99-2313. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS); Child Restraint Systems  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 20 (Monday, February 1, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 4834-4835]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-2313]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    
    49 CFR Part 571
    
    [Docket No. NHTSA-99-5025]
    
    
    Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS); Child Restraint 
    Systems
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S. 
    Department of Transportation (DOT).
    
    ACTION: Request for public comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is 
    conducting a review of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 
    No. 213, Child Restraint Systems, in order to determine, consistent 
    with Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and Section 
    610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, whether this rule 1 
    should be maintained without change, rescinded, or modified in order to 
    make it more effective or less burdensome in achieving its objectives. 
    This review also is being conducted to determine whether the rule can 
    become more consistent with the objectives of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act to achieve regulatory goals while imposing as few 
    burdens as possible on small entities.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ This document refers to FMVSS No. 213 as a ``rule'' 
    consistent with Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 
    Public Law 96-354, September 19, 1980 (see Section 601(2)).
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 2, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments must refer to the docket number cited at the 
    beginning of this notice and be submitted to the Docket Management, 
    Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. It is 
    requested, but not required, that one original plus two copies of the 
    comments be provided. The Docket hours are from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 
    p.m., Monday through Friday (telephone 202-366-9324).
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nita Kavalauskas, Office of Regulatory 
    Analysis and Evaluation, Office of Plans and Policy, National Highway 
    Traffic Safety Administration, Room 5208, 400 Seventh Street, SW, 
    Washington, DC 20590, (telephone 202-366-2584, fax 202-366-2559).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 
    (FMVSS) No. 213 (49 CFR 571.213) (``the rule'') specifies minimum 
    performance requirements for child restraint systems (both built-in and 
    add-on) used in motor vehicles and aircraft. The purpose of the rule is 
    to reduce the number of children killed or injured in motor vehicle and 
    aircraft crashes. The rule applies to passenger cars, multipurpose 
    passenger vehicles, trucks and buses, and to child restraint systems 
    for use in motor vehicles and aircraft.
        The rule evaluates the performance of child restraint systems in 
    dynamic tests performed in a simulated 30-mph frontal impact system. 
    The rule tests built-in child restraints either in the specific 
    vehicles or in the specific vehicle shell. Add-on child restraint 
    systems are tested on a standard test seat, restrained either by a lap 
    belt or (in the case of a belt positioning seat) by a lap/shoulder 
    belt. In addition, the rule requires labeling both belt-positioning 
    booster seats and shield-type booster seats to indicate which type of 
    belt system (lap belt only or lap/shoulder belt) can be used with that 
    particular booster seat.2
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ The agency has issued a proposal to standardize child 
    restraint anchorages. The agency would prefer not to receive 
    comments on this issue unless they relate to small business impacts.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The rule sets specific dummy testing requirements by weight and 
    height, so that an add-on or a built-in child restraint recommended for 
    a specific weight/height class will be tested using dummies 
    representative of that weight/height class. The rule also establishes 
    other requirements for child restraints with respect to such factors as 
    the height and width of the seat back surface, padding on surfaces 
    contacted by the child's head, the locations of fixed or movable 
    surfaces in front of the seated child, belt buckles and their releases, 
    seat belt material, and labeling requirements.
        The rule requires child restraint manufacturers to state on a label 
    the heights and weights of children for whom the system is designed to 
    protect. The rule also requires manufacturers of child restraints to 
    provide warning labels on rear-facing child restraints to alert parents 
    of the potential negative consequences of using rear-facing child 
    restraint systems in the front seat of vehicles with passenger-side air 
    bags.
        Also included in the rule is a requirement that child restraint 
    manufacturers supply, at the time of sale of the child restraint, a 
    postage-paid registration card that the purchaser can fill in with his/
    her name and address and mail back to the manufacturer so that the 
    purchaser could be notified in the event of a recall. Providing this 
    information on the label allows subsequent owners of child restraints 
    to register their restraints with the manufacturer so that they can be 
    contacted in the event of a recall. Manufacturers must record a list or 
    maintain records of the owners in a form suitable for inspection, such 
    as computer information storage devices or card files. Manufacturers 
    are required to retain the records of owners for six years from the 
    date of manufacture of the child restraint. The rule also requires that 
    each child restraint be permanently labeled with the manufacturer's 
    address or toll-free telephone number and the U.S. Government's Auto 
    Safety Hotline toll-free telephone number.
        At the present time, NHTSA has selected FMVSS No. 213 for review in 
    accordance with the regulatory review provisions at Section 5 of the 
    Executive Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, 
    51739, Oct. 4, 1993) and the directive of Section 610 of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
        Section 610(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act requires the 
    periodic review of rules to determine which ones have a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses. The agency 
    determined in August 1998 that FMVSS No. 213 (the rule) may have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses 
    and pursuant to section 610(c) is conducting this review of FMVSS No. 
    213. The purpose of the review is to determine whether the rule should 
    be continued without change, rescinded, or amended to make it more 
    effective or less burdensome in achieving its objectives, and to bring 
    it into better alignment with the objectives of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act to achieve regulatory goals while imposing as little 
    burden as possible on small entities. In the event the Agency 
    determines, based on the results of this review, that the rule should 
    be rescinded or modified, appropriate rulemaking will be initiated.
        An important step in the review process involves the gathering and 
    analysis of information from affected parties about their experience 
    with the rule and any material changes in circumstances since issuance 
    of the standard. This notice provides an opportunity for interested 
    parties to comment on the continuing need for, adequacy or inadequacy 
    of, and small business impacts of the rule. Comments concerning the 
    following subjects would assist the Agency in determining
    
