95-29808. Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; ULTANESUPTM  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 62869-62870]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-29808]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    [Docket No. 95E-0302]
    
    
    Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
    Extension; ULTANETM
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the 
    regulatory review period for ULTANETM and is publishing this 
    notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the 
    determination because of the submission of an application to the 
    Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the 
    extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments and petitions should be directed to the 
    Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, rm. 
    1-23, 12420 Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brain J. Malkin, Office of Health 
    Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
    Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-1382.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term 
    Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug 
    and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide 
    that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as 
    the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical 
    device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory 
    review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a 
    product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the 
    amount of extension an applicant may receive.
        A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A 
    testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the 
    testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical 
    investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the 
    approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial 
    submission of an application to market the human drug product and 
    continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product. 
    Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward 
    the actual amount of extension that the Commissioner of Patents and 
    Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be 
    subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent 
    was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review 
    period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase 
    and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
        FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product 
    ULTANETM (sevoflurane). ULTANETM is indicated for induction 
    and maintenance of general anesthesia in adult and pediatric patients 
    for inpatient and outpatient surgery. Subsequent to this approval, the 
    Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration 
    application for ULTANETM (U.S. Patent No. 4,250,334) from Baxter 
    International, Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested 
    FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for patent 
    term restoration. In a letter dated September 25, 1995, FDA advised the 
    Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product had undergone 
    a regulatory review period and that the approval of ULTANETM 
    represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the 
    product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested 
    that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
        FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
    ULTANETM is 3,418 days. Of this time, 3,086 days occurred during 
    the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 332 days 
    occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived 
    from the following dates:
        1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, 
    Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: January 29, 
    1986. The applicant claims January 10, 1986, as the date the 
    investigational new drug (IND) became effective. However, FDA records 
    indicate that the correct IND effective date was January 29, 1985, 
    which was 30 days after FDA receipt of IND 27,645 on December 30, 1985.
        2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to 
    the human drug product under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act: July 11, 1994. The applicant claims July 8, 1994, as 
    the date the new drug application (NDA) for ULTANETM (NDA 20-478) 
    was initially submitted. However, FDA records indicate that the 
    applicant submitted NDA 20-478 on July 8, 1994, and the agency received 
    the NDA on July 11, 1994, which is considered to be the NDA initially 
    submitted date.
        3. The date the application was approved: June 7, 1995. FDA has 
    verified the applicant's claim that NDA 20-478 was approved on June 7, 
    1995.
        This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the 
    maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. 
    Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in 
    its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its 
    application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,826 days of 
    patent term extension.
        Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published is 
    incorrect may, on or before February 5, 1996, submit to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a 
    redetermination. Furthermore, 
    
    [[Page 62870]]
    any interested person may petition FDA, on or before June 5, 1996, for 
    a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted 
    with due diligence during the regulatory review period. To meet its 
    burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA 
    investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-
    42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
        Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) in three copies (except that 
    individuals may submit single copies) and identified with the docket 
    number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and 
    petitions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m. 
    and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
        Dated: November 30, 1995.
    Stuart L. Nightingale,
    Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 95-29808 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/07/1995
Department:
Health and Human Services Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
95-29808
Pages:
62869-62870 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95E-0302
PDF File:
95-29808.pdf