98-32575. Oklahoma: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 236 (Wednesday, December 9, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 67800-67802]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-32575]
    
    
    
    [[Page 67800]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 271
    
    [FRL-6198-9]
    
    
    Oklahoma: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
    Program Revisions
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Immediate final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The State of Oklahoma has applied for final authorization to 
    revise its Hazardous Waste Program under the Resource Conservation and 
    Recovery Act (RCRA). The EPA has reviewed Oklahoma Department of 
    Environmental Quality's (ODEQ) application and determined that its 
    Hazardous Waste Program revision satisfies all of the requirements 
    necessary to qualify for final authorization. Unless adverse written 
    comments are received on this action, EPA's decision to approve 
    Oklahoma's Hazardous Waste Program Revision will take effect as 
    provided below in accordance with Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments 
    of 1984 (HSWA).
    
    DATES: This immediate final rule is effective on February 8, 1999 
    without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by January 
    8, 1999. Should the EPA receive such comments, it will publish a timely 
    withdrawal of this Immediate Final Rule in the Federal Register and 
    inform the public that the rule will not take effect.
        Written comments, referring to Docket Number OK-98-3, should be 
    sent to Alima Patterson, Region 6 Authorization Coordinator, Grants and 
    Authorization Section (6PD-G), Multimedia Planning and Permitting 
    Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202, phone 
    (214) 665-8533.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the Oklahoma program revision application and the 
    materials which EPA used in evaluating the revision are available for 
    inspection and copying from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through 
    Friday at the following addresses: State of Oklahoma Department of 
    Environmental Quality, 1000 Northeast Tenth Street, Oklahoma City, 
    Oklahoma 73117-1212, phone (405) 271-5338 and EPA, Region 6 Library, 
    12th Floor, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 65202, phone (214) 665-
    6444.
    
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson, Region 6 
    Authorization Coordinator, Grants and Authorization Section (6PD-G), 
    Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross 
    Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202, phone (214) 665-8533.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    A. Background
    
        States with final authorization under section 3006(b) of the RCRA, 
    42 U.S.C. 6926(b), have a continuing obligation to maintain a Hazardous 
    Waste Program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less 
    stringent than the Federal hazardous waste program. Revisions to State 
    hazardous waste programs are necessary when Federal or State statutory 
    or regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes 
    occur. Most commonly, State program revisions are necessitated by 
    changes to EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 
    parts 124, 260-264, 265, 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.
    
