97-33526. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to Extending the Pilot Injunctive Relief Rule  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 67423-67425]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-33526]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-39458; File No. SR-NASD-97-87]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
    Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the National 
    Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to Extending the Pilot 
    Injunctive Relief Rule
    
    December 17, 1997.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
    on December 8, 1997, the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
    Inc. (``NASD'' or ``Association'') filed with the Securities and 
    Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as 
    described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by 
    the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this 
    notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
    persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        NASD Regulatory is herewith filing a proposed rule change to extend 
    for six months the pilot injunctive relief rule, Rule 10335 (formerly 
    Section 47) of the Code of Arbitration Procedure (``Code'').
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
    proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
    proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
    the places specified in Item III below. The self-regulatory 
    organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C 
    below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        NASD Regulation's injunctive relief rule, Rule 10335 of the Code, 
    provides a procedure for obtaining injunctive relief in arbitration and 
    for expediting proceedings for injunctive relief in
    
    [[Page 67424]]
    
    intra-industry disputes. Rule 10335 took effect on January 3, 1996, for 
    a one-year pilot period. The initial pilot period was subsequently 
    extended on January 3, 1997 for another year in order to permit NASD 
    Regulation's Office of Dispute Resolution to gain additional experience 
    with the rule before determining whether the rule should be made 
    permanent, the pilot period should be extended, or the rule should be 
    permitted to terminate by its terms.\3\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38069 (December 20, 
    1996), 61 FR 68806 (December 30, 1996).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In September 1997, the NASD published a Notice to Members (97-59) 
    requesting comment on the rule.\4\ At that time, approximately 433 
    cases had been filed in which injunctive relief was sought pursuant to 
    the rule. The average number of days between filing and the 
    arbitrator's initial injunctive relief order was approximately 7.5 
    days. The majority of cases in which injunctive relief was sought 
    involved associated persons leaving one firm for another. In most but 
    not all cases, the associated person's former firm was the petitioner. 
    The Notice to Members sought comment on how the injunctive relief and 
    expedited proceedings work and how they could be improved, and 
    identified more than twenty specific questions based on previous 
    comments received from users of the rule. The comment period closed on 
    October 31, 1997. The NASD has received 19 comment letters in response 
    to the Notice to Members.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ A copy of Notice to Members 97-59 is attached as Exhibit 2 
    to the filing.
        \5\ The comment letters are attached as Exhibit 3 to the filing.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        On the basis of NASD Regulation's experience and the comments of 
    the participants, NASD Regulation believes that the procedures set 
    forth in Rule 10335 represent a significant improvement to the 
    procedures for resolving intra-industry disputes. However, NASD 
    Regulation also believes that additional time is necessary to 
    adequately review the comments received about the rule and to evaluate 
    how the Rule could be improved to meet the needs of the participants 
    more effectively.
        Accordingly, NASD Regulation is proposing to extend the injunctive 
    relief Rule as a pilot program for another six months. During the next 
    six months NASD Regulation will review the comments received in 
    response to Notice to Members 97-59, as well as comments from 
    arbitrators and NASD employees who have had experience with the 
    application of the rule, and will develop modifications or 
    interpretations of the Rule in response thereto.
        The NASD requests the Commission to find good cause, pursuant to 
    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, for approving the proposed rule change 
    prior to the thirtieth day after publication in the Federal Register. 
    Rule 10335 expires by its terms on January 3, 1998. As discussed above, 
    NASD Regulation believes that Rule 10335 represents a significant 
    improvement to the procedures for resolving intra-industry disputes, 
    and that an extension will permit more careful consideration of 
    modifications in response to comments. Accordingly, NASD Regulation 
    believes that it is in the interest of users of Rule 10335 for the 
    procedures to remain in effect without interruption.
    2. Statutory Basis
        NASD Regulation believes that the proposed rule change is 
    consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act \6\ in 
    that extending the effectiveness of the injunctive relief procedures 
    will serve the public interest by enhancing the satisfaction with the 
    arbitration process afforded by expeditious resolution of certain 
    disputes.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose 
    any burden on competition.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
    
        No written comments were either solicited or received.
    
    III. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the 
    Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be 
    available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the 
    NASD. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NASD-97-87 and should 
    be submitted by January 14, 1998.
    
    IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval 
    of Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Commission finds that the proposed rule change to extend the 
    pilot injunctive relief rule is consistent with the requirements of the 
    Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national 
    securities exchange, and particularly with Section 15A(b)(6) of the 
    Act.\7\ Rule 10335 is intended to provide a pilot system within the 
    NASD arbitration forum to process requests for temporary injunctive 
    relief. The Rule is intended principally to facilitate the disposition 
    of employment disputes and related disputes concerning whether 
    registered representatives who move to other firms may transfer their 
    accounts to their new firms. The Commission finds it is appropriate to 
    extend the pilot for six months. During that time the NASD Regulation 
    will be able to evaluate the success of the Rule, to adequately review 
    the comments received, and to determine whether to extend the pilot 
    further or make the Rule permanent.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule 
    change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of 
    notice of filing thereof in the Federal Register. The Commission 
    believes that accelerated approval of the proposal is appropriate 
    because members will continue to have the benefit of injunctive relief 
    in arbitration without interruption. The Rule was previously available 
    through the pilot and the Commission is extending the pilot for only 
    six months. The Commission believes, therefore, that granting 
    accelerated approval of the proposed rule change is consistent with 
    Section 15A of the Act.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) \8\ that the 
    proposed rule change (SR-NASD-97-87) is hereby approved on an 
    accelerated basis for a six-month pilot basis, through July 3, 1998.
    
        \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 67425]]
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-33526 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/24/1997
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-33526
Pages:
67423-67425 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-39458, File No. SR-NASD-97-87
PDF File:
97-33526.pdf