95-29782. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Listing Standards  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 62918-62920]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-29782]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-36531; File No. SR-CHX-95-26]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Listing 
    Standards
    
    November 30, 1995.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''), 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1), notice is hereby given that on November 
    8, 1995, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or ``Exchange'') 
    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
    proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which 
    Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The 
    Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
    proposed rule change from interested persons.
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Exchange proposes to amend Article XXVIII of the Exchange's 
    Rules to modify the Exchange's listing standards and create two tiers 
    of listings.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
    proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
    proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
    the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
    has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the 
    most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        The North American Securities Administration Association 
    (``NASAA'')\1\ has endorsed certain listing standards as sufficient to 
    warrant a state's granting exchange-listed securities a listing 
    exemption from registration. The CHX proposes to modify its own listing 
    standards to comply with those endorsed by NASAA and adopted by other 
    stock exchanges.\2\
    
        \1\NASAA is an association of securities administrators from 
    each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and ten 
    Canadian provinces.
        \2\See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34235 (June 
    17, 1994), 59 FR 32736 (June 24, 1994) (approving a Philadelphia 
    Stock Exchange rule change adopting NASAA endorsed standards); 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34429 (July 22, 1994), 59 FR 
    38998 (Aug. 1, 1994) (approving a Pacific Stock Exchange rule change 
    adopting NASAA endorsed standards).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The CHX proposes changes to its Rules regarding the quantitative 
    requirements for issuers and issues, qualitative requirements for 
    issuers (e.g., corporate governance standards), and maintenance 
    criteria for issues. In no case do the proposed changes decrease 
    current CHX standards.
        NASAA has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (``MOU'') with 
    the Philadelphia Stock Exchange (``Phlx'')\3\ and the Pacific Stock 
    Exchange (``PSE'').\4\ Those memoranda set out standards that NASAA 
    recognizes as sufficient to warrant listing exemptions from state blue 
    sky requirements. The proposed rules establish listing standards that 
    are essentially identical to the standards set out in those two NASAA 
    MOUs. Although the CHX is in the process of reaching a similar MOU with 
    NASAA, the CHX's new listing standards are specifically designed to 
    satisfy the listing standards endorsed by NASAA.
    
        \3\The Memorandum of Understanding was approved by NASAA and 
    Phlx on October 12, 1994.
        \4\The Memorandum of Understanding was approved by NASAA and the 
    PSE on October 12, 1994.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Other exchanges have established two tiers of listing requirements. 
    In general, Tier I listing standards are quantitatively and 
    qualitatively higher (i.e., more restrictive and demanding) than Tier 
    II listing standards.
        The CHX does not currently have a two-tier structure for listings 
    but proposes to create a two-tiered structure. Both Tier I and Tier II 
    listed issues will be traded pursuant to identical auction rules, but 
    otherwise the two tiers will differ in several ways. 
    
    [[Page 62919]]
    The new, higher standards proposed by the CHX will constitute 
    requirements for a new Tier I listing. The Tier I requirements for a 
    CHX listing will be identical in all material respects with the 
    requirements of the NASAA MOUs. The current standards of the CHX will 
    constitute the listing requirements for the new CHX Tier II listing. 
    The NASAA MOUs do not address Tier II standards.
        Tier I issuers and issues will have to meet the corporate 
    governance and disclosure standards endorsed by NASAA MOUs. These 
    include newly specific requirements for disclosure of reports filed 
    with federal regulatory bodies; specific requirements for shareholder 
    approval for certain corporate actions involving the sale or issuance 
    of stock; and specific voting rights provisions forbidding corporate 
    actions that have a disparate impact on holders of stock. The CHX 
    currently has strict corporate governance and disclosure requirements, 
    which will remain in place for Tier II issuers and issues.
        The CHX will identify and distinguish at all times which securities 
    are listed pursuant to Tier I and Tier II standards. If a Tier I listed 
    security fails to satisfy Tier I maintenance standards for continued 
    listing, the issue will be removed from Tier I listing. If it meets 
    Tier II standards, it will thereupon be listed on Tier II. If it does 
    not meet Tier II standards, it will be delisted. Moreover, if a Tier II 
    listed security matures to the point that it could meet the Tier I 
    standards, the issuer must apply and receive approval to list the 
    security pursuant to the Tier I standards before the CHX will recognize 
    that security as a Tier I issue. The CHX believes that adopting two 
    tiers of listing standards will provide flexibility for the CHX in 
    pursuing various listing objectives beneficial to CHX members and the 
    public.
        The CHX has chosen to adopt NASAA's MOU standards as criteria for 
    its new Tier I because the CHX views those standards as carefully 
    crafted to provide an extremely high level of investor and shareholder 
    protection. For the same reason, the CHX proposes for Tier I to adopt 
    also NASAA's substantial corporate governance standards, including 
    requirements for independent directors, audit committees, shareholder 
    quorums, common stock voting rights, and conflict of interest 
    provisions. The CHX's current rules already address many of these same 
    issues, but for Tier I the CHX proposes to adopt all of NASAA's 
    suggested standards.
        Tier I standards must be satisfied by all issuers on a continuing 
    basis. Moreover, CHX standards for Tier I initial and maintenance 
    listing are both mandatory and non-waivable.
    
