97-3645. Entek; Pesticide Tolerance Petition Filing  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 6526-6528]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-3645]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [PF-704; FRL-5586-5]
    
    
    Entek; Pesticide Tolerance Petition Filing
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice of filing.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide 
    petition proposing the establishment of tolerances for residues of 
    carbon disulfide in or on almond nutmeats, almond hulls, peaches and 
    plums (fresh prunes). This notice includes a summary of the petition 
    that was prepared by the petitioner, Entek Corporation.
    
    DATES: Comments, identified by the docket number [PF-704], must be 
    received on or before, March 14, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written comments to: Public Response and 
    Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to Rm. 1132, CM #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Comments and data may also be submitted electronically be sending 
    electronic mail (e-mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic 
    comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special 
    characters and any form of encryption. Comments and data will also be 
    accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1 file format or ASCII file 
    format. All comments and data in electronic form must be identified by 
    docket number [PF-704]. Electronic comments on this notice may be filed 
    online at many Federal Depository Libraries. Additional information on 
    electronic submissions can be found in Unit II. of this document.
        Information submitted as a comment concerning this document may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI). CBI should not be 
    submitted through e-mail. Information marked as CBI will not be 
    disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 
    2. A copy of the comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted 
    for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked confidential 
    may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written 
    comments will be available for public inspection in Rm. 1132 at the 
    address given above, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    excluding legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Giles-Parker, Product Manager 
    (22), Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    Office location, telephone number, and e-mail address: Rm. 229, CM #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA, 703-305-5540, e-mail: 
    giles-parker.cynthia@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has received a pesticide petition (PP 
    5F4482) from Entek Corporation, P.O. Box 458, Brea, CA 92822, proposing 
    pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act 
    (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR 180.467 by establishing a 
    tolerance, at 0.1 part per million (ppm), for residues of the fumigant 
    carbon disulfide resulting from the soil application of sodium 
    tetrathiocarbonate in or on the raw agricultural commodities almond 
    nutmeats, almond hulls, peaches and plumes (fresh prunes). The proposed 
    analytical method is gas chromatography using a sulfur specific 
    detector. EPA has determined that the petition contains data or 
    information regarding the elements set forth in section 408(d)(2); 
    however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted 
    data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the 
    petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the 
    petition.
        As required by section 408(d) of the FFDCA, as recently amended by 
    the Food Quality Protection Act (Pub. L. 104-170), Entek Corporation 
    included in the petition a summary of the petition and authorization 
    for the summary to be published in the Federal Register in a notice of 
    receipt of the petition. The summary represents the views of Entek 
    Corporation. EPA is in the process of evaluating the petition. As 
    required by section 408(d)(3) EPA is including the summary as a part of 
    this notice of filing. EPA has made minor edits to the summary for the 
    purpose of clarity.
    
    I. Entek's Petition Summary
    
    A. Residue Chemistry
    
        1. Plant metabolism. Radiolabel metabolism studies, using 14C 
    labeled sodium tetrathiocarbonate, were conducted with potatoes and 
    tomatoes. The studies established that sodium tetrathiocarbonate 
    rapidly degrades in soil and plants and the resulting residues are 
    carbon disulfide (CS2), free and bound. No other residues of 
    concern were identified in the radiolabel or other residue chemistry 
    studies submitted by the petitioner.
        2. Analytical method. An adequate analytical method for detecting 
    free and bound CS2 residues in plants is available. The method has 
    been validated by EPA. In brief, plant material is blended with water 
    in a sealed container. Aliquots of the gas and liquid phases are 
    removed and the free CS2 content is determined by purge-and-trap 
    gas chromatography using a sulfur-specific detector. A sample of the 
    liquid phase, purged for free CS2, is subjected to hot acid 
    hydrolysis followed by purge-and-trap gas chromatography in order to 
    measure the bound CS2 content. In general, the limit of detection 
    for the analytical method is 0.5 ppb and the limit of quantitation is 
    1.7 parts per billion (ppb).
        3. Magnitude of residues. Two field trials were conducted for each 
    crop (peaches, plums and almonds). Trials were all conducted in 
    California since it is the predominant growing area for each of the 
    requested raw agricultural commodities (RACs) and the petitioner has 
    proposed to limit use of Enzone (the product containing 
    sodium tetrathiocarbonate) to Arizona, California, Oregon, and 
    Washington. In each trial, sodium tetrathiocarbonate was applied in 
    amounts equal to or greater than the maximum label rate and 
    pretreatment, control and treatment samples were analyzed for free and 
    bound CS2.
        In the plum and peach trials, very low levels (<20 ppb)="" of="" free="" and="" bound="">2 were observed in pretreated, control and treatment 
    samples. In both almond trials, very low levels of free or bound 
    CS2 (< 10="" ppb)="" were="" observed="" in="" almond="" nutmeats.="" in="" one="" of="" the="" almond="" trials,="" unusually="" high="" levels="" of="" bound="">2 (from 567-6,761 
    ppb) were observed in control and treated almond hull
    
