97-33297. Individual Grants for Extramural Injury Research for Primary Prevention of Unintentional Injuries, Acute Care, Disability Prevention, and Biomechanics; Notice of Availability of Funds for Fiscal Year 1998  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 66871-66876]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-33297]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    [Number 816]
    
    
    Individual Grants for Extramural Injury Research for Primary 
    Prevention of Unintentional Injuries, Acute Care, Disability 
    Prevention, and Biomechanics; Notice of Availability of Funds for 
    Fiscal Year 1998
    
    Introduction
    
        The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces that 
    applications are being accepted for Injury Prevention and Control 
    Research Grants for fiscal year (FY) 1998.
        CDC is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease 
    prevention objectives of Healthy People 2000, a national activity to 
    reduce morbidity and mortality and improve the quality of life. This 
    announcement is related to the priority area of Unintentional Injuries. 
    (To order a copy of Healthy People 2000, see the Section Where to 
    Obtain Additional Information.)
    
    Authority
    
        This program is authorized under Sections 301, 391-394 of the 
    Public Health Service Act (42 USC 241, 280b-280b-3), as amended. 
    Program regulations are set forth in Title 42 CFR Part 52.
    
    Smoke-Free Workplace
    
        CDC strongly encourages all grant and cooperative agreement 
    recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and to promote the non-use 
    of all tobacco products, and Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act 
    of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities that receive Federal 
    funds in which education, library, day care, health care, and early 
    childhood development services are provided to children.
    
    Eligible Applicants
    
        Eligible applicants include all nonprofit and for-profit 
    organizations. Thus State and local health departments and State and 
    local governmental agencies, universities, colleges, research 
    institutions, and other public and private organizations, including 
    small, minority and/or woman-owned businesses are eligible for these 
    research grants. Current holders of CDC injury control research 
    projects are eligible to apply.
    
        Note: An organization described in section 501(c)(4) of the 
    Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which engages in lobbying activities 
    shall not be eligible to receive Federal funds constituting an 
    award, a grant, contract, loan, or any other form.
    
    Availability of Funds
    
        Approximately $2.7 million is available for FY 1998 injury research 
    grants that include funding for projects that address primary 
    prevention of unintentional injuries (home and leisure, and motor 
    vehicle related-injuries), acute care, the prevention of secondary 
    conditions in persons with disabilities, and biomechanics.
        Approximately $1,800,000 is available to support 6-8 projects that 
    address primary prevention of unintentional injuries (home and leisure, 
    and motor vehicle related-injuries), acute care, and the prevention of 
    secondary conditions in persons with disabilities. Awards will be made 
    for a 12-month budget period within a project period not to exceed 
    three years. The maximum funding level per year will not exceed 
    $300,000 (including both direct and indirect costs). Applications that 
    exceed the funding cap of $300,000 will be excluded from the 
    competition and returned to the applicant.
        Approximately $900,000 is available to support 3-5 projects that 
    address
    
    [[Page 66872]]
    
    biomechanics. Awards will be made for a 12-month budget period within a 
    project period not to exceed three years. The maximum funding level per 
    year will not exceed $300,000 (including both direct and indirect 
    costs). Applications that exceed the funding cap will be excluded from 
    the competition and returned to the applicant.
        The specific program priorities for these funding opportunities are 
    outlined with examples in this announcement under the subheading, 
    ``Programmatic Priorities.''
        Continuation awards within the project period will be made based on 
    satisfactory progress demonstrated by investigators at work-in-progress 
    monitoring workshops (travel expenses for this annual one day meeting 
    should be included in the applicant's proposed budget), the achievement 
    of workplan milestones reflected in the continuation application, and 
    the availability of Federal funds. In addition, if funds are available, 
    continuation awards may be eligible for increased funding to offset 
    inflationary costs.
    
