95-3575. Facilitation of Future Development of SMR Systems in the 800 MHz Frequency Band; Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications ActCompetitive Bidding, 800 MHz SMR  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 8341-8342]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-3575]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    
    47 CFR Part 90
    
    [PR Docket No. 93-144 and PP Docket No. 93-253; DA 95-67]
    
    
    Facilitation of Future Development of SMR Systems in the 800 MHz 
    Frequency Band; Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications 
    Act--Competitive Bidding, 800 MHz SMR
    
    AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of time.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On November 4, 1994, the Commission released a Further Notice 
    of Proposed Rule Making, FCC 94-271, concerning establishment of a 
    flexible regulatory scheme and competitive bidding procedures for 
    Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) systems in the 800 MHz band.
        Based on the number of initial comments received and the variety of 
    views expressed in this proceeding, this Order extends the deadline for 
    reply comments from January 20 to March 1, 1995. The intended effect of 
    this action is to provide members of the SMR industry with an 
    opportunity to further evaluate, discuss, and attempt to reach 
    consensus regarding the proposals presented and issues addressed both 
    in the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making and the initial comments 
    submitted in this proceeding.
    
    DATES: Reply comments must be filed on or before March 1, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Federal Commission, 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 
    20554.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    D'wana R. Speight, Legal Branch, Commercial Radio Division, Wireless 
    Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418-0620.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Order Extending Reply Comment Period
    
    Adopted: January 18, 1995
    Released: January 18, 1995
    
        By the Acting Chief, Commercial Radio Division:
    
        1. We have received requests from the American Mobile 
    Telecommunications Association, Inc. (``AMTA''), Personal 
    Communications Industry Association (``PCIA''), and SMR WON for an 
    extension of time for filing Reply Comments in response to the Further 
    Notice of Proposed Rule Making on this [[Page 8342]] proceeding.\1\ 
    AMTA's and SMR WON's motions, both filed on January 11, 1995, request 
    that the Commission extend the deadline for filing reply comments 
    (currently January 20, 1995) by 60 days. PCIA's motion, also filed on 
    January 11, 1995, requests that the deadline be extended by 30 days. To 
    date, no opposition to these requests has been filed.
    
        \1\Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, Amendment of Part 90 
    of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate Future Development of SMR 
    Systems in the 800 MHz Frequency Band and Implementation of Section 
    309(j) of the Communications Act--Competitive Bidding, 800 MHz SMR, 
    PR Docket No. 93-144 and PP Docket No. 93-253, FCC 94-271, adopted 
    October 20, 1994, released November 4, 1994, 59 FR 60111, published 
    November 22, 1994 (Further Notice).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        2. AMTA seeks an extension in order to ``facilitate continued 
    industry efforts to resolve certain of the matters on which no 
    consensus has yet been achieved.'' In its motion, SMR WON notes that 
    additional time is necessary to ``work out a consensus acceptable to 
    all major interested parties, even though SMR WON and other trade 
    associations held weekly meetings and conference calls throughout 
    November and December.'' In addition, PCIA observes that ``the number 
    of Comments, the controversial issues discussed, and the complexity of 
    the proceeding dictate that careful consideration be given to the 
    Comments filed by all parties.'' As a result, AMTA, SMR WON and PCIA 
    agree that an extension of time would allow interested and affected 
    parties to submit well-reasoned options and comments on the complex 
    issues addressed in this proceeding.
        3. Based on the number of comments received and the variety of 
    views expressed in this proceeding, it appears that an extension of the 
    reply comment period is warranted. We agree with both AMTA and SMR WON 
    that the public interest would be served by granting an extension so 
    that members of the SMR industry can further evaluate, discuss, and 
    attempt to reach consensus regarding the proposals presented and issues 
    addressed both in the Further Notice and the initial comments submitted 
    in this proceeding. Both parties indicate that discussions among 
    industry members have been ongoing and that the members are continuing 
    their efforts towards developing consensus positions. We believe that 
    additional time is needed to allow this process to continue. We also 
    agree with PCIA that additional time is needed to enable industry 
    members to review the extensive comment record filed in this proceeding 
    (over 80 comments have been filed) and to submit thorough and well-
    reasoned reply comments. We nevertheless remain concerned about 
    avoiding a substantial delay in the resolution of issues presented in 
    this proceeding. Thus, we believe that a 40-day extension of the reply 
    comment period is appropriate. We emphasize that in granting this 
    extension, we expect SMR industry representatives to use the additional 
    time productively by continuing their efforts to find solutions to the 
    issues presented in this proceeding that will be broadly supported by 
    industry members.
        4. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the Motions of Extension 
    of Time filed by the American Mobile Telecommunications Association, 
    the Personal Communications Industry Association, and SMR WON are 
    hereby GRANTED to the extent stated herein.
        5. It is further ordered, pursuant to Sec. 1.46 of the Commission's 
    Rules, 47 CFR 1.46, that the deadline for filing reply comments in this 
    proceeding is extended from January 20, 1995 to March 1, 1995.
    
    Federal Communications Commission.
    Rosalind K. Allen,
    Acting Chief, Commercial Radio Division, Wireless Telecommunications 
    Bureau.
    [FR Doc. 95-3575 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/14/1995
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule; extension of time.
Document Number:
95-3575
Dates:
Reply comments must be filed on or before March 1, 1995.
Pages:
8341-8342 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PR Docket No. 93-144 and PP Docket No. 93-253, DA 95-67
PDF File:
95-3575.pdf
CFR: (1)
47 CFR 90