99-32983. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2, A300-B2K, A300 B4-2C, A300 B4-100, and A300 B4-200 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 71333-71336]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-32983]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-NM-56-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2, A300-B2K, A300 
    B4-2C, A300 B4-100, and A300 B4-200 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the supersedure of an existing 
    airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Airbus Model A300 B2, 
    A300 B2K, A300 B2-200, A300 B4, A300 B4-100, and A300 B4-200 series 
    airplanes, that currently requires certain structural inspections and 
    modifications. This action would require that those inspections be 
    accomplished on additional airplanes. This action also would require 
    new repetitive inspections for airplanes in
    
    [[Page 71334]]
    
    certain configurations at revised thresholds and intervals. This 
    proposal is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness 
    information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions 
    specified by the proposed AD are intended to detect and correct 
    corrosion and cracking of the wings and fuselage, which could result in 
    reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by January 20, 2000.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-NM-56-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
    holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 
    Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager, 
    International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 
    227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 98-NM-56-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 98-NM-56-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        On April 10, 1996, the FAA issued AD 96-08-08, amendment 39-9574 
    (61 FR 18661, April 29, 1996), applicable to all Airbus Model A300 B2, 
    A300 B2K, A300 B2-200, A300 B4, A300 B4-100, and A300 B4-200 series 
    airplanes, to require structural inspections and modifications. That 
    action was prompted by reports of incidents involving fatigue cracking 
    and corrosion in transport category airplanes that are approaching or 
    have exceeded their economic design goal. These incidents have 
    jeopardized the airworthiness of the affected airplanes. The 
    requirements of that AD are intended to prevent degradation of the 
    structural capability of the affected airplanes.
    
    Actions Since Issuance of Previous Rule
    
        Since the issuance of that AD, Airbus has issued Revision 6 of 
    Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0162, dated March 20, 1996. The 
    inspections and modifications described in Revision 6 of the service 
    bulletin are identical to those in Revisions 4 and 5 of the service 
    bulletin (which were referenced in AD 96-08-08 as appropriate sources 
    of service information). However, the effectivity listing of Revision 6 
    of the service bulletin has been revised to include airplanes on which 
    Airbus Modifications 3275 and 5724 or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-
    0161 has been accomplished (i.e., Configuration 2 airplanes). The 
    remaining affected airplanes (Configuration 1) were subject to the 
    requirements of AD 96-08-08.
        Airbus also has issued Service Bulletin A300-53-0278, Revision 2, 
    dated November 10, 1995, which describes procedures for inspections of 
    an additional area between fuselage frames FR10 and FR10A. The actions 
    in Revision 2 are similar to those described in the original version 
    and Revision 1 of Service Bulletin A300-53-278 (the service bulletin 
    number was revised in Revision 2 to A300-53-0278), which were 
    referenced in AD 96-08-08 as appropriate sources of service 
    information; except, the inspections have been revised from eddy 
    current inspections to visual inspections. In addition, the effectivity 
    listing of Revision 2 of the service bulletin has been revised to 
    include airplanes on which Airbus Modification 1446 has been 
    accomplished (i.e., Configuration 3 airplanes). The remaining affected 
    airplanes (Configurations 1 and 2) were subject to the requirements of 
    AD 96-08-08.
        Accomplishment of the actions specified in the service bulletins is 
    intended to adequately address the identified unsafe condition. The 
    DGAC classified these service bulletins as mandatory and issued French 
    airworthiness directive 90-222-116(B)R4, dated March 27, 1996, in order 
    to assure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in France.
    
    FAA's Conclusions
    
        These airplane models are manufactured in France and are type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed 
    of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of 
    the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD 
    action is necessary for products of this type design that are 
    certificated for operation in the United States.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered 
    in the United States, the proposed AD would supersede AD 96-08-08 to 
    continue to require certain structural inspections and modifications. 
    The proposed AD would require that those inspections be accomplished on 
    additional airplanes. The proposed AD also would require new repetitive 
    inspections for airplanes in certain configurations at revised 
    thresholds and intervals. The new actions would be required to be 
    accomplished in accordance with the service bulletins described 
    previously, except as discussed below.
    
    [[Page 71335]]
    
    Differences Between Proposed Rule and Service Bulletin
    
        Operators should note that, although the service bulletins specify 
    that the manufacturer may be contacted for disposition of certain 
    repair conditions, this proposal would require the repair of those 
    conditions to be accomplished in accordance with a method approved by 
    the FAA.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 13 airplanes of U.S. registry that would be 
    affected by this proposed AD.
        The actions that were previously required by AD 96-08-08, and 
    retained in this AD, take approximately 2 work hours per airplane to 
    accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on 
    these figures, the cost impact of the currently required actions on 
    U.S. operators is estimated to be $120 per airplane, per inspection 
    cycle.
        The new inspection that is proposed in this AD action would take 
    approximately 3 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average 
    labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost 
    impact of the proposed requirements of this AD on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $180 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the current or proposed 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-9574 (61 FR 
    18661, April 29, 1996), and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD), to read as follows:
    