    Use of Funds-Restrictions on Lobbying
    
        Applicants should be aware of restrictions on the use of HHS funds 
    for lobbying of Federal or State legislative bodies. Under the 
    provisions of 31 U.S.C. 1352 (which has been in effect since December 
    23, 1989), recipients (and their subtier contractors) are prohibited 
    from using appropriated Federal funds (other than profits from a 
    Federal contract) for lobbying Congress or any Federal agency in 
    connection with the award of a particular contract, grant, cooperative 
    agreement, or loan. This includes grants/cooperative agreements that, 
    in whole or in part, involve conferences for which Federal funds cannot 
    be used directly or indirectly to encourage participants to lobby or to 
    instruct participants on how to lobby.
        In addition, the current HHS Appropriations Act expressly prohibits 
    the use of appropriated funds for indirect or ``grass roots'' lobbying 
    efforts that are designed to support or defeat legislation pending 
    before State legislatures. Section 503 of the law provides as follows:
    
        Section 503(a) No part of any appropriation contained in this 
    Act shall be used, other than for normal and recognized executive-
    legislative relationships, for publicity or propaganda purposes, for 
    the preparation, distribution, or use of any kit, pamphlet, booklet, 
    publication, radio, television, or video presentation designed to 
    support or defeat legislation pending before the Congress or any 
    State legislature, except in presentation to the Congress or any 
    State legislature itself .
        (b) No part of any appropriation contained in this Act shall be 
    used to pay the salary or expenses of any grant or contract 
    recipient, or agent acting for such recipient, related to any 
    activity designed to influence legislation or appropriations pending 
    before the Congress or any State legislature.
    
    Prohibition on Use of CDC Funds for Certain Gun Control Activities
    
        The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, 
    and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1998, specifies that: ``none 
    of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the 
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or 
    promote gun control.''
        Anti-Lobbying Act requirements prohibit lobbying Congress with 
    appropriated Federal monies. Specifically, this Act prohibits the use 
    of Federal funds for direct or indirect communications intended or 
    designed to influence a Member of Congress with regard to specific 
    Federal legislation. This prohibition includes the funding and 
    assistance of public grassroots campaigns intended or designed to 
    influence Members of Congress with regard to specific legislation or 
    appropriation by Congress.
        In addition to the restrictions in the Anti-Lobbying Act, CDC 
    interprets the language in the CDC's Appropriations Act to mean that 
    CDC's funds may not be spent on political action or other activities 
    designed to affect the passage of specific Federal, State, or local 
    legislation intended to restrict or control the purchase or use of 
    firearms.
    
    Background and Definitions
    
    A. Background
    
        By nearly every measure, injury ranks as one of the nation's most 
    pressing health problems. More than 150,000 people die each year as a 
    result of motor vehicle crashes, falls, fires, drownings, poisonings, 
    suicides, homicides, and other types of injuries. Each year, 56 million 
    people sustain injuries severe enough to require medical treatment, and 
    for every 100 people injured, the effects are serious enough to require 
    162 days of restricted activity. Thirty-four million injured persons 
    visit emergency departments and another 2.7 million are hospitalized.
        Injury is the leading cause of death for Americans between the ages 
    of one and 44 years, and the leading cause of potential years of life 
    lost. Young children are at the greatest risk from car crashes (both as 
    occupants and pedestrians), drownings, and fires. Adolescents and young 
    adults, especially males, are at highest risk of death from motor-
    vehicle crashes and gunshot wounds. For people older than 75, falls are 
    the leading cause of death.
        Although the greatest cost of injury is in human suffering and 
    loss, the financial cost of injury is estimated at more than $224 
    billion, an increase of 42 percent in the last decade. These costs 
    include direct medical care and rehabilitation costs as well as lost 
    wages of the individual and productivity losses to the nation.
        Opportunities to understand and prevent unintentional injuries and 
    reduce their effects are available. Maximizing these opportunities for 
    prevention and control requires a broad approach which will incorporate 
    many disciplines that previously have not been an integral part of 
    public health efforts. Many of these opportunities and research 
    priorities are identified in Healthy People 2000; Injury in America 
    (National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 
    20418--ISBN0-309-03545-7); Injury Prevention: Meeting the Challenge 
    (supplement to the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, (Vol. 5, 
    no. 3, 1989); and Cost of Injury (Dorothy P. Rice, Ellen J. MacKenzie, 
    and Associates, Cost of Injury: A Report to the Congress, San 
    Francisco, California: Institute for Health and Aging, University of 
    California and Injury Prevention Research Center, The Johns Hopkins 
    University, 1989).
    
