97-33863. Pipeline Safety: Intent To Approve Shell Pipe Line Corporation for the Pipeline Risk Management Demonstration Program  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 67932-67936]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-33863]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), DOT
    [Docket No. RSPA-97-3224; Notice 10]
    
    
    Pipeline Safety: Intent To Approve Shell Pipe Line Corporation 
    for the Pipeline Risk Management Demonstration Program
    
    AGENCY: Office of Pipeline Safety, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Research and Special Programs Administration's (RSPA) 
    Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) plans to approve Shell Pipe Line 
    Corporation (SPLC) as a participant in the Pipeline Risk Management 
    Demonstration Program. OPS believes the SPLC demonstration project will 
    provide superior safety by applying numerous risk control measures 
    which exceed regulatory requirements, including increased right-of-way 
    surveillance; smart pig inspections; close interval cathodic protection 
    surveys; enhanced communications with One-Call, excavators, and the 
    public; additional overpressure protection; and selected depth-of-cover 
    surveys. This notice explains OPS's rationale for approving this 
    project, and summarizes the demonstration project provisions (including 
    affected locations, risk control and monitoring activities, and 
    regulatory exemptions) that would go into effect once OPS issues an 
    order approving SPLC as a Demonstration Program participant. OPS seeks 
    public comment on the proposed demonstration project so that it may 
    consider and address these comments before approving the project. The 
    SPLC demonstration project is the first of several projects OPS plans 
    to approve and monitor in assessing risk management as a component of 
    the Federal pipeline safety regulatory program.
    
    ADDRESSES: OPS requests that comments to this notice be submitted on or 
    before February 4, 1998, so they can be considered before project 
    approval. However, comments on this or any other demonstration project 
    will be accepted in the Docket throughout the 4-year demonstration 
    period. Comments should be sent to the Dockets Facility, U.S. 
    Department of Transportation, Plaza 401, 400 Seventh Street, SW, 
    Washington, DC 20590-0001, or you can E-Mail your comments to 
    ops.comments@rspa.dot.gov. Comments should identify the docket number 
    RSPA-97-3224. Persons should submit the original comment document and 
    one (1) copy. Persons wishing to receive confirmation of receipt of 
    their comments must include a self-addressed stamped postcard. The 
    Dockets Facility is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building 
    in Room 401, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC. The Dockets 
    Facility is open from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    except on Federal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Callsen, OPS, (202) 366-
    4572, regarding the subject matter of this notice. Contact the Dockets 
    Unit, (202) 366-5046, for docket material.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    1. Background
    
        The Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) is the federal regulatory body 
    overseeing pipeline safety. As a critical component of its mandate, OPS 
    administers and enforces a broad range of regulations governing safety 
    of pipelines and environmental protection. These regulations have 
    contributed to a good pipeline industry safety record by ensuring that 
    risks associated with pipeline design, construction, operations, and 
    maintenance are understood, managed, and reduced.
        Preserving and improving this safety record is OPS's top priority. 
    On the basis of extensive research, and the experience of both 
    government and industry, OPS believes that a risk management approach, 
    properly implemented and monitored through a formal risk management 
    regulatory framework, offers opportunities to achieve:
        (1) Superior safety and environmental protection;
        (2) Increased efficiency and service reliability of pipeline 
    operations; and
        (3) Improved communication and dialogue among industry, the 
    government, and other stakeholders.
        A key benefit of this approach is the opportunity for greater 
    levels of public participation.
        As authorized by Congress, OPS is conducting a structured 
    Demonstration Program to evaluate the use of a comprehensive risk 
    management approach in the operations and regulation of interstate 
    pipeline facilities. This evaluation will be performed under strictly 
    controlled conditions through a set of demonstration projects to be 
    conducted
    
    [[Page 67933]]
    
    with interstate pipeline operators. While OPS may exempt a 
    participating operator from particular regulations if the operator 
    needs such flexibility in implementing a comprehensive risk management 
    project, regulatory exemption is neither a goal nor requirement of the 
    Demonstration Program.
    
