98-33911. Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Regarding the Calculation of the Short Option Adjustment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 23, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 71179-71181]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-33911]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-40800; File No. SR-OCC-98-11]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; 
    Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Regarding the Calculation of 
    the Short Option Adjustment
    
    December 16, 1998.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on September 10, 1998, The 
    Options Clearing Corp. (``OCC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
    Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
    Items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared primarily by 
    OCC. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments from 
    interested persons on the proposed rule change.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        Under the proposed rule change, OCC will amend the short option 
    adjustment contained in OCC's Theoretical Intermarket Margin System 
    (``TIMS'') to enable OCC to use a ``sliding scale'' to calculate short 
    option adjustment amounts.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, OCC included statements 
    concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
    discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
    text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
    Item IV below. OCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A), 
    (B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of such 
    statements.\2\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries 
    prepared by OCC.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        Under the proposed rule change, OCC will amend Rules 601 and 602 to
    
    [[Page 71180]]
    
    provide OCC with more flexibility in calculating the amount of the 
    short option adjustment.\3\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ OCC Rule 601 describes TIMS as it applies to equity options 
    (``equity TIMS'') and OCC Rule 602 describes TIMS as it applies to 
    non-equity options (``non-equity TIMS'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        OCC requires its clearing members to adjust their margin deposits 
    with OCC in the morning of every business day based on OCC's overnight 
    calculations. OCC imposes a margin requirement on short positions in 
    each clearing member account and gives margin credit for unsegregated 
    long positions.\4\ Under TIMS, the margin for positions in a class 
    group is based on premium levels at the close of trading on the 
    preceding day and is then increased or decreased by the additional 
    margin amount for that class group.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ A long position is unsegregated for OCC's purposes if OCC 
    has a lien on the position (i.e., has recourse to the value of the 
    position in the event that the clearing member does not perform an 
    obligation to OCC). Long positions in firm accounts and market-maker 
    accounts are unsegregated. Long positions in the clearing member's 
    customers' account are unsegregated only if the clearing member 
    submits instructions to that effect in accordance with Rule 611.
        \5\ For purposes of equity TIMS, a class group consists of all 
    put and call options, all BOUNDS, and all stock loan and borrow 
    positions relating to the same underlying security. For purposes of 
    non-equity TIMS, a class group consists of all put and call options, 
    certain market baskets, and commodity options and futures (that are 
    subject to margin at OCC because of a cross-margining program with a 
    commodity clearing organization) that relate to the same underlying 
    asset. A NEO TIMS class group may also contain stock loan baskets 
    and stock borrow baskets.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        TIMS calculates additional margin amounts using options price 
    theory. TIMS first calculates the theoretical liquidating value for the 
    positions in each class group assuming either an increase or decrease 
    in the market value of the underlying asset in an amount equal to the 
    applicable margin interval. The margin interval is the maximum one day 
    price movement that OCC wants to protect against in the price of the 
    underlying asset.\6\ Margin intervals are determined separately for 
    each underlying interest to reflect the volatility in the price of the 
    underlying interest.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ Some combinations of positions can present a greater net 
    theoretical liquidating value at an intermediate value than at 
    either of the endpoint values. As a result, TIMS also calculates the 
    theoretical liquidating value for the positions in each class group 
    assuming intermediate market values of the underlying asset.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        TIMS then selects the theoretical liquidating value that represents 
    the greatest decrease (where the actual liquidating value is positive) 
    or increase (where the actual liquidating value is negative) in 
    liquidating value compared with the actual liquidating value based on 
    the premium levels at the close of trading on the preceding day. The 
    difference between that theoretical liquidating value and the actual 
    liquidating value is the additional margin amount for that class group 
    unless the class group is subject to the short option adjustment.
        For net short positions \7\ in deep out of the money options, 
    little or no change in value would be predicted given a change in value 
    of the underlying interest equal to the applicable margin interval. As 
    a result, TIMS would calculate additional margin amounts of zero or 
    close to zero for deep out of the money options. However, volatile 
    markets could cause such positions to become near to or in the money 
    and thereby could create increased risk to OCC. OCC protects against 
    such risk by incorporating into the additional margin calculation a 
    margin cushion known as the short option adjustment.\8\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ A net position in an option series in an account is the 
    position resulting from offsetting the gross unsegregated long 
    position in that series against the gross short position in that 
    series. After netting, an account will reflect a net short position 
    or a net long position for each series of options held in the 
    account.
        \8\ The short option adjustment is described in Rule 
    601(c)(1)(C)(1) for equity options and Rule 602 (c)(1)(ii)(C)(1) for 
    non-equity options. OCC recently amended Interpretation .06 to Rule 
    602 so that net short non-equity option positions can be paired off 
    against net long non-equity positions whose underlying interests 
    exhibit price correlation of at least seventy percent. Securities 
    Exchange Act Release No. 40515 (September 30, 1988), 63 FR 53970.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Currently, the short option adjustment requires a minimum 
    additional margin amount equal to twenty-five percent of the applicable 
    margin interval for all unpaired\9\ net short positions in options 
    series for which the ordinary calculation of the additional margin 
    requirement would be less than twenty-five percent of the applicable 
    margin interval. OCC believes that this methodology requires clearing 
    members to deposit margin in excess of the risk presented by some 
    unpaired net short positions in out of the money options.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ The term unpaired is defined in Interpretation .04 to Rule 
    601 for equity options and Interpretation .06 to Rule 602 for non-
    equity options.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        OCC believes that this excess margin requirement can be attributed 
    essentially to two causes. First, some short positions are so far out 
    of the money that even an extreme market move would not cause them to 
    prevent risk to OCC commensurate with a short option adjustment 
    equivalent to twenty-five percent of the applicable margin interval. To 
    illustrate, on October 27, 1997, the S&P 500 Index fell 6.9% to 876.98 
    from its closing value of 941.64 on October 24, 1997.\10\ There was a 
    series of SPX 11/97 put options with an exercise price of 700 open on 
    that date. At the close of October 24, 1997, that series was 25.7% out 
    of the money and had a closing premium of $25.00. At the close on 
    October 27, 1997, that series was 20.2% out of the money and had a 
    closing premium of $56.25. The increase in the closing premium from 
    October 24 to October 27 was $31.25. In the absence of the short option 
    adjustment, TIMS would have required additional margin of $23.25. With 
    the short option adjustment, TIMS required additional margin of $875.00 
    (equal to the margin interval, which was 35 points, times the index 
    multiplier of 100, times 25%). Even in this extreme market move the 
    short option adjustment required far more collateral than OCC needed to 
    hedge the risk presented to it by unpaired short positions in this 
    series.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\ This market decline of 64.66 points was the 14th largest 
    one day percentage decline in the period from January 1930 through 
    June 1998, and it constituted a more extreme daily move than 99.9% 
    of the daily moves during this period. The decline on October 27, 
    1997, actually represents a more rigorous test of the short option 
    adjustment methodology than the market move on October 19, 1987. 
    There are several reasons for this, such as the option implied 
    volatility was so high on October 19, 1987, and the theoretical 
    additional margin levels calculated by TIMS generally exceeded the 
    alternative short option adjustment calculations.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Second, out of the money short call positions present less risk to 
    OCC than short put positions that are equally out of the money. This is 
    essentially because a market that moves sharply down (presenting risk 
    to OCC from short put positions) is generally associated with an 
    increase in option implied volatility whereas a market that moves 
    sharply up (presenting risk to OCC from short call positions) is 
    generally associated with a decrease in option implied volatility. 
    Other things being equal, an upward move in the market of a given size 
    creates less risk for OCC from short call positions than a downward 
    move in the market of the same size from short put positions. 
    Therefore, because TIMS employs a twenty-five percent short option 
    adjustment for both puts and calls, it tends to require excessive 
    additional margin particularly with respect to short call positions.
        To address these situations, the proposed rule change will 
    establish a sliding scale short option adjustment methodology. Using 
    the sliding scale, the short option adjustment percentage will be 
    applied to a particular series according to the extent to which the 
    series is out of the money. In addition, OCC will use different sliding 
    scales for put options and for call options.
        OCC believes that the margin required by these sliding scales 
    should be sufficient to protect it against the risks
    
