2,645="" fuel="" assemblies="" were="" considered="" in="" the="" original="" analysis="" which="" demonstrated="" that="" the="" acceptance="" criteria="" were="" met.="" the="" nrc="" staff="" has="" reviewed="" the="" licensee's="" analysis="" and,="" based="" on="" this="" review,="" it="" appear="" that="" the="" three="" standards="" of="" 10="" cfr="" 50.92(c)="" are="" satisfied.="" therefore,="" the="" nrc="" staff="" proposes="" to="" determine="" that="" the="" amendment="" request="" involves="" no="" significant="" hazards="" consideration.="" the="" commission="" is="" seeking="" public="" comments="" on="" this="" proposed="" determination.="" any="" comments="" received="" within="" 30="" days="" after="" the="" date="" of="" publication="" of="" this="" notice="" will="" be="" considered="" in="" making="" any="" final="" determination.="" normally,="" the="" commission="" will="" not="" issue="" the="" amendment="" until="" the="" expiration="" of="" the="" 30-day="" notice="" period.="" however,="" should="" circumstances="" change="" during="" the="" notice="" period="" such="" that="" failure="" to="" act="" in="" a="" timely="" way="" would="" result,="" for="" example,="" in="" derating="" or="" shutdown="" of="" the="" facility,="" the="" commission="" may="" issue="" the="" license="" amendment="" before="" the="" expiration="" of="" the="" 30-day="" notice="" period,="" provided="" that="" its="" final="" determination="" is="" that="" the="" amendment="" involves="" no="" significant="" hazards="" consideration.="" the="" final="" determination="" will="" consider="" all="" public="" and="" state="" comments="" received.="" should="" the="" commission="" take="" this="" action,="" it="" will="" publish="" in="" the="" federal="" register="" a="" notice="" of="" issuance="" and="" provide="" for="" opportunity="" for="" a="" hearing="" after="" issuance.="" the="" commission="" expects="" that="" the="" need="" to="" take="" this="" action="" will="" occur="" very="" infrequently.="" written="" comments="" may="" be="" submitted="" by="" mail="" to="" the="" rules="" review="" and="" directives="" branch,="" division="" of="" freedom="" of="" information="" and="" publications="" services,="" office="" of="" administration,="" u.s.="" nuclear="" regulatory="" commission,="" washington,="" dc="" 20555,="" and="" should="" cite="" the="" publication="" date="" and="" page="" number="" of="" this="" federal="" register="" notice.="" written="" comments="" may="" also="" be="" delivered="" to="" room="" 6d22,="" two="" white="" flint="" north,="" 11545="" rockville="" pike,="" rockville,="" maryland,="" from="" 7:30="" a.m.="" to="" 4:15="" p.m.="" federal="" workdays.="" copies="" of="" written="" comments="" received="" may="" be="" examined="" at="" the="" nrc="" public="" document="" room,="" the="" gelman="" building,="" 2120="" l="" street,="" nw.,="" washington,="" dc.="" the="" filing="" of="" requests="" for="" hearing="" and="" petitions="" for="" leave="" to="" intervene="" is="" discussed="" below.="" by="" january="" 19,="" 1995,="" the="" licensee="" may="" file="" a="" request="" for="" a="" hearing="" with="" respect="" to="" issuance="" of="" the="" amendment="" to="" the="" subject="" facility="" operating="" license="" and="" any="" person="" whose="" interest="" may="" be="" affected="" by="" this="" proceeding="" and="" who="" wishes="" to="" participate="" as="" a="" party="" in="" the="" proceeding="" must="" file="" a="" written="" request="" for="" a="" hearing="" and="" a="" petition="" for="" leave="" to="" intervene.="" requests="" for="" a="" hearing="" and="" a="" petition="" for="" leave="" to="" intervene="" shall="" be="" filed="" in="" accordance="" with="" the="" commission's="" ``rules="" of="" practice="" for="" domestic="" licensing="" proceedings''="" in="" 10="" cfr="" part="" 2.="" interested="" persons="" should="" consult="" a="" current="" copy="" of="" 10="" cfr="" 2.714="" which="" is="" available="" at="" the="" commission's="" public="" document="" room,="" the="" gelman="" building,="" 2120="" l="" street,="" nw.,="" washington,="" dc,="" and="" at="" the="" local="" public="" document="" room="" located="" at="" the="" ocean="" county="" library,="" reference="" department,="" 101="" washington="" street,="" toms="" river,="" new="" jersey="" 08753.