    2. OPS Evaluation of SPLC Demonstration Project Proposal
    
        Using the consultative process described in Appendix A of the 
    Requests for Application for the Pipeline Risk Management Demonstration 
    Program (62 FR 14719), published on March 27, 1997, OPS is prepared to 
    finalize the agreement with Shell Pipe Line Corporation (SPLC) on the 
    provisions for a demonstration project SPLC will conduct on two 
    pipeline segments it operates. The consultative review process ensures 
    that OPS considers and addresses comments on the SPLC proposal from all 
    stakeholders and interested parties.
        Several means have been used to provide information on the proposed 
    project and solicit questions and concerns. These include: (1) Previous 
    notices in the Federal Register (62 FR 40136 (July 25, 1997) and 62 FR 
    53052 (October 10, 1997)); (2) an Internet Information System (PRIMIS) 
    available via the OPS Home Page; (3) broadcasts via the Federal 
    Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Emergency Education Network 
    (EENET) (OPS received over 2,000 ``hits'' on the website broadcast 
    featuring SPLC); (4) a prospectus and map that OPS and SPLC produced 
    and mailed to over 400 people, including representatives from Local 
    Emergency Planning Committees (LEPC) along affected pipeline routes; 
    and (5) a November 19, 1997, public meeting OPS hosted in Houston, TX.
        OPS has also solicited comment on the SPLC proposal from other 
    federal agencies (including the Department of Justice and, via the 
    Regional Response Teams, the Environmental Protection Agency), state 
    and local government officials, public interest groups, and industry 
    and community representatives.
        This notice is the last public comment opportunity prior to 
    approval of SPLC's demonstration project. OPS will address and resolve 
    any issues and concerns raised through the consultative process with 
    SPLC.
    
    Company History and Record
    
        SPLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Shell Oil Products Company, 
    employing over 700 people, and operating approximately 8,000 miles of 
    pipelines in 18 states. Originally incorporated in 1919 (as the Ozark 
    Pipe Line Corporation), SPLC today transports approximately 4.0 million 
    barrels of crude oil, refined products, petrochemicals, carbon dioxide, 
    and natural gas daily.
        SPLC is headquartered in Houston, Texas. SPLC's parent corporation, 
    Shell Oil Products Company, is currently seeking government approval to 
    merge its refining, transportation, and marketing operations with 
    Texaco and Saudi Refining Inc. The merger will affect SPLC, although 
    the details are not yet known. In its Order approving SPLC's 
    demonstration project, OPS would require that the merged company 
    demonstrate that it will continue to commit to the objectives of the 
    Demonstration Program, and to comply with the requirements of the 
    Order.
        Before entering into consultations with SPLC, OPS determined that 
    SPLC was a favorable candidate for the Program, based on an examination 
    of the company's safety and environmental compliance record, its 
    accident history, and its commitment to working with OPS to develop a 
    project meeting the Demonstration Program goals. Neither of the two 
    pipeline segments SPLC is proposing for its demonstration project has 
    experienced a release due to unsafe operation (Section 4 of this 
    document describes the demonstration sites and the releases in the 
    demonstration segments).
        However, in December, 1988, another pipeline operated by SPLC 
    spilled 20,554 barrels of crude oil into the Gasconade River near 
    Vienna, Missouri. The cause of the spill was a manufacturing defect; 
    the consequences were aggravated by SPLC's failure to quickly stop the 
    pipeline flow. The subsequent OPS investigation of the spill found no 
    violations by SPLC of the pipeline safety regulations. Following this 
    spill, SPLC undertook a company-wide risk assessment and risk reduction 
    effort resulting in improved employee training, new or more aggressive 
    approaches to in-line inspection (smart pigging), hydrotesting, 
    hydraulic surge and spill volume analysis, and installation of 
    additional mainline block valves. Lessons learned from the December 
    1988, release and the subsequent company-wide assessments form the 
    foundation for SPLC's proposed risk management demonstration project.
        With regard to employee safety, from among some fifteen other 
    candidates, SPLC was selected as the American Petroleum Institute (API) 
    ``Safest Major Pipeline Operator'' in 1990, 1993, 1994, and 1995, and 
    was in second place in 1992 and 1996.
    
