92-2119. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Approval to a Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to an Amendment to Floor Procedure Advice F-2 Regarding Time Stamping, Matching, and Access to Matched Trade ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 92-2119]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: February 1, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-33512; File No. SR-Phlx-93-08]
    
     
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Approval to a 
    Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating 
    to an Amendment to Floor Procedure Advice F-2 Regarding Time Stamping, 
    Matching, and Access to Matched Trade Tickets
    
    January 24, 1994.
        On March 29, 1993, the Philadelpia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'' 
    or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (`'Commission'' or ``SEC'') pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 
    thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend Phlx Floor Procedure 
    Advice (``Phlx Advice'') F-2, currently titled ``Responsibility for 
    Time Stamping and Matching. Notice of the proposal appeared in the 
    Federal Register on September 1, 1993.\3\ No comment letters were 
    received on the proposed rule change. This order approves the 
    Exchange's proposal.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \2\17 CFR 240.19-4 (1992).
        \3\See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 32792 (August 24, 
    1993), 58 FR 46263.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Phlx has proposed the following amendments to Phlx Advice F-2: 
    (1) Renaming Phlx Advice F-2, ``Time Stamping, Matching and Access to 
    Matched Trades;'' (2) requiring matched tickets to be submitted to the 
    specialist post immediately upon execution; (3) requiring an execution 
    time stamp on the reverse side of a trade ticket; (4) adding provisions 
    limiting access to matched trade tickets to participants in the 
    transaciton, the specialist in that option and floor officials acting 
    in that capacity; (5) requiring specialist approval to access matched 
    trade tickets; and (6) requiring specialists to keep matched tickets 
    for a minimum of three years.
        Phlx Advice F-2 currently spells out the responsibilities 
    pertaining to time stamping and matching floor tickets, imposing this 
    duty upon the largest participant of a trade, or, where there is one 
    buyer and one seller, upon the seller. The Phlx is proposing to 
    separate Phlx Advice into three sections. Section (a) would contain the 
    current time stamping and matching responsibilities as well as two 
    additions. First, trade participants would be required to submit 
    matched tickets to the appropriate person at the specialist post 
    immediately upon effecting a transaction in order to assure that the 
    initiating party agrees with each contra-party's claim as to his or her 
    level of participation as well as to ensure that the terms of the trade 
    are correct. The Commission believes that immediate submissions also 
    lessen the potential for losing a matched ticket before entry into 
    Exchange trade comparison systems. Second, an execution time stamp 
    would be required on the reverse side of the order ticket to 
    distinguish the execution and order entry times for surveillance and 
    audit trail purposes.
        Becuase the Phlx is proposing to add provisions relating to access 
    to matched trades to Advice F-2, the Exchange proposes to rename this 
    Advice ``Time Stamping, Matching and Access to Matched Trades.'' In 
    this regard, the Phlx seeks to limit access to matched trade tickets to 
    those with a legitimate interest: participants, the specialist in that 
    option, and a floor official acting in that capacity. Intra-day, 
    matched trade tickets are kept behind the specialist post on the floor 
    after being electronically entered into the Exchange's trade comparison 
    systems so that errors can be corrected. Thus, the Phlx is also 
    proposing to require prior specialist permission before looking through 
    these tickets. The Commission believes that limiting access should 
    reduce the number of instances where floor personnel access trade 
    tickets to discern customers' identities or to ascertain trading 
    patterns. In addition, the Commission believes that supervising access 
    to trade tickets should provide accountability for persons who access 
    such tickets and help ensure that the trade tickets are returned to the 
    specialist post in a timely manner.
        Matched trade tickets serve important surveillance and operations 
    functions. Once a trade has been processed for trade dissemination and 
    clearing, it is then left in the possession of the attendant 
    specialist. Accordingly, the Phlx is prosing to not only limit access 
    to these tickets, but also to require specialists to keep all matched 
    trade tickets in their possession for a period of three years, whether 
    or not the specialist participated or acted as agent in any such trade.
        Advice F-2 is applicable to both the equity options and foreign 
    currency options floors. Accordingly, the Phlx proposes adding the 
    notation ``OF'' after Advice F-2. This notation indicates that the 
    advice is applicable to the Phlx options floor and the Phlx foreign 
    currency option floor. In addition, the Phlx proposes to increase the 
    fine schedule for this Advice and to apply the new fines on a three-
    year cycle, such that repeat violations during the same three-year 
    period would result in escalating fines.\4\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\Under the rolling three-year cycle, if there is no violation 
    of Advice F-2 for three years, the next violation would be treated 
    as a first occurrence. If there is a violation within three years 
    after the most recent violation, the next highest fine will be 
    issued. Thus, a third violation less than three years after a fine 
    was issued for a second occurrence would be treated as a third 
    occurrence, even though more than three years may have elapsed after 
    the first occurrence.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
    thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in 
    particular, the requirements of section 6(b)(5)\5\ in that the proposal 
    is designed to prevent fraudulent acts and practices, promote just and 
    equitable principles of trade, and protect investors and the public 
    interest. Specifically, the Commission believes that the proposed rule 
    change will help ensure prompt and accurate trade reporting, will 
    increase the performance of the Exchange's audit trail and other 
    surveillance-related trade comparison systems, and provide appropriate 
    fines for failing to perform the duties imposed by the rule change. 
    Moreover, the Commission believes that the Exchange's proposed 
    supervision of access to the saved trade tickets will serve as an 
    adequate measure to prevent such information from being used for 
    improper purposes.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\6\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Phlx-93-08) is approved.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2) 1982).
    
        For the commission, by the Division of Market Regulations, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1993).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 92-2119 Filed 01-31-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/01/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
92-2119
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: February 1, 1994, Release No. 34-33512, File No. SR-Phlx-93-08