="" if="" a="" request="" for="" a="" hearing="" or="" petition="" for="" leave="" to="" intervene="" is="" filed="" by="" the="" above="" date,="" the="" commission="" or="" an="" atomic="" safety="" and="" licensing="" board,="" designated="" by="" the="" commission="" or="" by="" the="" chairman="" of="" the="" atomic="" safety="" and="" licensing="" board="" panel,="" will="" rule="" on="" the="" request="" and/or="" petition;="" and="" the="" secretary="" or="" the="" designated="" atomic="" safety="" and="" licensing="" board="" will="" issue="" a="" notice="" of="" hearing="" or="" an="" appropriate="" order.="" as="" required="" by="" 10="" cfr="" 2.714,="" a="" petition="" for="" leave="" to="" intervene="" shall="" set="" forth="" with="" particularity="" the="" interest="" of="" the="" petitioner="" in="" the="" proceeding,="" and="" how="" that="" interest="" may="" be="" affected="" by="" the="" results="" of="" the="" proceeding.="" the="" petition="" should="" specifically="" explain="" the="" reasons="" why="" intervention="" should="" be="" permitted="" with="" particular="" reference="" to="" the="" following="" factors:="" (1)="" the="" nature="" of="" the="" petitioner's="" right="" under="" the="" act="" to="" be="" made="" party="" to="" the="" proceeding;="" (2)="" the="" nature="" and="" extent="" of="" the="" petitioner's="" property,="" financial,="" or="" other="" interest="" in="" the="" proceeding;="" and="" (3)="" the="" possible="" effect="" of="" any="" order="" which="" may="" be="" entered="" in="" the="" proceeding="" on="" the="" petitioner's="" interest.="" the="" petition="" should="" also="" identify="" the="" specific="" aspect(s)="" of="" the="" subject="" matter="" of="" the="" proceeding="" as="" to="" which="" petitioner="" wishes="" to="" intervene.="" any="" person="" who="" has="" filed="" a="" petition="" for="" leave="" to="" intervene="" or="" who="" has="" been="" admitted="" as="" a="" party="" may="" amend="" the="" petition="" without="" requesting="" leave="" of="" the="" board="" up="" to="" 15="" days="" prior="" to="" the="" first="" prehearing="" conference="" scheduled="" in="" the="" proceeding,="" but="" such="" an="" amended="" petition="" must="" satisfy="" the="" specificity="" requirements="" described="" above.="" no="" later="" than="" 15="" days="" prior="" to="" the="" first="" prehearing="" conference="" scheduled="" in="" the="" proceeding,="" a="" petitioner="" shall="" file="" a="" supplement="" to="" the="" petition="" to="" intervene="" which="" must="" include="" a="" list="" of="" the="" contentions="" which="" are="" sought="" to="" be="" litigated="" in="" the="" matter.="" each="" contention="" must="" consist="" of="" a="" specific="" statement="" of="" the="" issue="" of="" law="" or="" fact="" to="" be="" raised="" or="" controverted.="" in="" addition,="" the="" petitioner="" shall="" provide="" a="" brief="" explanation="" of="" the="" bases="" of="" the="" contention="" and="" a="" concise="" statement="" of="" the="" alleged="" facts="" or="" expert="" opinion="" which="" support="" the="" contention="" and="" on="" which="" the="" petitioner="" intends="" to="" rely="" in="" proving="" the="" contention="" at="" the="" hearing.="" the="" petitioner="" must="" also="" provide="" references="" to="" those="" specific="" sources="" and="" documents="" of="" which="" the="" petitioner="" is="" aware="" and="" on="" which="" the="" petitioner="" intends="" to="" rely="" to="" establish="" those="" facts="" or="" expert="" opinion.="" petitioner="" must="" provide="" sufficient="" information="" to="" show="" that="" a="" genuine="" dispute="" exists="" with="" the="" applicant="" on="" a="" material="" issue="" of="" law="" or="" fact.="" contentions="" shall="" be="" limited="" to="" matters="" within="" the="" scope="" of="" the="" amendment="" under="" consideration.="" the="" contention="" must="" be="" one="" which,="" if="" proven,="" would="" entitle="" the="" petitioner="" to="" relief.="" a="" petitioner="" who="" fails="" to="" file="" such="" a="" supplement="" which="" satisfies="" these="" requirements="" with="" respect="" to="" at="" least="" one="" contention="" will="" not="" be="" permitted="" to="" participate="" as="" a="" party.