    Airbus Industrie: Docket 98-NM-56-AD. Supersedes AD 96-08-08, 
    Amendment 39-9574.
        Applicability: All Model A300 B2, A300 B2K, A300 B2-200, A300 
    B4-2C, A300 B4-100, and A300 B4-200 series airplanes, certificated 
    in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (h) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To detect and correct corrosion and cracking of the wings and 
    fuselage, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the 
    airplane, accomplish the following:
    
    Inspection and Modification
    
        (a) Accomplish the inspections and modifications contained in 
    the Airbus service bulletins listed below prior to or at the 
    thresholds identified in each of those service bulletins, or within 
    1,000 landings or 12 months after April 13, 1992 (the effective date 
    of AD 92-02-09, amendment 39-8145), whichever occurs later, except 
    as provided in paragraph (d) of this AD for the service bulletin 
    identified in paragraph (a)(8) of this AD. Required inspections 
    shall be repeated thereafter at intervals not to exceed those 
    specified in the corresponding service bulletin for the inspection. 
    After April 13, 1992 (the effective date of AD 92-02-09, amendment 
    39-8145), the actions shall only be accomplished in accordance with 
    the latest revision of the service bulletins specified.
        (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-103, Revision 4, dated June 
    30, 1983; or Revision 5, dated February 23, 1994;
        (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-126, Revision 7, dated 
    November 11, 1990; or Revision 8, dated September 18, 1991;
        (3) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-146, Revision 7, dated April 
    26, 1991;
    
        Note 2: Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-146 provides for a 
    compliance threshold of within 5 years after the date of issuance of 
    French airworthiness directive 90-222-116(B), issued on December 12, 
    1990, the accomplishment of which is required by AD 85-07-09, 
    amendment 39-5033.
    
        (4) For Configuration 1 airplanes identified in Airbus Service 
    Bulletin A300-53-0162, Revision 6, dated March 20, 1996: Airbus 
    Service Bulletin A300-53-162, Revision 4, dated November 12, 1990; 
    Revision 5, dated March 17, 1994; or Revision 6, dated March 20, 
    1996. After the effective date of this new AD, only Revision 6 of 
    the service bulletin shall be used.
        (5) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-196, Revision 1, dated 
    November 12, 1990; as amended by Service Bulletin Change Notice 
    1.A., dated February 4, 1991, or Revision 2, dated March 17, 1994.
    
        Note 3: Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-196 provides for a 
    compliance threshold of within 6,000 landings after accomplishment 
    of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-194, accomplishment of which is 
    required by AD 87-04-12, amendment 39-5536.
    
        (6) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-225, Revision 2, dated May 
    30, 1990;
        (7) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-226, Revision 4, dated 
    November 12, 1990; or Revision 5, dated September 7, 1991;
    
        Note 4: Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-226 provides for a 
    compliance threshold of within 5 years after the issuance of French 
    airworthiness directive 90-222-116(B), issued on December 12, 1990; 
    but not later than 20 years after first delivery; the accomplishment 
    of which is required by AD 90-03-08, amendment 39-6481.
    
        (8) For Configuration 1 and 2 airplanes identified in Airbus 
    Service Bulletin A300-53-0278, Revision 2, dated November 10, 1995: 
    Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-278, dated November 12, 1990; or 
    Revision 1, dated March 17, 1994;
        (9) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-54-045, Revision 4, dated 
    January 31, 1990; or Revision 6, dated February 25, 1994;
        (10) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-54-060, Revision 2, dated 
    September 7, 1988, and Change Notice 2.A., dated February 13, 1990; 
    or Revision 3, dated February 25, 1994;
        (11) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-54-063, Revision 1, dated 
    April 22, 1987, and Change Notice 1.A., dated February 13, 1990; or 
    Revision 2, dated February 25, 1994; and
        (12) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-54-066, Revision 1, dated 
    February 15, 1989, and
    
    [[Page 71336]]
    
    Change Notice 1.A., dated February 13, 1990; or Revision 2, dated 
    February 25, 1994.
        (b) Accomplish the inspections and modifications contained in 
    the Airbus service bulletins listed below prior to or at the 
    thresholds identified in each of those service bulletins, or within 
    1,000 landings or 12 months after March 29, 1996 (the effective date 
    of AD 96-08-08, amendment 39-9574), whichever occurs later. Required 
    inspections shall be repeated thereafter at intervals not to exceed 
    those specified in the corresponding service bulletin for the 
    inspection.
    
        (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0194, Revision 2, including 
    Appendix 1, dated August 19, 1993;
    
        Note 5: Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0194 provides for a 
    compliance threshold of prior to the accumulation of 36,000 landings 
    for Model A300 B2 series airplanes on which the modification 
    described in Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-165 has not been 
    accomplished and for Model A300 B2 series airplanes on which that 
    modification has been accomplished prior to the accumulation of 
    24,000 landings on the airplane. Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-
    0194 also provides for a compliance threshold of prior to the 
    accumulation of 12,000 landings after the accomplishment of Airbus 
    Service Bulletin A300-57-165 (for Model A300 B2 series airplanes on 
    which the modification described in Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-
    165 has been accomplished on or after the accumulation of 24,000 
    landings on the airplane).
    