    [[Page 6527]]
    
    samples. The petitioner believes that these atypical levels were most 
    likely due to high natural occurrence or drift of an ethylene 
    bisdithiocarbamate (EBDC) pesticide from a nearby source.
        Rigorous statistical analysis of the sample data clearly showed 
    that there is no increase in CS2 (free or bound) above background 
    levels for treated almond, pear or plum trees when compared to 
    untreated or control trees.
    
    B. Toxicological Profile
    
        1. Acute toxicity. Technical sodium tetrathiocarbonate (32% active 
    ingredient) is moderately toxic by the oral route, with a combined 
    acute oral LD50 of 631 milligrams/kilograms (mg/kg) in the rat. 
    Technical sodium tetrathiocarbonate is practically nontoxic by dermal 
    application (acute dermal LD50 > 2,000 mg/kg) and slightly toxic 
    after a 4-hour inhalation exposure (acute LC50 is 4.73 mg/L 
    (males) and 3.17 mg/L (females). Technical sodium tetrathiocarbonate is 
    corrosive to skin and eyes but is not a dermal sensitizer.
        2. Genotoxicity. In the bacterial gene mutation test (Ames) 
    technical sodium tetrathiocarbonate was negative, with or without 
    metabolic activation. Technical sodium tetrathiocarbonate was also 
    negative in a mammalian gene mutation assay (CHO/HGPRT), with or 
    without metabolic activation. In the chromosome aberration assay, 
    technical sodium tetrathiocarbonate gave a weakly positive result under 
    activation conditions. Technical sodium tetrathiocarbonate was negative 
    in the unscheduled DNA Synthesis assay. On the basis of the 
    mutagenicity battery, Entek concludes that sodium tetrathiocarbonate is 
    not mutagenic or genotoxic.
        3. Developmental toxicity. Developmental toxicity studies with 
    sodium tetrathiocarbonate were performed in the rat and rabbit. In the 
    rat study, pregnant rats were administered sodium tetrathiocarbonate at 
    doses of 0, 150, 400, 450 and 500 mg/kg/day on gestation days 6 through 
    15. Necropsy examinations of the animals that died and animals that 
    survived to final sacrifice did not reveal any lesions which could be 
    attributed to sodium tetrathiocarbonate. Treatment with 150, 400 or 450 
    mg/kg/day of sodium tetrathiocarbonate did not alter fetal, skeletal or 
    visceral development. The developmental toxicity no observed effect 
    level (NOEL) for this study is 450 mg/kg/day. In the rabbit study, 
    pregnant rabbits were administered sodium tetrathiocarbonate at doses 
    of 0, 75, 150 and 185 mg/kg/day on days 7-19 of gestation. 
    Developmental effects (elevated resorptions and increased post-
    implantation loss) were observed at 185 mg/kg/day; developmental 
    effects were not observed at the lower dose levels. The developmental 
    toxicity no observed effect level (NOEL) for this study is 150 mg/kg/
    day.
        Entek has requested waivers for several of the toxicology studies 
    that are normally required for crop tolerances. These include: 90-day 
    oral toxicity study (rat and dog); 2-generation reproduction (rat); 
    chronic toxicity study (rat and dog); oncogenicity (rat and mouse) and 
    general metabolism. The basis for the waiver request is that the 
    natural or background levels of CS2, either free or bound, are not 
    increased from the application of sodium tetrathiocarbonate to almonds, 
    peaches or plums.
        In 1987, an oral reference dose (RfD) of 0.1 mg/kg/day for CS2 
    was established by EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
    