    B. Oklahoma
    
        Oklahoma initially received Final Authorization on January 10, 
    1985, (49 FR 50362) to implement its base hazardous waste management 
    program. Oklahoma received authorization for revisions to its program 
    on June 18, 1990 (55 FR 14280), effective November 27, 1990 (55 FR 
    39274), effective June 3, 1991 (56 FR 13411), effective November 19, 
    1991 (56 FR 47675), effective December 21, 1994 (59 FR 51116-51122), 
    effective April 27, 1995 (60 FR 2699-2702), effective October 9, 1996 
    (61 FR 52884-52886), and Technical Correction effective March 14, 1997 
    (62 FR 12100). The authorized Oklahoma RCRA program was incorporated by 
    reference into the CFR effective December 13, 1993 and July 14, 1998. 
    On July 31, 1998, Oklahoma submitted a final complete program revision 
    application for additional program approvals. The State of Oklahoma has 
    also adopted the regulations for Import and Export of Hazardous Waste. 
    However, the requirements of the Import and Export regulations will be 
    administered by the EPA and not the State because the exercise of 
    foreign relations and international commerce powers is reserved to the 
    Federal government under the United States Constitution. Therefore, the 
    State is not seeking authorization for this rule. Today, Oklahoma is 
    seeking approval of its program revision in accordance with 
    Sec. 271.21(b)(3).
        Oklahoma statutes provide authority for a single State agency, the 
    ODEQ, to administer the provisions of the State Hazardous Waste 
    Management Program. These statutes are the Oklahoma Environmental 
    Quality Act, 27 O.S. Supplement (Supp) 1997 sections 1-1-101 et seq. 
    General provisions of the Oklahoma Environmental Quality Code which may 
    affect the Hazardous Waste Program, 27A O.S. Supp. 1997 sections 2-1-
    101 through 2-3-507; and the Oklahoma Hazardous Waste Management Act 
    (OHWMA), 27A O.S. Supp. 1997 sections 2-7-101 et seq. No amendments 
    were made to the above statutory authorities during the 1997 
    legislative session which will substantially affect the State Hazardous 
    Waste Management Program; however, 27A O.S. sections 2-14-305 has been 
    added to allow for issuance of general permits.
        On January 8, 1998, the Council voted to recommend amendments to 
    Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) 252:200-3-1 and 252:200:3-2 to 
    incorporate by reference, in accordance with Guidelines For State 
    Adoption of Federal Regulations by Reference, the following EPA 
    Hazardous Waste Management Regulations as amended through July 1, 1997: 
    the provisions of 40 CFR part 124 which are required by 40 CFR 271.14 
    as well as 124.31, 124.32 and 124.33; 40 CFR parts 260-266, with the 
    exception of 40 CFR 260.20 through 260.22, 40 CFR part 268, 40 CFR part 
    270, 40 CFR part 273 and 40 CFR part 279. The Board adopted these 
    amendments on January 27, 1998 as permanent and emergency rules. The 
    emergency rules amendments became effective as permanent rules on June 
    1, 1998. The ODEQ remains the official agency of the State of Oklahoma, 
    as designated by 27A O.S. Supp. 1997 sections 2-7-105(13) to cooperate 
    with Federal agencies for the purposes of hazardous waste regulations. 
    The OHWMA delegates authority to the ODEQ to administer the State 
    Hazardous Waste Program, including the statutory and regulatory 
    provisions necessary to administer the RCRA Cluster VI requirements.
        The EPA reviewed ODEQ's application, and today is making an 
    immediate final decision, subject to public review and comment, that 
    ODEQ's Hazardous Waste Program revisions satisfies all of the 
    requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization. 
    Consequently, the EPA intends to grant final authorization for the 
    additional program modifications to Oklahoma. The public may submit 
    written comments on EPA's final decision until January 8, 1999. Copies 
    of Oklahoma's application for program revision are available for 
    inspection and copying at the locations indicated in the ADDRESSES 
    section of this document.
        Approval of ODEQ's program revision shall became effective 60 days 
    from the date this document is published, unless an adverse written 
    comment pertaining
    
    [[Page 67801]]
    
    to the State's revision discussed in this document is received by the 
    end of the comment period. If an adverse written comment is received, 
    the EPA will publish either, (1) a withdrawal of the immediate final 
    decision, or (2) a document containing a response to the comment that 
    either affirms that the immediate final decision takes effect or 
    reverses the decision.
        The ODEQ's program revision application includes State regulatory 
    changes that are equivalent to the rules promulgated in the Federal 
    RCRA implementing regulations in 40 CFR parts 124, 260-263, 264, 265, 
    266, 270, 273, and 279, that were published in the FR from July 1, 1995 
    through June 30, 1996. This proposed approval includes the provisions 
    that are listed in the chart below. This chart also lists the State 
    analogs that are being recognized as equivalent to the appropriate 
    Federal requirements.
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Federal citation                       State analog
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1. Hazardous Waste             OAC 27A Oklahoma Statutes (O.S.), Supp.
     Management; Liquids in         1997, Sec.  2-2-104 laws added 1994,
     Landfills, [60 FR 35703]       effective July 1, 1994; Secs.  2-7-106,
     July 11, 1995 (Checklist       amended 1993, and 2-7-107(A)(10),
     145).                          effective July 1, 1993. OHWMA, as
                                    amended, 252:200-3-1, through 252:200-3-
                                    4, amended January 27, 1998, emergency
                                    rule effective March 23, 1998, permanent
                                    rule effective June 1, 1998.
    2. RCRA Expanded Public        OAC 27A O.S., Supp. 1997, Secs.  2-7-104
     Participation, [60 FR 63417]   added 1994, effective July 1, 1994; 27A
     December 11, 1995 (Checklist   O.S. Supp. 1996 Sec.  2-7-106, and Sec.
     148).                          2-7-105(15), effective July 1, 1993;
                                    OHWMA Rules 252:200-3-1 through 252:200-
                                    3-4, amended January 27, 1998, emergency
                                    effective date March 23,1998, permanent
                                    rule effective June 1, 1998.
    3. Identification and Listing  OAC 27A O.S., Supp. 1997, Secs.  2-7-106
     of Hazardous Waste;            amended 1993, effective July 1, 1993;
     Amendments to Definition of    and Sec.  2-7-104, added by Laws 1994,
     Solid Waste, [61 FR 13103],    effective July 1, 1994; OHWMA Rules
     March 26, 1996. (Checklist     252:200-3-1 through 252:200-3-4, amended
     150).                          January 27, 1998, emergency effective
                                    date March 23, 1998, permanent effective
                                    June 1, 1998.
    4. Land Disposal Restrictions  OAC 27A O.S., Supp. 1996, Secs.  2-7-106
     Phase III-Deharacterized       amended 1993, effective July 1, 1993;
     Wastewaters, Carbamate         Sec.  2-7-104, Added by Laws 1994 and
     Waste, and Spent Potliners,    Sec.  2-7-106, effective July 1, 1994;
     [61 FR 15660] April 8, 1996,   OHWMA Rules 252:200-3-1 through 252:200-
     [61 FR 19117] April 30, 1996   3-4, amended June 18, 1996, emergency
     [61FR 33680], June 28, 1996,   effective date August 1, 1996, permanent
     [61 FR 36419], July 10,        effective June 1, 1997; 252:200-3-5, and
     1996, [61 FR 43924], April     252:200-3-6, Finally adopted March 30,
     26, 1996, and [62 FR 7502]     1994, effective as permanent May 26,
     February 19, 1997,             1994.
     (Checklist 151.1, 151.2,
     151.3, 151.4, 151.5 and
     151.6).
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Oklahoma is not authorized to operate the Federal program on Indian 
    lands. This authority remains with EPA.
    
