98-34293. Lead-Based Paint Activities in Target Housing and Child-Occupied Facilities; District of Columbia's Authorization Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 248 (Monday, December 28, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 71465-71467]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-34293]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    [PB-402404-DC; FRL-6042-9]
    
    
    Lead-Based Paint Activities in Target Housing and Child-Occupied 
    Facilities; District of Columbia's Authorization Application
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice; request for comments and opportunity for public 
    hearing.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On August 17, 1998, the District of Columbia submitted an 
    application for EPA approval to administer and enforce training and 
    certification requirements, training program accreditation 
    requirements, and work practice standards for lead-based paint 
    activities in target housing and child-occupied facilities under 
    section 402 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). This notice 
    announces the receipt of the District of Columbia's application, 
    provides a 45-day public comment period, and
    
    [[Page 71466]]
    
    provides an opportunity to request a public hearing on the application.
    
    DATES: Comments on the authorization application must be received on or 
    before February 11, 1999. Public hearing requests must be received on 
    or before January 27, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit all written comments and/or requests for a public 
    hearing identified by docket control number PB-402404-DC (in duplicate) 
    to: Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, Waste and Chemicals 
    Management Division, Toxics Programs and Enforcement Branch (3WC33), 
    1650 Arch St., Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029.
        Comments, data, and requests for a public hearing may also be 
    submitted electronically to: gerena.enid@epa.gov. Follow the 
    instructions under Unit IV. of this document. No information claimed to 
    be Confidential Business Information (CBI) should be submitted through 
    e-mail.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Enid A. Gerena (3WC33), Waste and 
    Chemicals Management Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
    III, 1650 Arch St., Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029, telephone: (215) 814-
    2067, e-mail address: gerena.enid@epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        On October 28, 1992, the Housing and Community Development Act of 
    1992, Pub. L. 102-550, became law. Title X of that statute was the 
    Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992. That Act 
    amended TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) by adding Title IV (15 U.S.C. 
    2681-2692), entitled ``Lead Exposure Reduction.''
        Section 402 of TSCA authorizes and directs EPA to promulgate final 
    regulations governing lead-based paint activities in target housing, 
    public and commercial buildings, bridges, and other structures. Those 
    regulations are to ensure that individuals engaged in such activities 
    are properly trained, that training programs are accredited, and that 
    individuals engaged in these activities are certified and follow 
    documented work practice standards. Under section 404 of TSCA, a State 
    may seek authorization from EPA to administer and enforce its own lead-
    based paint activities program.
        On August 29, 1996 (61 FR 45777) (FRL-5389-9), EPA promulgated 
    final TSCA section 402/404 regulations governing lead-based paint 
    activities in target housing and child-occupied facilities (a subset of 
    public buildings). Those regulations are codified at 40 CFR part 745 
    and allow both States and Indian Tribes to apply for program 
    authorization. Pursuant to section 404(h) of TSCA, EPA is to establish 
    the Federal program in any State or Tribal Nation without its own 
    authorized program in place by August 31, 1998.
        States and Tribes that choose to apply for program authorization 
    must submit a complete application to the appropriate Regional EPA 
    office for review. Those applications will be reviewed by EPA within 
    180 days of receipt of the complete application. To receive EPA 
    approval, a State or Tribe must demonstrate that its program is at 
    least as protective of human health and the environment as the Federal 
    program, and provides for adequate enforcement (section 404(b) of TSCA, 
    15 U.S.C. 2684(b)). EPA's regulations (40 CFR part 745, subpart Q) 
    provide the detailed requirements a State or Tribal program must meet 
    in order to obtain EPA approval.
        A State may choose to certify that its lead-based paint activities 
    program meets the requirements for EPA approval by submitting a letter 
    signed by the Governor (Mayor in the case of the District of Columbia) 
    or Attorney General stating that the program meets the requirements of 
    section 404(b) of TSCA. Upon submission of such certification letter, 
    the program is deemed authorized. This authorization becomes 
    ineffective, however, if EPA disapproves the application.
        Pursuant to section 404(b) of TSCA, EPA provides notice and an 
    opportunity for a public hearing on a State or Tribal program 
    application before authorizing the program. Therefore, by this notice 
    EPA is soliciting public comment on whether the District of Columbia's 
    application meets the requirements for EPA approval. This notice also 
    provides an opportunity to request a public hearing on the application. 
    If a hearing is requested and granted, EPA will issue a Federal 
    Register notice announcing the date, time, and place of the hearing. 
    EPA's final decision on the application will be published in the 
    Federal Register.
    
