[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66256-66264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30987]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service Modernization and Associated
Restructuring
ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Weather Service (NWS) is publishing proposed
certifications for the proposed consolidations of:
(1) Residual New York City Weather Service Office (WSO) into the
future New York City and Philadelphia Weather Forecast Offices (WFO);
(2) Providence WSO into the future Boston WFO;
(3) Worcester WSO into the future Boston WFO;
(4) residual Kansas City WSO into the future Kansas City/Pleasant
Hill WFO;
(5) Detroit WSO into the future Detroit WFO;
(6) Concordia WSO into the future Topeka, Wichita, and Hastings
WFOs;
(7) West Palm Beach WSO into the future Miami and Melbourne WFOs;
(8) Daytona Beach WSO into the future Melbournes and Jacksonville
WFOs;
(9) Waco WSO into the future Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/
Galveston WFOs;
(10) Beaumont/Port Arthur WSO into the future Lake Charles and
Shreveport WFOs;
(11) Knoxville WSO into the future Knoxville and Nashville WFOs;
(12) Havre WSO into the future Great Falls and Missoula WFOs; and
(13) Helena WSO into the future Great Falls WFO.
In accordance with Public Law 102-567, the public will have 60 days
in which to comment on these proposed consolidation certifications.
DATES: Comments are requested by February 20, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the proposed consolidation packages
should be sent to Janet Gilmer, Room 12316, 1325 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910, telephone 301-713-0276. All comments should be
sent to Janet Gilmer at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Scanlon at 301-713-1413.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NWS anticipates consolidating:
(1) the residual New York City Weather Service Office (WSO) with
the future New York City and Philadelphia Weather Forecast Offices
(WFOs);
(2) the Providence WSO with the future Boston WFO;
(3) the Worcester WSO with the future Boston WFO;
(4) the residual Kansas City WSO with the future Kansas City/
Pleasant Hill WFO;
(5) the Detroit WSO with the future Detroit WFO;
(6) the Concordia WSO with the future Topeka, Wichita, and Hastings
WFOs;
(7) the West Palm Beach WSO with the future Miami and Melbourne
WFOs;
(8) the Daytona Beach WSO with the future Melbourne and
Jacksonville WFOs;
(9) the Waco WSO with the future Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/
Galveston WFOs;
(10) the Beaumont/Port Arthur WSO with the future Lake Charles and
Shreveport WFOs;
(11) the Knoxville WSO with the future Knoxville and Nashville
WFOs;
(12) the Havre WSO with the future Great Falls and Missoula WFOs;
and
(13) the Helena WSO with the future Great Falls WFO. In accordance
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567, the Secretary of Commerce must
certify that these consolidations will not result in any degradation of
service to the affected areas of responsibility and must publish the
proposed consolidation certifications in the FR. The documentation
supporting each proposed certification includes the following:
(1) a draft memorandum by the meteorologist-in-charge recommending
the certification, the final of which will be endorsed by the Regional
Director and the Assistant Administrator of the NWS if appropriate,
after consideration of public comments and completion of consultation
with the Modernization Transition Committee (the Committee);
(2) a description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns which affect the weather services provided within the
service area;
(3) a comparison of the services provided within the service area
and the services to be provided after such action;
(4) a description of any recent or expected modernization of NWS
operation which will enhance services in the service area;
(5) an identification of any area within the affected service area
which
[[Page 66257]]
would not receive coverage (at an elevation of 10,000 feet) by the next
generation weather radar network;
(6) evidence, based upon operational demonstration of modernization
NWS operations, which was considered in reaching the conclusion that no
degradation in service will result from such action including the WSR-
88D Radar Commissioning Report(s) User Confirmation of Services
Report(s), and the Decommissioning Readiness Report (as applicable);
and
(7) a letter appointing the liaison officer.
These proposed certifications do not include any report of the
Committee which could be submitted in accordance with sections
706(b)(6) and 707(c) of Pub. Law 102-567. At its December 14, 1995
meeting the Committee concluded that the information presented did not
reveal any potential degradation of service and decided not to issue a
report.
Documentation supporting the proposed certifications is too
voluminous to publish in its entirety. Copies of the supporting
documentation can be obtained through the contact listed above.
Attached to this Notice are draft memoranda by the respective
meteorologists-in-charge recommending the certifications.
Once all public comments have been received and considered, the NWS
will complete consultation with the Committee and determine whether to
proceed with the final certifications. If decisions to certify are
made, the Secretary of Commerce must publish the final certifications
in the FR and transmit the certifications to the appropriate
Congressional committees prior to consolidating the offices.
Dated: December 15, 1995.