    Consultative Evaluation
    
        During the consultations, representatives from OPS headquarters and 
    Southwest Region, pipeline safety officials from Texas, Louisiana, and 
    Colorado, and risk management experts, met with SPLC to discuss SPLC's 
    risk assessment, supporting analyses, proposed risk control activities, 
    performance measures, and means of administering risk management within 
    the company. The discussions addressed technical validation of all 
    proposed activities, demographics and terrain along affected pipelines, 
    communications with outside stakeholders, and monitoring and auditing 
    of results once the demonstration project is underway. The 
    demonstration project provisions described in this notice evolved from 
    these consultations, as well as from any public comments received to 
    date. Once OPS and SPLC consider and address comments received on this 
    notice, OPS plans to issue an Order approving the SPLC demonstration 
    project.
    
    3. Statement of Project Goals
    
        OPS and SPLC believe SPLC's demonstration project will improve 
    safety through the application of numerous risk control measures that 
    exceed regulatory requirements on both pipeline segments, particularly 
    in the area of third party damage prevention. Increased right-of-way 
    surveillance; smart pig inspections; close interval cathodic protection 
    surveys; enhanced communications with One-Call, excavators, and the 
    public; additional overpressure protection; and selected depth-of-cover 
    surveys are some of the more significant activities that will be added 
    to existing measures to improve safety.
        SPLC is proposing that segments of two pipeline systems (the Texas-
    Louisiana System and the Cortez System) comprise its demonstration 
    project. SPLC conducted a thorough and systematic risk assessment to 
    identify hazards and risks associated with operating both of the 
    pipeline segments. SPLC then identified various activities that are 
    intended to result in reduced risk and superior safety and reliability 
    on both pipeline segments.
        SPLC's risk assessment process relies heavily on the expertise of 
    people familiar with the operation, maintenance, construction, and 
    history of the pipeline. With an average length of service of over 25 
    years, several of the people who participated in SPLC's risk 
    assessments have worked on the
    
    [[Page 67934]]
    
    proposed demonstration segments since the segments were constructed. 
    The risk assessments confirmed expectations, outlined previously in 
    SPLC's Letter of Intent, that third-party damage (i.e., contractors, 
    landowners, or others who accidentally strike pipelines during 
    excavation and/or other activities) is the most significant risk posed 
    to either pipeline segment. Therefore, SPLC's highest priority for its 
    risk management demonstration project is to prevent this type of 
    damage.
        For the Texas-Louisiana System, SPLC will supplement the required 
    activities it now performs with numerous new and additional risk 
    control activities based on SPLC's comprehensive risk assessment. SPLC 
    seeks no regulatory exemption on the Texas-Louisiana system. SPLC makes 
    a strong case that the risk of a release on this system will be 
    reduced, and superior safety will result. Releases from the Texas-
    Louisiana System pose little, if any, risk to the environment due to 
    the volatile nature of the commodity transported (ethylene).
        For the Cortez System, SPLC has also identified new and additional 
    risk control activities and has performed several technical validations 
    supporting a pressure increase beyond present regulatory limits at an 
    existing pump station in Cortez, CO. SPLC's assessment shows that a 
    combination of risk control activities, coupled with installation of 
    redundant overpressure protection systems, will offset any increase in 
    risk from the pressure increase that the company is requesting for the 
    Cortez segment. With the flexibility to raise pressure above regulatory 
    limits, SPLC can increase throughput (the amount of commodity 
    transported) without having to construct an intermediate pump station 
    in Blanco, NM. The Cortez System transports carbon dioxide 
    (CO2), which is a naturally occurring component of the air 
    and presents no environmental hazard. The regulatory exemption would 
    apply to a 25-mile segment of the pipeline located in a rural and 
    sparsely populated area in Colorado.
        For both pipeline segments, SPLC will improve emergency 
    preparedness through increased discussions with and the sharing of the 
    results of dispersion modeling with local emergency responders.
    
