95-3468. Northern Natural Gas Co.; Intent To Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed East Leg Expansion Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 8231-8232]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-3468]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    [Docket No. CP95-130-000]
    
    
    Northern Natural Gas Co.; Intent To Prepare an Environmental 
    Assessment for the Proposed East Leg Expansion Project and Request for 
    Comments on Environmental Issues
    
    February 7, 1995.
        The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the 
    Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will 
    discuss the environmental impacts of the construction and operation of 
    the facilities proposed in the East Leg Expansion Project.\1\ This EA 
    will be used by the Commission in its decision-making process to 
    determine whether an environmental impact statement is necessary and 
    whether to approve the project.
    
        \1\Northern Natural Gas Company's application was filed with the 
    Commission under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157 of 
    the Commission's regulations.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Summary of the Proposed Project
    
        Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern) wants to expand the 
    capacity of its facilities in Iowa, Illinois and Wisconsin to transport 
    an additional 107,600 million British thermal units per day of natural 
    gas to four local distribution companies and one electric cogeneration 
    plant. Northern requests Commission authorization, in Docket No. CP95-
    130-000, to construct and operate the following facilities needed to 
    transport those volumes:
    
    Phase I Facilities (1995)
    
         6,000 horsepower (hp) of electric motor-driven compression 
    at the new Hubbard Compressor Station in Hardin County, Iowa;
         Modification and repiping of the existing Waterloo 
    Compressor Station in Black Hawk County, Iowa;
         14,000 hp of gas turbine-driven compression at the new 
    Earlville Compressor Station in Delaware County, Iowa;
         A new Quad Cities town border station (TBS) in Dubuque 
    County, Iowa for deliveries to the Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric 
    Company;
         Modification of the existing Galena Compressor Station in 
    Jo Daviess County, Illinois;
         Modification of the existing Beloit TBS near Beloit, Rock 
    County, Wisconsin for deliveries to the Wisconsin Power and Light 
    Company; and
         A new LS Power TBS in Walworth County, Wisconsin for 
    Deliveries to the LS Power-Whitewater Limited Partnership (LS Power).
    
    Phase II Facilities (1996)
    
         3,200 hp of compression (two 1,600-hp gas turbine-driven 
    compressors) at the new Belleville Compressor Station in Green County, 
    Wisconsin.
        The general location of the project facilities and specific 
    locations for facilities on new sites are shown in appendix 1.\2\
    
        \2\The appendices referenced in this notice are not being 
    printed in the Federal Register. Copies are available from the 
    Commission's Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, Room 
    3104, 941 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, or 
    call (202) 208-1371. Copies of the appendices were sent to all those 
    receiving this notice in the mail.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Land Requirements for Construction
    
        Construction of the proposed facilities would require about 26.9 
    acres of land. Following construction about 8.6 acres would be 
    maintained as new above-ground facility sites. The remaining 18.3 acres 
    of land would be restored and allowed to revert to its former use.
    
    The EA Process
    
        The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the 
    Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could 
    result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a 
    Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us 
    to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals. 
    We call this ``scoping''. The main goal of the scoping process is to 
    focus the analysis in the EA on the important environmental issues. By 
    this Notice of Intent, the Commission requests public comments on the 
    scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All comments received 
    are considered during the preparation of the EA. State and local 
    government representatives are encouraged to notify their constituents 
    of this proposed action and encourage them to comment on their areas of 
    concern.
        The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the 
    construction and operation of the proposed project under these general 
    headings:
         Geology and soils
         Water resources, fisheries, and wetlands\3\
    
        \3\According to the applicant, the project will not affect any 
    waters of the United States. We will repot any potential impacts, or 
    their absence, under this heading.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
         Vegetation and wildlife
         Endangered and threatened species
         Land use
         Cultural resources
         Air quality and noise
         Hazardous waste
        We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the proposed project 
    or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen 
    or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
        Our independent analysis of the issue will be in the EA. Depending 
    on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA may be 
    published and mailed to Federal, state, and local agencies, public 
    interest groups, interested individuals, affected landowners, 
    newspapers, libraries, and the Commission's official service list for 
    this proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for review if the EA 
    is published. We will consider all comments on the EA before we 
    recommend that the Commission approve or not approve the project.
    
    Currently Identified Environmental Issues
    
        We have already identified several issues that we think deserve 
    attention based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and 
    the environmental information provided by Northern. Keep in mind that 
    this is a [[Page 8232]] preliminary list. The list of issues may be 
    added to, subtracted from, or changed based on your comments and our 
    analysis. Issues are:
         Eight federally listed endangered or threatened species 
    may occur in the proposed project area.
         A total of 8.6 acres of agricultural land, including a 
    total of 3.2 acres of prime farmland soils, would convert to industrial 
    use.
    
    Public Participation
    
        You can make a difference by sending a letter addressing your 
    specific comments or concerns about the project. You should focus on 
    the potential environmental effects of the proposal, alternatives to 
    the proposal (including alternative locations), and measures to avoid 
    or lessen environmental impact. The more specific your comments, the 
    more useful they will be. Please follow the instructions below to 
    ensure that your comments are received and properly recorded:
         Address your letter to: Lois Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
    Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol St., N.E., Washington, 
    D.C. 20426;
         Reference Docket No. CP95-130-000;
         Send a copy of your letter to: Mr. Jeff Gerber, EA Project 
    Manager, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol St., 
    N.E., Room 7312, Washington, D.C. 20426; and
         Mail your comments so that they will be received in 
    Washington, D.C. on or before March 13, 1995.
        If you wish to receive a copy of the EA, you should request one 
    from Mr. Gerber at the above address.
    
    Becoming an Intervenor
    
        In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want 
    to become an official party to the proceeding or become an 
    ``intervenor''. Among other things, intervenors have the right to 
    receive copies of case-related Commission documents and filings by 
    other intervenors. Likewise, each intervenor must provide copies of its 
    filings to all other parties. If you want to become an intervenor you 
    must file a motion to intervene according to Rule 214 of the 
    Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) attached 
    as appendix 2.
        The date for filing of timely motions to intervene in this 
    proceeding has passed. Therefore, parties now seeking to file late 
    interventions must show good cause, as required by Sec. 385.214(b)(3), 
    why this time limitation should be waived. Environmental issues have 
    been viewed as good cause for late intervention. You do not need 
    intervenor status to have your scoping comments considered.
        Additional information about the proposed project is available from 
    Mr. Jeff Gerber, EA Project Manager, at (202) 208-1121.
    Lois D. Cashell,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-3468 Filed 2-10-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/13/1995
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-3468
Pages:
8231-8232 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CP95-130-000
PDF File:
95-3468.pdf