95-31169. The Malibu-Newton Canyon Viticultural Area (95R-014P)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 66535-66538]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-31169]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
    Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
    
    27 CFR Part 9
    
    RIN 1512-AA07
    [Notice No. 817]
    
    
    The Malibu-Newton Canyon Viticultural Area (95R-014P)
    
    AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Department of the 
    Treasury.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) has received 
    a petition proposing the establishment of a viticultural area in the 
    State of California to be known as ``Malibu-Newton Canyon.'' This 
    proposal is the result of a petition submitted by Mr. George Rosenthal, 
    President of Rancho Escondido, Inc.
        ATF believes that the establishment of viticultural area names as 
    appellations of origin in wine labeling and advertising allows wineries 
    to designate the specific areas where the grapes used to make the wine 
    were grown and enables consumers to better identify the wines they 
    purchase.
    
    DATES: Written comments must be received by February 20, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: Chief, Wine, Beer and Spirits 
    Regulations Branch, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, P.O. Box 
    50221, Washington, DC 20091-0221 (Attn: Notice No. 817). Copies of the 
    petition, the proposed regulations, the appropriate maps, and any 
    written comments received will be available for public inspection 
    during normal business hours at: ATF Reading Room, Office of Public 
    Affairs and Disclosure, Room 6480, 650 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Brokaw, Wine, Beer and Spirits 
    Regulations Branch, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, 650 
    Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20226 (202-927-8230).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On August 23, 1978, ATF published Treasury Decision ATF-53 (43 FR 
    37672, 54624) revising regulations in 27 CFR Part 4. These regulations 
    allow the establishment of definitive viticultural areas. The 
    regulations allow the name of an approved viticultural area to be used 
    as an appellation of origin on wine labels and in wine advertisements. 
    On October 2, 1979, ATF published Treasury Decision ATF-60 (44 FR 
    56692) which added a new Part 9 to 27 CFR, for the listing of approved 
    American viticultural areas.
        Section 4.25a(e)(1), Title 27 CFR, defines an American viticultural 
    area as a delimited grape-growing region distinguishable by 
    geographical features, the boundaries of which have been delineated in 
    Subpart C of Part 9.
        Section 4.25a(e)(2) outlines the procedure for proposing an 
    American viticultural area. Any interested person may petition ATF to 
    establish a grape-
    
    [[Page 66536]]
    growing region as a viticultural area. The petition should include:
        (a) Evidence that the name of the proposed viticultural area is 
    locally and/or nationally known as referring to the area specified in 
    the petition;
        (b) Historical or current evidence that the boundaries of the 
    viticultural area are as specified in the petition;
        (c) Evidence relating to the geographical features (climate, soil, 
    elevation, physical features, etc.) which distinguish the viticultural 
    features of the proposed area from surrounding areas;
        (d) A description of the specific boundaries of the viticultural 
    area, based on the features which can be found on United States 
    Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) maps of the largest applicable scale; and
        (e) A copy of the appropriate U.S.G.S. map(s) with the boundaries 
    prominently marked.
    
    Petition
    
        ATF has received a petition from Mr. George Rosenthal, President of 
    Rancho Escondido, Inc., proposing to establish a new viticultural 
    appellation in the Malibu area of Los Angeles County, California, to be 
    known as ``Malibu-Newton Canyon.'' The viticultural area, comprising 
    approximately 850 acres, is located within Newton Canyon which is a 
    bowl shaped valley located on the south facing side of the Santa Monica 
    Mountains. Vineyards currently within the proposed viticultural area 
    are located on the Rancho Escondido Estate. Rancho Escondido is 
    comprised of approximately 157 acres, all of which lies within the 
    proposed ``Malibu-Newton Canyon'' viticultural area. Approximately, 14 
    of these acres are planted with premium wine producing vineyards. 
    Varietals include Cabernet Savignon, Merlot, Cabernet Franc, Chardonnay 
    and Petite Verdot. Currently, there are no wineries located within the 
    proposed ``Malibu-Newton Canyon'' area. The petition provides the 
    following information as evidence that the proposed area meets the 
    regulatory requirements discussed previously.
    