    Tier I Standards
    
        With regard to common stock, Rule 8(a) replicates the NASAA MOUs' 
    numerical criteria applicable to original listing determinations in 
    every aspect including net tangible assets, numbers of shareholders and 
    shares publicly held, pre-tax and net earnings, and stock price.
        In Rule 8(b), the CHX proposes to also offer alternate listing 
    standards for common stock issues. The proposed standards are identical 
    to those endorsed by NASAA. The CHX offers the alternate standards 
    because there are certain smaller companies that either due to the 
    nature of their business or the amount of resources committed by the 
    company to research and development, would not meet the standards in 
    Rule 8(a) but nevertheless deserve Tier I status. Thus, those types of 
    companies may be approved for listing under Tier I if they satisfy the 
    alternate listing criteria.
        Rule 8(c), in conformance with the NASAA MOUs, provides standards 
    for initial public offerings approved for listing on the CHX. Such 
    offerings must be underwritten on a ``firm commitment'' basis and must 
    meet the CHX's listing standards within a 30-day grace period after 
    completion of the offering.
        With regard to preferred stock, Rule 9 provides the Tier I original 
    listing criteria. Preferred stock issuers must satisfy the same net 
    tangible assets and net earnings criteria applicable to issuers of 
    common stock. The ability of the issuers to service the dividend 
    requirements for preferred stock will also be evaluated. The 
    requirements will differ for number of shares publicly held and 
    aggregate market value depending on whether the issuer has common stock 
    listed. Where the common stock is listed on the CHX, New York Stock 
    Exchange (``NYSE''), or American Stock Exchange (``Amex''), at least 
    100,000 shares of preferred stock must be publicly held with an 
    aggregate market value of at least $2 million dollars. Where the common 
    stock is not so listed, at least 400,000 shares of preferred stock must 
    be publicly held with an aggregate market value of at least $4 million. 
    Differentiating on this basis reflects the CHX's belief that companies 
    whose securities are publicly traded have a more significant investor 
    following and a greater demonstrated ability to raise necessary capital 
    while meeting the contingent payment obligations associated with 
    preferred stock and, as described below, bond and debentures. In either 
    case, a share of preferred stock must have a minimum closing bid price 
    of $10 to be eligible for listing.
        Listing of bonds and debentures under Tier I will be governed by 
    Rule 10. In addition to evaluating issuers according to the same net 
    tangible assets and earnings standards applicable to equity issuers, 
    the CHX will also evaluate the ability of these issuers to satisfy the 
    interest and principal payments of bonds and debentures as they become 
    due. As above, the required aggregate market value and number of public 
    beneficial holders varies depending on whether the issuer's common 
    stock is listed and traded on either the CHX, Amex or NYSE. 
    Additionally, the CHX will require municipal bonds to meet higher 
    standards than other bonds.
        Issuers seeking listing of warrants under Tier I must satisfy the 
    criteria of Rule 11. The CHX will set standards with regard to public 
    distribution, and it will not list warrants unless the security 
    underlying the warrant is already listed or will be listed concurrently 
    with the warrants on Tier I.
        Rule 12 provides criteria for contingent value rights (``CVRs''). 
    The CHX will set standards for CVRs with regard to aggregate market 
    value, public distribution, net tangible assets, and maturity date. CVR 
    issuers must meet the net tangible assets and earnings requirements for 
    issuers of stock listed on the Exchange, and the CVRs to be listed must 
    have been approved for listed on another national securities exchange. 
    Finally, Rule 13 contains criteria applicable to new and innovative 
    products that do not fall within Rules 8-12 but otherwise have the 
    financial qualifications to be listed and are suitable for auction 
    market trading.
        The CHX's maintenance requirements for Tier I securities duplicate 
    those found in the NASAA MOU with the PSE. Rules 14-17 set forth those 
    maintenance requirements for each type of issue. The CHX will initiate 
    delisting procedures against any issue that fails to meet the 
    maintenance requirements on a continuing basis.
    
    Tier II Standards
    
        Rule 18 sets forth the CHX's proposed Tier II standards. Tier II 
    standards will allow companies that may not be large enough to list 
    under Tier I the opportunity to have their securities traded in an 
    auction market, thereby increasing liquidity and issuer access to the 
    investment community.
    
    [[Page 62920]]
    
        The CHX's proposed Tier II standards are essentially identical to 
    the current CHX standards applicable to all listed issues, except that 
    index warrants and contingent value rights will no longer be listed 
    under Tier II.
    
    Miscellaneous
    
        The CHX does not propose to materially change its admissions 
    procedures or its delisting procedures.
    2. Statutory Basis
        The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the 
    Act in that the proposal fosters cooperation and coordination with 
    persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing 
    information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in 
    securities, removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free 
    and open market and a national market system and protects investors and 
    the public interest. The proposal also is consistent with Section 11A 
    of the Act in that approval of the Tier I standards will aid in the 
    development of the national market system by enhancing competition for 
    equity listings.
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
    impose any inappropriate burden on competition.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
    
        No written comments were either solicited or received.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
    Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the publication of this notice in the Federal 
    Register or within such other period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
        (A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
        (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communication relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the 
    Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such filing will also be available 
    for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
    submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-95-26 and should be 
    submitted by December 28, 1995.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    FR Doc. 95-29782 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/07/1995
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-29782
Pages:
62918-62920 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-36531, File No. SR-CHX-95-26
PDF File:
95-29782.pdf