94-3275. Notice of Amended Final Determination and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipes From Taiwan  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 29 (Friday, February 11, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-3275]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: February 11, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    [A-583-815]
    
     
    
    Notice of Amended Final Determination and Antidumping Duty Order: 
    Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipes From Taiwan
    
    Agency: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: February 11, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Beck, Office of Antidumping Duty 
    Investigations, Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
    14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 
    telephone (202)482-3464.
    
    Scope of Order
    
        The merchandise subject to this antidumping duty order is welded 
    austenitic stainless steel pipe (WSSP) that meets the standards and 
    specifications set forth by the American Society for Testing and 
    Materials (ASTM) for the welded form of chromium-nickel pipe designated 
    ASTM A-312. The merchandise covered by the scope of the investigation 
    also includes austenitic welded stainless steel pipes made according to 
    the standards of other nations which are comparable to ASTM A-312.
        WSSP is produced by forming stainless steel flat-rolled products 
    into a tubular configuration and welding along the seam. WSSP is a 
    commodity product generally used as a conduit to transmit liquids or 
    gases. Major applications for WSSP include, but are not limited to, 
    digester lines, blow lines, pharmaceutical lines, petrochemical stock 
    lines, brewery process and transport lines, general food processing 
    lines, automotive paint lines and paper process machines.
        Imports of WSSP are currently classifiable under the following 
    HTSUS subheadings: 7306.40.1000, 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5015, 
    7306.40.5045, 7306.40.5060, and 7306.40.5075. Although these 
    subheadings include both pipes and tubes, the scope of this 
    investigation is limited to welded austenitic stainless steel pipes. 
    Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
    purposes, our written description of the scope of this investigation is 
    dispositive.
    
    Amendment of Final Determination and Antidumping Duty Order
    
        On November 4, 1992, the Department of Commerce made its final 
    determination that certain welded stainless steel pipes from Taiwan 
    were being sold at less than fair value (57 FR 53705, November 12, 
    1992).
        In the final determination, one of the producers, Chang Tieh 
    Industry Co., Ltd. (CTI), had a final antidumping duty margin of zero. 
    The Department would normally exclude from the application of an 
    antidumping duty order a producer with a zero margin. In this instance, 
    however, petitioners submitted evidence indicating that CTI's sales 
    were contrived for purposes of the Department's investigation. 
    Specifically, petitioners submitted statements by several affiants who 
    asserted that they were told by officials of CTI's U.S. customer that 
    CTI sold small quantities of WSSP during the period of investigation 
    (POI) at artificially high prices with the intention of making sales at 
    less than fair value (LTFV) after being excluded from the order. In 
    view of the small volume of CTI's sales, and the fact that CTI did not 
    sell the subject merchandise in the U.S. market prior to the POI, 
    petitioners' evidence raised significant concerns about potential 
    evasion, by CTI, of the antidumping duty order.
        To address these concerns, the Department required CTI to provide, 
    as a condition for its exclusion from the application of the order, a 
    certification similar to those required under Secs. 353.14 and 
    353.25(b) of the Department's regulations. The certification 
    constituted an affirmation by CTI that it had not dumped goods in the 
    past and would not dump goods in the future. Chang Tieh had to certify 
    that it: (1) Did not sell subject merchandise to the United States at 
    less than its foreign market value during the POI; (2) did not intend 
    to sell the subject merchandise to the United States at less than its 
    foreign market value in the future; and (3) agreed to application of 
    the order to its imports of the subject merchandise, if the Department 
    determined, at any time during the existence of the order, that CTI had 
    sold or was likely to sell subject merchandise to the United States at 
    less than its foreign market value.
        On December 22, 1992, the Department of Commerce amended its final 
    determination to reflect the fact that it had received CTI's 
    certifications and issued an antidumping duty order (57 FR 62300, 
    December 30, 1992). This order excluded CTI from the application of the 
    antidumping duty order, provided that CTI acted consistently with its 
    certifications.
        On December 9, 1993, the Court of International Trade decided in 
    the case of Avesta Sheffield Inc., et al. (Avesta) v. United States, 
    Slip Op. 93-232 (December 9, 1993) that the Department could not 
    justify conditioning CTI's exclusion on submission of the 
    certification. This issue was remanded to the Department with 
    instructions to exclude CTI unconditionally from the antidumping duty 
    order. The Court expressly stated that the issue of whether Commerce 
    could initiate a changed circumstances review if Chang Tieh is later 
    alleged to be dumping was not before the Court and was, therefore, not 
    addressed.
        Accordingly, we are amending the final determination and order to 
    eliminate any reference to the certification requirement. Because the 
    Department has already directed Customs officers to exclude CTI from 
    the antidumping duty order, no further Customs instructions are 
    necessary. However, if the Department has reasonable cause to believe 
    or suspect at any time that CTI has sold or is likely to sell the 
    subject merchandise to the United States at less than its foreign 
    market value, then the Department may institute an administrative 
    review of CTI under section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
    amended.
        This notice constitutes the amended final determination and 
    antidumping duty order with respect to welded stainless steel pipe from 
    Taiwan. Interested parties may contact the Central Records Unit, room 
    B-099 of the Main Commerce Building, for copies of an updated list of 
    antidumping duty orders currently in effect.
        This amended final determination and order is published in 
    accordance with sections 735(a) and 736(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 
    353.20(a)(4) and 353.21.
    
        Dated: February 7, 1994.
    Joseph A. Spetrini,
    Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 94-3275 Filed 2-10-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/11/1994
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-3275
Dates:
February 11, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: February 11, 1994, A-583-815