[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 235 (Tuesday, December 8, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67584-67586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-32341]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[SC-21-1; SC-23-1-9832a; FRL-6197-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; South
Carolina: Approval of Revisions to the South Carolina SIP Regarding
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Definition Adoptions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the South Carolina State
Implementation Plan (SIP) which were submitted to EPA by South
Carolina, through the South Carolina Department of Health and
Environmental Control (SCDHEC), on June 6, 1989, and September 27,
1990. The EPA is approving the revisions and adoptions of general
definitions to the South Carolina regulation 62.1 Definitions, Permit
Requirements, and Emission Inventory.
DATES: This final rule is effective February 8, 1999 unless adverse or
critical comments are received by January 7, 1999. If EPA receives such
comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule
in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not
take effect.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action should be addressed to Randy
B. Terry at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Air Planning
Branch, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Copies of
documents relative to this action are available for public inspection
during normal business hours at the following locations. The interested
persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment
with the appropriate office at least 24 hours before the visiting day.
Reference South Carolina files 21-1, and 23-1. The Region 4 office may
have additional background documents not available at the other
locations.
Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center (Air Docket 6102), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC
20460.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Air Planning Branch, 61
Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull
Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201-1708.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy B. Terry at (404) 562-9032.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 6, 1989 and September 27, 1990, the
State of South Carolina submitted revisions to the South Carolina SIP.
The revisions include modifications to existing definitions and
additions of new definitions. EPA is approving the revisions described
herein as listed in regulation 62.1 Definitions, Permit Requirements
and Emission Inventory.
South Carolina adopted these revisions into the South Carolina
State Implementation Plan to adequately define words that are used
throughout the SIP. EPA is approving the following new definitions
because they are consistent with EPA requirements:
Afterburner.
Air curtain incinerator.
Boiler.
Chemotherapeutic waste.
``Continuous program of physical on-site construction.''
Crematory incinerator.
Hazardous waste.
Hazardous waste fuel.
Hazardous waste incinerator.
Industrial boiler.
Industrial furnace.
Industrial incinerator.
``In existence.''
Infectious waste.
Medical waste.
Medical waste incinerator.
Medical waste incinerator facility.
Multiple-chamber incinerator.
Municipal incinerator.
Municipal waste.
Non-industrial boiler.
Non-industrial furnace.
Non-spec oil.
Retail business type incinerator.
Sludge incinerator.
Substantial loss.
Used oil.
Utility boiler.
Virgin fuel.
Waste.
Waste fuel.
South Carolina amended their state definition for incinerator to be
more consistent with the EPA requirements.
Final Action
The EPA is approving the aforementioned revisions contained in the
State's June 6, 1989 and September
[[Page 67585]]
27, 1990, submittals because they are compatible with the requirements
set forth in the Clean Air Act amendments of 1990.
The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates
no adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal
Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision
should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be
effective February 8, 1999 unless, by January 7, 1999, adverse or
critical comments are received.
If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn
before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The
EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this
time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this
action will be effective February 8, 1999.
Nothing in this action should be construed as making any
determination or expressing any position regarding South Carolina's
audit privilege and penalty immunity law S.C. code ann. 4587-57-10 et.
seq. (Supp. 1996) or its impact upon any approved provision in the SIP,
including the revision at issue here. The action taken herein does not
express or imply any viewpoint on the question of whether there are
legal deficiencies in this or any other Clean Air Act program resulting
from the effect of South Carolina's audit privilege and immunity law. A
state audit privilege and immunity law can affect only state
enforcement and cannot have any impact on federal enforcement
authorities. EPA may at any time invoke its authority under the Clean
Air Act, including, for example, sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to
enforce the requirements or prohibitions of the state plan,
independently of any state enforcement effort. In addition, citizen
enforcement under section 304 of the Clean Air Act is likewise
unaffected by a state audit privilege or immunity law.
I. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, entitled
``Regulatory Planning and Review''.
B. Executive Order 12875
Under E.O. 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not
required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a state, local, or
tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those
governments. If the mandate is unfunded, EPA must provide to the Office
of Management and Budget a description of the extent of EPA's prior
consultation with representatives of affected state, local, and tribal
governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of written
communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the
need to issue the regulation. In addition, E.O. 12875 requires EPA to
develop an effective process permitting elected officials and other
representatives of state, local, and tribal governments ``to provide
meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory proposals
containing significant unfunded mandates.''
Today's rule does not create a mandate on state, local or tribal
governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these
entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875
do not apply to this rule.
C. Executive Order 13045
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) is
determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under E.O.
12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA
has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children.
If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate
the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on
children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other
potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered
by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does not involve
decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or safety risks.
D. Executive Order 13084
Under E.O. 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not
required by statute, that significantly affects or uniquely affects the
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by the tribal governments. If the mandate is unfunded,
EPA must provide to the Office of Management and Budget, in a
separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a
description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with
representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature
of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the
regulation. In addition, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to develop
an effective process permitting elected and other representatives of
Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in
the development of regulatory policies on matters that significantly or
uniquely affect their communities.''
Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Indian tribal governments. This action does not involve
or impose any requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of section 3(b) of E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental
jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under
section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create
any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is
already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not
create any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the
Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such
grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976);
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
F. Unfunded Mandates
Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
[[Page 67586]]
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate;
or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for informing and advising any small governments that may be
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in
the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves
pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.
G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
H. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 8, 1999. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 23, 1998.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart PP--South Carolina
2. In Section 52.2120, the entry for Regulation number 62.1 Section
I Definitions in the ``EPA Approved South Carolina Regulations'' table
in paragraph (c) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) EPA approved regulations.
Air Pollution Control Regulations for South Carolina
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal
State citation Title/subject State EPA approval register
effective date date notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation No. 62.1 Definitions, Permits Requirements, and Emissions Inventory
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
*
Section I.......................... Definitions................ 5/25/90 2/8/99
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 98-32341 Filed 12-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