    B. Definitions
    
        1. Injury is defined as physical damage to an individual that 
    occurs over a short period of time as a result of acute exposure to one 
    of the forms of physical energy in the environment or to chemical 
    agents or the acute lack of oxygen. The three phases of injury control 
    are defined as prevention, acute care, and rehabilitation. Within these 
    phases the major categories of injury are intentional, unintentional, 
    and occupational. Intentional injuries result from interpersonal or 
    self-inflicted violence, and include homicide, assaults, suicide and 
    suicide attempts, elder and child abuse, violence against women, and 
    sexual assault. Unintentional or unintended injuries include those that 
    result from motor vehicle collisions, falls, fires, poisonings, and 
    drownings. Occupational injuries occur at the worksite and include 
    unintentional trauma such as work-related motor-vehicle injuries, 
    drownings, electrocutions, and intentional injuries in the workplace 
    such as homicide. Not included in this definition of occupational 
    injuries are cumulative
    
    [[Page 66873]]
    
    trauma disorders, back injuries not caused by acute trauma, and effects 
    of repeated exposures to chemical or physical agents.
        2. Individual injury control research projects (R01) are defined as 
    research designed to:
        a. Elucidate the chain of causation--the etiology and mechanisms--
    of injuries and subsequent disabilities; or
        b. Yield results directly applicable to identifying interventions 
    to prevent injury occurrence or minimize disability; or
        c. Evaluate the effect of known interventions on injury morbidity, 
    mortality, disability, and costs.
    
    Purpose
    
        The purposes of this program are to:
        A. Support injury prevention and control research on priority 
    issues as delineated in Healthy People 2000; Injury in America; Injury 
    Prevention: Meeting the Challenge; and Cost of Injury.
        B. Encourage professionals from a wide spectrum of disciplines such 
    as engineering, medicine, health care, public health, behavioral and 
    social sciences, and others, to undertake research to prevent and 
    control injuries.
        C. Expand the development and evaluation of current or new 
    intervention methods and strategies for preventing unintentional 
    injuries.
        D. Build the scientific base for the prevention of unintentional 
    injuries and deaths.
    
    Program Requirements
    
        The following are applicant requirements:
        A. A principal investigator who has conducted research, published 
    the findings in peer-reviewed journals, and has specific authority and 
    responsibility to carry out the proposed project.
        B. Demonstrated experience (on the applicant's project team) in 
    conducting, evaluating, and publishing in peer-reviewed journals injury 
    control research (as previously defined).
        C. Effective and well-defined working relationships within the 
    performing organization and with outside entities that will ensure 
    implementation of the proposed activities.
        D. The ability to carry out an injury control research project as 
    previously defined under Background and Definitions, (B.2.a-c).
        E. The overall match between the applicant's proposed theme and 
    research objectives and the program priorities as described under the 
    heading ``Programmatic Priorities.''
    
        Note: Grant funds will not be made available to support the 
    provision of direct care services. Eligible applicants may enter 
    into contracts, including consortia agreements (as set forth in the 
    PHS Grants Policy Statement) as necessary to meet the requirements 
    of the program and strengthen the overall application.
    