    Evidence That the Name of the Area Is Locally or Nationally Known
    
        According to the petitioner, the origin of the name Malibu comes 
    from the ancient Chumash Indian word MALA I BOO, meaning ``Place on the 
    Cliff,'' and was the name of an Indian village just beyond Malibu 
    Beach. After the Spaniards took control of southern California, the 
    encompassing Chumash ranchera UMALIBO became known as the Malibu 
    Rancho. A Spanish settler, Jose Bartolome Tapia gained control of the 
    rancho and was later granted the land by the Governor of the 
    Californias. The present day spelling appears on the name of the 
    Topanga Malibu Sequit grant dated July 12, 1805. It originally totalled 
    13,315 acres, one of the largest southern California Ranchos at that 
    time.
        The petitioner further states that throughout the 19th century, 
    Rancho Malibu changed hands many times but remained intact. Until the 
    construction of the Pacific Coast Highway in the 1930's, the privacy of 
    Rancho Malibu had not been invaded. With the burgeoning economy of 
    southern California, conditions greatly changed. This historic rancho 
    was finally subdivided during the same decade. Following soon after, 
    the famous Malibu Beach Colony was established where movie stars and 
    industry moguls began constructing their homes. The Malibu area then 
    quickly developed into the highly recognized community of Los Angeles 
    as it is known today.
        Throughout this region there exists topography in the form of 
    roads, a creek, a lake, a canyon, a beach, hiking trails, parks, 
    vistas, etc. which denote the name ``Malibu.'' The region lying roughly 
    from the ridge line of the Santa Monica Mountains to the ocean, and 
    from Topanga Canyon to the Ventura County line is commonly known as 
    Malibu, according to the petitioner. While the city of Malibu was 
    incorporated in 1992, the entire surrounding area described above 
    continues to be recognized as Malibu. ``Malibu'' could be applied to 
    any of the hills/mountains which drain toward the ocean through the 
    city of Malibu, including Newton Canyon, the location of the proposed 
    viticultural area.
        The petitioner provided a 1:250,000 scale Topopgraphic-Bathymetric 
    map of Los Angeles to document the use of the name, ``Malibu.'' An 
    article in the October 15, 1994, issue of the ``Wine Spectator,'' 
    entitled ``A Vineyard Grows in Malibu Canyon,'' refers to the area 
    around ``The Malibu Estate'' (Rancho Escondido, Inc.) as ``Malibu 
    Hills.'' Also, included as an exhibit was a copy of an article from, 
    ``The Underground Wine Journal,'' 1994, entitled, ``Distinctive New 
    Wines.'' This article refers to ``The Malibu Estate'' as being located 
    ``in the hills above Malibu.''
        According to the petitioner, the name ``Newton Canyon'' is 
    generally known as describing the specific area in which the proposed 
    viticultural area is located. This is evidenced by the name of the main 
    street running through the proposed viticultural area--``Newton Canyon 
    Road.'' In addition, maps of the area, including the U.S.G.S. map 
    referenced and shown within the petition, label the area as, ``Newton 
    Canyon.'' The petitioner states that, ``'Newton Canyon alone is not 
    descriptive enough to describe the general location of the proposed 
    viticultural area, and further, might possibly cause public confusion 
    in relation to Newton Vineyards, located in the Napa Valley.'' 
    Therefore, the petitioner proposed the name, ``Malibu-Newton Canyon.''
    
    Historical or Current Evidence That the Boundaries of the Proposed 
    Viticultural Area Are as Specified in the Petition
    
        The boundaries of the proposed ``Malibu-Newton Canyon'' 
    viticultural area follow the natural ridge lines which define Newton 
    Canyon and are delineated on the U.S.G.S. Point Dume, California, 
    quadrangle map.
        Newton Canyon is a bowl shaped valley located on the south facing 
    side of the Santa Monica Mountains, in the Malibu area of Los Angeles 
    County. The canyon is oriented along an east-west axis. The valley 
    floor lies at an elevation of approximately 1,400 feet. The surrounding 
    ridgeline ranges in elevation from 1,800-2,100 feet on the southern 
    ocean side of the canyon, continuing to 2,100-2,800 feet on the high 
    side of the canyon to the north.
        According to the petitioner, the elevation of the southern rim of 
    the canyon is low enough to allow evening fog to sift into the valley, 
    but high enough to keep out the marine layer that shrouds much of the 
    coastline throughout the daytime. The northern rim of the canyon joins 
    the crest of the Santa Monica Mountains that divides oceanside from 
    leeside. Lying at the eastern most side of the canyon, Castro Peak is 
    another distinguishing feature which marks one of the highest points in 
    the Santa Monica Mountains at 2,824 feet.
        The petitioner further states that approximately two-thirds of the 
    surrounding Malibu area contains slopes greater than 25 percent, with 
    only one-fifth having relatively level terrain. Throughout the past 
    several decades, most of the usable land in the Malibu area has been 
    developed. Because of increasingly high land prices, very little of the 
    land in the general Malibu area is still used for agriculture. The 
    Santa Monica Mountains also have thousands of acres dedicated to State 
    and national parks, with more acreage being aggressively acquired by 
    public conservation agencies. 
    