    C. Aggregate Exposure
    
        1. Dietary exposure-- i. Food. Extensive residue data compiled by 
    the petitioner and information in the public literature has shown a 
    natural occurring dietary CS2 level (bound and free) of 
    approximately 10-20 ppb. Assuming a dietary intake of 3,000 g/day, the 
    daily intake of CS2 is approximately 0.06 mg/day. The use of 
    sodium tetrathiocarbonate on almonds, peaches or plums is not 
    anticipated to add to the daily intake of CS2 since, as noted 
    above, no increases in CS2 residues above background levels were 
    observed in the residue trials. It should also be noted that there was 
    no increase above background CS2 levels for the crops (grapes and 
    citrus) currently covered by a tolerance.
        ii. Drinking water. Two state-of-art prospective ground water 
    monitoring studies were conducted for sodium tetrathiocarbonate. In 
    both studies, sodium tetrathiocarbonate was applied above very shallow 
    aquifers (3-7 ft. below the surface) and the ground water was analyzed 
    for CS2. The studies demonstrated that CS2, from sodium 
    tetrathiocarbonate application, is not a residual ground water 
    contaminant.
        2. Non-dietary exposure. Carbon disulfide is an industrial chemical 
    used in the manufacture of rayon fibers; in the production of cellulose 
    and rubber chemicals; as a solvent for cleaning and extraction; as an 
    extractant for olive oil and in the production of adhesives. 
    Accordingly, workers in these industries may be exposed to low levels 
    of CS2 in the air. The daily exposure limit is 20 ppm (8-hr time 
    weight average).
    
    D. Cumulative Effects
    
        There is no reliable information to indicate that carbon disulfide 
    has a common mechanism of toxicity with any other chemical compound.
    
    E. Safety Determination
    
        1. U.S. population. Since the use of sodium tetrathiocarbonate on 
    almonds, peaches and plums is not anticipated to contribute to CS2 
    exposures, Entek concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no 
    harm will result from sodium tetrathiocarbonate application to these 
    RACs.
        2. Infants and children. Entek also concludes that there is a 
    reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children 
    since no increase in infant or child exposure to CS2 will result 
    from the application of sodium tetrathiocarbonate on almonds, peaches 
    and plums.
    
    F. International Tolerances
    
        There are no Codex maximum residue levels [MRLs] established for 
    residues of carbon disulfide resulting from the application of sodium 
    tetrathiocarbonate.
    
    II. Public Record
    
        A record has been established for this notice under docket number 
    [PF-704] including comments and data submitted electronically as 
    described below). A public version of this record, including printed, 
    paper versions of electronic comments, which does not include any 
    information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection from 8:30 a.m. 
    to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The public 
    record is located in Room 1132 of the Public Response and Program 
    Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Crystal Mall #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption.
        The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public 
    version, as described above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly, 
    EPA will transfer all comments received electronically into printed, 
    paper form as they are received and will place the paper copies in the 
    official rulemaking record which will also include all comments 
    submitted directly in writing. The official rulemaking record is the 
    paper record maintained at the address
    
    [[Page 6528]]
    
    in ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this document.
    
    List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: February 7, 1997.
    
    Donald R. Stubbs,
    
    Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
    [FR Doc. 97-3645 Filed 2-11-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/12/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of filing.
Document Number:
97-3645
Dates:
Comments, identified by the docket number [PF-704], must be received on or before, March 14, 1997.
Pages:
6526-6528 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PF-704, FRL-5586-5
PDF File:
97-3645.pdf