94-31460. Environmental Statements; Availability, etc.: Grass Creek Resource Area, WY  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 245 (Thursday, December 22, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-31460]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: December 22, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Bureau of Land Management
    [WY-010-1610-00]
    
     
    
    Environmental Statements; Availability, etc.: Grass Creek 
    Resource Area, WY
    
    AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact 
    Statement for the Grass Creek Resource Management Plan for public 
    review and comment.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Grass 
    Creek Resource Management Plan (RMP) describes and analyzes four 
    alternative resource management plans, including the Bureau of Land 
    Management's (BLM's) preferred alternative, developed through public 
    scoping and in consultation with local Governments. The planning area 
    includes portions of Big Horn, Hot Springs, Park, and Washakie counties 
    in the Bighorn Basin of north central Wyoming. When completed, the 
    Grass Creek RMP will provide the management direction for future land 
    and resource management actions on approximately 968,000 acres of 
    public land surface and approximately 1,171,000 acres of Federal 
    mineral estate administered by the BLM.
        The draft EIS focuses on resolving three key issues identified 
    through public scoping and analysis of current BLM management in the 
    Grass Creek planning area. These issues are:
    
    1. Vegetation management
    2. Special management area designations
    3. Public land and resource accessibility and manageability
    
        The proposed designation of three Areas of Critical Environmental 
    Concern (ACECs) is addressed in the draft EIS. These are the 
    Fifteenmile Creek Watershed proposed ACEC (274,300 acres), the 
    Meeteetse Draw proposed ACEC (6,800 acres), and the Upper Owl Creek 
    proposed ACEC (17,100 acres).
        Management of the Fifteenmile Creek Watershed proposed ACEC would 
    emphasize a cooperative approach to improving riparian and upland 
    areas, and reducing the amount of sediment delivered to the Bighorn 
    River. State and local Government, private landowners, grazing 
    permittees, and other interested parties would collaborate in managing 
    the area.
        The Meeteetse Draw proposed ACEC would highlight the importance of 
    Native American cultural values associated with this area. The primary 
    emphasis of BLM's management would be to improve public education, 
    interpretation, scientific research, and protection of Native American 
    cultural values. Controlled management of this area would also allow 
    Native Americans to have access to these sites for ritual purposes and 
    aid in preserving aspects of their heritage.
        The Upper Owl Creek proposed ACEC would be managed to maintain 
    important wildlife habitat, protect rare plants, maintain scenic 
    quality, enhance recreation, and reduce erosion and natural hazards 
    associated with the area's landslide potential.
        These proposed ACEC designations would highlight the three areas 
    for management and funding, but would not increase the level of 
    restrictions on land uses above that which would otherwise be 
    appropriate for management. The special management designations also 
    would not apply to State or private lands.
        In accordance with the provisions of 38 CFR Part 800, parties who 
    are interested in and who wish to be involved in future activity 
    planning and implementation of management actions that may involve or 
    affect the archaeological and historical resources addressed in the 
    proposed plan, are requested to identify themselves. Through contacting 
    the Worland District Office at the below address, you will be placed on 
    a future contact list.
        The coal screening process (including application of the coal 
    unsuitability criteria under 43 CFR Part 3461) was not conducted for 
    the planning effort. Any interest in coal exploration or leasing will 
    be handled on a case-by-case basis. If an application for a coal lease 
    is received sometime in the future, an appropriate land use 
    environmental analysis will be conducted (which will include conducting 
    the coal screening process) to determine whether or not the coal areas 
    applied for are acceptable for development and leasing consideration. 
    The RMP will be amended as necessary.
        In the course of conducting the planning effort and preparing the 
    Grass Creek RMP EIS, public lands along all waterways in the planning 
    area were reviewed to determine their eligibility for inclusion in the 
    National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. No public lands were found to 
    meet the eligibility criteria.
        The draft EIS contains socio-economic information on the 
    population, employment, and income of the planning area and describes 
    the impacts on the local economy of implementing each of the four 
    alternatives analyzed in the EIS.
        Wilderness management and recommendations on wilderness designation 
    have been considered in previous documents and are not addressed in 
    this draft EIS.
    
    DATES: Written comments will be accepted for 90 days following the date 
    the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publishes the filing of the 
    draft EIS for the Grass Creek RMP in the Federal Register. This filing 
    notice is expected to be published about mid or late December 1994. 
    Open houses will be held in communities within the planning area to 
    provide opportunities for the public to meet with the BLM and comment 
    on the draft EIS. These open houses will be held during January 1995. 
    Media releases will provide information on the locations and times of 
    the meetings when these are determined.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft EIS for the Grass Creek Resource 
    Management Plan are available from the BLM Worland District Office and 
    the Grass Creek Resource Area Office at P. O. Box 119, 101 South 23rd 
    Street, Worland, Wyoming 82401-0119. Comments and requests to be placed 
    on the Grass Creek RMP mailing list should be sent to Bob Ross, RMP 
    Team Leader, P. O. Box 119, Worland, Wyoming 82401-0119.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph T. Vessels, Grass Creek 
    Resource Area Manager or Bob Ross, RMP Team Leader at the above address 
    or by telephone (307) 347-9871.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Grass Creek Resource Area is responsible 
    for managing the BLM-administered public lands in portions of Big Horn, 
    Hot Springs, Park, and Washakie counties in Wyoming. Within the Grass 
    Creek RMP planning area there are varied and intermingled land surface 
    ownerships and overlapping mineral ownerships. Therefore, the 
    administrative jurisdictions for land use planning and for managing the 
    land surface and minerals are also varied, intermingled, and sometimes 
    overlapping. For this reason, it is important to understand that the 
    draft EIS does not address management of lands (about 302,000 acres) or 
    minerals (about 8,000 acres) within the planning area that are 
    privately-owned or owned by the State of Wyoming or local Governments. 
    It also does not address those Federally-owned minerals within the 
    planning area that are under Federal land surface managed by other 
    agencies (about 4,700 acres).
        The draft EIS for the Grass Creek RMP presents four alternative, 
    multiple use resource management plans for managing the BLM-
    administered public lands in the planning area. Alternative A 
    (continuation of current management) and three other alternatives that 
    suggest different combinations and emphases for managing the various 
    resource and land uses on the BLM-administered public lands, on the 
    basis of needs, opportunities, and public demand. The four alternative 
    plans focus on allocating public lands and resources among their valid 
    uses and prescribing general management actions that would be taken. 
    The preferred alternative is a combination of parts of alternatives A, 
    B, and C and represents what BLM believes is the best balance between 
    the public lands and resource uses and environmental protection in the 
    planning area. The various impacts that would be expected from 
    implementing each of the alternatives is also presented in the draft 
    EIS.
    
        Dated: December 5, 1994.
    Alan L. Kesterke,
    Associate State Director.
    [FR Doc. 94-31460 Filed 12-21-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/22/1994
Department:
Land Management Bureau
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Grass Creek Resource Management Plan for public review and comment.
Document Number:
94-31460
Dates:
Written comments will be accepted for 90 days following the date the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publishes the filing of the draft EIS for the Grass Creek RMP in the Federal Register. This filing notice is expected to be published about mid or late December 1994. Open houses will be held in communities within the planning area to provide opportunities for the public to meet with the BLM and comment on the draft EIS. These open houses will be held during January 1995. Media releases ...
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: December 22, 1994, WY-010-1610-00