99-33768. Rules to Provide Regulatory Flexibility in the 218-219 MHz Service  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 72956-72959]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-33768]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    
    47 CFR Part 95
    
    [WT Docket No. 98-169; FCC 99-372]
    
    
    Rules to Provide Regulatory Flexibility in the 218-219 MHz 
    Service
    
    AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Commission modifies the restructuring plan adopted in the 
    218-219 MHz final rule document. The purpose of the modification is to 
    remove a provision whereby an eligible licensee participating in the 
    restructuring plan can obtain a seventy-percent credit on its down 
    payment and forego, for a period of two years, eligibility to acquire 
    the surrendered licenses. It was not the Commission's intent to adopt 
    the seventy-percent credit and the intended effect is to correct the 
    prior error.
    
    DATES: Effective December 29, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Kelly, Wireless 
    Telecommunications Bureau, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division 
    (202) 418-0660.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. This Order on Reconsideration in WT 
    Docket 98-169 was adopted November 24, 1999 and released November 30, 
    1999. The document is available, in its entirety, for inspection and 
    copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center, (Room 
    CY-A257), 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. It may also be 
    purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
    Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS, Inc.), 1231 20th Street, NW, 
    Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800. In addition, it is available on 
    the Commission's website at http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders.
    
    Synopsis
    
    I. Background
    
        2. In the 218-219 MHz Report and Order 64 FR 59656 (November 3, 
    1999), the Commission adopted a restructuring plan for existing 218-219 
    MHz licensees. These licensees were current in installment payments 
    (i.e. less than ninety days delinquent) as of March 16, 1998, or those 
    licensees that had properly filed grace period requests
    
    [[Page 72957]]
    
    under the former installment payment rule. (``Eligible Licensees''). 
    The restructuring plan offered three options to provide specific relief 
    for licensees that wish to retain their license but are experiencing 
    financial hardship or that wish to return their licenses due to an 
    inability to assume their financial responsibilities. The three options 
    are: (a) Reamortization and Resumption of Payments; (b) Amnesty, and 
    (c) Prepayment, whereby an Eligible Licensee may prepay the principal 
    of any license it wishes to retain with cash and prepayment credits 
    generated from down payments on spectrum returned to the Commission and 
    any installment payments previously made. The Commission's order 
    allowed an Eligible Licensee electing the Amnesty option to choose 
    either to receive no credit for its down payment, but remain eligible 
    to bid on the surrendered licenses when they are subsequently offered 
    in auction, with no restriction on after-market acquisitions; or obtain 
    a credit for seventy percent of its down payment and forego for a 
    period of two years, from the start date of the next auction of the 
    218-219 MHz Service, eligibility to reacquire the surrendered licenses 
    through either auction or any secondary market transaction.
    
    II. Discussion
    
        3. It was not the Commission's original intent to adopt the seventy 
    percent credit proposed in the 218-219 MHz Flex NPRM, 63 FR 52215 
    (September 30, 1998) therefore, on its own motion, for the following 
    reasons, the Commission corrects the prior error. On review, it is 
    apparent that, under the Amnesty option, allowing an Eligible Licensee 
    to obtain credit for its down payment and forego reacquiring 
    surrendered licenses for a period of two years is inconsistent with our 
    responsibility to protect the integrity of the auction program and 
    promote new and innovative uses of spectrum. Giving a seventy percent 
    credit on down payments associated with returned spectrum, without an 
    adequate counterbalancing public interest benefit, would undermine the 
    integrity of the auction process by relieving participants of even the 
    most basic obligation of their participation.
        4. However, the Commission recognizes that it allows for a credit 
    on down payments in other portions of the 218-219 MHz Report and Order. 
    Specifically, an Eligible Licensee who elects the Prepayment option is 
    eligible for an eighty-five percent credit on its down payment. It is 
    important to note that an Eligible Licensee who elects the prepayment 
    option is providing a public benefit through early payment of its 
    financial obligations. Nevertheless, under the Prepayment option, the 
    Commission retains an amount equal to the three-percent default 
    payment. (Fifteen percent of the twenty-percent down payment equals 
    three percent of the purchase price.) Thus, as an Eligible Licensee 
    electing the Amnesty option is not providing the same public benefit, 
    it would not be in the public interest to allow it a seventy-percent 
    credit on its down payment. Amendment of the Commission's Rules 
    Regarding Installment Payment Financing For Personal Communications 
    Services, (PCS), Order on Reconsideration of the Second Report and 
    Order, 63 FR 17111 (April 8, 1998) (``C Block Reconsideration Order'').
        5. The 218-219 MHz Report and Order increased the flexibility of 
    the 218-219 MHz service and extended the license term in order to 
    encourage new and innovative uses in the marketplace and expedite 
    service to the public. In the 218-219 MHz Report and Order, the only 
    restriction on reacquisition applied to those Eligible Licensees opting 
    for the seventy percent credit. Thus, as the seventy percent credit is 
    no longer available, Eligible Licensees electing Amnesty will not be 
    precluded from reacquiring licenses at auction or in the secondary 
    market. This result is appropriate as Eligible Licensees electing 
    amnesty may still have viable business plans to implement based on 
    spectrum they may acquire in future auctions or in the secondary 
    market. A two-year restriction on the acquisition of certain spectrum 
    may negatively impact an otherwise viable business plan. The 
    Commission's action in this Order on Reconsideration moots the comments 
    of EON Corporation seeking to broaden the disqualification period to 
    exclude the future acquisition of any 218-219 MHz Service licenses to 
    be auctioned in the ensuing two-year period. As the Commission stated 
    in the 218-219 MHz Report and Order, limiting the reacquisition of 
    spectrum or acquisition of additional spectrum by Eligible Licensees 
    would not be in the public interest.
        6. The Commission modifies the 218-219 MHz Report and Order. 
    Therefore, while the Commission will not give Eligible Licensees 
    electing amnesty a credit for down payments associated with spectrum 
    returned to the Commission, neither will it limit the reacquisition of 
    spectrum or the acquisition of additional spectrum.
    
