97-3543. Liberty All-Star Equity Fund, et al.; Notice of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 6817-6819]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-3543]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Rel. No. IC-22498; 812-10430]
    
    
    Liberty All-Star Equity Fund, et al.; Notice of Application
    
    February 6, 1997.
    AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'').
    
    ACTION: Notice of application for exemption under the Investment 
    Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Applicants: Liberty All-Star Equity Fund (``All-Star'') and Liberty 
    Asset Management Company (``LAMCO'').
    
    RELEVANT ACT SECTIONS: Order requested under section 6(c) for an 
    exemption from section 15(a) of the Act.
    
    SUMMARY OF APPLICANT: Applicants request an order amending an existing 
    order, which amended a prior order, that let the Fund's investment 
    adviser hire and fire sub-advisers and enter new sub-advisory 
    agreements resulting from an ``assignment,'' as defined in the Act, and 
    delay shareholder approval until the next annual shareholder meeting. 
    Among other things, the existing order is subject to a requirement that 
    the new subadvisory agreement will affect no more than 25% of the 
    Fund's assets. The amended order would eliminate this condition.
    
    FILING DATES: The application was filed on November 14, 1996, and 
    amended on February 3, 1997.
    
    HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
    will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
    request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving 
    applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing 
    requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on March 3, 1997, 
    and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the 
    form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing 
    requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, the reason 
    for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be 
    notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the SEC's 
    Secretary.
    
    ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 
    20549. Applicants: Federal Reserve Plaza, Boston, MA 02210.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Christine Y. Greenless, Senior Counsel, at (202) 942-0581 or Mary Kay 
    Frech, Branch Chief, at (202) 942-0564 (Office of Investment Company 
    Regulation, Division of Investment Management).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
    application. The complete application
    
    [[Page 6818]]
    
    may be obtained for a fee at the SEC's Public Reference Branch.
    
    Applicants' Representations
    
        1. All-Star is a closed-end diversified management investment 
    company. LAMCO, a registered investment adviser, is an indirect wholly-
    owned subsidiary of Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. (``LFC''). LFC is 
    an indirect majority-owned subsidiary of Liberty Mutual Insurance 
    Company.
        2. All-Star employs a multi-manager methodology of portfolio 
    management. It allocates its investment portfolio on an approximately 
    equal basis among several independent investment management firms 
    (``Sub-Advisors''), currently five in number, selected and recommended 
    from time to time by LAMCO based on specific criteria, inducing a 
    sufficient diversity and breadth of investment styles. None of the Sub-
    Advisors has nay affiliation with All-Star or LAMCO other than as Sub-
    Advisor.
        3. Applicants received an order that permits All-Star and LAMCO to 
    enter into new subadvisory agreements incident to a change in Sub-
    Advisors or the addition of a Sub-Advisor recommended by LAMCO and to 
    delay shareholder approval of such agreements until All-Star's next 
    annual meeting of shareholders (the ``Prior Order'').\1\ Subsequently, 
    applicants received an order amending the Prior Order to extend the 
    relief granted therein so that, in the event of a sale of assets, 
    merger, or transfer of voting securities of a Sub-Advisor or other 
    transaction constituting an ``assignment'' (as defined in section 
    2(a)(4) of the Act), of All-Star's subadvisory agreement with such Sub-
    Advisor, All-Star, LAMCO, and such Sub-Advisor or its successor could 
    enter into a new subadvisory agreement and delay shareholder approval 
    of such agreement until All-Star's next annual meeting of shareholders 
    (``the Existing Order'').\2\ Applicants reaffirm all of the 
    representations made in the original applications, as amended, for the 
    Prior Order and the Existing Order.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Investment Company Act Release Nos. 19436 (April 27, 1993) 
    (notice) and 19491 (May 25, 1993) (order).
        \2\ Investment Company Act Release Nos. 20347 (June 8, 1994) 
    (notice) and 20355 (July 6, 1994) (order).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        4. Among other things, the Existing Order is conditioned upon the 
    requirement that the new subadvisory agreement involved will, when 
    entered into, affect no more than approximately 25% of All-Star's 
    assets. Applicants seek to amend the Existing Order to eliminate such 
    restriction.
    