        (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-166, Revision 3, including 
    Appendix 1, dated July 12, 1993;
        (3) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0167, Revision 1, including 
    Appendix 1, dated May 25, 1993;
        (4) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0168, Revision 3, including 
    Appendix 1, dated November 22, 1993;
        (5) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0180, Revision 1, dated 
    March 29, 1993;
        (6) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0185, Revision 1, including 
    Appendix 1, dated March 8, 1993; and
    
        Note: 6: The Airbus service bulletins specified in paragraphs 
    (b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(4), (b)(5), and (b)(6) of this AD provide for a 
    compliance threshold of prior to the accumulation of 36,000 landings 
    (for Model A300 B2 series airplanes); 30,000 landings (for Model 
    A300 B4-100 series airplanes); and 25,000 landings (for Model A300 
    B4-200 series airplanes) after the effective date of French 
    airworthiness directive 93-154-149(B), issued on September 15, 1993.
        (7) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-54-0084, dated April 21, 1994.
        (c) For Configuration 2 airplanes identified in Airbus Service 
    Bulletin A300-53-0162, Revision 6, dated March 20, 1996: Accomplish 
    the inspections contained in Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0162, 
    Revision 6, dated March 20, 1996, prior to or at the thresholds 
    identified in the service bulletin; or within 1,000 landings or 12 
    months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. 
    Required inspections shall be repeated thereafter at intervals not 
    to exceed those specified in the service bulletin for the 
    inspection.
        (d) For Configuration 1 and 2 airplanes identified in Airbus 
    Service Bulletin A300-53-0278, Revision 2, dated November 10, 1995: 
    Accomplish the inspections contained in Airbus Service Bulletin 
    A300-53-0278, Revision 2, dated November 10, 1995; at the time 
    specified in paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this AD, as applicable. 
    Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3,600 
    flight cycles. Accomplishment of the inspections required by this 
    paragraph constitutes terminating action for the inspections 
    required by paragraph (a)(8) of this AD.
        (1) For airplanes that have not been inspected in accordance 
    with paragraph (a) and (a)(8) of this AD prior to the effective date 
    of this AD: Inspect at the time specified in paragraph (d)(1)(i) or 
    (d)(1)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.
        (i) For Configuration 1 airplanes: Prior to the accumulation of 
    18,300 total landings, or within 1,000 landings or 12 months after 
    the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
        (ii) For Configuration 2 airplanes: At the earlier of the times 
    specified in paragraphs (d)(1)(ii)(A) or (d)(1)(ii)(B) of this AD.
        (A) At the time specified in paragraphs (a) and (a)(8) of this 
    AD.
        (B) Prior to the accumulation of 22,000 total landings, or 
    within 1,000 landings or 12 months after the effective date of this 
    AD, whichever occurs later.
        (2) For airplanes that have been inspected in accordance with 
    paragraph (a) and (a)(8) of this AD prior to the effective date of 
    this AD: Perform the next inspection within 3,600 landings after 
    accomplishing the last inspection, or within 1,000 landings or 12 
    months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
        (e) For Configuration 3 airplanes identified in Airbus Service 
    Bulletin A300-53-0278, Revision 2, dated November 10, 1995: 
    Accomplish the inspections contained in Airbus Service Bulletin 
    A300-53-0278, Revision 2, dated November 10, 1995, prior to the 
    accumulation of 26,000 total flight cycles; or within 1,000 landings 
    or 12 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs 
    later. Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 
    5,000 flight cycles.
    
        Note 7: Accomplishment of the inspections specified in Airbus 
    Service Bulletin A300-53-0278, Revision 2, dated November 10, 1995, 
    is considered acceptable for compliance with the significant 
    structural details (SSD) inspection 536206 of ``Airbus Industrie 
    A300 Supplemental Structural Inspection Document'' (SSID), Revision 
    2, dated June 1994, required by AD 96-13-11, amendment 39-9679 (61 
    FR 35122, July 5, 1996).
    
    Corrective Action
    
        (f) If any discrepant condition identified in any service 
    bulletin referenced in this AD is found during any inspection 
    required by this AD, prior to further flight, accomplish the 
    corresponding corrective action specified in the service bulletin, 
    except as specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.
        (g) If any crack is found during any inspection required by this 
    AD; and the applicable service bulletin specifies to contact Airbus 
    for appropriate action: Prior to further flight, repair in 
    accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International 
    Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate; or the DGAC 
    (or its delegated agent). For a repair method to be approved by the 
    Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, as required by this 
    paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must specifically reference 
    this AD.
    
    Alternative Methods of Compliance
    
        (h) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International 
    Branch, ANM-116.
    
        Note 8: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
    
    Special Flight Permits
    
        (i) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Note 9: The subject of this AD is addressed in French 
    airworthiness directive 90-222-116(B)R4, dated March 27, 1996.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 15, 1999.
    D.L. Riggin,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-32983 Filed 12-20-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/21/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
99-32983
Dates:
Comments must be received by January 20, 2000.
Pages:
71333-71336 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-NM-56-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-32983.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13