    III. Ordering Clauses
    
        7. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to Sec. 1.108 of the 
    Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.108, the Commission reconsiders on its own 
    motion the decision in Amendment of part 95 of the Commission's Rules 
    to Provide Regulatory Flexibility in the 218-219 MHz Service, Report 
    and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, WT Docket No. 98-169, FCC 
    99-239 regarding amnesty and resumption of payment in the 218-219 MHz 
    service, as detailed herein.
    
    IV. Supplemental Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
    
        8. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (``RFA''),\1\ an 
    Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') was incorporated in 
    the Amendment of part 95 of the Commission's Rules to Provide 
    Regulatory Flexibility in the 218-219 MHz Service and Amendment of part 
    95 of the Commission's Rules to Allow Interactive Video and Data 
    Service Licensees to Provide Mobile Services, 218-219 MHz Flex NPRM. 
    The Commission sought written public comment on the proposals in the 
    218-219 MHz Flex NPRM, including comment on the IRFA. A Final 
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``FRFA'') was included in the 
    Amendment of part 95 of the Commission's Rules to Provide Regulatory 
    Flexibility in the 218-219 MHz Service, 218-219 MHz Report and Order. 
    In this Order on Reconsideration, we issue this supplemental Final 
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``supplemental FRFA'') which conforms 
    to the RFA.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ See 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. 601 et. seq., has 
    been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, 
    Public Law 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (``CWAAA''). Title II of 
    the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 
    of 1996 (``SBREFA'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    V. Need for, and Objecties of, The Order on Reconsideration
    
        9. In the 218-219 MHz Report and Order, among other things, we 
    adopted a restructuring plan for existing 218-219 MHz licensees that 
    were current in installment payments (i.e. less than ninety days 
    delinquent) as of March 16, 1998, or those licensees that had properly 
    filed grace period requests under the former installment payment rule. 
    (``Eligible Licensees''). The restructuring plan offered three options 
    to provide specific relief for licenses that wish to retain their 
    license, but are experiencing financial hardship, or that wish to 
    return their licenses due to an inability to assume their financial 
    responsibilities. Under one of these options, Amnesty, an Eligible 
    Licensee could choose either to receive no credit
    
    [[Page 72958]]
    
    for its down payment, but remain eligible to bid on the surrendered 
    licenses when they are subsequently offered in auction, with no 
    restriction on after-market acquisitions; or obtain a credit for 
    seventy percent of its down payment and forego for a period of two 
    years, from the start date of the next auction of the 218-219 MHz 
    Service, eligibility to reacquire the surrendered licenses through 
    either auction or any secondary market transaction.
        10. On review, it is apparent that, under the Amnesty option, 
    allowing an Eligible Licensee to obtain credit for its down payment and 
    forego reacquiring surrendered licenses for a period of two years is 
    inconsistent with our responsibility to protect the integrity of the 
    auction program and promote new and innovative uses of spectrum. Giving 
    a seventy percent credit of the down payments associated with returned 
    spectrum would undermine the integrity of the auction process by 
    relieving participants of even the most basic obligation of their 
    participation. Further, a two-year restriction on the reacquisition of 
    the surrendered license unduly restricts the number of potential 
    licenses, and is inconsistent with a fair and equitable auction 
    process.
    
    VI. Summary of Significant Issues Raised by Public Comments in Response 
    to the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
    
        11. Previously, no petitions were filed in direct response to the 
    IRFA or the FRFA in this proceeding. Thus, on our own motion, we have 
    issued this 218-219 MHz Reconsideration Order.
    
