94-31853. Excalibur Automobile Corporation; Receipt of Application for Temporary Exemption From Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 28, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page ]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-31853]
    
    
    [Federal Register: December 28, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    [Docket No. 94-100; Notice 1]
    
    
    Excalibur Automobile Corporation; Receipt of Application for 
    Temporary Exemption From Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208
    
        Excalibur Automobile Corporation of West Allis, Wisconsin, has 
    applied for a temporary exemption of its JAC 427 Cobra passenger car 
    for three years from compliance with paragraph S4.1.4 of Federal Motor 
    Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection. The basis of 
    the application is that compliance would cause substantial economic 
    hardship to a manufacturer that has tried to comply with the standard 
    in good faith.
        Notice of receipt of the application is published in accordance 
    with agency regulations on the subject (49 CFR part 555) and does not 
    represent any judgment of the agency on the merits of the application.
        The applicant seeks an exemption for its JAC 427 Cobra passenger 
    car, of which it has produced 59 between January 1993 and September 
    1994. Thirty-six of these ``are presently in the control of Excalibur's 
    dealers'', and the applicant asks that the exemption cover these 
    vehicles so that they may be offered for sale and sold in compliance 
    with the law. It plans increased production in 1995, of which 60 to 108 
    would be sold in the United States.
        Excalibur is a small company with 37 employees and net assets of 
    $3,000,000. The company has had cumulative net losses of $4,493,000 
    from January 1, 1992 to September 30, 1994. If it were required to 
    comply immediately with the automatic restraint requirements of 
    Standard No. 208, it would have to raise the retail price by more than 
    300 per cent which ``is likely to deemed (sic) to be prohibitive by 
    potential purchasers (and dealers), thereby significantly reducing the 
    line's desirability, if not ending the demand entirely . . . .'' Denial 
    of the petition would result in a reduction of the work force to 8 
    employees.
        Excalibur has been owned since 1991 by German residents, who 
    changed the company's management in August 1994. The new management has 
    not been able to trace the company's efforts to comply beyond December 
    1993 when the then Vice President of Production informed the then 
    President that he had ``just located a potential source for a retrofit 
    driver's as well as passenger air bag system.'' Compliance was 
    anticipated ``within weeks.'' NHTSA was likewise informed of this 
    possibility in December 1993. On May 31, 1994, in an incomplete 
    petition for exemption from Standard No. 208, Excalibur informed the 
    agency that its efforts to work with companies in Arizona and Florida 
    had ended in frustration and failure and that it was currently unable 
    to find a source for an adequate, workable airbag system.
        According to its application, Excalibur will use the exemption 
    period ``to accommodate a fully-complying airbag system.'' It is 
    investigating the possibility of installing Ford Mustang steering 
    columns and airbag systems, as well as whether its existing column 
    could accept an airbag produced by Breed Technologies. Exempted 
    vehicles would be provided with a three-point restraint system as well 
    as with a ``clearly visible warning label reminding the vehicle's 
    occupants of the importance of wearing their safety belts.
        The company argues that an exemption would be in the public 
    interest and consistent with the objectives of motor vehicle safety 
    because it presently has 17 dealers in 12 states, and ``a thriving 
    manufacturing business and dealer network not only provides employment, 
    but will generate federal and state tax revenues.'' The small number of 
    vehicles that the exemption will cover and the limited mileage they 
    will be driven ensure that an exemption ``will not materially affect 
    overall motor vehicle safety in the U.S.''
        Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the 
    application described above. Comments should refer to the docket and 
    notice number referenced above, and be submitted to: Docket Section, 
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, room 5109, 400 Seventh 
    St. SW, Washington, DC 20590. It is requested but not required that 10 
    copies be submitted.
        All comments received before the close of business on the comment 
    closing date indicated below will be considered, and will be available 
    for examination in the docket at the above address both before and 
    after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the 
    closing date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the 
    application will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the 
    authority indicated below.
        Comment closing date: January 27, 1995.
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30113; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 
    1.50 and 501.8.
    
        Issued on: December 21, 1994.
    Barry Felrice,
    Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
    [FR Doc. 94-31853 Filed 12-27-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/28/1994
Department:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-31853
Dates:
January 27, 1995.
Pages:
0-0 (None pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: December 28, 1994, Docket No. 94-100, Notice 1