    Programmatic Priorities
    
        Grant applications for research projects that address primary 
    prevention of unintentional injuries (home and leisure, and motor 
    vehicle related-injuries ), acute care, the prevention of secondary 
    conditions in persons with injury-related disabilities, and 
    biomechanics are sought. The focus of grants should reflect the broad-
    based need to control injury morbidity, mortality, disability, and 
    costs.
        Applications must address a programmatic priority area as noted 
    below. Examples of possible projects listed under the priority areas 
    below are not exhaustive. Innovative alternative approaches are 
    encouraged.
        For primary prevention of unintentional injuries, there is 
    programmatic interest in the areas of home and leisure, and motor 
    vehicle injuries:
        (1) Specifically, there is special programmatic interest in the 
    development and evaluation of unintentional injury prevention 
    strategies that can be applied in inpatient and outpatient clinical 
    and/or managed care settings (e.g., HMOs, PPOs, clinics, clinicians' 
    offices, academic health centers, etc.). For example, health care-based 
    programs that reduce the injury risk to elderly drivers with medical 
    conditions, fall prevention programs among the elderly, and other 
    methods of delivering injury prevention through clinical practice or 
    managed care settings, are acceptable.
        (2) There is interest in applying behavioral research to injury 
    prevention science. That is, the application of behavior change 
    strategies to injury problems. For example, applying ``stages-of-
    change'' or the transtheoretical model to modify behaviors that will 
    increase the protection of motor vehicle occupants, testing peer-to-
    peer and cross-generational counseling approaches, applying elements of 
    social learning theory or social cognitive theory to changing 
    unintentional injury risk behaviors, or implementing interventions that 
    take advantage of several theoretical approaches simultaneously are 
    acceptable.
        (3) There is programmatic interest in research that evaluates the 
    effects of making low-cost safety devices more available and or 
    accessible to special and general populations. There is interest, as 
    well, in the use of economic incentive systems, such as discounts and 
    rebates, or through insurance programs (health, automobile or life). 
    For example, these approaches could be studied as methods for 
    increasing the use and maintenance of residential smoke detectors or 
    sprinkler systems in high risk or rural neighborhoods, or to promote 
    bicycle helmet ownership and use at the community level.
        Community based research is particularly relevant, and studies that 
    replicate successful programs in new settings or with other populations 
    are eligible.
        Unintentional injury prevention proposals primarily addressing the 
    epidemiology of unintentional injuries will not be funded under this 
    announcement.
        A more thorough discussion of methodologies for conducting 
    prevention effectiveness research is presented in ``A Framework for 
    Assessing the Effectiveness of Disease and Injury Prevention,'' (CDC 
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, March 27, 1992, Volume 41, 
    Number RR-3, pp. 5-11) and in ``Assessing the Effectiveness of Disease 
    and Injury Prevention Programs: Costs and Consequences'\5\ (CDC 
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, August 18, 1995, Vol. 44, No. 
    RR10). To receive information on these reports see the section Where to 
    Obtain Additional Information.
        In acute care there is programmatic interest in intensifying the 
    role of the hospital emergency department and inpatient hospital trauma 
    services in public health surveillance (e.g., emergency department 
    surveillance systems, inpatient trauma registries), clinical prevention 
    services (e.g., protocols, interventions, and referrals for patients 
    injured in interpersonal violence or identified as alcohol drinkers who 
    drink at a hazardous level), evaluation of acute care effectiveness and 
    costs (e.g., studies of trauma care systems in terms of their impact on 
    morbidity and disability, assessments of treatment modalities that are 
    used conventionally or are emerging rapidly in mainstream clinical 
    practice).
        (1) There is interest in establishing electronic linkages and 
    common data elements across clinical information and public health 
    surveillance systems (e.g., incorporating NCIPC's Data Elements for 
    Emergency Department Systems, Release 1.0 in distributed record 
    systems) to facilitate reporting of injury incidence and outcome data. 
    There is interest in developing or further refining measures of injury 
    severity (e.g., indices that stratify injuries by anatomic severity to 
    facilitate evaluation of
    
    [[Page 66874]]
    