    VII. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which 
    the Rules Apply
    
        12. Previously, in the FRFA, pursuant to the RFA, we provided a 
    detailed description and estimate of the number of small entities that 
    may be affected by the proposed rules, if adopted. We noted that the 
    218-219 MHz Report and Order affects a number of small entities who are 
    either licensees, or who may choose to become applicants for licenses, 
    in the 218-219 MHz Service. Such entities fall into two categories. The 
    first category consists of those using the 218-219 MHz Service for 
    providing interactivity capabilities in conjunction with broadcast 
    services. In the FRFA, with respect to the first category, we estimated 
    that the number of small business entities operating in the 218-219 MHz 
    band for interactivity capabilities with television viewers in the 218-
    219 MHz Service which will be subject to the rules will be less than 
    612. The second category consists of those using the 218-219 MHz 
    Service to operate other types of wireless communications services with 
    a wide variety of uses, such as commercial data applications and two-
    way telemetry services. In the FRFA, with respect to the second 
    category, we estimated that the number of small entities that would 
    provide wireless communications services other than that described 
    herein would be 247 or less.
        13. On January 6, 1998, the SBA approved of the small business size 
    standards established in the Competitive Bidding Tenth Report and 
    Order.\2\ As we described in the FRFA, the first auction of 218-219 MHz 
    spectrum resulted in 170 entities winning licenses for 594 Metropolitan 
    Statistical Area (``MSA'') licenses. Of the 594 licenses, 557 were won 
    by entities qualifying as a small business.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ See Letter to Daniel B. Phythyon, Chief, WTB, from Aida 
    Alverez, Administrator, SBA, Dated Jan. 6, 1998.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    VIII. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other 
    Compliance Requirements
    
        14. Previously, in the FRFA to the 218-219 MHz Report and Order, we 
    adopted rules altering the reporting and recordkeeping requirements for 
    a number of small business entities. The rules changed the obligations 
    of 218-219 MHz Service licensees with respect to license renewal, 
    construction reports, and acquisitions by partitioning or 
    disaggregation. As we noted in the FRFA, the 218-219 MHz Report and 
    Order contained three options relevant to some small businesses that 
    will alter their reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Our 
    reconsideration order is relevant only to the second option. 
    Specifically, non-defaulting 218-219 MHz Service licensees currently 
    participating in the installment payment plan may elect one of three 
    restructuring plans concerning their outstanding payments. However, our 
    reconsideration order does not alter any reporting, recordkeeping, or 
    other compliance requirements contained in the 218-219 MHz Report and 
    Order.
    
    IX. Steps Taken to Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small 
    Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
    
        15. As we described in detail in the FRFA to the 218-219 MHz Report 
    and Order, we adopted final rules designed to maximize opportunities 
    for participation by, and growth of, small businesses in providing 
    wireless services. We noted that we expected that the extension of 
    license terms from five to ten years and allowing partitioning and 
    disaggregation of licenses will specifically assist small businesses. 
    We also noted that the 218-219 MHz Report and Order contained 
    provisions, such as liberalization of construction requirements and 
    technical restrictions, and elimination of the cross-ownership 
    restriction, that will assist all licenses, including small business 
    licensees.
        16. In this Order on Reconsideration, we change the options 
    available to those small businesses electing the Amnesty option in the 
    restructuring plan. The 218-219 MHz Report and Order allowed an 
    Eligible Licensee electing the Amnesty option to choose either to 
    receive no credit for its down payment, but remain eligible to bid on 
    the surrendered licenses when they are subsequently offered in auction, 
    with no restriction on after-market acquisitions; or obtain a credit 
    for seventy percent of its down payment and forego for a period of two 
    years, from the start date of the next auction of the 218-219 MHz 
    Service, eligibility to reacquire the surrendered licenses through 
    either auction or any secondary market transaction. We recognize that 
    some commentators proposed a more liberal amnesty option. However, we 
    believe that eliminating all adverse financial consequences of a 
    licensee's decision to participate in the auction would be contrary to 
    a fair and equitable auction process. Further, it might encourage 
    future licensees to participate in an auction under the assumption that 
    the Commission will relieve it of the most basic obligations of 
    participation in an auction, if, in the future, its business plans do 
    not prove profitable. Thus, we will not provide the licensees with a 
    seventy percent down payment credit. However, to the extent that a 
    licensee believes that it can create a valuable business with the same 
    license, if its debt burden were smaller, it will not be precluded from 
    acquiring the license at auction, or in any secondary market 
    transaction. For these reasons, we did not consider any significant 
    alternatives to our proposals to minimize significant economic impact 
    on small entities.
        17. Report to Congress: The Commission will send a copy of the 
    Order on Reconsideration, including this FRFA, in a report to be sent 
    to Congress pursuant to the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
    Fairness Act of 1996, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). In addition, the 
    Commission will send a copy of the Order on Reconsideration, including 
    FRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business 
    Administration.
    
    [[Page 72959]]
    
    List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 95
    
        Communications equipment, Penalties, Radio, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
    Federal Communications Commission.
    William F. Caton,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-33768 Filed 12-28-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/29/1999
Published:
12/29/1999
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-33768
Dates:
Effective December 29, 1999.
Pages:
72956-72959 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
WT Docket No. 98-169, FCC 99-372
PDF File:
99-33768.pdf
CFR: (1)
47 CFR 95