96-2982. Florida Power and Light Company Turkey Point Unit Nos. 3 and 4; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 5413-5414]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-2982]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251]
    
    
    Florida Power and Light Company Turkey Point Unit Nos. 3 and 4; 
    Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an amendment to the technical specifications 
    (TS) for Facility Operating License No. DPR-31 and DPR-41, issued to 
    Florida Power and Light Company (FPL or the licensee) for operation of 
    Turkey Point Unit Nos. 3 and 4 located in Dade County, Florida.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would modify the Index of the TS to remove 
    reference to the TS Bases pages.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for amendment dated November 22, 1995.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action deletes reference to the TS Bases pages and is 
    in accordance with 10 CFR 50.36(a), which indicates that the Bases 
    shall not become a part of the TS.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action 
    and concludes that the modification to the Index of the TS is 
    administrative in nature.
        The change will not increase the probability or consequences of 
    accidents, no changes are being made in the types of any effluents that 
    may be released offsite, and there is no significant increase in the 
    allowable individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. 
    Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant 
    radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
    action does involve features located entirely within the restricted 
    area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. It does not affect nonradiological 
    plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Accordingly, the 
    Commission concludes that there are no significant nonradiological 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the Commission has concluded there is no measurable 
    environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any 
    alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be 
    evaluated. As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff 
    considered denial of the proposed action. Denial of the application 
    would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The 
    environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action 
    are similar. 
    
    [[Page 5414]]
    
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for Turkey 
    Point Unit Nos. 3 and 4.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on February 5, 1995, the NRC 
    staff consulted with the Florida State official, Dr. Lyle Jerrett of 
    the State Office of Radiation Control, regarding the environmental 
    impact of the proposed action. The State official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes 
    that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has 
    determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
    licensee's letter dated November 22, 1995, which is available for 
    public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, The Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
    document room located at the Florida International University, 
    University Park, Miami, Florida 33199.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of February 1996.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    David B. Matthews,
    Director, Project Directorate II-1, Division of Reactor Projects--I/II, 
    Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 96-2982 Filed 2-9-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/12/1996
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-2982
Pages:
5413-5414 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251
PDF File:
96-2982.pdf