    trauma care processes and outcomes. Acute care-based, public health 
    surveillance systems are most valuable where they provide comprehensive 
    coverage of defined populations, are used to identify injury causes, 
    risk factors, treatments and outcomes, and lend themselves to 
    developing or refining clinical and epidemiologic measures of injuries 
    including their severity and costs. Information on obtaining Data 
    Elements for Emergency Department Systems, Release 1.0, can be found 
    under the section Where to Obtain Additional Information.
        (2) There is interest in evaluating the effectiveness and costs of 
    programs that identify patients at high risk for subsequent injury and 
    provide on-site interventions or referrals to further define the role 
    of clinical prevention services in acute care settings. There is 
    interest in research that evaluates ways to overcome barriers to 
    service provision in emergency departments and inpatient trauma 
    services to encourage greater use of clinical prevention services shown 
    to be effective and economical. Acute care practitioners are uniquely 
    positioned to help reduce or eliminate injury risk factors in the 
    patient populations they serve. In emergency departments and inpatient 
    trauma services there are opportunities to introduce or extend clinical 
    prevention services (e.g., screening and brief intervention for 
    patients with mild to moderate alcohol problems and identification and 
    referral of patients with severe alcohol problems to specialized 
    alcohol treatment services).
        (3) There is interest in comprehensive evaluations of the 
    effectiveness of trauma care systems (e.g., baseline and follow-up 
    study of State or regional trauma care systems that identifies the 
    system's impact on special populations such as children and the elderly 
    as well as overall system effectiveness). There is interest in 
    systematic studies in people of standard ways of delivering acute care 
    as well as new interventions, particularly where key questions persist 
    about benefits, risks, and costs (e.g., clinical trials of procedures, 
    medications, or protocols used in trauma care). Systematic, 
    empirically-based studies of effectiveness and costs are needed to 
    evaluate poison control systems, trauma care systems, and specific 
    diagnostic and therapeutic interventions currently used or rapidly 
    emerging in acute care of injured persons.
        In disability prevention, there is programmatic interest in 
    community-based research to prevent the occurrence and reduce the 
    severity of disabilities or other adverse outcomes among persons with 
    traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI). Adverse 
    outcomes include secondary conditions such as pressure ulcers and 
    contractures; cognitive, behavioral, or psychological disorders; and 
    other definable conditions associated with TBI or SCI. Research topics 
    relating to TBI or SCI must include any of the following:
        (1) Identifying risk factors associated with adverse outcomes 
    following rehabilitation.
        (2) Developing or evaluating interventions that are delivered in 
    the community setting or as part of outpatient rehabilitation care to 
    prevent or minimize the impact of adverse outcomes or secondary 
    conditions.
        (3) Defining the incidence of and adverse outcomes associated with 
    mild TBI (i.e., nonfatal TBI not resulting in hospitalization) in a 
    defined geopolitical population. Research proposals may address all age 
    groups or may be limited to children and adolescents. Alcohol and drug 
    use or dependence can be among a range of outcomes considered, but 
    should not be the primary focus of the project.
        (4) Defining patterns of post acute care among persons with SCI or 
    TBI resulting in hospitalization, using population-based data. The 
    evolving nature of health care delivery may have changed the 
    availability of rehabilitation, the location where rehabilitative 
    services are delivered, the timing of services received, and the length 
    of the rehabilitation period. Research in this area should define the 
    type of facility where rehabilitation services are received, timing of 
    rehabilitation service delivery, length of rehabilitation period, and 
    payment source for services.
        Disability prevention proposals primarily addressing alcohol and 
    other drug use or dependence will not be funded under this 
    announcement.
        In biomechanics, there is programmatic interest in traumatic brain 
    and spinal cord injury (TBI/SCI). This interest includes the 
    biomechanical evaluation of intervention concepts and strategies (e.g., 
    multi-use recreational helmets, mouth and face protection devices for 
    athletes, energy-absorbing playground surfaces, hip pads, motor vehicle 
    side impact and rollover countermeasures, etc.). There is special 
    interest in defining human tolerance limits for injury among very young 
    children, women, and older persons; the development of biofidelic 
    models to elucidate injury physiology and pharmacologic, surgical, 
    rehabilitation, and other interventions; improvements in injury 
    assessment technology; understanding impact injury mechanisms; and 
    quantifying injury-related biomechanical responses for critical areas 
    of the human body (e.g., brain and vertebral injury with spinal cord 
    involvement). Consideration will also be given to the biomechanics of 
    thoracic and abdominal viscera, musculature and joints including the 
    articular cartilage, tendons and ligaments.
    
    Reporting Requirements
    
        An original and two copies of the financial status and progress 
    reports are due 90 days after the end of each budget period. Final 
    financial status and progress reports are due 90 days after the end of 
    the project period.
    
