98-3175. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality State Implementation Plans (SIP); Texas; Disapproval of Revisions to the State Implementation Plan  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 6651-6653]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-3175]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [TX35-1-6168; FRL-5962-3]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality State Implementation 
    Plans (SIP); Texas; Disapproval of Revisions to the State 
    Implementation Plan
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The EPA is taking final action on disapproval of SIP revisions 
    Texas submitted for Regulation IV, 30 TAC Chapter 114, sections 114.1 
    ``Maintenance and Operation of Air Pollution Control Systems or Devices
    
    [[Page 6652]]
    
    Used to Control Emissions from Motor Vehicles'' and 114.5 ``Exclusions 
    and Exceptions'' on February 24, 1989, September 6, 1990, and July 13, 
    1993.
        The EPA is disapproving these revisions that relate to Statewide 
    antitampering provisions and exemptions to antitampering provisions for 
    motor vehicles or motor vehicle engine emission control systems. The 
    EPA is taking final disapproval action because the State's 
    antitampering rules are not consistent with the Clean Air Act (the 
    Act), section 203(a)(3) and EPA's tampering prohibition as outlined in 
    EPA's antitampering Enforcement Policy, Mobile Source Enforcement 
    Memorandum No. 1A.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This action is effective as of March 12, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Paul Scoggins, Air Planning 
    Section (6PD-L), EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-
    2733, telephone (214) 665-7354 or via E-mail at 
    scoggins.paul@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        This document announces EPA's final action regarding disapproval of 
    three revisions that relate to Statewide antitampering provisions and 
    exceptions to antitampering provisions for motor vehicles or motor 
    vehicle engine emission control systems. On February 24, 1989, 
    September 6, 1990, and July 13, 1993, EPA received revisions to the 
    Texas SIP for changes to Regulation IV, 30 TAC Chapter 114, sections 
    114.1 and 114.5, 114.5, and 114.1 and 114.5 respectively. In their 
    regulations, Texas adopted specific measures restricting emission 
    control equipment removal/modifications (antitampering) and exempting 
    or providing exclusions for vehicles from antitampering requirements.
        The Federal tampering prohibition for emission control equipment 
    for motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines is contained in section 
    203(a)(3) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7522(a)(3). Section 203(a)(3)(A) of the 
    Act prohibits ``any person from removing or rendering inoperative any 
    emission control device or element of design installed on or in a motor 
    vehicle or motor vehicle engine prior to its sale and delivery to an 
    ultimate purchaser'' and prohibits ``any person from knowingly removing 
    or rendering inoperative any such device or element of design after 
    such sale and delivery to the ultimate purchaser.'' Mobile Source 
    Enforcement Memorandum No. 1A, dated June 25, 1974, provides guidance 
    on what is a violation of section 203(a)(3).
        The State revision, received February 24, 1989, made the following 
    changes. Section 114.1 prohibits: (1) The removal of or render 
    inoperative any system or device used to control emissions from a motor 
    vehicle or motor vehicle engine or any part thereof; (2) specifies the 
    conditions for the acceptable removal and/or installation of vehicle 
    engines, catalytic converters, or other emission control components; 
    (3) prohibits leasing, sale, or offer to sale motor vehicles that have 
    tampered emission control equipment; (4) and finally, establishes sign 
    posting requirements for prohibitions.
        Section 114.5 exempts from the provisions of 114.1: (1) Dual-fuel 
    conversions specified by the Department of Public Safety (DPS); (2) 
    vehicles belonging to persons being transferred to a foreign country 
    and specifies associated documentation requirements; (3) sales or 
    offers for sale motor vehicles for wholesale transaction and for sales 
    or trade-ins from an individual to a vehicle dealer; (4) Federal, State 
    and local agencies that sell abandoned, confiscated, or seized vehicles 
    and vehicle auction facilities if specific conditions are satisfied.
        The State revision, received September 9, 1990, to section 114.5 
    exempts all dealer transactions that do not result in the sale of a 
    tampered vehicle to an individual for operation on a public highway.
        The State revision, received on July 13, 1993, made the following 
    changes. Section 114.1 addresses the replacement or installation of 
    aftermarket alternative fuel conversions equipment and any other system 
    or device relating to emissions, safety concerns and antitampering. 
    Section 114.5 specifies conditions for granting motor vehicle and motor 
    vehicle engine exclusions from the provisions of section 114.1, deletes 
    original text in section 114.5(c) to improve consistency with section 
    114.1, and redesignates original paragraphs. For further discussion, 
    please refer to the proposal for this action (62 FR 48033, September 
    12, 1997).
    
