99-33715. Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Amendment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 73031-73032]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-33715]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. CP99-21-002]
    
    
    Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Amendment
    
    December 22, 1999.
        Take notice that on December 17, 1999, Northern Border Pipeline 
    Company (Northern Border), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 
    68124-1000, filed is Docket No. CP99-21-002, an amendment to its 
    application in Docket No. CP99-21, for a certificate of public 
    convenience and necessity, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas 
    Act and part 157 of the Commission's regulations, to construct and 
    operate pipeline and compression facilities all as more fully set forth 
    in the amendment which is on file with the Commission and open to 
    public inspection. This filing may be viewed on the Internet at http://
    www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
        On March 25, 1999, Northern Border filed with the Commission an 
    amendment to its application in Docket No. CP99-21-001, wherein 
    Northern Border modified the design of the pipeline and compression 
    facilities it proposes. By this amendment, Northern Border now proposes 
    to install approximately 34.4 miles of 30-inch pipeline (rather than 
    36-inch pipeline, as previously proposed), commencing from Northern 
    Border's 36-inch pipeline near Manhattan, Illinois to a point near 
    North Hayden, Indiana. The proposed pipeline extension will 
    interconnect with Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO) at 
    the terminus of the pipeline at which point Northern Border proposes to 
    install a meter station. The pipeline extension between Manhattan and 
    Northern Hayden will have a design capacity of 544,000 Mcf/
    d and a maximum operating pressure of 1,050 psig. Due to the potential 
    development of a new airport along the route of the proposed pipeline, 
    Northern Border has been requested and proposes to install a tee and 
    side valve on the pipeline extension near the site. Further, the 
    planned cooling modifications at proposed Compressor Station No. 18 
    have been eliminated. The change in pipeline diameter from a 36-inch to 
    30-inch, and the elimination of cooling at Compressor Station No. 18 
    are the only facility changes from those proposed in the March 25, 
    1999, amendment.
        As now amended, the estimated project cost is $94.4 million, in 
    fourth quarter 1999 dollars. Northern Border says that it does not 
    intend to use its cost projection in the instant application as the 
    basis for an incentive rate proposal. Northern Border filed additional 
    exhibits which compare the transportation cost for the year 2002 
    without the proposed facilities to the projected year 2002 cost with 
    the proposed facilities in order to show the impact of rolling-in the 
    proposed facilities on the first calendar year of operations' cost of 
    service. Northern Border's year 2002 projected unit cost of service 
    rate, including fuel, the proposed facility costs, and the related 
    volumes in 4.30 center per 100 Dekatherm-Miles, which is the same as 
    the unit cost without the proposed facilities and related volumes. 
    Northern Border says that this demonstrates that Project 2000 is 
    financially viable
    
    [[Page 73032]]
    
    without ``subsidy'' from existing customers.
        On September 15, 1999, the Commission issued a Statement of Policy 
    in Docket No. PL99-3-000, ``Certification of New Interstate Natural Gas 
    Pipeline Facilities''. The Policy Statement announced changes to the 
    pricing and rate criteria applicable to new construction projects and, 
    specified that applicants proposing to add new pipeline capacity must 
    satisfy a threshold requirement of ``no financial subsidies''. The 
    Policy Statement also announced that a project will also be evaluated 
    based upon consideration of (i) the interests of the applicant's 
    existing customers; (ii) the interests of competing existing pipelines 
    and their captive customers, and (iii) the interests of landowners and 
    surrounding communities. Where a project results in adverse impacts to 
    any of members of these three stakeholder groups, the project sponsor 
    must show how the specific public benefits resulting from its project 
    outweigh the adverse effects the members of the three stakeholder 
    groups.
        Northern Border states that Project 2000, as now amended, meets the 
    Commission's threshold ``no financial subsidies'' requirement of for 
    certification. Further, its says that the public benefits of Project 
    2000 outweigh any adverse impacts to any members of the three 
    stakeholder groups identified in the Policy Statement, because in its 
    amendment, Northern Border describes in detail how Project 2000 does 
    not have any adverse impact on the three stakeholder groups listed in 
    the Policy Statement, Northern Border therefore requests that the 
    Commission promptly certificate Project 2000, as hereby amended, and 
    that such approvals issue no later than March 15, 2000.
        Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
    reference to said application should on or before January 14, 2000, 
    file with the Federal Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
    Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in 
    accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
    and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) and the regulations under 
    the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the 
    Commission will be considered by it in determining the appropriate 
    action to be taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties 
    to the proceeding. The Commission's rules require that protestors 
    provide copies of their protests to the party or parties directly 
    involved. Any person wishing to become a party in any proceeding herein 
    must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's 
    rules.
        A person obtaining intervenor status will be placed on the service 
    list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive 
    copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by every one of the 
    intervenors. An intervenor can file for rehearing of any Commission 
    order and can petition for court review of any such order. However, an 
    intervenor must submit copies of comments or any other filing it makes 
    with the Commission to every other intervenor in the proceeding, as 
    well as 14 copies with the Commission.
        A person does not have to intervene, however, in order to have 
    comments considered. A person, instead, may submit two copies of 
    comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Commenters will be placed 
    on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive copies of 
    environmental documents and will be able to participate in meetings 
    associated with the Commission's environmental review process. 
    Commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on 
    all other parties. However, commenters will not receive copies of all 
    documents filed by other parties or issued by the Commission and will 
    not have the right to seek rehearing or appeal the Commission's final 
    order to a federal court. The Commission will consider all comments and 
    concerns equally, whether filed by commenters or those requesting 
    intervenor status.
        Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
    and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Commission by 
    Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the Commission's Rules of 
    Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be held without further notice 
    before the Commission or its designee on this application if no motion 
    to intervene is filed within the time required herein, if the 
    Commission on its own review of the matter finds that permission and 
    approval for the proposed abandonments and a grant of the certificate 
    are required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for 
    leave to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own 
    motion believes that formal hearing is required, further notice of such 
    hearing will be duly given.
        Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
    it will be unnecessary for Northern Border to appear or to be 
    represented at the hearing.
    Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-33715 Filed 12-28-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/29/1999
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-33715
Pages:
73031-73032 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CP99-21-002
PDF File:
99-33715.pdf