    4. Demonstration Project Pipeline Segments
    
    The Texas-Louisiana System
    
        SPLC's 250-mile Texas-Louisiana Ethylene Pipeline System (the 
    Texas-Louisiana System) transports chemical-grade ethylene between 
    Shell Oil Product's Deer Park, TX, manufacturing complex and its 
    Napoleonville, LA, transfer facility. SPLC's customers use ethylene for 
    manufacturing plastics, detergents, antifreeze, and other consumer 
    products. Ethylene is a flammable, highly volatile liquid that becomes 
    a slightly lighter-than-air gas when released to the atmosphere. Under 
    certain conditions, it could form an explosive vapor cloud until 
    diluted or dispersed. SPLC proposes to include 205 miles of this 
    system--from its Mont Belvieu, TX, compressor station to a block valve 
    at the western edge of the Atchafalaya Basin east of New Iberia, LA--in 
    its risk management demonstration project. Although routed mostly 
    through rural areas, the line passes near five large industrial and 
    developing residential areas, and includes more than 40 road crossings 
    and 12 water crossings. Due to its volatile nature, ethylene is not 
    considered a water pollutant.
        The Texas-Louisiana line has experienced 2 reportable releases 
    since it was commissioned in 1979, both the result of third party 
    damage. These two releases resulted in no fatalities or injuries, 
    although a fire and explosion did occur during the latter of these 
    releases (1981). There was no fire or explosion associated with the 
    first release (1979). The total volume of ethylene released to the 
    atmosphere in these two events was the equivalent of approximately 
    14,000 barrels of liquid. Neither event affected the environment. There 
    have been six minor, unreportable releases totalling the equivalent of 
    approximately 220 barrels of liquid, caused by miscellaneous mechanical 
    failures. Four additional ``near miss'' events of third party damage to 
    the pipeline system (one in the past few months) have also occurred, 
    none of which resulted in a release.
    
    The Cortez System
    
        The 502-mile Cortez carbon dioxide (CO2) Pipeline System 
    (the Cortez System) carries naturally-occurring commercial-grade CO2 
    from Cortez, CO, across New Mexico to Denver City, TX. CO2 
    is injected into oil wells to aid in the production of crude oil. 
    CO2 is a nonflammable, inert, non-toxic liquid that, when 
    released to the atmosphere, becomes a heavier-than-air gas. Although 
    CO2 is a naturally occurring component of air and presents 
    no environmental hazard, at high concentrations in confined, low lying 
    areas, it can present an asphyxiation hazard until it is dispersed or 
    diluted. The operating pressures on this line presently range from 2147 
    pounds per square inch gauge (psig) to 2999 psig. These pressures are 
    high compared to pipelines in general, but are typical for pipelines 
    transporting CO2.
        SPLC proposes to include the northwestern half of the Cortez System 
    (roughly 260 miles), from the Cortez pump station to the inlet of its 
    pressure-reducing station at Edgewood, NM (east of Albuquerque). The 
    line traverses rolling hills, mountainous areas, and sandy soils, 
    passing near five small communities. The route crosses four major 
    rivers and about 15 major roads. The segment of the Cortez line in the 
    demonstration project is located mostly in sparsely populated, rural 
    areas.
        The Cortez line has experienced no releases since it was 
    commissioned in 1984. There have been four ``near miss'' events of 
    third-party damage to the pipeline system. OPS databases have no 
    records of any releases from CO2 pipelines that have 
    resulted in injury or death.
        Neither demonstration segment is likely to impact the environment.
    
