2019-28007. Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of Pitt County, North Carolina, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area  

  • Start Preamble Start Printed Page 72250

    AGENCY:

    Office of Personnel Management.

    ACTION:

    Proposed rule.

    SUMMARY:

    The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a proposed rule that would define Pitt County, North Carolina, as an area of application county to the Wayne, NC, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. This change is necessary because there is one NAF FWS employee working in Pitt County, and the county is not currently defined to a NAF wage area.

    DATES:

    Send comments on or before January 30, 2020.

    ADDRESSES:

    You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title, by the following method:

    All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number or RIN for this document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at (202) 606-2858 or by email at pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    OPM is issuing a proposed rule that would define Pitt County, NC, as an area of application to the Wayne, NC, NAF FWS wage area. The Department of Veterans Affairs notified OPM that the Veterans Canteen Service now has one NAF FWS employee in Pitt County.

    Under section 532.219 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, each NAF wage area “shall consist of one or more survey areas, along with nonsurvey areas, if any, having nonappropriated fund employees.” Pitt County does not meet the regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.219 to be established as a separate NAF wage area; however, nonsurvey counties may be combined with a survey area to form a wage area. Section 532.219 lists the regulatory criteria that OPM considers when defining FWS wage area boundaries. This regulation allows consideration of the following criteria: Proximity of largest activity in each county, transportation facilities and commuting patterns, and similarities of the counties in overall population, private employment in major industry categories, and kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments.

    Pitt County, NC, would be defined as an area of application to the Wayne, NC, NAF FWS wage area. The proximity criterion favors the Wayne wage area. The transportation facilities and commuting patterns criterion does not favor one wage area more than another. The overall population, employment sizes, and kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments criterion does not favor one wage area more than another. While a standard review of regulatory criteria shows mixed results, the proximity criterion favors the Wayne wage area. Based on this analysis, we propose that Pitt County be defined to the Wayne NAF wage area.

    With the definition of Pitt County to the Wayne NAF wage area, the Wayne wage area would consist of one survey county (Wayne County, NC) and two area of application counties (Halifax and Pitt Counties, NC). The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, the national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, made a majority recommendation to define Pitt County to the Wayne NAF wage area. This change would be effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 30 days following publication of the final regulations.

    Regulatory Impact Analysis

    This action is not a “significant regulatory action” under the terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore not subject to review under E.O. 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).

    Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs

    This rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because this rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.

    Regulatory Flexibility Act

    OPM certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

    Federalism

    We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State, local, or tribal governments.

    Civil Justice Reform

    This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in Executive Order 12988.

    Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995

    This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

    Congressional Review Act

    This action pertains to agency management, personnel, and organization and does not substantially affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties and, accordingly, is not a “rule” as that term is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the Small Business “Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.

    Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping Start Printed Page 72251requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    • Administrative practice and procedure
    • Freedom of information
    • Government employees
    • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    • Wages
    End List of Subjects Start Signature

    Office of Personnel Management.

    Alexys Stanley,

    Regulatory Affairs.

    End Signature

    Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:

    Start Part

    PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS

    End Part Start Amendment Part

    1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Authority

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.

    End Authority Start Amendment Part

    2. In Appendix D to subpart B amend the table by revising the wage area listing for the State of North Carolina to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part

    Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—Nonappropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas

    Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area Survey Areas

    *    *    *    *    *
    NORTH CAROLINA
    Craven
    Survey Area
    North Carolina:
    Craven
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    North Carolina:
    Carteret
    Dare
    Cumberland
    Survey Area
    North Carolina:
    Cumberland
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    North Carolina:
    Durham
    Forsyth
    Rowan
    Onslow
    Survey area
    North Carolina:
    Onslow
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    North Carolina:
    New Hanover
    Wayne
    Survey area
    North Carolina:
    Wayne
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    North Carolina:
    Halifax
    Pitt
    *    *    *    *    *
    End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 2019-28007 Filed 12-30-19; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 6325-39-P

Document Information

Published:
12/31/2019
Department:
Personnel Management Office
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
2019-28007
Dates:
Send comments on or before January 30, 2020.
Pages:
72250-72251 (2 pages)
RINs:
3206-AN94: Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of Pitt County, North Carolina, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/3206-AN94/prevailing-rate-systems-definition-of-pitt-county-north-carolina-to-a-nonappropriated-fund-federal-w
Topics:
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages
PDF File:
2019-28007.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Excepted Service
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Federal Employees Health Benefits Open Season Express Interactive Voice Response System and Open Season Website
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: We Need Information About Your Missing Payment-OPM Form RI 38-31, OMB No. 3206-0187
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Representative Payee Survey
» Meetings: Hispanic Council on Federal Employment
» Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program Enrollee Decision Period for Current Enrollees
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Application for Deferred or Postponed Retirement- Federal Employees Retirement System
CFR: (1)
5 CFR 532