94-31748. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 27, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-31748]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: December 27, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 94-NM-143-AD]
    
     
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A320 series 
    airplanes. This proposal would require modification of the trimmable 
    horizontal stabilizer (THS). This proposal is prompted by a report of 
    leakage from some of the hydraulic pipe fittings after a lightning 
    strike. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to 
    prevent such leakage from hydraulic pipe fittings, which could result 
    in the loss of the pilot's ability to control the moveable surfaces of 
    the THS.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by February 6, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 94-NM-143-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this 
    location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 
    Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Slotte, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 
    227-2797; fax (206) 227-1320.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 94-NM-143-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 94-NM-143-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the 
    airworthiness authority for France, recently notified the FAA that an 
    unsafe condition may exist on certain Airbus Model A320 series 
    airplanes. The DGAC advises that one operator found leakage from some 
    of the hydraulic pipe fittings on one airplane after a lightning 
    strike. Investigation revealed that the electrical bonding of the 
    hydraulic pipe fittings and actuator servo control units of the 
    trimmable horizontal stabilizer (THS) has insufficient protection from 
    a lightning strike. This condition, if not corrected, could result in 
    the loss of the pilot's ability to control the moveable surfaces of the 
    THS, which could adversely affect the controllability of the airplane.
        Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-29-1058, dated July 16, 
    1993, which describes procedures for modification of the THS. This 
    modification involves installing bonding leads across all return 
    hydraulic pipe fittings in the THS area and across the actuator return 
    line elbows. This modification also involves replacing the existing 
    clamps with items of increased electrical conductivity.
        Airbus has also issued Service Bulletin A320-27-1041, Revision 2, 
    dated April 20, 1994, which describes procedures for modification of 
    the THS. This modification involves installing bonding plates and leads 
    between the elevator and the THS, and bonding leads between the 
    actuator bodies and the THS bonding strip. This modification also 
    connects bonding leads to the return hydraulic pipes across all the 
    fittings in the THS area.
        Accomplishment of both of these modifications will improve the 
    electrical bonding protection on the THS. The DGAC classified these 
    service bulletins as mandatory and issued French AD 93-123-046 (B), 
    dated August 4, 1993, in order to assure the continued airworthiness of 
    these airplanes in France.
        This airplane model is manufactured in France and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed 
    of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of 
    the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD 
    action is necessary for products of this type design that are 
    certificated for operation in the United States.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered 
    in the United States, the proposed AD would require modification of the 
    THS. The actions would be required to be accomplished in accordance 
    with the service bulletins described previously.
        As a result of recent communications with the Air Transport 
    Association (ATA) of America, the FAA has learned that, in general, 
    some operators may misunderstand the legal effect of AD's on airplanes 
    that are identified in the applicability provision of the AD, but that 
    have been altered or repaired in the area addressed by the AD. The FAA 
    points out that all airplanes identified in the applicability provision 
    of an AD are legally subject to the AD. If an airplane has been altered 
    or repaired in the affected area in such a way as to affect compliance 
    with the AD, the owner or operator is required to obtain FAA approval 
    for an alternative method of compliance with the AD, in accordance with 
    the paragraph of each AD that provides for such approvals. A note has 
    been included in this notice to clarify this requirement.
        The FAA estimates that 99 airplanes of U.S. registry would be 
    affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 13 work 
    hours per airplane to accomplish the proposed actions, and that the 
    average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts would be 
    supplied by the manufacturer at no cost to the operators. Based on 
    these figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. 
    operators is estimated to be $77,220, or $780 per airplane.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Airbus Industrie: Docket 94-NM-143-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model A320 series airplanes on which Airbus 
    Modification 22621 (reference Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1041) 
    and Airbus Modification 23556 (reference Airbus Service Bulletin 
    A320-29-1058) have not been installed, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (b) to request approval from the FAA. This 
    approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
    eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions necessary to 
    address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request 
    should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously. To prevent loss of the pilot's ability to control the 
    moveable surfaces of the THS, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 3,500 flight hours after the effective date of this 
    AD, modify the trimmable horizontal stabilizer in accordance with 
    Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1058, July 16, 1993, and Airbus 
    Service Bulletin A320-27-1041, Revision 2, dated April 20, 1994.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 20, 1994.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-31748 Filed 12-23-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/27/1994
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
94-31748
Dates:
Comments must be received by February 6, 1995.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: December 27, 1994, Docket No. 94-NM-143-AD
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13