98-34711. Notice of Planning Update for the John Day River Management Plan and Potential Related Amendments to the Two Rivers and John Day Resource Management Plans  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 251 (Thursday, December 31, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 72323-72324]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-34711]
    
    
    
    [[Page 72323]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Bureau of Land Management
    [OR-050-1220-00; GP9-0053]
    
    
    Notice of Planning Update for the John Day River Management Plan 
    and Potential Related Amendments to the Two Rivers and John Day 
    Resource Management Plans
    
    AGENCY: Prineville District, Central Oregon Resource Area.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Present Status regarding development of a Revised 
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Management Plan for the Wild 
    and Scenic John Day River and related Resource Management Plans.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in the State of Oregon, 
    Prineville District, Central Oregon Resource Area, is revising the 
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Management Plan for the Wild 
    and Scenic John Day River Plan which will further amend sections of the 
    Two Rivers and John Day Resource Management Plan. Reference may be made 
    to the original Notice of Intent, Federal Register, Vol. 56, No. 234, 
    December 5, 1991, page 63742.
        The original Plan completion schedule is revised as a result of a 
    litigated settlement concerning a suit against the BLM.
    
    DATES: The previously announced public scoping period was concluded on 
    October 30, 1997. The revised draft river management plan and 
    environmental impact statement (EIS) was previously scheduled for a 90 
    day public review period in the early summer of 1998; however, this 
    date has been changed to April of 1999. The proposed river plan, 
    related RMP amendments, and final EIS are now expected to be available 
    for public review during November of 1999. Any additional opportunities 
    for public review and comment will be announced through the Federal 
    Register, direct mailings to known interested parties, and 
    announcements in Prineville's newspaper, the Central Oregonian, John 
    Day's newspaper, the Blue Mountain Eagle, and Condon's newspaper, the 
    Condon Times.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR RELATED DOCUMENTS CONTACT: Dan Wood, Project 
    Manager, Prineville District BLM, PO Box 550, Prineville, Oregon 97754 
    (Telephone 541-416-6751, FAX 541-416-6798). Anyone interested in 
    participating during the public review process of this planning effort 
    may request to be added to the mailing list. Individuals should specify 
    if they wish to have their names and addresses withheld from public 
    access under the privacy provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. 
    Copies of the two existing approved plans (as amended) are available, 
    upon request at this location.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau of Land Management is developing 
    a Revised Draft Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement 
    (EIS) for public lands along the John Day River system in Oregon. The 
    John Day River watershed encompasses all or portions of eleven 
    counties, six of which would be directly affected by the proposed plan. 
    The development of the Plan is accomplished through a partnership 
    consisting of the BLM, the State of Oregon, The Confederated Tribes of 
    the Warm Springs and the John Day River Coalition of Counties which 
    consist of Gilliam, Grant, Jefferson, Sherman, Wasco and Wheeler 
    Counties. Progress of the Plan is reviewed monthly by a Resource 
    Advisory Council (RAC) Sub-Group, created expressly for this purpose, 
    which comments back to the BLM and Partners developing the Plan.
        The planning and analysis process will comply with the procedural 
    requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, the Wild and 
    Scenic River Act (as amended) and the Federal Land Policy and 
    Management Act. The resulting decisions are expected to satisfy the 
    requirements of the 1989 Omnibus Oregon Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 
    amend relevant portions of the Two Rivers and John Day Resource 
    Management Plans (both within and outside the river corridors) and 
    address relevant issues from ongoing litigation concerning the John Day 
    River Plan. The federally designated Wild and Scenic segments of the 
    John Day River managed by the Bureau include 147 miles of the John Day 
    River mainstem from Service Creek to Tumwater Falls and 47 miles of the 
    South Fork of the John Day River from the Malheur National Forest 
    boundary to Smokey Creek. The 54 mile federally designated Wild and 
    Scenic segment of the North Fork of the John Day River is managed by 
    the Umatilla National Forest under a previously prepared and approved 
    plan.
        The revised draft plan and EIS will analyze public lands managed by 
    the Bureau along the John Day River segments which are federally 
    designated as Wild and Scenic and segments which are not so designated, 
    some of which may be potentially suitable for designation as additional 
    components of the National Wild and Scenic River System. Special 
    emphasis will be given to management strategies that protect and 
    enhance the outstandingly remarkable values for which the Bureau 
    managed segments were designated. These outstandingly remarkable values 
    are scenic, recreational, geologic, fish, wildlife, historic and 
    cultural. Other values identified as significant are botanical, 
    ecological, paleontological,, and archeological resources. Planning and 
    analysis issues will include management, protection and enhancement of 
    the identified river related values, plus any related Bureau authorized 
    activities or resource uses such as, but not limited to, livestock 
    grazing, irrigated agriculture, road and facility construction and 
    maintenance, noxious weed control, streambank stability and 
    stabilization, acquisition and management of additional lands within 
    the river corridor and attainment of State of Oregon approved water 
    quality standards.
        Preliminary future management strategies (alternatives0 to be 
    addressed are (1) Baseline/ Current Use, Development and Management (No 
    Action), (2) Maximum Enhancement of Natural Values With Minimal 
    Development, (3) Required Protection and System Restoration and 
    Moderate Use and Development, (4) Increased Use and Development to 
    Enhance Local Economic Activity and Developed recreation Consistent 
    with River Resource Protection and (5) A Preferred Alternative (to be 
    developed from elements of the other alternatives with public input). 
    Any decisions which are inconsistent with the current Two Rivers or 
    John Day RMPs would result in amendments to the applicable plans as a 
    result of the Oregon State Director approval of the Record of Decision. 
    A team of interdisciplinary specialists, whose backgrounds are in the 
    resources to be affected, will be involved in the review and 
    development of the description of the affected environment, development 
    of alternatives and impact analysis. Disciplines to be represented on 
    the team preparing the plan amendment and EIS include, but are not 
    limited to: archeology, anthropology, economics, lands and minerals, 
    recreation, forestry, fisheries, hydrology, botanical, soils wildlife, 
    geology and hazardous materials.
        The Prineville District's Two Rivers (1986) and John Day (1985, 
    1995) Resource Management Plans (RMPs) currently provide general 
    management for the river corridors and known river related values as 
    well as overall land resource use allocations and resource protection 
    or enhancement. Although it is anticipated that the final decisions for
    
