[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68245-68246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34081]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD11-95-003]
RIN 2115-AE47
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal
Canal, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Proposed rule; termination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is terminating rulemaking which would have
amended the regulation for the draws of the Alameda County vehicular
bridges crossing the Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal at the following
locations: Park Street, mile 7.3; Fruitvale Avenue, mile 7.7; High
Street, mile 8.1; as well as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers railroad
bridge, mile 7.7 at Fruitvale Avenue. The proposed rule did not meet
the reasonable needs of navigation. The County apparently is no longer
interested in pursuing this rulemaking.
DATES: This proposed rulemaking is terminated December 12, 1997.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry P. Olmes, Bridge Section,
Eleventh Coast Guard District, Building 50-6, Coast Guard Island,
Alameda, CA 94501-5100, telephone (510) 437-3515.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory History
On May 9, 1995, the Coast Guard published the NPRM in the Federal
Register (60 FR 24599). The Coast Guard received 18 letters in response
to the NPRM, 6 of which requested a public hearing. The Coast Guard
then decided to reopen the comment period and hold a public hearing; a
notice of reopening of the comment period and of the public hearing was
published in the Federal
[[Page 68246]]
Register on September 12, 1995 (60 FR 47317). The comment period was
extended until October 31, 1995, and a public hearing was held on
October 5, 1995.
The majority of respondents objected to the proposal for reasons of
safety and inconvenience to waterway users. Based on the comments
received, the Coast Guard denied the request. The Coast Guard offered a
counter proposal, but the County did not respond to the counter
proposal.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
terminating all further rulemaking under docket number CGD11-95-003.
Dated: December 12, 1997.
J.C. Card,
Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 97-34081 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
