95-30967. Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Nacote Creek, New Jersey  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 65613-65614]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-30967]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Coast Guard
    
    33 CFR Part 117
    
    [CGD05-95-065]
    
    
    Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Nacote Creek, New Jersey
    
    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: At the request of the New Jersey Department of Transportation 
    (NJDOT), the Coast Guard is proposing to change the regulations 
    governing operation of the Route 9 Bridge across Nacote Creek, mile 
    1.5, in Smithville, Atlantic County, New Jersey. This proposal would 
    require the Route 9 Bridge to open on signal except during the period 
    from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., when a two-hour advance notice for openings 
    would be required. This change should help relieve the bridge owner of 
    the burden of having a bridgetender constantly available at times when 
    there are few or no quests for openings, while still proving for the 
    needs of navigation.
    
    DATE: Comments must be received on or before February 20, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Commander, Fifth Coast Guard 
    District, c/o Commander (obr), First Coast Guard District, Bldg. 135A, 
    Governors Island, New York 10004-5073, or may be hand-delivered to the 
    same address between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    except Federal holidays. The telephone number is (212) 668-7170. 
    Comments will become part of this docket and will be available for 
    inspection and copying at the above address.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Kassof, Bridge Administrator-NY, 
    Fifth Coast Guard District, (212) 668-6969.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Request for Comments
    
        The Coast Guard encourages interested persons to participate in 
    this rulemaking by submitting written views, comments, data, or 
    arguments. Persons submitting comments should include their names and 
    addresses, identify this rulemaking (CGD05-95-065), the specific 
    section of this rule to which each comment applies, and give reasons 
    for each comment. The Coast Guard requests that all comments and 
    attachments be submitted in an unbound format suitable for copying and 
    electronic filing. If that is not practical, a second copy of any bound 
    material is requested. Persons wanting acknowledgment of receipt of 
    comments should enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope.
        The Coast Guard will consider all comments received during the 
    comment period. It may change this rule in view of the comments.
        The Coast Guard plans no public hearing. Persons may request a 
    public hearing by writing to the Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District, 
    c/o Commander (obr), First Coast Guard District at the address listed 
    under ADDRESSES. The request should include reasons why a hearing would 
    be beneficial. If it determines that the opportunity for oral 
    presentations will aid this rulemaking, the Coast Guard will hold a 
    public hearing at a time and place announced by a later notice in the 
    Federal Register.
    
    Drafting Information
    
        The principal persons involved in drafting this document are Mr. J. 
    Arca, Fifth Coast Guard District, Bridge 
    
    [[Page 65614]]
    Branch-NY, Project Officer, and CAPT R.A. Knee, Fifth Coast Guard 
    District Legal Office, Project Counsel.
    
    Background and Purpose
    
        The Route 9 Bridge across Nacote Creek, mile 1.5, at Smithville, 
    Atlantic County, NJ, has a vertical clearance of 5' above mean high 
    water (MHW) and 8' above mean low water (MLW) in the closed position. 
    The current regulations require the bridge to open on signal at all 
    times.
        Review of the bridge logs provided by NJDOT reveals that from 11 
    p.m. to 7 a.m., there were no requests for bridge openings in 1992 and 
    1993, and only 13 requests for openings in 1994 during these hours. 
    NJDOT is seeking relief from the requirement that a bridgetender be 
    present during the hours of 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. when there are minimal 
    requests for openings.
        The New Jersey Department of Transportation requested that the 
    Coast Guard make a permanent change to the regulations governing 
    operation of the Route 9 Bridge to require the draw to open on signal 
    except from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., which would require a two-hour advance 
    notice. At all other times, the bridge would open on signal. The 
    bridgetenders would be on call to open the draw when the advance notice 
    is given. A 24-hour special telephone number would be posted on the 
    bridge and maintained by the NJDOT.
        Accordingly, a new provision allowing the draw of the Route 9 
    bridge, at mile 1.5, to remain closed during late night and early 
    morning hours unless two hours advance notice is given will be 
    designated as paragraph (a). The current provision allowing the draw of 
    the Atlantic County (Rte. 575) bridge, at mile 3.5, to remain closed 
    unless eight hours advance notice is given will be designated as 
    paragraph (b). A general provision requiring the passage of Federal, 
    State, and local government vessels used for public safety through all 
    drawbridges in published at 33 CFR 117.31, and is no longer required to 
    be published for each waterway. Therefore, this proposal would remove a 
    provision requiring passage of public vessels from section 117.732.
    
    Regulatory Evaluation
    
        The proposed action is not a significant regulatory action under 
    section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an 
    assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of 
    that order. It has been exempted from review by the Office of 
    Management and Budget under that order. It is not significant under the 
    regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation 
    (DOT) (44 FR 11040, February 26, 1979). The Coast Guard expects the 
    economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory 
    Evaluation, under paragraph 10e of the regulatory policies and 
    procedures of DOT is unnecessary. This conclusion is based on the fact 
    that the rule will not prevent mariners from transiting the bridge. It 
    will only require mariners to plan their transits.
    
    Small Entities
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the 
    Coast Guard must consider whether this proposal, if adopted, will have 
    a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities. ``Small entities'' include independently owned and operated 
    small businesses that are not dominant in their field and that 
    otherwise qualify as ``small business concerns'' under section 3 of the 
    Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632). Because it expects the impact of 
    this proposal to be minimal, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 
    605(b) that this proposal will not have a significant economic impact 
    on a substantial number of small entities.
    
    Collection of Information
    
        This proposal contains no collection of information requirements 
    under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    
    Federalism
    
        The Coast Guard has analyzed this rule under the principles and 
    criteria contained in Executive Order 12612 and it has been determined 
    that this proposal will not have sufficient federalism implications to 
    warrant preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Environment
    
        The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this 
    proposal and concluded that under section 2.B.2.e.(32)(e) of Commandant 
    Instruction M16475.1B (as amended, 59 FR 38654, July 29, 1994), this 
    proposal is categorically excluded from further environmental 
    documentation. A Categorical Exclusion Determination statement has been 
    prepared and placed in the rulemaking docket.
    
    List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
    
        Bridges.
    
        In consideration of the foregoing, the Coast Guard proposes to 
    amend part 117 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
    
    PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 49 CFR 1.46; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 
    117.255 also issued under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 
    Stat. 5039.
    
        2. Section 117.732 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 117.732  Nacote Creek.
    
        (a) The Route 9 bridge, mile 1.5, shall open on signal except that 
    from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., the draw shall open if at least two hours 
    advance notice is given.
        (b) The draw of the Atlantic County (Rte. 575) bridge, mile 3.5, at 
    Port Republic, shall open on signal if at least eight hours advance 
    notice is given.
    
        Dated: November 22, 1995.
    W.J. Ecker,
    Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
    [FR Doc. 95-30967 Filed 12-19-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/20/1995
Department:
Coast Guard
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
95-30967
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before February 20, 1996.
Pages:
65613-65614 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CGD05-95-065
PDF File:
95-30967.pdf
CFR: (1)
33 CFR 117.732