    [[Page 66537]]
    
    
    Evidence Relating to the Geographical Features (Climate, Soil, 
    Elevation, Physical Features, etc.) Which Distinguish the Viticultural 
    Features of the Proposed Area From Surrounding Areas
    
    Climate
    
        Based upon a 1994 climate study completed by Fox Weather, Oxnard, 
    California, the petitioner asserts the following: The general climate 
    of the Malibu area is typical of southern California with mild rainy 
    winters, and warm dry summers. However, there are several 
    climatological factors which distinguish the proposed ``Malibu-Newton 
    Canyon'' viticultural area from the surrounding region.
        While summer temperatures often exceed 80 degrees in the afternoon, 
    cooling ocean breezes flow into the valley in the evening, according to 
    the petitioner. Moreover, during the evening and early morning a light 
    fog often filters into the valley and settles along the slopes, 
    creating a unique microclimate which is significantly cooler than the 
    surrounding inland areas. Typically, the morning sun shines through the 
    fog, which in turn is swept out by warm winds and high daytime 
    temperatures. The valley enjoys southern exposure to the sun throughout 
    the afternoon. According to the petitioner, these conditions are ideal 
    for premium grape growing.
        Because of its high elevation and orientation, the proposed 
    viticultural area does not experience the constantly overcast skies and 
    cooler temperatures of the coastal region immediately below.
        Newton Canyon, within which the proposed viticultural area is 
    located, is a unique pocket protected from marine influence. The 
    coastline near sea level is a more temperate climate controlled by 
    marine stratus with uniformly cold temperatures, fog and low clouds. 
    This cooler and more humid coastal environment, mainly affecting areas 
    below the 1,300 foot level, can create grape rot and delay maturation.
        The petitioner claims that the proposed ``Malibu-Newton Canyon'' 
    viticultural area is, in the daytime, a sunny warm oasis for a coastal 
    location. The proposed area is located at an elevation which lies just 
    at the bottom of the inversion layer and just at the top of the marine 
    layer. Typically, the marine layer ceiling is approximately 1,400 feet 
    on average. The southern or bottom rim of the canyon acts as a barrier 
    to the marine layer, preventing the bulk of the coastal fog and low 
    clouds from penetrating the valley for extended periods of time. This 
    allows the ``Malibu-Newton Canyon'' area to enjoy favorable cooling 
    effects of the Pacific ocean and have the warm sunny daytime 
    temperatures found in the adjacent interior valleys.
        Nearby inland areas experience uniformly hot summer temperatures 
    similar to those experienced in the upper elevations on the oceanside 
    of the Santa Monica Mountains. However, these inland areas receive 
    little or no fog and much less precipitation than the oceanside regime, 
    according to the petitioner.
        An additional distinctive aspect is an increasing amount of 
    precipitation with increasing elevation. The petitioner states that 
    upland weather stations report practically twice the mean precipitation 
    of the nearby lowland stations. Furthermore, the greatest monthly 
    precipitation during the rainy season is from 1.5 to 3.0 times as great 
    as that for the lowland stations. Precipitation is concentrated in the 
    winter months. The average annual rainfall is about 24 inches, with 
    approximately 12 percent occurring from the months of April to October.
        The proposed area experiences typical low temperatures in the 
    winter time, just above freezing temperatures. Infrequent winter 
    freezes have been known to occur during the dormant winter growing 
    cycle.
        In summary, the petitioner states that the proposed viticultural 
    area is characterized by an isolated microclimate that captures the 
    favorable climatic conditions necessary for premium wine grape growing. 
    In contrast, the petitioner states that the surrounding areas found on 
    the oceanside of the Santa Monica Mountains (i.e, Malibu, Oxnard, Santa 
    Monica) are uniformly cool and overcast. Surrounding inland areas found 
    on the leeside of the Santa Monica Mountains (i.e, Thousand Oaks, 
    Agoura, Woodland Hills) are uniformly hot and dry. The petitioner 
    provided a diagram illustrating the ``Malibu-Newton Canyon'' 
    microclimate and a November 29, 1994, ``CLIMATOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 
    RANCHO ESCONDIDO VINEYARDS,'' by Alan D. Fox of Fox Weather.
    