    Application Content
    
        Applications for injury control research grants should include:
        A. The project's focus that justifies the research needs and 
    describes the scientific basis for the research, the expected outcome, 
    and the relevance of the findings to reduce injury morbidity, 
    mortality, disability, and economic losses. This focus should be based 
    on recommendations in Healthy People 2000; Injury In America; Injury 
    Prevention: Meeting the Challenge; and Cost of Injury and should seek 
    creative approaches that will contribute to a national program for 
    injury control.
        B. Specific, measurable, and time-framed objectives.
        C. A detailed plan describing the methods by which the objectives 
    will be achieved, including their sequence. A comprehensive evaluation 
    plan is an essential component of the application.
        D. A description of the grant's principal investigator's role and 
    responsibilities.
        E. A description of all the project staff regardless of their 
    funding source. It should include their title, qualifications, 
    experience, percentage of time each will devote to the project, as well 
    as that portion of their salary to be paid by the grant.
        F. A description of those activities related to, but not supported 
    by the grant.
        G. A description of the involvement of other entities that will 
    relate to the proposed project, if applicable. It should include 
    commitments of support and a clear statement of their roles.
        H. A detailed first year's budget for the grant with future annual 
    projections, if relevant. Awards will be made for project periods of up 
    to three years.
        I. Applicants must identify the principal injury phase (prevention, 
    acute care, rehabilitation) discipline
    
    [[Page 66875]]
    
    (biomechanics, epidemiology) or type of injury (intentional, 
    unintentional) upon which their project focuses.
        An applicant organization has the option of having specific salary 
    and fringe benefit amounts for individuals omitted from the copies of 
    the application which are made available to outside reviewing groups. 
    To exercise this option: on the original and five copies of the 
    application, the applicant must use asterisks to indicate those 
    individuals for whom salaries and fringe benefits are not shown; the 
    subtotals must still be shown. In addition, the applicant must submit 
    an additional copy of page four of Form PHS-398, completed in full, 
    with the salary and fringe amounts shown. This budget page will be 
    reserved for internal staff use only.
    
    Evaluation Criteria
    
        Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed by CDC staff for 
    completeness and responsiveness as outlined under the previous heading, 
    Program Requirements (A-E). Incomplete applications and applications 
    that are not responsive will be returned to the applicant without 
    further consideration. Applications that are complete and responsive 
    may be subjected to a preliminary evaluation by a peer review group to 
    determine if the application is of sufficient technical and scientific 
    merit to warrant further review (triage); the CDC will withdraw from 
    further consideration applications judged to be noncompetitive and 
    promptly notify the principal investigator/program director and the 
    official signing for the applicant organization. Those applications 
    judged to be competitive will be further evaluated by a dual review 
    process. Awards will be made based on priority score ranking by the 
    Injury Research Grants Review Committee (IRGRC), programmatic 
    priorities and needs as determined by the Advisory Committee for Injury 
    Prevention and Control, and the availability of funds.
        A. The first review will be a peer review conducted by the IRGRC on 
    all applications. Factors to be considered will include:
        1. The specific aims of the research project, i.e., the broad long-
    term objectives, the intended accomplishment of the specific research 
    proposal, and the hypothesis to be tested.
        2. The background of the proposal, i.e., the basis for the present 
    proposal, the critical evaluation of existing knowledge, and specific 
    identification of the injury control knowledge gaps which the proposal 
    is intended to fill.
        3. The significance and originality from a scientific or technical 
    standpoint of the specific aims of the proposed research, including the 
    adequacy of the theoretical and conceptual framework for the research.
        4. For competitive renewal applications, the progress made during 
    the prior project period. For new applications, (optional) the progress 
    of preliminary studies pertinent to the application.
        5. The adequacy of the proposed research design, approaches, and 
    methodology to carry out the research, including quality assurance 
    procedures, plan for data management, and statistical analysis plan.
        6. The extent to which the research findings will lead to feasible, 
    cost-effective injury interventions.
        7. The extent to which the evaluation plan will allow the 
    measurement of progress toward the achievement of the stated 
    objectives.
        8. Qualifications, adequacy, and appropriateness of personnel to 
    accomplish the proposed activities.
        9. The degree of commitment and cooperation of other interested 
    parties (as evidenced by letters detailing the nature and extent of the 
    involvement).
        10. The reasonableness of the proposed budget to the proposed 
    research and demonstration program.
        11. Adequacy of existing and proposed facilities and resources.
        B. The second review will be conducted by the Advisory Committee 
    for Injury Prevention and Control. The factors to be considered will 
    include:
        1. The results of the peer review.
        2. The significance of the proposed activities in relation to the 
    priorities and objectives stated in Healthy People 2000; Injury in 
    America; Injury Prevention; Meeting the Challenge; and Cost of Injury.
        3. National needs.
        4. Program balance among the three phases of injury control: 
    prevention, acute care, and rehabilitation; the major disciplines of 
    injury control: biomechanics and epidemiology; target populations 
    (e.g., adolescents, children, racial and ethnic minorities, rural 
    residents, farm families, and people with low incomes); and
        5. Budgetary considerations.
        C. Continued Funding:
        Continuation awards made after FY 1998, but within the project 
    period, will be made on the basis of the availability of funds and the 
    following criteria:
        1. The accomplishments reflected in the progress report of the 
    continuation application indicate that the applicant is meeting 
    previously stated objectives or milestones contained in the project's 
    annual workplan and satisfactory progress demonstrated through 
    presentations at work-in-progress monitoring workshops.
        2. The objectives for the new budget period are realistic, 
    specific, and measurable.
        3. The methods described will clearly lead to achievement of these 
    objectives.
        4. The evaluation plan will allow management to monitor whether the 
    methods are effective.
        5. The budget request is clearly explained, adequately justified, 
    reasonable and consistent with the intended use of grant funds.
    