    5. Project Description
    
        The following risk control and monitoring activities would be 
    included in the Order OPS issues formally approving the SPLC 
    demonstration project.
    
    Risk Control Activities
    
        The company proposes using inspection techniques on both 
    demonstration pipelines to determine if there has been any past, 
    unknown damage while simultaneously applying a combination of risk 
    control activities and risk communications to reduce the likelihood and 
    the consequences of future third-party damage. In addition, the company 
    believes that several of these risk control activities will help 
    prevent third party damage on its newly constructed propylene pipeline, 
    which runs parallel to parts of the Texas-Louisiana line. The 
    activities proposed by SPLC to address damage from outside parties go 
    beyond the minimum requirements in the existing Federal Pipeline Safety 
    Regulations.
        SPLC has committed to:
         Increasing scheduled air patrol of the lines from every 
    two weeks to weekly;
         Improving air patrol effectiveness through enhanced staff 
    training, including techniques for more immediate reporting and 
    evaluation of potential instances of third party encroachment to 
    responsible SPLC personnel in the vicinity;
         Adding traffic barriers to aboveground equipment near 
    roadways
    
    [[Page 67935]]
    
    to reduce the likelihood of vehicle accidents impacting the pipeline;
         Reviewing locations of and supplementing where appropriate 
    existing right-of-way markers that identify the presence of a pipeline, 
    including adding Global Positioning System (GPS) locating information 
    on markers;
         Increasing ground surveillance of the lines in densely 
    populated areas;
         Enhancing company sponsorship of the local One-Call system 
    (the system in which excavators provide notification of their intent to 
    dig so that underground utilities like pipelines can be located and 
    protected prior to digging);
         Significantly upgrading public/neighbor education and 
    awareness efforts (including media usage);
         Conducting community-based emergency planning, training, 
    and drills, so that both the company and local officials will be better 
    prepared in the event of an accident;
         Using a warning ``mesh'' for backfilling during new 
    construction or significant repairs (excavators digging near a line 
    would encounter this mesh before hitting the pipe);
         Running in-line inspection device(s) on the Texas-
    Louisiana demonstration segment to determine if there is any existing 
    mechanical damage to the pipeline from prior third party encroachments; 
    and
         Assessing other risk control measures and staffing 
    requirements.
        SPLC will also perform dispersion analyses for the Texas-Louisiana 
    ethylene demonstration segment to better understand the potential 
    consequences of a release, and thus help improve emergency response 
    planning and communications with local responders.
    
    Increased Throughput on the Cortez System
    
        With implementation of the above activities to control the causes 
    of the most significant risks to both of the demonstration segments, 
    SPLC believes it can then proceed with a plan to increase the Cortez 
    System's throughput (the amount of product transported) while still 
    delivering superior safety. This plan calls for increasing the maximum 
    operating pressure by up to 11 percent beyond what is allowed by the 
    regulations on the 25-miles of pipeline immediately downstream of the 
    Cortez pump station. In the Order authorizing SPLC to commence its 
    demonstration project, OPS will exempt SPLC from 49 CFR 195.406(a)(1-
    3), which addresses the maximum operating pressure for pipelines 
    transporting hazardous liquids.
        To support its evaluation of risk associated with increased 
    operating pressure on the Cortez line, SPLC conducted several technical 
    analyses. These include:
         A comprehensive review of the original pipe 
    specifications; actual materials' properties; pipemill manufacture, 
    inspection, and testing procedures; and field construction and 
    inspection techniques that demonstrated the pipe's safety margin 
    exceeds regulatory requirements, and thus can safely handle the 
    proposed increase in operating pressure;
         Steady state transthermal hydraulic analysis and computer 
    modeling to determine the actual pressure and corresponding safety 
    factors at any point in the pipeline under normal and worst case 
    operating conditions;
         Surge analyses and modeling to determine the pressure at 
    any point in the pipeline under abnormal or unexpected operating 
    events; and
         Dispersion analyses to better understand the potential 
    consequences of a release, and thus help improve emergency response 
    planning and communications with local responders.
    