    Applicants' Legal Analysis
    
        1. Section 15(a) of the Act makes it unlawful for any person to act 
    as an investment adviser to a registered investment company except 
    pursuant to a written contract, whether with such registered company or 
    with an investment adviser of such registered company, which has been 
    approved by the majority vote of the outstanding voting securities of 
    such registered company.
        2. Applicants state that All-Star's multi-manager methodology of 
    portfolio management is based on the premise that most investment 
    management firms consistently employ a distinctive investment style 
    that causes them to emphasize stocks with particular characteristics, 
    and that, because of changing investor preferences, any given 
    investment style will move into and out of market favor and will result 
    in better investment performance under certain market conditions, but 
    less successful performance under other conditions. All-star's multi-
    manager methodology, by allocating its portfolio among several Sub-
    Advisors employing different investment styles, seeks to achieve more 
    consistent and less volatile performance over the long term then if an 
    single investment style was employed throughout the entire period. The 
    Sub-Advisors recommended by LAMCO represent a blending of different 
    investment styles, which, in its opinion, is appropriate to All-Star's 
    investment objective, and which is sufficiently broad so that, insofar 
    as All-Star's investment objective permits, at least one of such styles 
    can reasonably be expected to be in market favor in all reasonable 
    foreseeable market conditions.
        3. LAMCO believes that the investment styles of certain investment 
    management firms may result in more volatile performance than those of 
    other firms. Accordingly, it believes that the objectives of reducing 
    volatility and providing a blending of different investment styles 
    appropriate for All-Star's investment objectives may be better served 
    by allocating more than an equal portion of All-Star's assets to a Sub-
    Advisor whose investment style is expected to result in less volatile 
    performance than those of the other Sub-Advisors, and allocating the 
    remaining assets among the other Sub-Advisors (not necessarily on an 
    equal basis). The relative allocations among the Sub-Advisors, once 
    established, would be maintained through rebalancings at approximately 
    the same levels until the next change or addition of a Sub-Advisor.
        4. Applicants submit that, except for the fact that any order 
    granting the requested relief will not contain the Existing Order's 
    requirement that the new subadvisory agreement involved will, when 
    entered into, affect no more than approximately 25% of All-Star's 
    assets, each of the factors that provided the basis for the granting of 
    the Prior Order and the Existing Order would continue to apply.
        5. Section 6(c) of the Act authorizes the SEC to exempt persons or 
    transactions from the provisions of the Act to the extent that such 
    exemptions are necessary or appropriate in the public interest and 
    consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly 
    intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. Applicants submit 
    that the requested amendment to the exemption from section 15(a) of the 
    Act granted by the Existing Order would be consistent with the 
    standards set forth in section 6(c) of the Act and would be in the best 
    interests of All-Star and its shareholders.
    
    Applicants' Conditions
    
        Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief shall 
    be subject to the following conditions:
        1. The new sub-advisory agreement will be submitted for 
    ratification and approval to the vote of All-Star's shareholders no 
    later than at the regularly scheduled annual meeting of shareholders of 
    All-Star next following the effective date of the new sub-advisory 
    agreement, and its continuance after such meeting will be conditioned 
    on approval by a majority vote (as defined in section 2(a) (42) of the 
    Act) of such shareholders.
        2. All-Star will continue to hold annual meetings of its 
    shareholders, whether or not required to do so by the rules of the New 
    York Stock Exchange, Inc. or otherwise.
        3. The trustees of All-Star, in addition to approving the new sub-
    advisory agreement in accordance with the requirements of section 15(c) 
    of the Act, will specifically determine that entering into a sub-
    advisory agreement in advance of the next regular annual meeting of the 
    shareholders of All-Star, and without prior shareholder approval is in 
    furtherance of All-Star's multi-manager methodology, and is in the best 
    interests of All-Star and its shareholders.
        4. The new Sub-Advisor will have no affiliation with All-Star or 
    LAMCO other than as Sub-Advisor, and will have no duties or 
    responsibilities with respect to All-Star beyond the investment 
    management of the portion of All-Star's portfolio assets allocated to
    
    [[Page 6819]]
    
    it by LAMCO from time to time and related record keeping and reporting.
        5. The new sub-advisory agreement will provide for a sub-advisory 
    fee no higher than that provided in All-Star's existing sub-advisory 
    agreements and, except for the provisions relating to shareholder 
    approval referred to in condition 1 above, will be on substantially the 
    same other terms and conditions as such existing agreements. In the 
    event that the new sub-advisory agreement provides for sub-advisory 
    fees at rates less than those provided in the existing agreements, the 
    difference will be passed on to All-Star and its shareholders through a 
    corresponding voluntary reduction in the fund management fees payable 
    by All-Star to LAMCO.
        6. The appointment of the new or successor Sub-Advisor will be 
    announced by press release promptly following the trustees' action 
    referred to in condition 3 above, and a notice of the new sub-advisory 
    agreement, together with a description of the new or successor sub-
    Advisor, will be included in All-Star's next report to shareholders.
        7. In the case of a new subadvisory agreement with an existing Sub-
    Advisor or its successor following an ``assignment,'' as defined in 
    section 2(a)(4) of the Act and the rules thereunder, off All-Star's 
    sub-advisory agreement with that Sub-Advisor, LAMCO or the Sub-Advisor 
    (or its successor) will pay the incremental cost of including the 
    proposal to approve or disapprove the new sub-advisory agreement in the 
    proxy material for the next annual meeting of All-Star Growth's 
    shareholders.
        8. LAMCO will provide overall supervisory responsibility for the 
    general management and investment of All-Star's assets, subject to All-
    Star's investment objectives and policies and any directions of All-
    Star's trustees. In particular, LAMCO will: (a) Provide overall 
    investment programs and strategies for All-Star; (b) recommend to All-
    Star's trustees investment management firms for appointment or 
    replacement as All-Star Sub-Advisors; (c) allocate and reallocate All-
    Star's portfolio assets among the Sub-Advisors; and (d) monitor and 
    evaluate the investment performance of the Sub-Advisors, including 
    their compliance with All Star's investment objectives, policies, and 
    restrictions.
    
        For the SEC, by the Division of Investment Management, under 
    delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-3543 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/13/1997
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of application for exemption under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').
Document Number:
97-3543
Dates:
The application was filed on November 14, 1996, and amended on February 3, 1997.
Pages:
6817-6819 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Rel. No. IC-22498, 812-10430
PDF File:
97-3543.pdf