    Physical Features
    
        According to the petitioner, the primary distinction of the 
    proposed viticultural area is its unique combination of shape, 
    elevation, orientation and relative location to the marine influences 
    of the Pacific Ocean. The proposed area lies within a clearly defined 
    valley with a ``bowl'' shape resting high on the oceanside of the Santa 
    Monica Mountains. These physical features create a pocket which harbors 
    the distinct microclimate described above. The petitioner provided 
    aerial photos to illustrate these physical features.
    
    Drainage
    
        All of the proposed viticultural area drains into Newton Canyon 
    Creek, continuing to Zuma Creek which then drains into the Pacific 
    Ocean at Point Dume's westward beach, according to the petitioner.
    
    Soils
    
        As evidence of soil types, the petitioner provided a 1994 soils 
    study completed by Soil & Plant Laboratory, Inc., Orange, California, 
    in addition to ``Soils of the Malibu Area California'' published by the 
    Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
        According to this information, major soils within the proposed 
    viticultural area range from loam to clay loam in texture. Subsoil 
    texture ranges from clay loam to clay. Current plantings are mainly on 
    Castaic and Rincon silty clay loams and Malibu loam which are lower 
    elevation terrace soils that are moderately deep, with favorable 
    Capability Class ratings of II to IV. Steeper hillside soils (mostly 
    above the 1,700 foot contour line) are shallower with Capability Class 
    ratings ranging from IV to VIII.
        Soils in the proposed viticultural area have moderate to high 
    inherent fertility. Soil reaction in surface soils ranges from 
    moderately acid to slightly alkaline. Subsoil ph varies with type and 
    several areas are calcareous.
        According to the petitioner, soil tests performed prior to the 
    planting of vineyards in 1988 revealed that the topsoil found in much 
    of lower Newton Canyon contained crushed rock, as a result of the 
    construction of the nearby Kanan Dume Road tunnel, which is ideal for 
    good drainage.
        The surrounding areas are mainly steep hillsides and mountainous 
    uplands with poor soil capability. These soils are usually shallower 
    than those found in the proposed viticultural area, and are subject to 
    erosion.
    
    Proposed Boundary
    
        The boundary of the proposed ``Malibu-Newton Canyon'' viticultural 
    area may be found on one United States Geological Survey map, entitled 
    Point Dume Quadrangle, California, 7.5 minute series, with a scale of 
    1:24,000.
    
    Public Participation--Written Comments
    
        ATF requests comments from all interested parties. Comments 
    received 
    
    [[Page 66538]]
    on or before the closing date will be carefully considered. Comments 
    received after that date will be given the same consideration if it is 
    practical to do so. However, assurance of consideration can only be 
    given to comments received on or before the closing date.
        ATF will not recognize any submitted material as confidential and 
    comments may be disclosed to the public. Any material which a commenter 
    considers to be confidential or inappropriate for disclosure to the 
    public should not be included in the comments. The name of the person 
    submitting a comment is not exempt from disclosure.
        Comments may be submitted by facsimile transmission to (202) 927-
    8602, provided the comments: (1) are legible; (2) are 8\1/2\ x 11'' in 
    size, (3) contain a written signature, and (4) are 3 pages or less in 
    length. This limitation is necessary to assure reasonable access to the 
    equipment. Comments sent by FAX in excess of three pages will not be 
    accepted. Receipt of FAX transmittals will not be acknowledged. 
    Facsimile transmitted comments will be treated as originals.
        During the comment period, any person who desires an opportunity to 
    comment orally at a public hearing on the proposed regulation should 
    submit his or her request, in writing, to the Director within the 60-
    day comment period. However, the Director reserves the right to 
    determine, in light of all circumstances, whether a public hearing will 
    be held.
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        It has been determined that this proposed regulation is not a 
    significant regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866. 
    Accordingly, this proposal is not subject to the analysis required by 
    this executive order.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        It is hereby certified that this proposed regulation will not have 
    a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities. The establishment of a viticultural area is neither an 
    endorsement nor approval by ATF of the quality of wine produced in the 
    area, but rather an identification of an area that is distinct from 
    surrounding areas. ATF believes that the establishment of viticultural 
    areas merely allows wineries to describe more accurately the origin of 
    their wines to consumers, and helps consumers identify the wines they 
    purchase. Thus, any benefit derived from the use of a viticultural area 
    name is the result of the proprietor's own efforts and consumer 
    acceptance of wines from that area.
        Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required 
    because the proposal, if promulgated as a final rule, is not expected 
    (1) to have significant secondary, or incidental effects on a 
    substantial number of small entities; or (2) to impose, or otherwise 
    cause a significant increase in the reporting, recordkeeping, or other 
    compliance burdens on a substantial number of small entities.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 
    96-511, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR 
    Part 1320, do not apply to this notice of proposed rulemaking because 
    no requirement to collect information is proposed.
    