Louis J. Boezi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Modernization.
U.S. Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
175 Brookhaven Avenue, Building NWS-1, Upton, NY 11973
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
Michael E. Wyllie, AM/MIC NWSFO New York City
Chet Henricksen, AM/MIC NWSFO Philadelphia, PA
Peter Ahnert, MIC NWSO Binghamton, NY
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Residual New York
City Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the future New York City and
Philadelphia Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the New York City service area.
This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the New
York City service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future New York City and
Philadelphia WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
New York City service area from the Residual New York City WSO
location and a list of services to be provided from the future New
York City and Philadelphia WFO locations after the proposed
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map
shows the RWSO New York City Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected
Service Area'') and the future WFO New York City Area of
Responsibility. AD discussed below, I find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the RWSO New York City service area is included as
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has
or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for New York and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the New
York City service area will be increased and no area will be missed
in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from New York City,
Philadelphia and Binghamton, attachment E validate that the WSR-88Ds
meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect. Note: Binghamton, NY
is used as a backup but no Residual New York City services were
transferred to Binghamton.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from New York City,
Philadelphia and Binghamton, attachment F, document that three
negative comments were received from New York City, Philadelphia and
Binghamton related to the RWSO New York City service area. All
negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the
users as reflected in the reports.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing New York City WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the New York
City service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
October 3, 1995.
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Robert M. Thompson, NWSFO Boston AM/MIC
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Providence Weather
Service Office (WSO) with the future Boston Weather Forecast Office
(WFO) located in Taunton, MA, will not result in any degradation in
weather services to the Providence service area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and
[[Page 66258]]
application of the modernization criteria for consolidation of a field
office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Providence service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the Boston WFO will not degrade
these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Providence service area from the Providence WSO location and a list
of services to be provided from the Boston WFO location after
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map
shows the WSO Providence Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected
Service Area'') and the future WFO Boston Area of Responsibility. As
discussed below, I find that there will be no degradation in the
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Providence service area is included as
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has
or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Rhode Island is included as attachment D. NWS
operational radar coverage for the Providence service area will be
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report, attachment E,
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed. There were two national work-arounds. One of
these has been satisfied while the other one remains in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents
that several responses required explanation. This included two
negative comments. Two other responses expressed concern over the
new radar. Telephone calls were placed to the four responders and
their comments and concerns were addressed. All four responsers are
now satisfied with our service, as stated in the Confirmation of
Services Report.
C. The Providence Weather Service Office does not have a network
or local warning radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Providence
service area is included as attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________
public comments received during the comment period (attachment J).
On ____________________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
October 3, 1995.
Memorandum for: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Robert M. Thompson, NWSTFO Boston AM/MIC
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Worcester Weather
Service Office (WSO) with the future Boston Weather Forecast Office
(WFO) located in Taunton, MA, will not result in any degradation in
weather services to the Worcester service area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Worcester service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the NWSFO Boston will not degrade
these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Worcester service area from the Worcester WSO location and a list of
services to be provided from the NWSFO Boston location after
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map
shows the WSO Worcester Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected
Service Area'') and the future WFO Boston Area of Responsibility. As
discussed below, I find that there will be no degradation in the
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Worcester service area is included as attachment
C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhanced services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for southern New England including central and west
central Massachusetts is included as attachment D. NWS operational
radar coverage for the Worcester service area will be increased and
no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report, attachment E,
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed. There were two national work-arounds. One of
these has been satisfied while the other one remains in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents
that several responses required explanation. This included two
negative comments. Two other responses expressed concern over the
new radar. Telephone calls were placed to the four responders and
their comments and concerns were addressed. All four responsers are
now satisfied without service, as stated in the Confirmation of
Services Report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verified
that the existing Worcester local warning WSR-74C radar is no longer
needed to support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Worcester
service area is included as attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________
public comments received during the comment period (attachment J).
On ____________________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
[[Page 66259]]
Attachments
1803 North 7 Highway, Pleasant Hill, MO 64080
October 27, 1995.
Memorandum for: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From: Lynn P. Maximuk, MIC NWSO Kansas City/Pleasant Hill
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
In December 1993 a change of operations occurred when most
personnel and most services provided by the WSO at Kansas City
International Airport were transferred to the future WFO site in
Pleasant Hill, Missouri. At that time a Residual Weather Service
Office (RWSO) was left at the airport site to continue the surface
and radar observational programs. Since that time the Kansas City
International Airport ASOS has been commissioned, and the WSR-57
radar has been decommissioned.
