94-31814. Proposed Administrative Order On Consent; Petrochem Recycling Corp./Ekotek, Inc. Site, Salt Lake City, UT  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 27, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-31814]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: December 27, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [FRL-5128-8]
    
     
    
    Proposed Administrative Order On Consent; Petrochem Recycling 
    Corp./Ekotek, Inc. Site, Salt Lake City, UT
    
    AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).
    
    ACTION: Proposed de minimis settlements.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of section 122(i)(1) of 
    the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability 
    Act, as amended (CERCLA), notice is hereby given of two proposed de 
    minimis settlements under section 122(g) concerning the Petrochem 
    Recycling Corp./Ekotek, Inc., Site in Salt Lake City, Utah (the Site). 
    The first proposed Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) (Settlement 
    #1) requires 15 potentially responsible parties (PRP) to pay an 
    aggregate total of $231,922.08 to resolve their liability to the EPA 
    related to response actions taken or to be taken at the Site. The terms 
    of the proposed AOC for these settlements are identical to that 
    recently approved and made effective by EPA November 16, 1994 (See 
    Federal Register notice, dated September 2, 1994). Additionally, notice 
    is given of four settlements that have changed from EPA's previous de 
    minimis settlement notice. The second proposed AOC (Settlement #2) 
    requires 22 potentially responsible parties (PRP) to pay an aggregate 
    total of $357,111.00 to resolve their liability to the EPA related to 
    response actions taken or to be taken at the Site. The proposed AOC for 
    Settlement #2 involves settlement payments adjusted in consideration of 
    the parties' ability to pay.
    
