2022-28318. Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas  

  • Start Preamble Start Printed Page 80472

    AGENCY:

    Office of Personnel Management.

    ACTION:

    Proposed rule.

    SUMMARY:

    The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is proposing a rule to redefine the geographic boundaries of the following appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas for pay-setting purposes: Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; Roanoke, VA; and Washington, DC. The proposed rule would redefine the Shenandoah National Park portions of Albemarle, Augusta, Greene, Page, and Rockingham Counties, VA, to the Washington, DC, wage area. This change is based on a recent consensus recommendation of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC).

    DATES:

    Send comments on or before January 30, 2023.

    ADDRESSES:

    You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title, by the following method:

    Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

    All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number or RIN for this document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Ana Paunoiu, by telephone at (202) 606-2858 or by email at pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    OPM is proposing a rule to redefine the geographic boundaries of the following appropriated fund FWS wage areas: Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; Roanoke, VA; and Washington, DC. This proposed rule would redefine the Shenandoah National Park portions of Albemarle, Augusta, Greene, Page, and Rockingham Counties, VA, to the Washington, DC, wage area. Shenandoah National Park would become consolidated under the Washington, DC, FWS wage area so that the installation would be defined to a single wage area. This change is based on a recent recommendation of FPRAC, the statutory national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters affecting the pay of FWS employees. From time to time, FPRAC reviews the boundaries of wage areas and provides OPM with recommendations for changes if the Committee finds that changes are warranted.

    As provided by 5 CFR 532.211, this regulation allows consideration of the following criteria when defining wage area boundaries: distance, transportation facilities, and geographic features; commuting patterns; and similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments.

    The Shenandoah National Park (approximately 105 miles long) is currently split among four FWS areas. When the FWS was first established, most of Shenandoah National Park was in the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg wage area. Over time, as a result of changes in Office of Management and Budget defined metropolitan statistical areas, the wage area definitions for some counties that comprise the Shenandoah National Park have been changed by OPM based on recommendations of FPRAC.

    Presently, portions of the Shenandoah National Park are defined to the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; Roanoke, VA; and Washington, DC, FWS wage areas as follows:

    (1) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Albemarle and Greene Counties, VA, is defined to the Richmond wage area;

    (2) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Augusta County, VA, is defined to the Roanoke wage area;

    (3) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Madison, Rappahannock, and Warren Counties, VA, is defined to the Washington, DC, wage area; and

    (4) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Page and Rockingham Counties, VA, is defined to the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD, wage area.

    Albemarle and Greene Counties, except for the Shenandoah National Park portions, continue to be appropriately defined to the Richmond, VA, wage area. Augusta County, except for the Shenandoah National Park portion, continues to be appropriately defined to the Roanoke, VA, wage area. Page and Rockingham Counties, except for the Shenandoah National Park portions, continue to be appropriately defined to the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD, wage area. Madison, Rappahannock, and Warren Counties continue to be appropriately defined to the Washington, DC, wage area.

    There are 14 FWS National Park Service (NPS) employees working in the Shenandoah National Park portion of Madison County and 17 FWS NPS employees working in the Shenandoah National Park portion of Page County. So that the FWS employees working at Shenandoah National Park are not split among four wage areas, OPM proposes that the Shenandoah National Park portions of Albemarle, Augusta, Greene, Page, and Rockingham Counties be redefined to the Washington, DC, wage area. Shenandoah National Park would then be entirely defined to the Washington, DC, wage area. This change would provide equal pay treatment for FWS employees working at Shenandoah National Park.

    FPRAC, the national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, recommended this change by consensus. This change would be effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 30 days following publication of the final regulations.

    Regulatory Impact Analysis

    This action is not a “significant regulatory action” under the terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR Start Printed Page 80473 51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore not subject to review under E.O. 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).

    Regulatory Flexibility Act

    OPM certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

    Federalism

    We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State, local, or tribal governments.

    Civil Justice Reform

    This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in Executive Order 12988.

    Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995

    This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

    Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    • Administrative practice and procedure
    • Freedom of information
    • Government employees
    • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    • Wages
    End List of Subjects Start Signature

    Office of Personnel Management.

    Stephen Hickman,

    Federal Register Liaison.

    End Signature

    Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:

    Start Part

    PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS

    End Part Start Amendment Part

    1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Authority

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.

