95-29393. Compagnie Financiere de Paribas; Application to Engage in Nonbanking Activities  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 232 (Monday, December 4, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 62092-62093]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-29393]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
    
    Compagnie Financiere de Paribas; Application to Engage in 
    Nonbanking Activities
    
        Compagnie Financire de Paribas, Paris, France (Applicant), has 
    given notice pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company 
    Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) (BHC Act) and 225.23(a)(3) of the Board's 
    Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(3)) to engage de novo through its 
    indirect subsidiary, Sema Group, London, England (Company),\1\ in 
    providing software to mobile telephone network operators (client 
    networks). The software would enroll new subscribers; identify 
    subscribers and control access by subscribers to client networks; 
    generate subscriber billing statements for and monitor subscriber 
    payments to client networks; calculate and reconcile fund transfers 
    between client networks; and monitor subscriber 
    
    [[Page 62093]]
    usage patterns. Company currently provides these services to client 
    networks outside the United States. Applicant proposes that Company 
    would expand its operations to offer these services to client networks 
    on a nationwide basis inside the United States.
    
        \1\ Applicant owns 50.1 percent of Financiere Sema, and France 
    Telecom owns the remaining 49.9 percent. Financiere Sema in turns 
    owns approximately 40 percent of the voting shares of Company.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act provides that a bank holding company 
    may engage in any activity that the Board, after due notice and 
    opportunity for hearing, has determined by order or regulation to be so 
    closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a 
    proper incident thereto. This statutory test requires that two separate 
    tests be met for an activity to be permissible for a bank holding 
    company. First, the Board must determine that the activity is, as a 
    general matter, closely related to banking. Second, the Board must find 
    in a particular case that the performance of the activity by the 
    applicant bank holding company may reasonably be expected to produce 
    public benefits that outweigh possible adverse effects.
        A particular activity may be found to meet the ``closely related to 
    banking'' test if it is demonstrated that banks have generally provided 
    the proposed services, that banks generally provide services that are 
    operationally or functionally similar to the proposed services so as to 
    equip them particularly well to provide the proposed services, or that 
    banks generally provide services that are so integrally related to the 
    proposed services as to require their provision in a specialized form. 
    National Courier Ass'n v. Board of Governors, 516 F.2d 1229, 1237 (D.C. 
    Cir. 1975). In addition, the Board may consider any other basis that 
    may demonstrate that the activity has a reasonable or close 
    relationship to banking or managing or controlling banks. Board 
    Statement Regarding Regulation Y, 49 FR 806 (January 5, 1984); 
    Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors, 468 U.S. 207, 210-11, 
    n.5 (1984).
        Applicant states that the Board previously has determined by 
    regulation that providing certain data processing and data transmission 
    services and facilities (including software) and providing access to 
    such services and facilities by any technological means are closely 
    related to banking for purposes of section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act. In 
    order to be found to be closely related to banking, the data to be 
    handled must be ``financial, banking, or economic'' in nature, and such 
    activities must be conducted within certain additional limitations 
    established by the Board. See 12 CFR 225.25(b)(7). Applicant maintains 
    that Company's proposed activities would relate primarily to financial, 
    banking, or economic data, and would otherwise conform to Regulation Y.
        Applicant also contends that, to the extent the proposed activities 
    involve processing nonfinancial data, a bank holding company may engage 
    in these activities as part of its offering of a larger package of data 
    processing services, when processing nonfinancial data is an 
    ``essential component'' of such package. See Banc One Corporation, 80 
    Fed. Res. Bull. 139 (1994). Applicant represents that Company's 
    proposed activities with respect to nonfinancial data satisfy these 
    criteria.
        In order to approve the proposal, the Board also must determine 
    that the proposed activities to be engaged in by Company are a proper 
    incident to banking that ``can reasonably be expected to produce 
    benefits to the public, such as greater convenience, increased 
    competition, or gains in efficiency, that outweigh possible adverse 
    effects, such as undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair 
    competition, conflicts of interests, or unsound banking practices.'' 12 
    U.S.C. 1843(c)(8). Applicant contends that its proposal would produce 
    public benefits that outweigh any potential adverse effects.
        In publishing the proposal for comment, the Board does not take a 
    position on issues raised by the proposal. Notice of the proposal is 
    published solely to seek the views of interested persons on the issues 
    presented by the notice and does not represent a determination by the 
    Board that the proposal meets, or is likely to meet, the standards of 
    the BHC Act.
        Any comments or requests for hearing should be submitted in writing 
    to William W. Wiles, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal 
    Reserve System, Washington DC 20551, not later than December 18, 1995. 
    Any request for a hearing on this notice must, as required by Sec.  
    262.3(e) of the Board's Rules of Procedure (12 CFR 262.3(e)), be 
    accompanied by a statement of reasons why a written presentation would 
    not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any 
    questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the evidence that 
    would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the party 
    commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
        This application may be inspected at the offices of the Board of 
    Governors or the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    
        Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 28, 
    1995.
    Jennifer J. Johnson,
    Deputy Secretary of the Board.
    [FR Doc. 95-29393 Filed 12-1-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/04/1995
Department:
Federal Reserve System
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-29393
Pages:
62092-62093 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-29393.pdf