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, that consolidation of the Kansas City
Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the future Kansas City/
Pleasant Hill Weather Forecast Office (FWO) in Pleasant Hill,
Missouri will not result in any degradation in weather services to
the Kansas City service area. This proposed certification is in
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the pre-
modernized Kansas City service area is included as attachment A. As
discussed below, I find that providing the services which address
these characteristics and concerns from the future Kansas City/
Pleasant Hill WFO will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided from the
Kansas City RWSO location and a list of comparable services to be
provided from the future Kansas City/Pleasant Hill WFO location
after consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map
shows the pre-modernized WSO Kansas City area of responsibility
(i.e., ``affected service area'') and the future WFO Kansas City/
Pleasant Hill area of responsibility. As discussed below, I find
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services
as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Kansas City service area is included as
attachment C. The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS)
has or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Kansas and Missouri is included as attachment D. NWS
operational radar coverage for the Kansas City service area will be
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, attachment E,
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed but two national workarounds remain in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents
that all comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the
commentors as stated in the service Conformation Report. Three of
the commentors had concerns about the automated coded radar
observation product (ROB). They were specifically concerned about
the lack of movement speed and direction, and the inclusion of AP in
the reports. We have discussed these problems with those people and
they are satisfied that the NWS is working toward a solution. These
three users have stated that those limitations do not diminish the
capabilities of the WSR-88D from providing superior radar
information through their video feeds. An emergency management
agency responded negatively due to the cost of obtaining a NIDS
drop. They have since completed negotiations with a NIDS vendor to
receive the WSR-88D data. Four other respondents had negative
responses but followed with comments not directly related to the
WSR-88D. Those comments dealt with inadequate NWR coverage and other
NWS products or services.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Kansas City WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Kansas
City service area is included as attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________________
public comments received during the comment period (attachment J).
On ____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE
9200 White Lake Rd White Lake, MI 48386
October 25, 1995.
Memorandum for: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From: Dean P. Gulezian, MIC, WSFO DTX
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certifiction
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Detroit Weather
Service Offices (WSO) with the future Detroit Weather Forecast
Office (WFO) in White Lake, Michigan will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the Detroit service area. This
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Detroit service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from future Detroit WFO will not
degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services traditionally provided within
the Detroit service area from the Detroit WSO location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Detroit WFO location after
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map
shows the WSO Detroit area of responsibility (i.e. ``affected
service area'') and the future WFO Detroit area of responsibility.
As discussed below, I find that there will be no degradation in the
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Detroit service area is
[[Page 66260]]
included as attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and
AWIPS) has or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Michigan is included as attachment D. NWS
operational radar coverage for the Detroit service area will be
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, attachment E,
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents
that three negative comments were received. All comments have been
answered to the satisfaction of the commentors as stated in the
service Confirmation Report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Detroit WSR-74S radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Detroit
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
Date
Memorandum for: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region.
From:
Curtis S. Holderbach, MIC (AM) NWSFRO Topeka, KS
Richard H. Elder, MIC, NWSO Wichita, KS
Steven D. Schurr, MIC, NWSO Hastings, NE
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Concordia Weather
Service Office (WSO) with the future Topeka, Wichita, and Hastings
Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any degradation in
weather services to the Concordia service area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, we are
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Concordia service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Topeka, Wichita, and
Hastings WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Concordia service area from the Concordia WSO location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Topeka, Wichita, and
Hastings WFO locations after the proposed consolidation is included
as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all
services currently provided will continue to be provided after the
proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO
Concordia Area of Responsibility (i.e., ``Affected Service Area'')
and the future Topeka, Wichita and Hastings WFOs' Areas of
Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWF) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Concordia service area is included as attachment
C. The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will
be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Kansas and portions of surrounding areas is included
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Concordia
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from Topeka, Wichita,
and Hastings, attachment E validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Topeka, Wichita, and
Hastings, attachment F, document that no negative comments were
received from Topeka, seven negative comments were received from
Wichita, and one negative comment from Hastings. All negative
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the commentors as
reflected in the reports.
c. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Concordia WSR-74C radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Concordia
service area is included as attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________, public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
__________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue
to recommend this certification.