    Additional Risk Control Activities on the Cortez Line
    
        In addition, prior to any increase in operating pressure on the 
    Cortez segment (expected to occur in August-September, 1998), SPLC's 
    plan also calls for:
         Conducting a Close Interval Survey, which involves 
    inspection and electrical testing every two to three feet along the 
    pipeline to confirm the ability of protection systems to mitigate 
    corrosion, and to help detect if there is any coating damage that might 
    indicate the presence of mechanical damage to the pipeline from 
    possible prior third party encroachments.
         Performing a Depth-of-Cover Survey (from the Cortez 
    Station to the 25-mile mark) to ensure adequate protection from 
    external mechanical damage and loading.
         Developing a Geographic Information System (GIS) Data Base 
    (from the Cortez Station to the 25-mile mark) to test its applicability 
    and usefulness for pipeline operations, including emergency response.
         Installing additional equipment at the Cortez Station 
    beyond that currently required by the regulations to provide four 
    levels of redundant protection against overpressure situations. This 
    will provide additional assurance that the pressures in the pipe will 
    not exceed the safe levels determined from the system review noted 
    above.
         Doubling the inspection frequency from once per year to 
    every six months for the overpressure protection devices mentioned 
    above.
    
    Monitoring Demonstration Project Effectiveness
    
        The SPLC Demonstration Project includes a comprehensive approach to 
    performance monitoring that assures the superior protection of public 
    safety, and achieves other project objectives. A key element of this 
    monitoring plan is a set of performance measures that would track the 
    growth and institutionalization of risk management within the company, 
    measure the effectiveness of SPLC's risk control activities, validate 
    analyses supporting current safety activities, and provide a basis for 
    future improvement. Examples include: The number of SPLC-operated 
    pipeline systems under risk management (should increase if risk 
    management is feasible); the number of unmonitored encroachments on the 
    pipeline right-of-way (should decrease due to improved communications); 
    accuracy of One-Call reports (should improve due to improved pipeline 
    markers); employee awareness of risk management process (should improve 
    through training and participation in process); quantity/accessibility 
    of data to support risk assessment (should improve as performance 
    measure data accumulates). SPLC will report performance measure data 
    and project progress regularly to OPS throughout the four year 
    demonstration period. This information, as well as periodic OPS audits, 
    will assure accountability for improved performance.
    
    6. Regulatory Perspective
    
    Why OPS Plans To Approve This Project
    
        OPS is considering SPLC's proposed project for the Demonstration 
    Program because, after extensive review, OPS is satisfied that the 
    proposal:
        A. Provides superior safety for both of the demonstration segments. 
    For the Cortez line, OPS is satisfied that the safety margin in the 
    pipe can accommodate the proposed increase in pressure without adding 
    significant additional risk to the public. Furthermore, SPLC has 
    adequately demonstrated that the combination of third party damage and 
    other risk control activities described earlier more than offset any 
    increase in risk associated with the higher operating pressure in the 
    first 25-miles of the line. For the Texas-Louisiana ethylene line, all 
    of the proposed risk control activities go beyond the current 
    regulatory
    