    C. Decision
    
        I conclude that ODEQ's application for a program revision meets the 
    statutory and regulatory requirements established by RCRA. Accordingly, 
    ODEQ is granted Final Authorization to operate its hazardous waste 
    program as revised. Upon effective final approval Oklahoma will be 
    responsible for permitting treatment, storage, and disposal facilities 
    within its borders and for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA program 
    described in its revised program application, subject to the 
    limitations of the HSWA. Oklahoma also has primary enforcement 
    responsibilities, although EPA retains the right to conduct inspections 
    under section 3007 of RCRA, and to take enforcement actions under 
    sections 3008, 3013 and 7003 of RCRA.
    
    D. Codification in Part 272
    
        The EPA uses 40 CFR part 272 for codification of the decision to 
    authorize ODEQ's program and for incorporation by reference of those 
    provisions of its statutes and regulations that EPA will enforce under 
    sections 3008, 3013, and 7003 of RCRA. Therefore, EPA is reserving 
    amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart LL until a later date.
    
    E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    
        Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public 
    Law (Pub. L.) 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to 
    assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and 
    tribal governments and the private sector.
        The EPA has determined that sections 202 and 205 requirements do 
    not apply to today's action because this rule does not contain a 
    Federal mandate that may result in annual expenditures of $100 million 
    or more for State, local, and/or tribal governments already exist under 
    the State of Oklahoma's program, and today's action does not impose any 
    additional obligations on regulated entities. In fact, the EPA's 
    approval of State programs generally may reduce, not increase, 
    compliance costs for the private sector. Further, as it applies to the 
    State, this action does not impose a Federal intergovernmental mandate 
    because UMRA does not include duties arising from participation in a 
    voluntary federal program.
        The requirements of sections 203 of UMRA also do not apply to 
    today's action because this rule contains no regulatory requirements 
    that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Although 
    small governments may be hazardous waste generators, transporters, or 
    own and/or operate of hazardous waste, treatments, storage or disposal 
    facilities (TSDFs), they are already subject to the regulatory 
    requirements under the existing State laws that are being authorized by 
    the EPA, and, thus, are not subject to any additional significant or 
    unique requirements by virtue of this program approval.
    
    F. Certification Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., 
    as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 
    1996), whenever an agency is required to publish a notice of rulemaking 
    for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make available for 
    public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the 
    effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small 
    organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions). This analysis is 
    unnecessary, however, if the agency's administrator certifies that the 
    rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities.
        The EPA has determined that this authorization will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    Such small entities which are hazardous waste generators, transporters, 
    or which own and/or operate TSDFs are already
    
    [[Page 67802]]
    
    subject to the regulatory requirements under the existing State laws 
    that are now being authorized by the EPA. The EPA's authorization does 
    not impose any significant additional burdens on these small entities. 
    This is because the EPA's authorization would simply result in an 
    administrative change, rather than a change in the substantive 
    requirements imposed on these small entities.
        Pursuant to the provision at 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Agency hereby 
    certifies that this authorization will not have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. This authorization 
    approves regulatory requirements under existing State law to which 
    small entities are already subject. It does not impose any new burdens 
    on small entities. This rule, therefore, does not require a regulatory 
    flexibility analysis.
    
