98-32666. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. Relating to Crossed Markets Adjustments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 236 (Wednesday, December 9, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 67971-67972]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-32666]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-40734; File No. SR-PCX-98-55]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change and Amendment No. 1 by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. Relating to 
    Crossed Markets Adjustments
    
    December 1, 1998.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
    on November 5, 1998, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. ``PCX'' or 
    ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``Commission'' or ``SEC'') the proposed rule change as described in 
    Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the 
    Exchange. On November 30, 1998, the PCX submitted to the Commission an 
    amendment to the proposed rule change.\3\ The Commission is publishing 
    this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
    interested persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
        \3\ The proposed rule change was originally filed pursuant to 
    Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act. The amendment converted the 
    proposed rule change to a filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act. Letter from Michael D. Pierson, Senior Attorney, Regulatory 
    Policy, PCX to Kelly McCormick, Attorney, Division of Market 
    Regulation, SEC, dated November 27, 1998 (``Amendment No. 1'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The PCX is proposing to clarify its rules on the automatic 
    execution of option orders when the PCX market and the market of a 
    competing exchange are crossed or locked (i.e., the bid disseminated 
    through the facilities of one exchange is higher than or equal to the 
    offer disseminated through the facilities of another exchange). The 
    change is intended to make consistent the Exchange's rules on the 
    handling of electronic orders in such circumstances. The text of the 
    proposed rule change follows. Additions to the proposed rule are in 
    italics; deletions are in [brackets].
    Text of the Proposed Rule Change
    para. 5231 Automatic Execution System
    
        Rule 6.87(a)-(c)--No Change.
        (d) Auto-Ex NBBO. The Options Floor Trading C[c]ommittee (``OFTC'') 
    may designate electronic orders in an option issue to receive automatic 
    executions at prices reflecting the national best bid or offer 
    (``NBBO''), provided that the OFTC may designate, for an option issue, 
    that an order will default for manual representation in the trading 
    crowd if[: (1)] the order would be executed at a price that is more 
    than one trading increment away from the PCX market price[; or (2) the 
    NBBO is crossed or locked].
        (e) Crossed or Locked Markets. The OFTC may designate, for an 
    option issue, that an order will default for manual representation in 
    the trading crowd if the NBBO is crossed or locked.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the PCX included statements 
    concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and 
    discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
    text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
    Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
    sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
    statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        On September 8, 1998, the Commission approved a PCX rule change 
    regarding the automatic execution of option orders.\4\ The rule change 
    provides that the Exchange's Options Floor Trading Committee (``OFTC'') 
    may designate electronic orders in an option issue to receive automatic 
    executions at prices reflecting the National Best Bid or Offer
    
    [[Page 67972]]
    
    (``NBBO'').\5\ It further provides that the OFTC may designate, for an 
    option issue, that if the NBBO is crossed (e.g., 6\1/8\ bid, 6 asked) 
    or locked (e.g., 6 bid, 6 asked), then customer orders would exit the 
    automatic execution system of the Exchange and default for Floor Broker 
    representation in the trading crowd.\6\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ Exchange Act Release No. 40412 (September 8, 1998), 63 FR 
    49626 (September 16, 1998) (SR-PCX-98-27).
        \5\ Id.
        \6\ Id.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        After the Commission approved File No. SR-PCX-98-27, the PCX has 
    become aware that PCX Rule 6.87(d), the rule that the proposal changed, 
    could imply that the OFTC can designate an option issue for Floor 
    Broker representation in crossed and locked markets only if the issue 
    is eligible to receive automatic execution at the NBBO. The Exchange, 
    however, intended to allow the OFTC to designate any issue for Floor 
    Broker representation in crossed and locked markets. Accordingly, the 
    Exchange is now proposing to modify Rule 6.87 to clarify that the OFTC 
    may designate, for any option issue, that if the NBBO is crossed or 
    locked, then customer orders will default for Floor Broker 
    representation in the trading crowd regardless of whether the 
    Exchange's Auto-Ex system is set to execute orders at prices reflecting 
    the NBBO.
        The Exchange is planning to implement a systems change to cover the 
    potential for Floor Broker representation of option orders during 
    crossed or locked markets. However, before effecting that change, the 
    Exchange has determined to file this proposal to clarify the Exchange's 
    procedure on the handling of option orders when the NBBO is crossed or 
    locked. Accordingly, upon approval of this proposal, the Exchange will 
    be in a position to effect the appropriate systems changes as quickly 
    as possible.
        As with PCX-98-27, the Exchange believes that its proposal, if 
    implemented, will serve to protect public customers from receiving 
    inferior prices on their orders in situations where the NBBO is crossed 
    or locked. For example, if the PCX's market is 5 bid, 5\1/4\ asked, and 
    Exchange B's market is 4 bid, 4\1/4\ asked, the NBBO will be 5 bid, 
    4\1/4\ asked. If the 5 bid is based on a public customer order for 10 
    contracts, and that order is automatically executed, the customer would 
    be deprived of an opportunity to cancel the order at 5 and buy 10 
    contracts at Exchange B at 4\1/4\. This could occur regardless of 
    whether the PCX Auto-Ex is using the NBBO or PCX quotes. Moreover, 
    during the time that the market is crossed, it is not immediately clear 
    whether the crossed markets arise from errors resulting from 
    communication or system problems, keystroke errors, quotation 
    dissemination delays, or are in fact true markets. The default 
    mechanism will give Floor Brokers in the trading crowd an opportunity 
    to ascertain whether the markets are erroneous and to assure that 
    customers receive the best possible price.
        While these situations occur very infrequently, the Exchange 
    believes that investors should be protected through the use of human 
    intervention. During these times (if so designated by the OFTC for a 
    particular option issue), public customer orders will be manually 
    represented in the trading crowd by Floor Brokers and handled in a 
    manner that is consistent with the Floor Brokers' best execution 
    obligations.\7\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ See PCX Rule 6.46 (``Responsibilities of Floor Brokers'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    2. Basis
        The proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) \8\ of the Act 
    because it is designed to facilitate transactions in securities.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
    impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
    in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others
    
        Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited 
    nor received.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing 
    for Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the publication of this notice in the Federal 
    Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
        (A) by order approve the proposed rule change, or
        (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
    change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Copies 
    of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements 
    with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the 
    Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the 
    Commission's Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, 
    DC 20549. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection 
    and copying at the principal office of the PCX. All submissions should 
    refer to File No. SR-PCX-98-55 and should be submitted by December 30, 
    1998.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-32666 Filed 12-8-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/09/1998
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-32666
Pages:
67971-67972 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-40734, File No. SR-PCX-98-55
PDF File:
98-32666.pdf