    II. State Program Description Summary
    
        The following summary of the District of Columbia's proposed 
    program has been provided by the applicant:
        The primary agency that is responsible for administering and 
    enforcing the District Lead-Based Paint Activities Program is the 
    Department of Health, Environmental Health Administration (DHEHA).
        Proposed lead abatement control legislation was initially 
    introduced to the District of Columbia City Council and referred to the 
    Council's Committee on Housing and Urban affairs on June 20, 1996. The 
    Committee held a round table to receive comments from the public on the 
    proposed regulations. At that hearing, several organizations that 
    advocate promoting and implementing safe lead abatement practices 
    testified in support of a lead abatement program in the District of 
    Columbia. Some comments were incorporated into the revised bill, which 
    was then approved by the Council, the Mayor, the District of Columbia 
    Financial Recovery Authority, and, finally, the U.S. Congress. In 
    October 1997, proposed regulations implementing the Act were published 
    for public review and comment. No comments were received and the final 
    regulations were published in the D.C. Register on January 2, 1998 (45 
    DCR 20). The District of Columbia's Title 20 DCMR Section 806 
    (Regulations) became effective January 2, 1998.
        The DHEHA is seeking program authorization from EPA to administer 
    and enforce the ``District of Columbia Lead-Based Paint Abatement 
    Control Act of 1996'' in accordance with sections 402/404 of TSCA 
    ``Requirements for Lead-Based Paint Abatement in Target Housing and 
    Child-Occupied Facilities.'' EPA designed this program to ensure that 
    DHEHA properly trains and certifies individuals conducting lead-based 
    paint inspections, risk assessments and abatements in target housing 
    and child-occupied facilities in the District of Columbia, that 
    training programs providing instruction in such activities are 
    accredited and that these activities are conducted according to 
    reliable, effective, and safe work practice standards.
        The regulations established:
        1. Procedures and requirements for the accreditation of lead-based 
    paint training activities.
        2. Procedures and requirements for the certification of individuals 
    engaged in lead-based paint activities.
        3. Work practice standards for the conduct of lead-based paint 
    activities.
        4. Requirements that all lead-based paint activities be conducted 
    by appropriately certified contractors.
        5. Development of the appropriate infrastructure or government 
    capacity to carry out and enforce a State program effectively.
        The overall objective of the District of Columbia's Lead-Based 
    Paint Program is to ultimately establish a registry of lead safe houses 
    and interface proactively with other District agencies and the 
    community to eliminate lead-based paint hazards. With a pool of 
    qualified technicians and lead abatement workers
    
    [[Page 71467]]
    
    who are trained and certified to remove lead in the environment in a 
    safe manner, future generations will be assured of a cleaner 
    environment and healthier lives.
    
    III. Federal Overfiling
    
        TSCA section 404(b) makes it unlawful for any person to violate, or 
    fail, or refuse to comply with, any requirement of an approved State or 
    Tribal program. Therefore, EPA reserves the right to exercise its 
    enforcement authority under TSCA against a violation of, or a failure 
    or refusal to comply with, any requirement of an authorized State or 
    Tribal program.
    
    IV. Public Record and Electronic Submissions
    
        The official record for this action, as well as the public version, 
    has been established under docket control number PB-402404-DC. Copies 
    of this notice, the District of Columbia's authorization application, 
    and all comments received on the application are available for 
    inspection in the Region III office, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 
    through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket is located at U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, Waste and Chemicals 
    Management Division, Toxics Programs and Enforcement Branch, 1650 Arch 
    St., Philadelphia, PA.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
    
        gerena.enid@epa.gov
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption. Comments and data 
    will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 5.1/6.1 or ASCII file 
    format. All comments and data in electronic form must be identified by 
    the docket control number PB-402404-DC. Electronic comments on this 
    document may be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries. 
    Information claimed as CBI should not be submitted electronically.
        Commenters are encouraged to structure their comments so as not to 
    contain information for which CBI claims would be made. However, any 
    information claimed as CBI must be marked ``confidential,'' ``CBI,'' or 
    with some other appropriate designation, and a commenter submitting 
    such information must also prepare a nonconfidential version (in 
    duplicate) that can be placed in the public record. Any information so 
    marked will be handled in accordance with the procedures contained in 
    40 CFR part 2. Comments and information not claimed as CBI at the time 
    of submission will be placed in the public record.
    