4Endorsement
I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central; Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Weather Service Forecast Office
11691 S.W. 17 Street, Miami, FL 33165-2149
Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region
From:
Paul J. Hebert, AM/MIC, Miami, FL
Bart Hagemeyer, MIC, Melbourne, FL
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the West Palm Beach
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Miami and Melbourne
Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any degradation
in weather services to the West Palm Beach service area. This
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance
with section 706 of Public law 102-567. If you concur, please
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and
[[Page 66261]]
application of the modernization criteria for consolidation of a field
office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the West
Palm Beach service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns by the Miami and Melbourne WFOs will
not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
West Palm Beach service area from the West Palm Beach location and a
list of services to be provided from the Miami and Melbourne WFO
locations after consolidation is included in Attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO West Palm Area
of Responsibility (i.e., ``Affected Service Area'') and the future
WFO Miami Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a
result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO West Palm Beach service area is included as
Attachment C. The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS)
has or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Florida is included as Attachment D. NWS operational
radar coverage for the specific service area will be increased and
no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSO Melbourne,
Attachment E-1, and NWSFO Miami, Attachment E-2, validate that the
WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, Attachments F-1 and F-2,
document that only one negative comment was received for the Miami
WSR-88D. The negative comment has been answered to the satisfaction
of the commenter as stated in the service Confirmation Report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies
that the existing West Palm Beach WSR-74S radar is no longer needed
to support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the West Palm
Beach service area is included as Attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (Attachment I) and the ____________
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J).
On ____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (Attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director Southern Region
From: Bart Hagemeyer, MIC, NWSO Melbourne, FL; Steve Letro, MIC,
NWSO Jacksonville, FL
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Daytona Beach
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Melbourne and
Jacksonville Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the Daytona Beach service area.
This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Daytona Beach service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from Melbourne and Jacksonville WFOs
will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Daytona Beach service area from the Daytona Beach WSO location and a
list of services to be provided from the Melbourne and Jacksonville
WFO locations after consolidation is included as attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Daytona Beach
Area of Responsibility (i.e. Affected Service Area) and the future
WFO Melbourne Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services
as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations that will enhance services
in the WSO Daytona Beach service area are included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Florida is included as attachment D. NWS operational
radar coverage for the specific service area will be increased and
no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports, attachment E,
validate that the Melbourne and Jacksonville WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed, but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services reports, attachment F,
document that no negative comments were received from the WSO
Daytona Beach service area.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Daytona Beach WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Daytona
Beach service area is included as attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________
public comment(s) received during the comment period (attachment J).
On ____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director Southern Region
From:
Gifford Ely, MIC, NWSFO Dallas/Fort Worth, TX
[[Page 66262]]
Bill Read, MIC, NWSO Houston/Galveston, TX
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Waco Weather
Service Office (WSO) with the future Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/
Galveston Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the Waco service area. This
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the Waco
service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below, I find
that providing the services which address these characteristics and
concerns from the future Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/Galveston
WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Waco service area from the Waco WSO location and a list of services
to be provided from the future Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/
Galveston WFO locations after consolidation is included as
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Waco Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Dallas/Fort Worth Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services
as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Waco service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Texas is included as attachment D. The combination
NWS and DOD operational radar coverage for the specific service area
will be increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSFO Dallas/Fort
Worth and NWSFO Houston/Galveston, attachment E, validate that the
WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services for Dallas/Fort Worth and
Houston/Galveston, attachment F, document that one negative comment
was received from both the Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/Galveston
Radar Service Confirmations related to the WSO Waco Service Area.
These negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of
the commentors as stated in the two attached Radar Service
Confirmation Reports.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Waco WSR-74 radar is no longer needed to support
services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Waco
service area is included as attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the
(____________) public comments received during the comment period
(attachment J). On (____________________), the Committee voted to
endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment K). I believe all
negative comments have been addressed to the satisfaction of our
customers and I continue to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region
From:
David C. McIntosh, MIC, NWSO Lake Charles, LA
Lee Harrison, MIC, NWSO Shreveport, LA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, that consolidation of the Beaumont/
Port Arthur Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Lake
Charles and Shreveport Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not
result in any degradation in weather services to the Beaumont/Port
Arthur service area. This proposed certification is in accordance
with the advance notification provided in the National
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Beaumont/Port Arthur service area is included as attachment A. As
discussed below, I find that providing the services which address
these characteristics and concerns from future WFOs Lake Charles and
Shreveport will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Beaumont/Port Arthur service area from WSO Beaumont/Port Arthur and
a list of services to be provided from the future WFO Lake Charles
and Shreveport locations after consolidation is included as
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Beaumont/Port
Arthur Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and
the future WFO Lake Charles Area of Responsibility. As discussed
below, I find that there will be no degradation in the quality of
these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Beaumont/Port Arthur service area is included as
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has
or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Texas is included as attachment D. NWS operational
radar coverage for the specific service area will be increased and
no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernization NWS operations, played a key role in concluding
there will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSO Lake Charles
and Shreveport, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88D meets
technical specifications (acceptance test); is fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment, along with trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services for NWSO Lake Charles and
Shreveport, attachment F, documents that two negative comments were
received from NWSO Lake
[[Page 66263]]
Charles. However, neither of the negative comments came from the
Beaumont/Port Arthur service area. The negative comments were
addressed and answered to the satisfaction of the users as stated in
the Service Confirmation Report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, has
already been approved and the WSR-57 radar has been decommissioned.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Beaumont/
Port Arthur service area is included as attachment H.