    [[Page 67936]]
    
    requirements and thus provide a higher level of public protection than 
    exists today.
        B. Offers a good opportunity to evaluate risk management as a 
    component of the Federal pipeline safety regulatory program. OPS 
    believes the Demonstration Program could benefit from SPLC's 
    participation, given some of the distinguishing features of its 
    proposed demonstration project, including:
         Comprehensive evaluation of two distinctly different 
    pipeline systems transporting different products, in different 
    locations with substantially different surroundings, representing 
    significantly different risks;
         Emphasis on improving damage prevention and emergency 
    response coordination;
         Concentrated public outreach and risk communications 
    efforts;
         A good illustration (on the Texas-Louisiana line) of how 
    companies can use risk management to improve safety without seeking to 
    reduce costs incurred by existing regulations;
         Willingness to share information with OPS and state 
    pipeline safety agencies on the specific risks associated with the 
    demonstration line segments, as well as its risk management program and 
    processes (which is far more information than is typically provided in 
    the existing compliance process). This additional information allows 
    OPS to more effectively ensure safe operation, as well as helps OPS 
    understand how risk management might be employed to supplement the 
    existing regulatory framework; and
         Systematic allocation of resources to potentially higher-
    risk operations.
    
    How Will OPS Oversee This Project?
    
        OPS retains its full authority to administer and enforce all 
    regulations governing pipeline safety. Except for the increase in 
    maximum operating pressure over the initial 25-mile segment of the 
    Cortez line, SPLC is not requesting any regulatory relief or 
    exemptions. Both of these lines will be subject to routine OPS 
    inspection to ensure compliance with the applicable Federal Pipeline 
    Safety Regulations. In addition, subsequent to approval, the 
    Demonstration Project will be monitored by a Project Review Team (PRT) 
    consisting of OPS headquarters and regional staff and state pipeline 
    safety officials. The PRT is designed to be a more comprehensive 
    oversight process, which draws maximum technical experience and 
    perspective from all affected OPS regional and headquarters offices as 
    well as any affected state agencies that would not normally provide 
    oversight on interstate transmission projects. One of the primary 
    functions of this Team will be to conduct periodic risk management 
    audits, which will be performed in addition to the normal OPS 
    inspections. These risk management audits will be used to ensure 
    company compliance with the specific terms and conditions of the OPS 
    Order authorizing this Demonstration Project. OPS is developing a 
    detailed audit plan, tailored to the unique requirements of the SPLC 
    Demonstration Project. This plan will describe the audit process (e.g., 
    types of inspections, methods, and their frequency), as well as the 
    specific requirements for reporting information and performance measure 
    data to OPS.
    
    Information Provided to the Public
    
        OPS has previously provided information to the public about the 
    SPLC project, and has requested public comment, using many different 
    sources. OPS aired two electronic ``town meetings'' (June 5, 1997, and 
    September 17, 1997) enabling viewers of the two-way live broadcasts to 
    pose questions and voice concerns about candidate companies (including 
    SPLC). Two earlier Federal Register notices (62 FR 40135; July 25, 1997 
    and 62 FR 53052; October 10, 1997) informed the public that SPLC was 
    interested in participating in the Demonstration Program, provided 
    general information about technical issues and risk control 
    alternatives to be explored, and identified the geographic areas the 
    demonstration project would traverse.
        Since August, OPS has used an Internet-accessible data system 
    called the Pipeline Risk Management Information System (PRIMIS) at 
    http://www.cycla.com/opsdemo to collect, update, and exchange 
    information about all demonstration candidates, including SPLC.
        At a November 19, 1997, public meeting OPS hosted in Houston, TX, 
    SPLC officials presented a summary of the proposed demonstration 
    project and answered questions from meeting attendees. (Portions of 
    this meeting were broadcast on December 4, 1997. This broadcast is 
    available on demand via our OPS website ops.dot.gov/tmvid.htm.)
        OPS has provided a prospectus, which includes a map of the 
    demonstration sites, to State officials and community representatives 
    who may be interested in reviewing project information, providing 
    input, or monitoring the progress of the project. This notice is the 
    last public comment opportunity prior to approval of SPLC's 
    demonstration project.
    
        Issued in Washington, DC on December 23, 1997.
    Richard B. Felder,
    Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
    [FR Doc. 97-33863 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-60-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/30/1997
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
97-33863
Pages:
67932-67936 (5 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. RSPA-97-3224, Notice 10
PDF File:
97-33863.pdf