    V. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
    
    A. Certain Acts and Executive Orders
    
        EPA's actions on State or Tribal lead-based paint activities 
    program applications are informal adjudications, not rules. Therefore, 
    the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 
    et seq.), Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR 
    51735, October 4, 1993), and Executive Order 13045 (Protection of 
    Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks, 62 FR 1985, 
    April 23, 1997), do not apply to this action. This action does not 
    contain any Federal mandates, and therefore is not subject to the 
    requirements of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538). 
    In addition, this action does not contain any information collection 
    requirements and therefore does not require review or approval by the 
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
    (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    
    B. Executive Order 12875
    
        Under Executive Order 12875, entitled Enhancing the 
    Intergovernmental Partnership (58 FR 58093, October 28, 1993), EPA may 
    not issue a regulation that is not required by statute and that creates 
    a mandate upon a State, local or Tribal government, unless the Federal 
    government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
    costs incurred by those governments. If the mandate is unfunded, EPA 
    must provide to OMB a description of the extent of EPA's prior 
    consultation with representatives of affected State, local, and Tribal 
    governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of any written 
    communications from the governments and a statement supporting the need 
    to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive Order 12875 requires 
    EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected officials and 
    other representatives of State, local, and Tribal governments ``to 
    provide meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory 
    proposals containing significant mandates.''
        Today's action does not create an unfunded Federal mandate on 
    State, local, or Tribal governments. This action does not impose any 
    enforceable duties on these entities. Accordingly, the requirements of 
    section 1(a) of Executive Order 12875 do not apply to this action.
    
    C. Executive Order 13084
    
        Under Executive Order 13084, entitled Consultation and Coordination 
    with Indian Tribal Governments (63 FR 27655, May 19, 1998), EPA may not 
    issue a regulation that is not required by statute and that 
    significantly or uniquely affects the communities of Indian tribal 
    governments, and that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on 
    those communities, unless the Federal government provides the funds 
    necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by the Tribal 
    governments. If the mandate is unfunded, EPA must provide OMB, in a 
    separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a 
    description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with 
    representatives of affected Tribal governments, a summary of the nature 
    of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the 
    regulation. In addition, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to develop 
    an effective process permitting elected and other representatives of 
    Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in 
    the development of regulatory policies on matters that significantly or 
    uniquely affect their communities.''
        Today's action does not significantly or uniquely affect the 
    communities of Indian tribal governments. This action does not involve 
    or impose requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the 
    requirements of section 3(b) of Executive Order 13084 do not apply to 
    this action.
    
        Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2682, 2684.
    
    List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Hazardous substances, Lead, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: December 15, 1998.
    
    W. Michael McCabe,
    
    Regional Administrator, Region III.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-34293 Filed 12-24-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/28/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice; request for comments and opportunity for public hearing.
Document Number:
98-34293
Dates:
Comments on the authorization application must be received on or before February 11, 1999. Public hearing requests must be received on or before January 27, 1999.
Pages:
71465-71467 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PB-402404-DC, FRL-6042-9
PDF File:
98-34293.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Letter from James J. Burke, Division Director, USEPA Region III, to Theodore J. Gordon, Senior Deputy Director, DC Department of Health, referring to "the Adequacy of the District's Civil and Criminal Penalty Authorities"
» Letter from Gerallyn Valls, Lead Program Coordinator, USEPA Region III, to Lynette D. Stokes, Chief, Environmental Health Administration, referring to DC's "Request for Lead Program Authorization"
» Letter from Richard N. Brewster, Program Manager, DC Environmental Health Administration, to Gerallyn Valls, Lead Program Coordinator, USEPA Region III, referring to "TSCA 404 Program Authorization"
» Letter from Gerallyn Valls, Lead Program Coordinator, USEPA Region III, to Richard Brewster, Program Manager, DC Environmental Health Administration, referring to "Items Discussed in EPA May 3, 1999 Letter"
» Letter from Richard N. Brewster, Program Manager, DC Environmental Health Administration, to Gerallyn Valls, Lead Program Coordinator, USEPA Region III, referring to "EPA Authorization Review"
» Letter from Gerallyn Valls, Lead Program Coordinator, USEPA Region III, to Richard Brewster, Program Manager, DC Environmental Health Administration, referring to a previous letter from DC to USEPA that "Appears to be Missing Most of its Attachments"
» Letter from Richard N. Brewster, Program Manager, DC Environmental Health Administration, to Gerallyn Valls, Branch Chief, USEPA Region III, referring to "EPA Authorization Review"
» Letter from Gerallyn Valls, Lead Program Coordinator, USEPA Region III, to Richard Brewster, Program Manger, DC Environmental Health Administration, referring to a "Summary of Information that EPA Considers to be Still Required" from DC
» Letter from Richard N. Brewster, Program Manager, Environmental Health Administration, to Aquinetta Dickens, Branch Chief, USEPA Region III, referring to "Response to Notes on DC State Authorization"
» Letter from Gerallyn Valls, Lead Program Coordinator, USEPA Region III, to Sandra Handon, Lead Abatement Coordinator, DC Environmental Health Administration, responding to DC's March 15, 1999 Letter