95-30888. Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 2; Issuance, Availability  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 65694-65695]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-30888]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 2; Issuance, Availability
    
        The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has recently published 
    ``Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission,'' NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 2. For over 20 years the NRC has 
    conducted regulatory value-impact analyses to determine whether there 
    is an adequate basis for imposing new requirements on licensees. In 
    January 1983, the NRC first published its Regulatory Analysis 
    Guidelines (NUREG/BR-0058) in order to clarify and formalize its 
    existing value-impact guidance for the analysis of regulatory actions. 
    Revision 1 to NUREG/BR-0058 was issued in May 1984 to include 
    appropriate references to NUREG/CR-3568; a handbook that provided 
    implementation guidance to the NRC staff for the policy set forth in 
    the Guidelines.
        In August 1993, the NRC published a draft version of the 
    Guidelines, Revision 2, and invited public comment on the draft report. 
    This revision reflects (1) the NRC's accumulated experience with 
    implementing the previous Guidelines; (2) changes in NRC regulations 
    and procedures since 1984, especially the backfit rule (10 CFR 50.109) 
    and the Policy Statement on Safety Goals for the Operation of Nuclear 
    Power Plants (51 FR 30028, August 21, 1986); (3) advances and 
    refinements in regulatory analysis techniques; (4) regulatory guidance 
    for Federal agencies issued by the Office of Management and Budget 
    (OMB); and (5) procedural changes designed to enhance NRC's regulatory 
    effectiveness.
        In the draft report, the NRC indicated that a review and analysis 
    of the dollar per person-rem conversion factor policy was ongoing and 
    until its completion, the existing conversion factor policy would 
    remain operative. The conversion factor is a central consideration 
    because it is the basis for translating radiological exposure to a 
    monetary value and, as such, allows direct comparison between the 
    potential health and safety benefits and the costs of a proposed 
    regulatory initiative. The staff's reevaluation has now been completed, 
    and the Commission has decided to implement a $2000 per person-rem 
    conversion factor, subject it to present worth considerations, and 
    limit its scope solely to health effects. This is in contrast to the 
    previous policy and staff practice of using an undiscounted $1000 per 
    person-rem conversion factor which served as a surrogate for all 
    offsite consequences (health and offsite property).
        The new conversion factor policy is based on a relatively simple 
    and straightforward logic in which the dollar per person-rem conversion 
    factor is defined as the product of the dollar value of the health 
    detriment and a risk coefficient that establishes the probability of 
    health effects as a result of low doses of radiation. In the NRC's 
    formulation, the value of the latter term is on the order of 
    7 x 10-4 per rem which includes allowances for fatal cancers, 
    nonfatal cancers, and severe genetic effects. The national and 
    international bodies (NCRP, ICRP) directly responsible for evaluating 
    and recommending a risk coefficient for the total health detriment are 
    all in close agreement, and NRC has adopted their recommendations. For 
    the dollar valuation of the health detriment, the NRC has adopted $3 
    million as a representative value. This estimate is consistent with 
    OMB's best estimate and an extensive literature review performed by the 
    NRC. The resulting $2000 conversion factor was derived by multiplying 
    these two factors (7 x 10-4 and $3 million) and expressing the 
    result with one significant digit.
        In addition, to provide meaningful summations of the costs and 
    benefits that accrue over time, the dollar valuation of person-rem are 
    to be expressed on a present-worth basis. Based on OMB guidance, 
    present-worth calculations are to use the recommended discount rate 
    specified in the latest version of OMB Circular A-94. This circular was 
    most recently updated in late 1992 and specifies the use of a 7-percent 
    real discount rate.
        The final change in conversion factor policy concerns the treatment 
    of offsite property consequences. The $2000 conversion factor is now 
    clearly defined as the value of the health effects associated with a 
    person-rem of dose. As such, it can no longer be used as a surrogate 
    value for other consequences that could be attributable to offsite 
    radiological releases or exposures. Thus, in those regulatory 
    applications where offsite property consequences could result, these 
    consequences would have to be calculated separately, and incorporated 
    into the overall value-impact assessment.
        The net effect of this revised conversion factor policy on the 
    bottom-line value-impact results is mixed. In most regulatory 
    applications the only consequence of radiological exposure is health 
    effects. As a result, the dollar valuation of a person-rem would shift 
    from an undiscounted $1000 to a $2000 conversion factor which would be 
    subject to present worth calculations. In these circumstances, the 
    doubling of the conversion factor and discounting tend to cancel each 
    other. The differential in total dollar valuation is not of major 
    significance and no improvement or change in regulatory decisions is 
    expected. However, there are select circumstances where improvements in 
    regulatory decisionmaking are possible. In regulatory applications 
    involving certain severe power reactor accidents, offsite property 
    consequences are an expected outcome. Under the new policy, an 
    additional dollar allowance would need to be included, and in these 
    instances the change in total dollar value could be important to the 
    regulatory decision.
        The new conversion factor policy has been incorporated in this 
    final version of the Guidelines without the opportunity for public 
    comment. This position was adopted because the NRC was interested in 
    avoiding further delay in publication of the Guidelines so that 
    analysts will have the benefit of other areas of improved guidance. 
    Furthermore, in most regulatory 
    
    [[Page 65695]]
    applications this policy shift will have no meaningful effect on 
    bottom-line cost-benefit results. In addition, given that this policy 
    will be included in regulatory analyses for specific rulemakings, the 
    opportunity to comment on it also exists within the context of 
    individual regulatory initiatives. Finally, these Guidelines are not 
    regulations and are not legally binding on anyone and are merely 
    intended to inform the analyst as to expected staff practice.
        A more complete discussion of the basis and implications of the new 
    person-rem conversion factor are provided in NUREG 1530, ``Reassessment 
    of NRC's Dollar Per Person-Rem Conversion Factor Policy'' (to be 
    published in late 1995). Members of the public who may wish to comment 
    on this issue are encouraged to do so, and, on the basis of these 
    comments, the NRC holds open the possibility of revising this policy in 
    the future.
        Copies of NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 2, as well as NUREG-1530 may be 
    purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government 
    Printing Office, P.O. Box 37082, Washington, DC 20402-9328. Copies are 
    also available from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 
    Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. A copy is also available for 
    inspection and/or copying for a fee in the NRC Public Document Room, 
    2120 L Street, NW. (Lower Level), Washington, DC 20555-0001.
        Mail comments to: Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch, 
    Division of Freedom of Information and Publication Services, Mail Stop 
    T-6 D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. 
    Comments may be hand-delivered to 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
    Maryland, between 7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of December, 1995.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    John C. Hoyle,
    Secretary of the Commission.
    [FR Doc. 95-30888 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/20/1995
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-30888
Pages:
65694-65695 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-30888.pdf