="" those="" permitted="" to="" intervene="" become="" parties="" to="" the="" proceeding,="" subject="" to="" any="" limitations="" in="" the="" order="" granting="" leave="" to="" intervene,="" and="" have="" the="" opportunity="" to="" participate="" fully="" in="" the="" conduct="" of="" the="" hearing,="" including="" the="" opportunity="" to="" present="" evidence="" and="" cross-="" examine="" witnesses.="" if="" a="" hearing="" is="" requested,="" the="" commission="" will="" make="" a="" final="" determination="" on="" the="" issue="" of="" no="" significant="" hazards="" consideration.="" the="" final="" determination="" will="" serve="" to="" decide="" when="" the="" hearing="" is="" held.="" if="" the="" final="" determination="" is="" that="" the="" amendment="" request="" involves="" no="" significant="" hazards="" consideration,="" the="" commission="" may="" issue="" the="" amendment="" and="" make="" it="" immediately="" effective,="" notwithstanding="" the="" request="" for="" a="" hearing.="" any="" hearing="" held="" would="" take="" place="" after="" issuance="" of="" the="" amendment.="" if="" the="" final="" determination="" is="" that="" the="" amendment="" request="" involves="" a="" significant="" hazards="" consideration,="" any="" hearing="" held="" would="" take="" place="" before="" the="" issuance="" of="" any="" amendment.="" a="" request="" for="" a="" hearing="" or="" a="" petition="" for="" leave="" to="" intervene="" must="" be="" filed="" with="" the="" secretary="" of="" the="" commission,="" u.s.="" nuclear="" regulatory="" commission,="" washington,="" dc="" 20555,="" attention:="" docketing="" and="" services="" branch,="" or="" may="" be="" delivered="" to="" the="" commission's="" public="" document="" room,="" the="" gelman="" building,="" 2120="" l="" street,="" nw.,="" washington,="" dc,="" by="" the="" above="" date.="" where="" petitions="" are="" filed="" during="" the="" last="" 10="" days="" of="" the="" notice="" period,="" it="" is="" requested="" that="" the="" petitioner="" promptly="" so="" inform="" the="" commission="" by="" a="" toll-free="" telephone="" call="" to="" western="" union="" at="" 1-(800)="" 248-5100="" (in="" missouri="" 1-(800)="" 342-6700).="" the="" western="" union="" operator="" should="" be="" given="" datagram="" identification="" number="" n1023="" and="" the="" following="" message="" addressed="" to="" phillip="" f.="" mckee:="" petitioner's="" name="" and="" telephone="" number,="" date="" petition="" was="" mailed,="" plant="" name,="" and="" publication="" date="" and="" page="" number="" of="" this="" federal="" register="" notice.="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" petition="" should="" also="" be="" sent="" to="" the="" office="" of="" the="" general="" counsel,="" u.s.="" nuclear="" regulatory="" commission,="" washington,="" dc="" 20555,="" and="" to="" ernest="" l.="" blake,="" jr.,="" esquire,="" shaw,="" pittman,="" potts="" &="" trowbridge,="" 2300="" n="" street,="" nw.,="" washington,="" dc="" 20037="" attorney="" for="" the="" licensee.="" nontimely="" filings="" of="" petitions="" for="" leave="" to="" intervene,="" amended="" petitions,="" supplemental="" petitions="" and/or="" requests="" for="" hearing="" will="" not="" be="" entertained="" absent="" a="" determination="" by="" the="" commission,="" the="" presiding="" officer="" or="" the="" presiding="" atomic="" safety="" and="" licensing="" board="" that="" the="" petition="" and/or="" request="" should="" be="" granted="" based="" upon="" a="" balancing="" of="" the="" factors="" specified="" in="" 10="" cfr="" 2.714(a)(1)="" (i)-(v)="" and="" 2.714(d).="" the="" commission="" hereby="" provides="" notice="" that="" this="" is="" a="" proceeding="" on="" an="" application="" for="" a="" license="" amendment="" falling="" within="" the="" scope="" of="" section="" 134="" of="" the="" nuclear="" waste="" policy="" act="" of="" 1982="" (nwpa),="" 42="" u.s.c.="" 10154.="" under="" section="" 134="" of="" the="" nwpa,="" the="" commission,="" at="" the="" request="" of="" any="" party="" to="" the="" proceeding="" must="" use="" hybrid="" hearing="" procedures="" with="" respect="" to="" ``any="" matter="" which="" the="" commission="" determines="" to="" be="" in="" controversy="" among="" the="" parties.''