97-31549. Notice of Filing of Pesticide Petitions  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 63940-63942]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-31549]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    [PF-774; FRL-5751-9]
    
    
    Notice of Filing of Pesticide Petitions
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of pesticide 
    petitions proposing the establishment of regulations for residues of 
    certain pesticide chemicals in or on various food commodities.
    DATES: Comments, identified by the docket control number PF-774, must 
    be received on or before January 2, 1998.
    ADDRESSES: By mail submit written comments to: Public Information and 
    Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and Services Division 
    (7506C), Office of Pesticides Programs, Environmental Protection 
    Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person bring comments 
    to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Comments and data may also be submitted electronically to: docket@epamail.epa.gov. Follow the instructions under ``SUPPLEMENTARY 
    INFORMATION.'' No confidential business information should be submitted 
    through e-mail.
        Information submitted as a comment concerning this document may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI). CBI should not be 
    submitted through e-mail. Information marked as CBI will not be 
    disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 
    2. A copy of the comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted 
    for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked confidential 
    may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written 
    comments will be available for public inspection in Rm. 1132 at the 
    address given above, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    excluding legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Treva Alston, Registration 
    Division (7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. Office location, telephone number and e-mail 
    address: Rm. 4W55 4th floor, CS1, 2800 Crystal Drive, Arlington VA, 
    (703) 308-8373, e-mail: alston.traver@epamail.epa.gov.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has received pesticide petitions as 
    follows proposing the establishment and/or amendment of regulations for 
    residues of certain pesticide chemicals in or on various food 
    commodities under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Comestic 
    Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a. EPA has determined that these petitions 
    contain data or information regarding the elements set forth in section 
    408(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the 
    submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting of 
    the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the 
    petition.
        The official record for this notice of filing, as well as the 
    public version, has been established for this notice of filing under 
    docket control number [PF-774] (including comments and data submitted 
    electronically as described below). A public version of this record, 
    including printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does 
    not include any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection 
    from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
    holidays. The official record is located at the address in 
    ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this document.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov
    
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption. Comment and data 
    will also be accepted on disks in Wordperfect 5.1 file format or ASCII 
    file format. All comments and data in electronic form must be 
    identified by the docket number [PF-774] and appropriate petition 
    number. Electronic comments on notice may be filed online at many 
    Federal Depository Libraries.
    
    List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Food additives, 
    Feed additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        Dated: November 20, 1997.
    
    James Jones,
    Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
    Summaries of Petitions
    
        Petitioner summaries of the pesticide petitions are printed below 
    as required by section 408(d)(3) of the FFDCA. The summaries of the 
    petitions were prepared by the petitioners and represent the views of 
    the petitioners. EPA is publishing the petition summaries verbatim 
    without editing them in any way. The petition summary announces the 
    availability of a description of the analytical methods available to 
    EPA for the detection and measurement of the pesticide chemical 
    residues or an explanation of why no such method is needed.
    
    [[Page 63941]]
    
    1. GlobeTech Industries Corporation
    
    PP 7E4810
    
        EPA has received a pesticide petition (PP 7E4810) from GlobeTech 
    Industries Corporation, 57 Pratt Street, Suite 504, Hartford, CT 06103 
    proposing pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug and 
    Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180 to establish 
    an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for Crezasin when used 
    as an inert ingredient in pesticide formulations applied to growing 
    crops.
        EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information 
    regarding the elements set forth in section 408(d)(2) of the FFDCA; 
    however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted 
    data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the 
    petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the 
    petition.
    
    A. Toxicological Profile
    
        The toxicity of Crezasin has been studied in Russia and the 
    territories of the Former USSR for a period of 20 years on insects 
    (bees, silkworms,) birds (chickens, ducks, turkeys), rabbits, dogs, 
    sheep, swine and cattle and on an international level with companies 
    from Japan, Mongolia, France, USA, Bulgaria, Hungary, and Poland. The 
    results of experiments on the toxic effects of Crezasin on different 
    animals indicate that the preparation has low toxicity with weakly 
    defined cumulation and has a high index of safe application, 
    LD50= 3,600 +/- 320 milligrams/kilogram in laboratory female 
    mice and LC50= 6,570 +/- 150 milligrams/kilogram in 
    laboratory female rats. The 50% lethal concentration (LC50) 
    of Crezasin in water for Daphnia is 221.5 milligrams/liter.
    
