97-3462. Indiana Michigan Power Company; Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Environmental Assessment and Finding of no Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 6565-6566]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-3462]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316]
    
    
    Indiana Michigan Power Company; Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, 
    Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Environmental Assessment and Finding of no 
    Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of amendments to Facility Operating License Nos. 
    DPR-58 and DPR-74, issued to Indiana Michigan Power Company, (the 
    licensee), for operation of the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 
    2, located in Berrien County, Michigan.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        By letter dated February 26, 1996, the licensee requested 
    amendments to the Technical Specifications (TS) to allow an increased 
    limit for the nominal enrichment of new (unirradiated) Westinghouse 
    fabricated fuel stored in the new fuel storage racks. The proposed 
    changes would allow for the storage of fuel with an enrichment not to 
    exceed a nominal 4.95 weight percent (w/o) U-235, subject to certain 
    integral fuel burnable absorber (IFBA) requirements, in the new fuel 
    storage racks. Plant operation using the higher enriched fuel will be 
    demonstrated to be acceptable by a cycle specific reload safety 
    evaluation performed prior to each fuel loading.
    
    Need for Proposed Action
    
        The licensee intends to use higher enrichment fuel in subsequent 
    fuel load cycles which does not currently meet the new fuel storage 
    limits in the TSs. By increasing the fuel enrichment, the licensee will 
    implement the fuel strategies developed for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2.
    
    Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed 
    revision to the TSs and concludes that storage of fuel enriched with U-
    235 up to 4.95 weight percent at D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 is acceptable. 
    The safety considerations associated with higher enrichments have been 
    evaluated by the NRC staff and the staff has concluded
    
    [[Page 6566]]
    
    that such changes would not adversely affect plant safety. The proposed 
    changes have no adverse effect on the probability of any accident. As a 
    result, there is no increase in individual or cumulative radiation 
    exposure.
        The environmental impacts of transportation resulting from the use 
    of higher enrichment and extended irradiation are discussed in the 
    staff assessment entitled ``NRC Assessment of the Environmental Effects 
    of Transportation Resulting from Extended Fuel Enrichment and 
    Irradiation.'' This assessment was published in the Federal Register on 
    August 11, 1988 (53 FR 30355), as corrected on August 24, 1988 (53 FR 
    32322), in connection with the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 
    I: Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact. As 
    indicated therein, the environmental cost contribution of an increase 
    in fuel enrichment of up to 5 weight percent U-235 and irradiation 
    limits of up to 60 Gigawatt Days per Metric Ton (GWD/MT) are either 
    unchanged, or may in fact be reduced from those summarized in Table S-4 
    as set forth in 10 CFR 51.52(c). These findings are applicable to the 
    proposed amendment for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2. Accordingly, the 
    Commission concludes that this proposed action would result in no 
    significant radiological environmental impact.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
    changes involve systems located within the restricted area as defined 
    in 10 CFR Part 20. It does not affect nonradiological plant effluents 
    and has no other environmental impact. Therefore, the Commission 
    concludes that there are no significant nonradiological environmental 
    impacts associated with the proposed amendment.
        The Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility 
    Operating License, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration 
    Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing in connection with this 
    action was published in the Federal Register on April 24, 1996 (61 FR 
    18172).
    
    Alternative to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the Commission concluded that there are no significant 
    environmental effects that would result from the proposed action, any 
    alternative with equal or greater environmental impacts need not be 
    evaluated.
        The principal alternative would be to deny the requested amendment. 
    This would not reduce environmental impacts of plant operation and 
    would result in reduced operational flexibility.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for D.C. 
    Cook, Units 1 and 2, dated August 1973.
    
    Agencies and Persons Contacted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on December 20, 1996, the 
    Commission consulted with the Michigan State official, Mr. Dennis Hahn 
    of the Michigan Department of Public Health, Nuclear Facilities and 
    Environmental Monitoring, regarding the environmental impact of the 
    proposed action. The State official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes 
    that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has 
    determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    application for license amendment dated February 26, 1996. Copies are 
    available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document 
    Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555, 
    and at the local public document room located at the Maud Preston 
    Palenske Memorial Library, 500 Market Street, St. Joseph, Michigan 
    49085.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of January 1997.
    
         For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    John B. Hickman,
    Project Manager, Project Directorate III-3, Division of Reactor 
    Projects III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 97-3462 Filed 2-11-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/12/1997
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-3462
Pages:
6565-6566 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316
PDF File:
97-3462.pdf