    Executive Order 12372 Review
    
        Applications are not subject to the review requirements of 
    Executive Order 12372.
    
    Public Health System Reporting Requirement
    
        This program is not subject to the Public Health System Reporting 
    Requirements.
    
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number
    
        The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number is 93.136.
    
    Other Requirements
    
    A. Human Subjects
    
        If the proposed project involves research on human subjects, the 
    applicant must comply with the Department of Health and Human Services 
    Regulations, 45 CFR Part 46, regarding the protection of human 
    subjects. Assurance must be provided to demonstrate that the project 
    will be subject to initial and continuing review by an appropriate 
    institutional review committee. The applicant will be responsible for 
    providing assurance in accordance with the appropriate guidelines and 
    forms provided in the application kit.
    
    B. Animal Subjects
    
        If the proposed project involves research on animal subjects, the 
    applicant must comply with the ``PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of 
    Laboratory Animals by Awardee Institutions.'' An applicant organization 
    proposing to use vertebrate animals in PHS-supported activities must 
    file an Animal Welfare Assurance with the Office for Protection from 
    Research Risks at the National Institutes of Health.
    
    C. Women, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
    
        It is the policy of the CDC to ensure that women and racial and 
    ethnic groups will be included in CDC
    
    [[Page 66876]]
    
    supported research projects involving human subjects, whenever feasible 
    and appropriate. Racial and ethnic groups are those defined in OMB 
    Directive No. 15 and include American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, 
    Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian or other 
    Pacific Islander. Applicants shall ensure that women, racial and ethnic 
    minority populations are appropriately represented in applications for 
    research involving human subjects. Where clear and compelling rationale 
    exist that inclusion is inappropriate or not feasible, this situation 
    must be explained as part of the application.
        In conducting the review of applications for scientific merit, 
    review groups will evaluate proposed plans for inclusion of minorities 
    and both sexes as part of the scientific assessment and assigned score. 
    This policy does not apply to research studies when the investigator 
    cannot control the race, ethnicity and/or sex of subjects. Further 
    guidance to this policy is contained in the Federal Register, Vol. 60, 
    No. 179, Friday, September 15, 1995, pages 47947-47951.
    
    D. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        Projects that involve the collection of information from 10 or more 
    individuals and funded by this grant program will be subject to review 
    by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act.
    
    Application Submission and Deadlines
    
    A. Preapplication Letter of Intent
    
        Although not a prerequisite of application, a non-binding letter of 
    intent-to-apply is requested from potential applicants. The letter 
    should be submitted to the Grants Management Specialist (whose address 
    is reflected in section B, ``Applications''). It should be postmarked 
    no later than two months prior to the planned submission deadline, 
    (e.g., January 26 for February 25 submission). The letter should 
    identify the announcement number, name the principal investigator, and 
    specify the injury phase or discipline addressed by the proposed 
    project. The letter of intent does not influence review or funding 
    decisions, but it will enable CDC to plan the review more efficiently, 
    and will ensure that each applicant receives timely and relevant 
    information prior to application submission.
    