    End Authority Start Amendment Part

    2. In Appendix C to subpart B amend the table by revising the wage area listings for the District of Columbia and the States of Maryland and Virginia to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part

    Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532—Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas

    Definitions of Wage and Wage Survey Areas

    * * * * *

    District of Columbia

    Washington, DC

    Survey Area

    District of Columbia:

    Washington, DC

    Maryland:

    Charles

    Frederick

    Montgomery

    Prince George's

    Virginia (cities):

    Alexandria

    Fairfax

    Falls Church

    Manassas

    Manassas Park

    Virginia (counties):

    Arlington

    Fairfax

    Loudoun

    Prince William

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

    Maryland:

    Calvert

    St. Mary's

    Virginia (city):

    Fredericksburg

    Virginia (counties):

    Albemarle (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion)

    Augusta (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion)

    Clarke

    Culpeper

    Fauquier

    Greene (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion)

    King George

    Madison

    Page (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion)

    Rappahannock

    Rockingham (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion)

    Spotsylvania

    Stafford

    Warren

    West Virginia:

    Jefferson

    * * * * *

    Maryland

    Baltimore

    Survey Area

    Maryland (city):

    Baltimore

    Maryland (counties):

    Anne Arundel

    Baltimore

    Carroll

    Harford

    Howard

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

    Maryland:

    Queen Anne's

    Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg

    Survey Area

    Maryland:

    Washington

    Pennsylvania:

    Franklin

    West Virginia:

    Berkeley

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

    Maryland:

    Allegany

    Garrett

    Pennsylvania:

    Fulton

    Virginia (cities):

    Harrisonburg

    Winchester

    Virginia (counties):

    Frederick

    Page (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion)

    Rockingham (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion)

    Shenandoah

    West Virginia:

    Hampshire

    Hardy

    Mineral

    Morgan

    * * * * *

    Virginia

    Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News-Hampton

    Survey Area

    Virginia (cities):

    Chesapeake

    Hampton

    Newport News

    Norfolk

    Poquoson

    Portsmouth

    Suffolk

    Virginia Beach

    Williamsburg

    Virginia (counties):

    Gloucester

    James City

    York

    North Carolina:

    Currituck

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

    Virginia (city):

    Franklin

    Virginia (counties):

    Accomack

    Isle of Wight

    Mathews

    Northampton

    Southampton

    Surry

    North Carolina:

    Camden

    Chowan

    Gates

    Pasquotank

    Perquimans

    Maryland:

    Assateague Island part of Worcester

    Richmond

    Survey Area

    Virginia (cities): Start Printed Page 80474

    Colonial Heights

    Hopewell

    Petersburg

    Richmond

    Virginia (counties):

    Charles City

    Chesterfield

    Dinwiddie

    Goochland

    Hanover

    Henrico

    New Kent

    Powhatan

    Prince George

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

    Virginia (cities):

    Charlottesville

    Emporia

    Virginia (counties):

    Albemarle (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion)

    Amelia

    Brunswick

    Buckingham

    Caroline

    Charlotte

    Cumberland

    Essex

    Fluvanna

    Greene (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion)

    Greensville

    King and Queen

    King William

    Lancaster

    Louisa

    Lunenberg

    Mecklenburg

    Middlesex

    Nelson

    Northumberland

    Nottoway

    Orange

    Prince Edward

    Richmond

    Sussex

    Westmoreland

    Roanoke

    Survey Area

    Virginia (cities):

    Radford

    Roanoke

    Salem

    Virginia (counties):

    Botetourt

    Craig

    Montgomery

    Roanoke

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

    Virginia (cities):

    Bedford

    Buena Vista

    Clifton Forge

    Covington

    Danville

    Galax

    Lexington

    Lynchburg

    Martinsville

    South Boston

    Staunton

    Waynesboro

    Virginia (counties):

    Alleghany

    Amherst

    Appomattox

    Augusta (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion)

    Bath

    Bedford

    Bland

    Campbell

    Carroll

    Floyd

    Franklin

    Giles

    Halifax

    Henry

    Patrick

    Pittsburgh

    Pulaski

    Rockbridge

    Wythe

    * * * * *
    End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 2022-28318 Filed 12-29-22; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 6325-39-P

Document Information

Published:
12/30/2022
Department:
Personnel Management Office
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
2022-28318
Dates:
Send comments on or before January 30, 2023.
Pages:
80472-80474 (3 pages)
RINs:
3206-AO49
Topics:
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages
PDF File:
2022-28318.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Excepted Service
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Federal Employees Health Benefits Open Season Express Interactive Voice Response System and Open Season Website
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: We Need Information About Your Missing Payment-OPM Form RI 38-31, OMB No. 3206-0187
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Representative Payee Survey
» Meetings: Hispanic Council on Federal Employment
» Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program Enrollee Decision Period for Current Enrollees
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Application for Deferred or Postponed Retirement- Federal Employees Retirement System
CFR: (1)
5 CFR 532