94-30648. Federal Acquisition Regulation; Advance Agreements, Composition of Total Cost, and Accounting for Unallowable Costs  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 28, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page ]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-30648]
    
    
    [Federal Register: December 28, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
    
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
    
    48 CFR Part 31
    
    [FAC 90-23; FAR Case 91-45; Item XXI]
    RIN 9000-AE81
    
    
    Federal Acquisition Regulation; Advance Agreements, Composition 
    of Total Cost, and Accounting for Unallowable Costs
    
    AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
    (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC) and the Defense 
    Acquisition Regulations Council (DARC) have agreed on revisions of the 
    Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) concerning advance agreements, 
    cost principles, composition of total cost, and accounting for 
    unallowable costs. This final rule represents the first in a series 
    resulting from the Councils' ongoing review of industry recommendations 
    concerning the FAR's contract cost principles and procedures. This 
    regulatory action was not subject to Office of Management and Budget 
    review under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: February 27, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeremy Olson at (202) 501-3221 in 
    reference to this FAR case. For general information, contact the FAR 
    Secretariat, Room 4037, GS Building, Washington, DC 20405 (202) 501-
    4755. Please cite FAC 90-23, FAR case 91-45.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    A. Background
    
        A proposed rule was published in the Federal Register at 56 FR 
    43739, September 4, 1991. The proposed rule, which amends FAR 31.109, 
    Advance agreements; 31.201-1, Composition of total cost; and 31.201-6, 
    Accounting for unallowable costs, is being adopted as a final rule 
    without change.
        This rule is the first in a series resulting from the Councils' 
    ongoing review of industry recommendations, submitted as part of the 
    Defense Management Review, concerning FAR Part 31, Contract Cost 
    Principles and Procedures. After considering public comments, the 
    Councils have agreed to finalize and publish FAR changes as the 
    deliberations on each increment are completed.
        Language is added at FAR 31.109(a) to address the use of advance 
    agreements to clarify allowability issues under the specific cost 
    principles, in order to minimize subsequent disputes. The phrase in FAR 
    31.109(a), ``particularly for firms or their divisions that may not be 
    under effective competitive constraints,'' is deleted because the 
    determination of the reasonableness, allocability, or allowability of a 
    cost under the specific cost principles is not significantly impacted 
    by the business environment in which the industry operates. Changes in 
    FAR 31.201-1 include deleting the word ``allowable'' in its first 
    sentence; redesignating the existing paragraph as ``(a)''; and 
    inserting a new paragraph ``(b)'' which makes it clear that while the 
    total cost of a contract includes all allocable costs, the total 
    allowable costs on a Government contract are limited to those allocable 
    costs which are allowable pursuant to Part 31 and agency supplements. 
    FAR 31.201-6(c) is revised to clarify that there is no intended 
    difference in the accounting and presentation of unallowable costs 
    between contracts which are covered by the Cost Accounting Standards 
    and those which are not.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and 
    the National Aeronautics and Space Administration certify that this 
    final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 
    601, et seq., because most contracts awarded to small entities are 
    awarded on a competitive, fixed-price basis and the cost principles do 
    not apply.
    
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to 
    the FAR do not impose recordkeeping or information collection 
    requirements, or collections of information from offerors, contractors, 
    or members of the public which require the approval of the Office of 
    Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
    
    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 31
    
        Government procurement.
    
        Dated: December 7, 1994.
    Albert A. Vicchiolla,
    Director, Office of Federal Acquisition Policy.
    
        Therefore, 48 CFR part 31 is amended as set forth below:
    
    PART 31--CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
    
        1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 31 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 
    U.S.C. 2473(c).
    
        2. Section 31.109 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    31.109  Advance agreements.
    
        (a) The extent of allowability of the costs covered in this part 
    applies broadly to many accounting systems in varying contract 
    situations. Thus, the reasonableness, the allocability and the 
    allowability under the specific cost principles at subparts 31.2, 31.3, 
    31.6, and 31.7 of certain costs may be difficult to determine. To avoid 
    possible subsequent disallowance or dispute based on unreasonableness, 
    unallocability or unallowability under the specific cost principles at 
    subparts 31.2, 31.3, 31.6, and 31.7, contracting officers and 
    contractors should seek advance agreement on the treatment of special 
    or unusual costs. However, an advance agreement is not an absolute 
    requirement and the absence of an advance agreement on any cost will 
    not, in itself, affect the reasonableness, allocability or the 
    allowability under the specific cost principles at subparts 31.2, 31.3, 
    31.6, and 31.7 of that cost.
        3. Section 31.201-1 is amended by revising the first sentence of 
    the existing paragraph and designating the paragraph as paragraph (a); 
    and adding paragraph (b) to read as follows:
    
    
    31.201-1  Composition of total cost.
    
        (a) The total cost of a contract is the sum of the direct and 
    indirect costs allocable to the contract, incurred or to be incurred, 
    less any allocable credits, plus any allocable cost of money pursuant 
    to 31.205-10. * * *
        (b) While the total cost of a contract includes all costs properly 
    allocable to the contract, the allowable costs to the Government are 
    limited to those allocable costs which are allowable pursuant to part 
    31 and applicable agency supplements.
        4. Section 31.201-6 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    31.201-6  Accounting for unallowable costs.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) The practices for accounting for and presentation of 
    unallowable costs will be those as described in 48 CFR 9904.405-50, 
    Accounting for Unallowable Costs.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 94-30648 Filed 12-27-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6820-34-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/28/1994
Department:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-30648
Dates:
February 27, 1995.
Pages:
0-0 (None pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: December 28, 1994, FAC 90-23, FAR Case 91-45, Item XXI
RINs:
9000-AE81
CFR: (1)
48 CFR 31