    DATES: Comments must be submitted by no later than January 26, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Greg Phoebe (8HWM-SR), 
    Enforcement Specialist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
    VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202-2405, and 
    should refer to: In the matter of Petrochem/Ekotek De Minimis 
    Settlement.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    James M. Stearns, Office of Regional Counsel, EPA Region VIII, at (303) 
    294-7197.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of section 122(g) De Minimis 
    Settlements: Settlement #1: In accordance with section 122(i)(1) of 
    CERCLA, notice is hereby given that the terms of an Administrative 
    Order on Consent (AOC) have been agreed to by the following 15 parties, 
    for the following amounts: Option A Settlements: Moser Engine Service 
    ($772.20); The Walt Disney Company ($69,634.00); B&W Garage, Inc. 
    ($5,384.70); Davis County School District ($30,632.96); Transmission 
    Limited ($11,985.30); Reo Mc Murdie ($1,173.44); Merritt Chevron 
    ($8,059.68); Guy F. Atkinson Construction Company ($26,766.20); W&K 
    Mobile Services, Inc. ($8,260.40); Western Drive Train ($9,788.96); and 
    Industrial Compliance (3120.81). Option B Settlements: Polyclad 
    Laminates ($16,335.00); Gus Paulos Chevrolet ($12,753.00); Holladay 
    Conoco (Vaughn Smith Conoco) ($7,215.65); and Standard Transportation 
    ($20,039.78).
        By the terms of the proposed AOC, these PRPs will together pay 
    $231,922.08 to the Hazardous Substance Superfund (Superfund). The 
    $231,922.08 represents approximately 0.3% of the total anticipated 
    costs for the Site upon which this settlement was based.
        In addition, the following settlements represent changes from the 
    de minimis settlements listed in EPA's Federal Register notice of 
    September 2, 1994, under the AOC identical to the settlement noticed 
    herein under Settlement #1: Option A Settlements: Allied Petroleum of 
    Reno ($51,384.32). Option B Settlements: ASF-24 (U.S. Army) 
    ($3,528.36); Discount Tire and Automotive, Inc. ($5,550.50); For 
    Douglas (Transportation Motor Pool) ($20,092.05); and Parley's Way 
    Conoco ($4,701.60). EPA has determined that it is necessary to reissue 
    the public notice for these settlements.
        In exchange for payment, U.S. EPA will provide the settling parties 
    with a covenant not to sue for liability under sections 106 and 107(a) 
    of CERCLA, including liability for EPA past costs, the one-time cost of 
    remedy, future EPA oversight costs, future operation and maintenance of 
    the as-yet unselected remedy, and under section 7003 of the Solid Waste 
    Disposal Act, as amended (also known as the Resources Conservation and 
    Recovery Act (RCRA)).
        The amount that each individual PRP will pay, as shown above for 
    Settlement #1, equals $2.97 multiplied by the number of gallons of 
    waste the party sent to the Site (Base Amount), plus a premium payment 
    of either 30% or 120% of the Base Amount, as specified by each 
    Respondent PRP in the AOC. The per gallon charge of $2.97 was 
    calculated by dividing the total estimated response costs for the Site 
    ($69,594,403) by the total estimated volume of waste disposed of at the 
    Site (23,454,592 gallons). For parties paying a 30% premium, the 
    ``Option A'' settlement, there is an exception to the covenant not to 
    sue if total response costs at the Site exceed $69,594,403. If this 
    amount were exceeded, EPA could sue these parties for all or a portion 
    of the overage. For parties paying the 120% premium, the ``Option B'' 
    settlement, the exception to the covenant not to sue does not apply.
        Settlement #2: In accordance with section 122(i)(1) of CERCLA, 
    notice is hereby given that the terms of an Administrative Order on 
    Consent (AOC) have been agreed to by the following 22 parties, for the 
    following amounts: Clifford Motors (a/k/a Steve Clifford Motors) 
    ($1,500.00); Interstate Transmission (a/k/a Bailey Financial Corp.) 
    ($1,800.00); Barnes Amoco ($1,400.00); Rocky Mountain Lube ($2,000.00); 
    Zippy Lube (n/k/a Estate of Virgil Ruhter, deceased) ($4,000.00); Bob's 
    Oil Exchange & Car Wash ($25,000.00); Frank Fiksdal ($2,000.00); Tri-
    State Oil ($30,000.00); Ray McKee (a/k/a Lonnie Ray McKee) ($1,000.00); 
    Landers Salvage ($8,668.00); Al Moser Chevron ($2,200.00); Herzog 
    Brothers ($1,500.00); Crestwood Texaco ($1,893.00); O.N.O., Inc. (d/b/a 
    Brigham Street Service) $3,600.00); Desert Oil Company ($60,000.00); 
    Horner's Chevron (Wayne Hormer) ($200.00); Refinoil Products (d/b/a 
    gardner Refinoil) ($500.00); Mesa Oil Company ($193,000.00); Al's 
    Conoco (a/k/a Al Cazier's Conoco) ($200.00); A&W Diesel Sales & 
    Service, Inc. ($14,000.00); Kent's Amoco/Service ($1,500.00); and Bill 
    & Vern's Service ($1,150.00).
        By the terms of the proposed AOC for this settlement, these 22 PRPs 
    will together pay $357,111.00 to the Hazardous Substance Superfund 
    (Superfund). The $357,111.00 represents approximately 0.5% of the total 
    anticipated costs for the Site upon which this settlement was based.
        In exchange for payment, U.S. EPA will provide the settling parties 
    with a covenant not to sue for liability under sections 106 and 107(a) 
    of CERCLA, including liability for EPA past costs, the one-time cost of 
    remedy, future EPA oversight costs, future operation and maintenance of 
    the as-yet unselected remedy, and under section 7003 of the Solid Waste 
    Disposal Act, as amended (also known as the Resource Conservation and 
    Recovery Act (RCRA)).
        The amount that each individual PRP will pay, as shown above for 
    Settlement #2, has been reduced in consideration of the ability of the 
    settling party to pay. EPA has determined that the settling parties 
    cannot afford EPA's least expensive de minimis settlement option 
    offered to sde minimis parties at the Site; that is, the ``Option A'' 
    settlement. The settlement amount for each settling party has been 
    reduced to the maximum amount EPA has determined the party is able to 
    pay. Each settling parties' settlement amount equals $2.97 (derived and 
    described above) multiplied by the number of gallons of waste the party 
    sent to the Site (Base Amount), plus a premium payment of 30% of the 
    Base Amount, minus an adjustment reflecting EPA's determination that 
    the party is unable to pay the full settlement amount, referred to in 
    the AOC as the ``inability-to-pay factor.'' The proposed AOC for all 
    settlors participating in Settlement #2 contains an exception to the 
    covenant not to sue if total response costs at the Site exceed 
    $69,594,403. If this amount were exceeded, EPA could sue these parties 
    for all or a portion of the overage.
        For a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication, 
    the public may submit comments to U.S. EPA relating to the proposed de 
    minimis settlements.
        A copy of the proposed AOCs may be obtained from Greg Phoebe (8HWM-
    SR), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th 
    Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202-2405, (303) 294-7036. 
    Additional background information relating to the de minimis settlement 
    is available for review at the Superfund Records Center at the above 
    address, and at the Mariott Library, Special Collections Department, 
    University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (801) 581-8863.
    Jack W. McGraw,
    Acting Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA, Region VIII.
    [FR Doc. 94-31814 Filed 12-23-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/27/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Proposed de minimis settlements.
Document Number:
94-31814
Dates:
Comments must be submitted by no later than January 26, 1995.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: December 27, 1994, FRL-5128-8