[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 7, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-30069]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: December 7, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP93-147-007]
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Rate Filing
December 1, 1994.
Take notice that on November 23, 1994, Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute First Revised Sheet No.
94, Substitute Original Sheet Nos. 95A and 95B, Substitute First
Revised Sheet Nos. 96 and 100, with a proposed effective date of
November 1, 1994. Tennessee states that the purpose of this filing is
to comply with the Commission's letter order dated November 15, 1994.
Tennessee states that the Commission approved Tennessee's previous
filing subject to a few modifications. The instant filing implements
those modifications. Specifically, Tennessee has clearly stated at
Sheet No. 95B that any authorized overrun transportation will be
subject to the scheduling priorities of Section 5(e) of Article III of
its General Terms and Conditions, which clearly states that authorized
overrun has a priority below firm transportation. Tennessee has also
modified the language of Sec. 3.4(b) to clarify that Tennessee will
waive both the overrun charge and the $25.00 penalty when overruns are
authorized. Tennessee has also added the language that had been omitted
from Section 8.1 of the FS Rate Schedule.
Tennessee also states that has made a few other changes in the
instant filing to either clarify items or respond to customer requests.
Specifically, Tennessee has replaced the term ``excess deliverability''
with ``conditional deliverability'' wherever it appears in the FS Rate
Schedule and replaced the term ``customer'' with ``Shipper'' wherever
it appeared. Tennessee has clarified that Section 3.4(e) applies to
assignments as well as agency arrangements. Finally, Tennessee has
clarified that the requirement that a Shipper's Maximum Storage
Quantity be between 30 and 150 times a shipper's Maximum Daily
Withdrawal Quantity applies exclusive of any conditional deliverability
awarded in this docket.
While Tennessee does not believe any waivers are necessary,
Tennessee respectfully requests that the Commission grant any waivers
it deems necessary for acceptance of this filing.
Tennessee states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all
of its jurisdictional customers and affected state regulatory
commission.
Any person desiring to protest with reference to said filing should
file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North
Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section
211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.211. All such protests should be filed on or before December 8,
1994. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants
parties to this proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file and
available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-30069 Filed 12-6-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