    B. Aggregate Exposure
    
        The usage pattern for Crezasin includes an economical effect on a 
    limited number of agriculture cultures including potatoes, tomatoes, 
    grapes and cereal grains (wheat, barley and oats). Practical usage of 
    Crezasin is for the treatment of seeds and foliar spraying of plants. 
    Rates of seed treatment of agricultural crops is between 2 - 10 grams 
    per metric tons of seeds. Applications higher than 10 grams/ton can 
    result in a reduced economic benefit of usage. For spraying of growing 
    plants, the recommended dosage rates are between 0.32 x 10-4 
    moles/liter (100 mg/liter) and 0.06 x10-4 moles/liter (20 
    mg/liter) of Crezasin, with working solution rates up to 166 liters/
    acre (400 liters/hectare). Application rates higher than 
    10-4 moles/liter have resulted in a reduced economic 
    benefit. The usage of Crezasin in ornamental plants, lawn care and 
    other decorative public landscaping has not resulted in an economical 
    or biological benefit, and thus its usage would not be found in these 
    applications.
        Relating to the mobility and persistence in soils. Crezasin is 
    considered easily soluble in water at 100 grams/liter at pH 7, 25 
    degrees C. Crezasin is considered moderately stable in water, at pH 7, 
    25 degrees C, 50% hydrolysis of Crezasin in water is observed in 8.59 
    days, 95% hydrolysis is observed in 43.5 days. The constant of 
    hydrolysis in neutral water is: C125 = 0.05 
    day-1. The persistence of Crezasin in soils, pH 5 - 8, 
    organic matter content 1% - 4%, at 20 degrees C: 50% Crezasin 
    degradation is observed in 16 days and 90% degradation is observed in 
    23.5 days.
    
    C. Safety Determination
    
        Based on the very low level of substance toxicity, relatively short 
    period of environmental fate and its usage pattern which results in low 
    concentration usage, Crezasin exhibits very minimal risk exposure both 
    in dietary and non-occupational exposures to children.
    
    D. International Tolerances
    
        There are no Codex maximum residue levels established for residues 
    of Crezasin.
    
    2. GlobeTech Industries Corporation
    
    PP 7E4811
    
        EPA has received a pesticide petition (PP 7E4811) from GlobeTech 
    Industries Corporation, 57 Pratt Street, Suite 504, Hartford, CT 06103. 
    proposing pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug and 
    Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180 to establish 
    an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for Mival when used as 
    an inert ingredient in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops.
        EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information 
    regarding the elements set forth in section 408(d)(2) of the FFDCA; 
    however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted 
    data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the 
    petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the 
    petition.
    
    A. Toxicological Profile
    
        The toxicity of Mival has been studied in Russia and the 
    territories of the Former USSR for a period of 20 years on insects 
    (bees, silkworms,) birds (chickens, ducks, turkeys), rabbits, dogs, 
    sheep, swine and cattle and on an international level with companies 
    from Japan, Mongolia, France, USA, Bulgaria, Hungary, and Poland. The 
    results of experiments on the toxic effect of Mival on different 
    animals indicate that the preparation has low toxicity with weakly 
    defined cumulation and has a high index of safe application, 
    LD50= 2,300 +/- 240 milligrams/kilogram in laboratory mice 
    and LD50= 4,150 +/- 520 milligrams/kilogram in laboratory 
    rats. In reservoir waters, the unaffecting dosage to the chemical 
    characteristics of water and microbiological plant and animal life is 
    10 milligrams/liter.
    
    B. Aggregate Exposure
    
        The usage pattern for Mival includes an economical effect on a 
    limited number of agriculture cultures including cotton, potatoes, 
    tomatoes, corn, and cereal grains (wheat, barley and oats). Practical 
    usage of Mival is for the treatment of seeds and foliar spraying of 
    plants. Rates of seed treatment of agricultural crops is between 2 - 10 
    grams per metric tons of seeds. Applications higher than 10 grams/ton 
    can result in a reduced economic benefit of usage for all cultures. For 
    spraying of growing plants, the recommended dosage rates are between 
    10-4 moles/liter (225 mg/liter) and 2 x 10-4 
    moles/liter (450 mg/liter) of Mival, with working solution rates up to 
    100 liters/acre.). Application rates higher than 2 x10-4 
    moles/liter have resulted in a reduced economic benefit. The usage of 
    Mival in ornamental plants, lawn care and other decorative public 
    landscaping has not resulted in an economical or biological benefit, 
    and thus its usage would not be found in these applications.
        Relating to the mobility and persistence in soils. Mival is 
    considered easily soluble in water at 1 gram/liter at pH 7, 20 degrees 
    C. Usage of Mival in concentrations higher the 1 gm/liter must be 
    accompanied by an acceptable solvent. Based on the usage requirements 
    of Mival, such concentrations will lead to a negating effect of the 
    biological benefits of its usage on plants. Mival is considered 
    unstable in water, at pH 7, 25 degrees C, 50% hydrolysis of Mival in 
    water is observed in 10-12 hours, 90% hydrolysis is observed in 48 
    hours. The constant of hydrolysis in neutral water is: 
    C125 = 9.73 +/- 0.02 liter*mole*sec. The 
    persistence of Mival in soils, pH 5 - 8, organic matter content 1% - 
    4%, at 20 degrees C: 50% Mival degradation is observed in 5 days, and 
    90% degradation is observed in 21 days.
    
    [[Page 63942]]
    
    C. Safety Determination
    
        Based on the very low level of substance toxicity, relatively short 
    period of environmental fate and its usage pattern, Mival exhibits very 
    minimal risk exposure both in dietary and non-occupational exposures to 
    children.
    
    D. International Tolerances
    
        There are no Codex maximum residue levels established for residues 
    of Mival.
    [FR Doc. 97-31549 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/03/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
97-31549
Dates:
Comments, identified by the docket control number PF-774, must be received on or before January 2, 1998.
Pages:
63940-63942 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PF-774, FRL-5751-9
PDF File:
97-31549.pdf