    B. Applications
    
        Applicants should use Form PHS-398 and adhere to the ERRATA 
    Instruction Sheet for Form PHS-398 contained in the Grant Application 
    Kit. Please submit an original and five copies on or before February 
    25, 1998 to: Lisa G. Tamaroff, Grants Management Specialist, Grants 
    Management Branch, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease 
    Control and Prevention (CDC), 255 East Paces Ferry Road, NE., Room 300, 
    Atlanta, GA 30305.
    
    C. Deadlines
    
        1. Applications shall be considered as meeting the deadline if they 
    are either:
        A. Received at the above address on or before the deadline date, or
        B. Sent on or before the deadline date to the above address, and 
    are received in time for the review process. Applicants should request 
    a legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark or obtain a legibly dated 
    receipt from a commercial carrier or the U.S. Postal Service. Private 
    metered postmarks shall not be acceptable as proof of timely mailings.
        2. Applications that do not meet the criteria above are considered 
    late applications and will be returned to the applicant.
    
    Where To Obtain Additional Information
    
    Application Packet
    
        To receive additional written information call 1-888-GRANTS4. You 
    will be asked to leave your name, address, and phone number and will 
    need to refer to Announcement #816. CDC will not send application kits 
    by facsimile or express mail. Please refer to Announcement #816 when 
    requesting information and submitting an application.
    
    Internet
    
        This and other CDC announcements are also available through the CDC 
    homepage on the Internet. The address for the CDC homepage is [http://
    www.cdc.gov]. For your convenience, you may be able to retrieve a copy 
    of the PHS Form 398 from [http://www.nih.gov80/grants/funding].
    
    Business Management Technical Information
    
        If you need further assistance after reviewing the contents of the 
    documents business management information may be obtained from Lisa 
    Tamaroff, Grants Management Specialist, Procurement and Grants Office, 
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 255 East Paces Ferry 
    Road, NE., Mailstop E-13, Atlanta, GA 30305, telephone (404) 842-6796 
    or Internet:lgt1@cdc.gov.
    
    Programmatic Technical Assistance
    
        If you have programmatic question you may obtain information from 
    Ted Jones, Program Manager, Extramural Research Grants Branch, National 
    Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control 
    and Prevention (CDC), Mailstop K-58, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Atlanta, 
    GA 30341-3724, telephone (770) 488-4824, Internet: tmj1@cdc.gov.
        Potential applicants may obtain a copy of Healthy People 2000 (Full 
    Report, Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or Healthy People 2000 (Summary 
    Report, Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of 
    Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325, 
    telephone (202) 512-1800.
        The document, ``Data Elements for Emergency Department System, 
    Release 1.0'', and subsequent revisions can be found at the National 
    Center for Injury Prevention and Control Web site: http://www.cdc.gov/
    ncipc/pub-res/deedspage.htm.
        Information for obtaining copies of Injury in America (National 
    Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20418--
    ISBN0-309-03545-7); Injury Prevention: Meeting the Challenge 
    (supplement to the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, (Vol. 5, 
    no. 3, 1989); Cost of Injury (Dorothy P. Rice, Ellen J. MacKenzie, and 
    Associates, Cost of Injury: A Report to the Congress, San Francisco, 
    California: Institute for Health and Aging, University of California 
    and Injury Prevention Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University, 
    1989); A Framework for Assessing the Effectiveness of Disease and 
    Injury Prevention,'' (CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, March 
    27, 1992, Volume 41, Number RR-3, pp. 5-11); and in ``Assessing the 
    Effectiveness of Disease and Injury Prevention Programs: Costs and 
    Consequences'' (CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, August 18, 
    1995, Vol. 44, No. RR10) is included on a separate sheet with the 
    application kit.
    
        Dated: December 16, 1997.
    Joseph R. Carter,
    Acting Associate Director, Management and Operations, Centers for 
    Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
    [FR Doc. 97-33297 Filed 12-19-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-18-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/22/1997
Department:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-33297
Pages:
66871-66876 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Number 816
PDF File:
97-33297.pdf