    [[Page 72324]]
    
    river management considered through this analysis could be in full 
    conformance with the applicable RMPs, it is possible that portions of 
    some actions under some alternatives may not be in full conformance 
    with the approved RMPs, as required by 43 Code of Federal Regulations 
    (CFR), Sub-part 1610.5-3, ``Conformity and Implementation''. The 
    environmental analysis and public and interagency review process 
    anticipated for this analysis are expected to fully comply with the 
    Bureaus regulations for land use planning, including land use plan 
    amendments, public involvement and coordination with other Federal 
    agencies, State and local governments and Indian tribes, (43 CFR 
    1610.2, 1610.3 and 1610.5-5). This will allow the analysis to consider 
    river corridor and value strategies which are inconsistent with the 
    current direction or substantially affect other resource uses and 
    allocations in one or more of the subject approved RMPs. Any approved 
    decisions which amend the applicable plans will be incorporated into 
    the plans and become part of the permanent planning record. Any 
    refinements or clarifications of management direction, priority of 
    river resource allocations and use of final river corridor boundaries 
    will be incorporated into the applicable plans and documented through 
    published plan maintenance reports, as provided under 43 CFR 1610.5-4. 
    Copies of the two existing approved plans (as amended) will be 
    available in the same locations as the other elements of the supporting 
    record, as noted elsewhere in this notice.
        The decisions made through this analysis are expected to be 
    implemented in a series of actions over a period of several years. 
    Although the intent is to implement the final river plan within 
    approximately two years of the approval of the decision(s), some 
    residual actions or independent resource use actions which are in 
    conformance with the analysis and decisions and associated approved 
    RMPs may occur over a period of ten or more years. In effect, this 
    analysis will serve both to facilitate the immediate need for a 
    comprehensive river plan and some immediate changes in resource use or 
    resource allocations or vegetation remediation or recreational facility 
    projects and it will also provide for future long-term actions that 
    fall under the programmatic nature of this analysis dealing with 
    ``desired future conditions''. Future site developments, land use 
    allocation changes and projects would be subject to appropriate 
    environmental analyses, public and interagency reviews and will be 
    reported in the applicable District periodic planning update reports 
    which are distributed to known interested parties.
    
        Dated: December 18, 1998.
    James L. Hancock,
    District Manager.
    [FR Doc. 98-34711 Filed 12-30-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/31/1998
Department:
Land Management Bureau
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Present Status regarding development of a Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Management Plan for the Wild and Scenic John Day River and related Resource Management Plans.
Document Number:
98-34711
Dates:
The previously announced public scoping period was concluded on October 30, 1997. The revised draft river management plan and environmental impact statement (EIS) was previously scheduled for a 90 day public review period in the early summer of 1998; however, this date has been changed to April of 1999. The proposed river plan, related RMP amendments, and final EIS are now expected to be available for public review during November of 1999. Any additional opportunities for public review and ...
Pages:
72323-72324 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
OR-050-1220-00, GP9-0053
PDF File:
98-34711.pdf