    Drafting Information
    
        The principal author of this document is David Brokaw, Wine, Beer 
    and Spirits Regulations Branch, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and 
    Firearms.
    
    List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
    
        Administrative practices and procedures, Consumer protection, 
    Viticultural areas, and Wine.
    
    Authority and Issuance
    
        Title 27, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 9, American 
    Viticultural Areas, is proposed to be amended as follows:
    
    PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
    
        Par. 1. The authority citation for Part 9 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
    
    Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
    
        Par. 2. Subpart C is amended by adding Sec. 9.152 to read as 
    follows:
    * * * * *
    
    
    Sec. 9.152  Malibu-Newton Canyon.
    
        (a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this 
    petition is ``Malibu-Newton Canyon.''
        (b) Approved maps. The appropriate map for determining the boundary 
    of the Malibu-Newton Canyon viticultural area is the U.S.G.S. map, 
    ``Point Dume Quadrangle, California'' (7.5 Minute Series 1:24,000 
    Topographic map, photorevised 1981).
        (c) Boundary. The Malibu-Newton Canyon viticultural area is located 
    in Los Angeles County, California. The boundary is as follows:
        (1) Beginning at the intersection of the Newton Canyon creek 
    (lowest elevation) and an unnamed medium duty road referred to by the 
    petitioner as Kanan Dume Road at the boundary of section 13 and 18 on 
    the U.S.G.S. map ``Point Dume Quadrangle.''
        (2) Then south along Kanan Dume Road to the point where an unnamed, 
    unimproved dirt road referred to by the petitioner as Ramerez Mountain 
    Way crosses over Kanan Dume Road at the tunnel in the northwest corner 
    of section 19.
        (3) Then east along Ramerez Mountain Way, following the southern 
    ridgeline of Newton Canyon, to Latigo Canyon Road in the southwest 
    corner of section 17.
        (4) Then south along Latigo Canyon Road to an unnamed, unimproved 
    dirt road referred to by the petitioner as Newton Mountain Way at the 
    southern boundary of section 17.
        (5) Then northeast along Newton Mountain Way, following the 
    southeastern ridgeline of Newton Canyon, to an unnamed, unimproved dirt 
    road referred to by the petitioner as Castro Mountain Way in section 
    16.
        (6) Then west along Castro Mountain Way, past Castro Peak, 
    following the northern ridgeline of Newton Canyon to Latigo Canyon Road 
    in section 18.
        (7) Then southwest along the natural ridgeline of Newton Canyon to 
    the intersection of Kanan Dume Road and the 1,600 foot contour line in 
    the southeastern portion of section 13.
        (8) Then southeasterly along Kanan Dume Road to the beginning 
    point.
    
        Signed: December 11, 1995.
    Daniel R. Black,
    Acting Director.
    [FR Doc. 95-31169 Filed 12-21-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/22/1995
Department:
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
95-31169
Dates:
Written comments must be received by February 20, 1996.
Pages:
66535-66538 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Notice No. 817
RINs:
1512-AA07: American Viticultural Areas
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/1512-AA07/american-viticultural-areas
PDF File:
95-31169.pdf
CFR: (1)
27 CFR 9.152