    II. Final Action
    
        The EPA is taking final disapproval action on Texas SIP revisions 
    for Texas Regulation IV, 30 TAC Chapter 114, sections 114.1 and 114.5, 
    based on the following inconsistencies with the Clean Air Act and EPA's 
    tampering prohibition. Section 114.1(b)(4) allows replacement or 
    installation of any system or device (other than catalytic converters, 
    engines and the conversion of the vehicle to alternative fuels, which 
    are handled under separate subsections) if: The system or device can be 
    demonstrated to be at least as effective in reducing emissions as the 
    original equipment. This rule does not provide how the above 
    demonstration will be made nor the criteria for the demonstration. 
    Section 114.5(a)(1) allows registered farm vehicles used primarily on a 
    farm or ranch to remove or make inoperable the farm vehicles air 
    pollution control system or device used to control emissions from the 
    farm vehicle. This exemption is contrary to section 203(a)(3)(A) of the 
    Act and EPA tampering prohibition as outlined in Memorandum No. 1A. 
    Section 114.5(c) allows exclusion from tampering laws by petition to 
    the State for danger to person or property. The EPA has never 
    recognized any circumstances that merit removal of a catalytic 
    converter or other emissions controls because of a fire hazard or other 
    problem. Again, this is contrary to the Act and EPA tampering 
    prohibition. In addition, section 114.1(b)(3) references a deleted 
    section and section 114.1(e) allows dispensing of leaded gasoline if 
    properly labeled. The Act banned the dispensing of leaded gasoline on 
    January 1, 1996.
        These inconsistencies and the basis of EPA's action were published 
    as a proposed disapproval action on September 12, 1997, in the Federal 
    Register (62 FR 48033). No comments were received during the public 
    comment period.
        Texas' statewide tampering prohibitions are part of the state SIP 
    but are not required under section 179(a) of the Act. Even though there 
    is a federal law which provides for EPA enforcement, many states do 
    have such rules and use them successfully as enforcement tools for 
    resolutions of consumer complaints involving tampered vehicles, 
    deterrence of tampering, deterrence of selling tampered vehicles, and 
    enforcement of tampering violations. Federal law in section 203(a) of 
    the Act, which prohibits tampering, will continue to be in effect. 
    Since State tampering rules are not required by the Act, this final 
    disapproval action does not impose sanctions for failure to meet Act 
    requirements.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
    revision to any State Implementation Plan. Each request for revision to 
    the State Implementation Plan shall be considered separately in light 
    of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in 
    relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
    
    [[Page 6653]]
    
    III. Administrative Requirements
    
    A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
    
        The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this regulatory 
    action from E.O. 12866 review.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. See 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
    Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
    and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        The EPA's disapproval action of the State request under section 110 
    and subchapter I, part D of the Act does not affect any existing 
    requirements applicable to small entities. Any preexisting Federal 
    requirements remain in place after this final disapproval. Federal 
    disapproval of the State submittal does not affect its State-
    enforceability. Moreover, EPA's final disapproval of the submittal does 
    not impose any new Federal requirements. Therefore, EPA certifies that 
    this final disapproval action does not have a significant impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities because it does not remove 
    existing requirements and impose any new Federal requirements.
    
    C. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 
    signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must prepare a budgetary impact 
    statement to accompany any proposed or final rule that includes a 
    Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs to State, local, or 
    tribal governments in the aggregate; or to private sector, of $100 
    million or more. Under section 205, EPA must select the most cost-
    effective and least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives 
    of the rule and is consistent with statutory requirements. Section 203 
    requires EPA to establish a plan for informing and advising any small 
    governments that may be significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
        The EPA has determined that this final disapproval action does not 
    include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 
    million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the 
    aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal final disapproval 
    action imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to 
    State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result 
    from this action.
    
    D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
    
        Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the small business 
    Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report 
    containing this rule and the other required information to the U.S. 
    Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General 
    of the General Accounting Office prior to publication of this rule in 
    today's Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined 
    by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
    
    E. Petitions for Judicial Review
    
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review 
    of this action must be filed in the United States Courts of Appeals for 
    the appropriate circuit by April 13, 1998. Filing a petition for 
    reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
    the finality of this rule for the purpose of judicial review nor does 
    it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
    filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
    This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
    requirements. See section 307(b)(2) of the Act.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
    Hydrocarbons, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: January 26, 1998.
    Jerry Clifford,
    Acting Regional Administrator, Region VI.
    
        Chapter I, title 40, of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
    as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
    
    Subpart SS--Texas
    
        2. Section 52.2311 is added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.2311  Motor vehicle antitampering.
    
        The State of Texas submitted revisions to the State Implementation 
    Plan for 30 TAC Chapter 114, sections 114.1 ``Maintenance and Operation 
    of Air Pollution Control Systems or Devices Used to Control Emissions 
    from Motor Vehicles'' and 114.5 ``Exclusions and Exceptions'' on 
    February 24, 1989, and September 6, 1990, and July 13, 1993. The EPA 
    disapproved these revisions that relate to Statewide antitampering 
    provisions and exemptions to antitampering provisions for motor 
    vehicles or motor vehicle engine emission control systems because the 
    State's antitampering rules are not consistent with the Act, section 
    203(a)(3) and EPA's tampering prohibition as outlined in EPA's 
    antitampering enforcement policy, Mobile Source Enforcement Memorandum 
    No. 1A.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-3175 Filed 2-9-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/12/1998
Published:
02/10/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-3175
Dates:
This action is effective as of March 12, 1998.
Pages:
6651-6653 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
TX35-1-6168, FRL-5962-3
PDF File:
98-3175.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.2311