    [[Page 4835]]
    
    whether to retain the rule unchanged or to initiate rulemaking for 
    purposes of revision or rescission:
        1. The benefits and utility of the rule in its current form and, if 
    amended, in its amended form;
        2. The continued need for the rule;
        3. The complexity of the rule;
        4. Whether and to what extent the rule overlaps, duplicates or 
    conflicts with other Federal, State, and local governmental rules;
        5. Information on any new developments in technology, economic 
    conditions, or other factors affecting the ability of affected firms to 
    comply with the rule;
        6. Alternatives to the rule or portions of the rule that would 
    minimize significant impacts on small businesses while achieving the 
    objectives of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
        In essence, the agency would like to know what sections of FMVSS 
    No. 213 significantly affect small business costs, unnecessarily affect 
    costs, are particularly burdensome for small entities, or could be 
    rewritten to minimize burdens on small entities. In addition, NHTSA 
    would like to know which sections of the rule could be written more 
    clearly and in plain English.
    
    Comments
    
    How do I prepare and submit comments?
    
        Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your 
    comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket 
    number of this document in your comments.
        Your comments must not be more than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21). 
    We established this limit to encourage you to write your primary 
    comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary 
    additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length 
    of the attachments.
        Please submit two copies of your comments, including the 
    attachments, to Docket Management at the address given above under 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    How can I be sure that my comments were received?
    
        If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of 
    your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the 
    envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket 
    Management will return the postcard by mail.
    
    How do I submit confidential business information?
    
        If you wish to submit any information under a claim of 
    confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete 
    submission, including the information you claim to be confidential 
    business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given 
    above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, you should 
    submit two copies, from which you have deleted the claimed confidential 
    business information, to Docket Management at the address given above 
    under ADDRESSES. When you send a comment containing information claimed 
    to be confidential business information, you should include a cover 
    letter setting forth the information specified in our confidential 
    business information regulation. (49 CFR part 512.)
    
    Will the agency consider late comments?
    
        We will consider all comments that Docket Management received 
    before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated 
    above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also consider 
    comments that Docket Management receives after that date.
    
    How can I read the comments submitted by other people?
    
        You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the 
    address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the Docket are 
    indicated above in the same location.
        You may also see the comments on the Internet. To read the comments 
    on the Internet, take the following steps:
        1. Go to the Docket Management System (DMS) Web page of the 
    Department of Transportation (http://dms.dot.gov/).
        2. On that page, click on ``search.''
        3. On the next page (http://dms.dot.gov/search/), type in the four-
    digit docket number shown at the beginning of this document. Example: 
    If the docket number were ``NHTSA-1998-1234,'' you would type ``1234.'' 
    After typing the docket number, click on ``search.''
        4. On the next page, which contains docket summary information for 
    the docket you selected, click on the desired comments.
        You may download the comments. However, since the comments are 
    imaged documents, instead of word processing documents, the downloaded 
    comments are not word searchable.
        Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will 
    continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes 
    available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly, 
    we recommend that you periodically check the Docket for new material.
    William H. Walsh,
    Associate Administrator for Plans and Policy.
    [FR Doc. 99-2313 Filed 1-29-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/01/1999
Department:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Request for public comments.
Document Number:
99-2313
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before April 2, 1999.
Pages:
4834-4835 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. NHTSA-99-5025
PDF File:
99-2313.pdf
CFR: (1)
49 CFR 571