94-30398. Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Corporate Jets Model BAe 125- 1000A Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 27, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-30398]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: December 27, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 94-NM-67-AD; Amendment 39-9096; AD 94-25-12]
    
     
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Corporate Jets Model BAe 125-
    1000A Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Raytheon Corporate Jets Model BAe 125-1000A 
    series airplanes, that requires modification of the galley feeder 
    cables and toilet services fuse. This amendment is prompted by a report 
    that the gauge size of the existing galley feeder cable is not 
    compatible with the rating of the currently used toilet services fuse. 
    The actions specified by this AD are intended to ensure that the 
    subject cables are compatible with the toilet services fuse in order to 
    prevent overheating of the cables, which could result in smoke and fire 
    in the cabin.
    
    DATES: Effective on January 26, 1995.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of January 26, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information references in this AD may be 
    obtained from Raytheon Corporate Jets, Inc., 3 Bishops Square Street, 
    Albans Road West, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL109NE, United Kingdom. 
    This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration 
    (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, 
    SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 
    North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Schroeder, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 
    227-2148; fax (206) 227-1320.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Raytheon Corporate Jets 
    Model BAe 125-1000A series airplanes was published in the Federal 
    Register on July 5, 1994 (59 FR 34396). That action proposed to require 
    modification of the galley feeder cables and toilet services fuse.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response 
    to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
        The FAA has recently reviewed the figures it has used over the past 
    several years in calculating the economic impact of AD activity. In 
    order to account for various inflationary costs in the airline 
    industry, the FAA has determined that it is necessary to increase the 
    labor rate used in these calculations from $55 per work hour to $60 per 
    work hour. The economic impact information, below has been revised to 
    reflect this increase in the specified hourly labor rate.
        As a result of recent communications with the Air Transport 
    Association (ATA) of America, the FAA has learned that, in general, 
    some operators may misunderstand the legal effect of AD's on airplanes 
    that are identified in the applicability provision of the AD, but that 
    have been altered or repaired in the area addressed by the AD. Under 
    these circumstances, at least one operator appears to have incorrectly 
    assumed that its airplane was not subject to an AD. On the contrary, 
    all airplanes identified in the applicability provision of an AD are 
    legally subject to the AD. If an airplane has been altered or repaired 
    in the affected area in such a way as to affect compliance with the AD, 
    the owner or operator is required to obtain FAA approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance with the AD, in accordance with the 
    paragraph of each AD that provides for such approvals. A note has been 
    added to this final rule to clarify this requirement. The FAA has 
    determined that this addition will neither increase the economic burden 
    on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
        The FAA estimates that 4 airplanes of U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 16 work hours per 
    airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor 
    rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will cost approximately $500 
    per airplane. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the AD 
    on U.S. operators is estimated to be $5,840, or $1,460 per airplane.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of 
    small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A 
    final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained 
    in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket 
    at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    94-25-12 Raytheon Corporate Jets, Inc.: Amendment 39-9096. Docket 
    94-NM-67-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model BAe 125-1000A series airplanes; as listed 
    in Hawker-Raytheon Corporate Jets Service Bulletin SB.25-76-
    25A698A&B, dated February 10, 1994, and Hawker-Raytheon Corporate 
    Jets Service Bulletin SB.25-75-25A699A, dated February 10, 1994; 
    certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (c) to request approval from the FAA. This 
    approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
    eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions necessary to 
    address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request 
    should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent smoke and fire in the cabin due to overheating of 
    galley cables, accomplish the following:
        (a) For airplanes listed in Hawker-Raytheon Corporate Jets 
    Service Bulletin SB.25-76-25A698A&B, dated February 10, 1994: With 
    100 hours time-in-service after the effective date of this AD, 
    install Modification 25A698A&B in accordance with that service 
    bulletin.
        (b) For airplanes listed in Hawker-Raytheon Corporate Jets 
    Service Bulletin SB.25-75-25A699A, dated February 10, 1994: Within 
    100 hours time-in-service after the effective date of this AD, 
    install Modification 25A699A in accordance with that service 
    bulletin.
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, AMS-113, 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (e) The installation shall be done in accordance with Hawker-
    Raytheon Corporate Jets Service Bulletin SB.25-76-25A698A&B, dated 
    February 10, 1994, or Hawker-Raytheon Corporate Jets Service 
    Bulletin SB.25-75-25A699A, dated February 10, 1994, as applicable. 
    This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
    51. Copies may be obtained from Raytheon Corporate Jets, Inc., 
    Customer Support Department, Adams Field, P.O. Box 3356, Little 
    Rock, Arkansas 72203. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or 
    at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, 
    NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (f) This amendment becomes effective on January 26, 1995.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 5, 1994.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-30398 Filed 12-23-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/26/1995
Published:
12/27/1994
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-30398
Dates:
Effective on January 26, 1995.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: December 27, 1994, Docket No. 94-NM-67-AD, Amendment 39-9096, AD 94-25-12
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13