    G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
    
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq, as added by the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
    provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
    the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
    to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
    United States. The EPA submitted a report containing this rule and 
    other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U. S. House of 
    Representatives and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
    to publication of the rule in today's Federal Register. This rule is 
    not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    
    H. Regulatory Review Under Executive Order 12866
    
        The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this rule 
    from the requirements of section 3 of Executive Order 12866.
    
    I. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risk and Safety 
    risks Under Executive Order 13045
    
        Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of Children from Environmental 
    Health Risks and Safety Risk'' applies to any rule that: (1) the OMB 
    determines is ``economically significant'' as defined under Executive 
    Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk 
    that the EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect 
    on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency 
    must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the planned 
    rule on children and explain why the planned regulation is preferable 
    to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives 
    considered by the Agency.
    
    J. Enhancing Intergovernmental Partnership Under Executive Order 
    12875
    
        Under Executive Order 12875, the EPA may not issue regulation that 
    is not required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a State, 
    local or tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the 
    funds necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those 
    governments. If the mandate is unfunded, the EPA must provide to the 
    OMB a description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with 
    representatives of affected State, local and tribal governments, the 
    nature of their concerns, copies of any written communications from the 
    governments, and a statement supporting the need to issue the 
    regulation. In addition, Executive Order 12875 requires the EPA to 
    develop an effective process permitting elected officials and other 
    representatives of State, local and tribal governments ``to provide 
    meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory proposals 
    containing significant unfunded mandates.''
        This rule does not create a mandate on State, local or tribal 
    governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these 
    entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1 (a) of Executive 
    Order 12875 do not apply to this rule.
    
    K. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments 
    Under Executive Order 13084
    
        Under Executive Order 13084, the EPA may not issue a regulation 
    that is not require by statute, that significantly or uniquely affects 
    the communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes 
    substantial direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the 
    Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct 
    compliance cost incurred by the tribal governments, or EPA consults 
    with those governments. If EPA complies by consulting, Executive Order 
    13084 requires the EPA to provide the OMB , in a separately identified 
    section of the preamble to the rule, a description of the extent of 
    EPA's prior consultation with representatives of affected tribal 
    governments, summary of the nature of their concerns, and a statement 
    supporting the need to issue the regulations. In addition, Executive 
    Order 13084 requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting 
    elected officials and other representatives of Indian tribal 
    governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development 
    of regulatory policies on matters that significantly or uniquely affect 
    their communities.''
        Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the 
    communities of Indian tribal governments. Accordingly, the requirements 
    of section 3(b) of Executive Order 13084 do not apply to this rule.
    
    L. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
    
        Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
    Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 
    note) directs the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its 
    regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with 
    applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards 
    are technical standards (e.g. materials specifications, test methods, 
    sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or 
    adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs the 
    EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency 
    decides not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus 
    standards.
        This action does not involved technical standards. Therefore, the 
    EPA did not consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.
    
    Paper Reduction Act
    
        Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., Federal 
    agencies must consider the Paperwork burden imposed by any information 
    request contained in a proposed rule or a final rule. This rule will 
    not impose any information requirements upon the required community.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Confidential business information, Hazardous materials transportation, 
    Hazardous waste, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 
    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution control, 
    Water supply.
    
        Authority: This notice is issued under the authority of Sections 
    2002(a), 3006 and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended 
    42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
    Jerry Clifford,
    Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 6.
    [FR Doc. 98-32575 Filed 12-8-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/8/1999
Published:
12/09/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Immediate final rule.
Document Number:
98-32575
Dates:
This immediate final rule is effective on February 8, 1999 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by January 8, 1999. Should the EPA receive such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of this Immediate Final Rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect.
Pages:
67800-67802 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-6198-9
PDF File:
98-32575.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 271.21(b)(3)