="" the="" hybrid="" procedures="" in="" section="" 134="" provide="" for="" oral="" argument="" on="" matters="" in="" controversy,="" proceeded="" by="" discovery="" under="" the="" commission's="" rules,="" and="" the="" designation,="" following="" argument,="" of="" only="" those="" factual="" issues="" that="" involve="" a="" genuine="" and="" substantial="" dispute,="" together="" with="" any="" remaining="" questions="" of="" law,="" to="" be="" resolved="" in="" an="" adjudicatory="" hearing.="" actual="" adjudicatory="" hearings="" are="" to="" be="" held="" on="" those="" issues="" found="" to="" meet="" the="" criteria="" of="" section="" 134="" and="" set="" for="" hearing="" after="" oral="" argument.="" the="" commission's="" rules="" implementing="" section="" 134="" of="" the="" nwpa="" are="" found="" in="" 10="" cfr="" part="" 2,="" subpart="" k,="" ``hybrid="" hearing="" procedures="" for="" expansion="" of="" spent="" nuclear="" fuel="" storage="" capacity="" at="" civilian="" nuclear="" power="" reactors''="" (published="" at="" 50="" fr="" 41670,="" october="" 15,="" 1985)="" to="" 10="" cfr="" 2.1101="" et="" seq.="" under="" those="" rules,="" any="" party="" to="" the="" proceeding="" may="" invoke="" the="" hybrid="" hearing="" procedures="" by="" filing="" with="" the="" presiding="" officer="" a="" written="" request="" for="" oral="" argument="" under="" 10="" cfr="" 2.1109.="" to="" be="" timely,="" the="" request="" must="" be="" filed="" within="" 10="" days="" of="" an="" order="" granting="" a="" request="" for="" hearing="" or="" petition="" to="" intervene.="" (as="" outlined="" above,="" the="" commission's="" rules="" in="" 10="" cfr="" part="" 2,="" subpart="" g,="" and="" 2.714="" in="" particular,="" continue="" to="" govern="" the="" filing="" of="" requests="" for="" a="" hearing="" or="" petitions="" to="" intervene,="" as="" well="" as="" the="" admission="" of="" contentions.)="" the="" presiding="" officer="" shall="" grant="" a="" timely="" request="" for="" oral="" argument.="" the="" presiding="" officer="" may="" grant="" untimely="" request="" for="" oral="" argument="" only="" upon="" showing="" of="" good="" cause="" by="" the="" requesting="" party="" for="" the="" failure="" to="" file="" on="" time="" and="" after="" providing="" the="" other="" parties="" an="" opportunity="" to="" respond="" to="" the="" untimely="" request.="" if="" the="" presiding="" officer="" grants="" a="" request="" for="" oral="" argument,="" any="" hearing="" held="" on="" the="" application="" shall="" be="" concluded="" in="" accordance="" with="" hybrid="" hearing="" procedures.="" in="" essence,="" those="" procedures="" limit="" the="" time="" available="" for="" discovery="" and="" require="" that="" an="" oral="" argument="" be="" held="" to="" determine="" whether="" any="" contentions="" must="" be="" resolved="" in="" adjudicatory="" hearing.="" if="" no="" party="" to="" the="" proceedings="" requests="" oral="" argument,="" or="" if="" all="" untimely="" requests="" for="" oral="" argument="" are="" denied,="" then="" the="" usual="" procedures="" in="" 10="" cfr="" part="" 2,="" subpart="" g,="" apply.="" for="" further="" details="" with="" respect="" to="" this="" action,="" see="" the="" application="" for="" amendment="" dated="" november="" 25,="" 1994,="" which="" is="" available="" for="" public="" inspection="" at="" the="" commission's="" public="" document="" room,="" the="" gelman="" building,="" 2120="" l="" street,="" nw.,="" washington="" dc,="" and="" at="" the="" local="" public="" document="" room="" located="" at="" the="" ocean="" county="" library,="" reference="" department,="" 101="" washington="" street,="" toms="" river,="" new="" jersey="" 08753.="" dated="" at="" rockville,="" maryland,="" this="" 13th="" day="" of="" december="" 1994.="" for="" the="" nuclear="" regulatory="" commission.="" alexander="" w.="" dromerick,="" senior="" project="" manager,="" project="" directorate="" i-4,="" division="" of="" reactor="" projects--i/ii,="" office="" of="" nuclear="" reactor="" regulation.="" [fr="" doc.="" 94-31199="" filed="" 12-19-94;="" 8:45="" am]="" billing="" code="" 7590-01-m="">

Document Information

Published:
12/20/1994
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-31199
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: December 20, 1994, Docket No. 50-219