I have maintained a close association with the emergency
management community in southeast Texas and they have all expressed
appreciation for the improved warning services they have received.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (Attachment I) and the ____________
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J).
On ____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (Attachment K). I have tried to answer all negative
comments and responses to the satisfaction of our customers and,
based upon their later actions and comments, I continue to recommend
this certification.
Endorsement
I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum for:
Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, NWS
From:
Jerry O. McDuffie, MIC, NWSO Knoxville/Tri-Cities, TN
Derrel R. Martin, MIC, NWSO Nashville, TN
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, that consolidation of the Knoxville
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities
and Nashville Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the Knoxville area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advanced notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Knoxville service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities
and Nashville WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the service currently provided within the
Knoxville service area from the WSO Knoxville location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities and
Nashville WFO locations after consolidation is included as
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. The enclosed map shows the WSO Knoxville service area
and the future WFO Knoxville/Tri-Cities service area. As discussed
below, I submit that there will be no degradation in the quality of
these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the modernization of National Weather
Service (NWS) operations which will enhance services in the WSO
Knoxville service area is included as attachment C. The new
technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be installed
and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned WSR-88D radar coverage at an elevation
of 10,000 feet for east Tennessee is included as attachment D. NWS
operational radar coverage for the specific service area will be
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSO Knoxville/
Tri-Cities and NWSO Nashville, attachment E, validate that the WSR-
88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment, along with trained operations
and maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was
completed; but, two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services for Knoxville/Tri-Cities
and Nashville, attachment F, document that only one (1) negative
comment was received. Followup with Monroe County indicates the main
concern was NOAA Weather Radio coverage from the Chattanooga
transmitter in regard to warnings, not really the WSR-88D. The
County Director of EMA stated on October 17, 1995, after several
months of evaluation, that the radar coverage and service to Monroe
County is very good. Several positive comments were given.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Knoxville
service area is included as attachment G.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment H) and the ____________
public comments received during the comment period (attachment I).
On ____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment j). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certifications.
Endorsement
I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memoradum for: Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region
From: Kenneth Mielke, AM/MIC, NWSFO Great Falls, MT
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Havre Weather
Service Office (WSO) with the future Great Falls Weather Forescast
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services
to the Havre service area. This proposed certification is in
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congresss.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Harve service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below,
I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Great Falls WFO will
not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Havre service area from the Havre WSO location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Great Falls WFO after
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map
shows the WSO Havre Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service
Area''), and the future WFO Great Falls Area of Responsibility. As
discussed below, I find that there will be no degradation in the
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Havre service area is
[[Page 66264]]
included as attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and
AWIPS) has or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Montana is included as attachment D. NWS operational
radar coverage for the Havre service area will be increased and no
area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report, attachment E,
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed but, two national work-arounds remain in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents
that three negative comments were received, but none impacted the
WSO Havre service area. These negative comments were answered to the
satisfaction of the commentors, as stated in the service
Confirmation Report.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Havre
service area is included as attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________
public comments recieved during the comment period (attachment J).
On ____________________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas D. Potter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum for: Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region
From:
Kenneth Mielke, AM/MIC, NWSFO Great Falls, MT
Brenda Brock, MIC, NWSO Missoula, MT
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Helena Weather
Service Office (WSO) with the future Great Falls Weather Forecast
Office (WFO) and the Missoula Weather Forecast Office will not
result in any degradation in weather services to the Helena service
area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application for the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Helena service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below,
I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Great Falls and
Missoula WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Helena service area from the Helena WSO location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Great Falls and Missoula WFO
locations after consolidation is included as attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Helena Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Great Falls Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a
result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Helena service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Montana is included as attachment D. NWS operational
radar coverage for the Helena service area will be increased.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports for Great Falls and
Missoula, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but, two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services for NWSFO Great Falls and
NWSO Missoula, attachment F, document that only three negative
comments were received from Great Falls. All three of the negative
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the commentors,
as stated in the service Confirmation Report. Two negative comments
were received from Missoula and both were answered to the
satisfaction of the commentors.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Helena
service area is included as attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernation Transition
Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comments period (attachment J). On
____________________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas D. Potter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachments
[FR Doc. 95-30987 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M
