96-3199. Request for Comments Concerning Proposed Request for Approval of a Collection of InformationSafety Standard for Automatic Residential Garage Door Operators  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 5537-5538]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-3199]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
    
    
    Request for Comments Concerning Proposed Request for Approval of 
    a Collection of Information--Safety Standard for Automatic Residential 
    Garage Door Operators
    
    AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
    35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission requests comments on a 
    proposed request for approval of a collection of information from 
    manufacturers and importers of residential garage door operators. The 
    collection of information consists of testing and recordkeeping 
    requirements in certification regulations implementing the Safety 
    Standard for Automatic Residential Garage Door Operators (16 CFR Part 
    1211). The Commission will consider all comments received in response 
    to this notice before requesting approval of this collection of 
    information from the Office of Management and Budget.
    
    DATES: Written comments must be received by the Office of the Secretary 
    not later than April 15, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments should be captioned ``Residential Garage 
    Door Operators'' and mailed to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer 
    Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207, or delivered to that 
    office, room 502, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the proposed 
    request for approval of the collection of information, or to obtain a 
    copy of 16 CFR Part 1211, call or write Nicholas V. Marchica, Director, 
    Office of Planning and Evaluation, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 
    Washington, DC 20207; telephone (301) 504-0416, extension 2243.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1990, Congress enacted legislation 
    requiring residential garage door operators to comply with the 
    provisions of a standard published by Underwriters Laboratories to 
    protect against entrapment. The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act 
    of 1990 (the Improvement Act) (Pub. L. 101-608, 104 Stat. 3110) 
    includes requirements that residential garage door operators 
    manufactured on or after January 1, 1993, must comply with the 
    entrapment protection provisions in UL Standard 325 in effect on or 
    before January 1, 1992. The entrapment protection requirements of UL 
    Standard 325 are codified as the Safety Standard for Automatic 
    Residential Garage Door Operators, 16 CFR Part 1211.
    
    A. Certification Requirements
    
        The Improvement Act provides that UL Standard 325 shall be 
    considered to be a consumer product safety standard issued by the 
    Consumer Product Safety Commission under section 9 of the Consumer 
    Product Safety Act (CPSA) (15 U.S.C. 2058). Section 14(a) of the CPSA 
    (15 U.S.C. 2063(a)) requires manufacturers, importers, and private 
    labelers of a consumer product subject to a consumer product safety 
    standard to issue a certificate stating that the product complies with 
    all applicable consumer product safety standards. Section 14(a) of the 
    CPSA also requires that the certificate of compliance must be based on 
    a test of each product or upon a reasonable testing program.
        Section 14(b) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2063(b)) authorizes the 
    Commission to issue regulations to prescribe a 
    
    [[Page 5538]]
    reasonable testing program to support certificates of compliance with a 
    consumer product safety standard. Section 14(b) of the CPSA allows 
    firms which are required to issue certificates of compliance to use an 
    independent third-party organization to conduct the testing required to 
    support the certificate of compliance.
        Section 16(b) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2065(b)) authorizes the 
    Commission to issue rules to require establishment and maintenance of 
    records necessary to implement the CPSA or determine compliance with 
    rules issued under the authority of the CPSA. On December 22, 1992, the 
    Commission issued rules prescribing requirements for a reasonable 
    testing program to support certificates of compliance with the Safety 
    Standard for Automatic Residential Garage Door Operators (57 FR 60449). 
    These regulations also require manufacturers, importers, and private 
    labelers of residential garage door operators to establish and maintain 
    records to demonstrate compliance with the requirements for testing to 
    support certification of compliance. 16 CFR Part 1211, Subparts B and 
    C.
        The Commission uses the information compiled and maintained by 
    manufacturers and importers of residential garage door operators to 
    protect consumers from risks of death and injury resulting from 
    entrapment accidents associated with garage door operators. More 
    specifically, the Commission uses this information to determine whether 
    the products produced and imported by those firms comply with the 
    standard. The Commission also uses this information to facilitate 
    corrective action if any residential garage door operators fail to 
    comply with the standard in a manner that creates a substantial risk of 
    injury to the public.
    
    B. Estimated Burden
    
        The Commission staff estimates that about 14 firms are subject to 
    the testing and recordkeeping requirements of the certification 
    regulations. Information available to the Commission staff indicates 
    that all of these firms use the services of an independent third-party 
    organization to conduct the testing and maintain the records necessary 
    to satisfy the requirements of the certification regulations.
        The Commission staff estimates that after an initial one-time test 
    to establish that a garage door operator complies with the requirements 
    of the standard, the annual cost to a manufacturer or importer of 
    garage door operators for the inspection and certification services of 
    a third-party organization is approximately $1,200 per year. Thus, the 
    total annual burden imposed by the certification regulations on all 
    manufacturers and importers of garage door operators is about $16,800.
        During a typical year, the Commission will expend approximately one 
    week of professional staff time reviewing records required to be 
    maintained by the certification regulations for residential garage door 
    operators. The annual cost to the Federal government of the collection 
    of information in these regulations is estimated to be $1,400.
    
    C. Request for Comments
    
        The Commission solicits written comments from all interested 
    persons about the proposed request for approval of the collection of 
    information in the certification and recordkeeping regulations for 
    residential garage door operators. The Commission specifically solicits 
    information about the hourly burden and monetary costs imposed by the 
    collection of information on firms subject to this collection of 
    information. The Commission also seeks information relevant to the 
    following topics:
         Whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
    proper performance of the Commission's functions;
         Whether the information will have practical utility for 
    the Commission;
         Whether the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
    information to be collected could be enhanced; and
         Whether the burden imposed by the collection of 
    information could be minimized by use of automated, electronic or other 
    technological collection techniques, or other form of information 
    technology.
    
        Dated: February 7, 1996.
    Sadye E. Dunn,
    Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
    [FR Doc. 96-3199 Filed 2-12-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/13/1996
Department:
Consumer Product Safety Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
96-3199
Dates:
Written comments must be received by the Office of the Secretary not later than April 15, 1996.
Pages:
5537-5538 (2 pages)
PDF File:
96-3199.pdf