    [[Page 71181]]
    
    presented by out of the money short positions even in extreme market 
    conditions. For example, in the illustration described above, the 
    sliding scale short option adjustment would still have required 
    additional margin of $350.00 (equal to the margin interval of 35 
    points, times the index multiplier of 100, times 10%, the applicable 
    percentage for a short put 25.7% out of the market) which is well in 
    excess of the risk presented to OCC by the short puts in the SPX 11/97 
    700 series.
        Under the proposed rule change, OCC will modify Rules 601 and 602 
    to provide that the short option adjustment to be applied to any 
    unpaired short position will be determined using a percentage that OCC 
    deems to be appropriate. A specific short option adjustment percentage 
    will not be included in the rules.\11\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\ A schedule of the sliding scales that OCC intends to use 
    initially is attached as Exhibit A to its filing, which is available 
    for inspection at the Commission's Public Reference Room and through 
    OCC. OCC will always specify a minimum short option adjustment 
    percentage. OCC will inform its members of the initial schedule of 
    the sliding scales through an Important Notice and will notify its 
    members of any changes to the schedule.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        OCC believes that this information provides appropriate flexibility 
    to make adjustments to the sliding scales from time to time as OCC 
    determines is warranted. OCC further believes that the proposed rule 
    change is consistent with the approach taken in Rule 60(c)(1)(C)(1) and 
    Rule 602(c)(1)(ii)(C)(1) which both permit OCC to use such formulas, 
    assumptions, and data as it deems appropriate for purposes of 
    calculating additional margin.
        OCC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with 
    Section 17A of the Act \12\ and the rules and regulations thereunder 
    because it furthers the public interest by reducing the 
    overcollateralization of certain short positions in deep out of the 
    money options. In addition, OCC believes that the proposed rule change 
    should remove an impediment to market liquidity while still providing 
    OCC with appropriate protection to the risks presented by short out of 
    the money option positions.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        OCC does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any 
    burden on competition.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
    
        Written comments were not and are not intended to be solicited with 
    respect to the proposed rule change, and none have been received.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing 
    for Commission Action
    
        Within thirty-five days of the date of publication of this notice 
    in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the 
    Commission may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds 
    such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so 
    finding or (ii) as to which OCC consents, the Commission will:
        (A) by order approve such proposed rule change or
        (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
    change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available 
    for inspection and coping at the principal office of OCC. All 
    submissions should refer to File No. SR-OCC-98-11 and should be 
    submitted by January 12, 1999.
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \13\ 17 CFR 200-30(a) (12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-33911 Filed 12-22-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/23/1998
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-33911
Pages:
71179-71181 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-40800, File No. SR-OCC-98-11
PDF File:
98-33911.pdf