96-3325. Topical Antimicrobial Drug Products For Over-The-Counter Human Use; Proposed Amendment of Final Monograph for OTC First Aid Antibiotic Drug Products  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 5918-5920]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-3325]
    
    
    
          
    
    [[Page 5917]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part IX
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Health and Human Services
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    21 CFR Part 333
    
    
    
    Topical Antimicrobial Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; 
    Proposed Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 14, 1996 / 
    Proposed Rules
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 5918]]
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food And Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Part 333
    
    [Docket No. 95N-0062]
    RIN 0910-AA01
    
    
    Topical Antimicrobial Drug Products For Over-The-Counter Human 
    Use; Proposed Amendment of Final Monograph for OTC First Aid Antibiotic 
    Drug Products
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing a notice of 
    proposed rulemaking that would amend the final monograph for over-the-
    counter (OTC) first aid antibiotic drug products (the regulation that 
    establishes conditions under which these drug products are generally 
    recognized as safe and effective and not misbranded). The amendment 
    would add a warning statement concerning allergic reactions resulting 
    from topical antibiotic drug products containing bacitracin, bacitracin 
    zinc, neomycin, neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B, or polymyxin B sulfate. 
    This proposal is part of the ongoing review of OTC drug products 
    conducted by FDA.
    
    DATES: Written comments on the proposed regulation by May 14, 1996; 
    written comments on the agency's economic impact determination by May 
    14, 1996. FDA is proposing that any final rule based on this proposal 
    become effective 12 months after its date of publication in the Federal 
    Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Dockets Management Branch 
    (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, rm. 1-23, 12420 Parklawn Dr., 
    Rockville, MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William E. Gilbertson, Center for Drug 
    Evaluation and Research (HFD-105),-Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
    Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-2304.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        In the Federal Register of December 11, 1987 (52 FR 47312), FDA 
    issued a final monograph for OTC first aid antibiotic drug products in 
    part 333 (21 CFR part 333) subpart B. The monograph provides for single 
    ingredient products containing bacitracin, bacitracin zinc, neomycin, 
    or neomycin sulfate and various combinations containing bacitracin, 
    neomycin sulfate, and polymyxin B sulfate.
        FDA has been informed (Ref. 1) that manufacturers of OTC topical 
    antibiotic drug products containing bacitracin zinc, neomycin sulfate, 
    and polymyxin B sulfate voluntarily have added the following 
    information about the possibility of allergic reactions associated with 
    these antibiotics in the warnings for these products: ``Stop use and 
    consult a physician if * * * a rash or other allergic reaction 
    develops. Do not use this product if you are allergic to any of the 
    listed ingredients.'' This allergy warning resulted from an industry 
    task group's review of adverse event reports involving products 
    containing bacitracin zinc, neomycin sulfate, and polymyxin B sulfate. 
    The reports showed that these products have been reported to be 
    associated with hypersensitivity reactions in susceptible individuals 
    and, in rare instances, nonfatal systemic hypersensitivity reactions.
        The agency requested that the task group provide these reports for 
    evaluation (Ref. 2), and the industry subsequently submitted them (Ref. 
    3). The reports included: (1) Listings from FDA's Spontaneous Reporting 
    System (SRS) of adverse experience reports for prescription and OTC 
    drug products containing bacitracin, neomycin, and polymyxin B sulfate, 
    and (2) sublistings of reports of allergic reactions to bacitracin, 
    neomycin, and polymyxin B sulfate in OTC, prescription, unclassified, 
    and all types of products, not just topical first aid antibiotics. The 
    sublistings showed 923 cases of allergic hypersensitivity; 631 related 
    to prescription products, 261 related to OTC products, and 31 that 
    could not be classified from the available information. No deaths 
    attributable to allergic hypersensitivity have been reported from use 
    of any OTC drug products containing these ingredients. Beginning in 
    1983, the total number of reports of allergic reactions associated with 
    OTC antibiotic drug products containing bacitracin, neomycin, and/or 
    polymyxin B sulfate increased. The industry believed this increase was 
    associated with more OTC topical antibiotic drug products being 
    marketed following publication of the tentative final monograph for 
    these products in 1982. Industry reported that over the past 4 years, 
    the number of units of these products sold per year has been constant 
    at approximately 29 million units per year.
        The industry stated that incidence figures cannot be generated from 
    the data because the denominator (total number of exposures) cannot be 
    accurately determined and the numerator may be confounded by over- and/
    or underreporting of adverse reactions. The industry concluded that 
    reference to the possibility of allergic reactions in the products' 
    label warnings would benefit consumers who use these products.
    
    II. The Agency's Proposal
    
        The agency has reviewed the adverse experience reports and 
    determined that the labeling suggested by the industry would be 
    beneficial to consumers who use these OTC first aid antibiotic drug 
    products. For the OTC drug products, the majority of reports appear to 
    be nonserious skin reactions characterized as either rash or contact 
    dermatitis. No fatalities were reported for OTC drug products; however, 
    the outcome was listed as unknown in the majority of the reports. More 
    than 50 percent of the allergic reactions reported in the SRS involved 
    antibiotic combination products (e.g., containing at least two of the 
    ingredients, bacitracin, polymyxin B sulfate, and/or neomycin). As with 
    all combination products, an adverse effect may be due to one or 
    several of the ingredients in the product. However, the SRS lists 
    allergic (or rash) reports individually for bacitracin and neomycin. 
    The SRS also contains a few such reports for polymyxin B sulfate 
    products singly. In addition, the Physicians' Desk Reference (Ref. 4) 
    lists such allergic reactions for a single-ingredient polymyxin B 
    sulfate powder for parenteral and/or ophthalmic use.
        The final monograph for OTC first aid antibiotic drug products, 
    issued on December 11, 1987, did not include an allergy warning for 
    products containing bacitracin, neomycin, and polymyxin B sulfate. 
    Based on the new information provided by industry, showing an increase 
    in the total number of reports of allergic reactions since 1983, the 
    agency is proposing to add a new warning for products containing 
    bacitracin (zinc), neomycin (sulfate), and polymyxin B (sulfate). The 
    warning adds the words ``or if a rash or other allergic reaction 
    develops. Do not use if you are allergic to any of the ingredients.'' 
    in the middle of the existing warning in Sec. 333.150(c)(2) that has 
    been used for all OTC first aid antibiotic drug products for years. The 
    new warning would read:
        Stop use and consult a doctor if the condition persists or gets 
    worse, or if a rash or other allergic reaction develops. Do not use 
    if you are allergic to any of the ingredients. Do not use longer 
    than 1 week unless directed by a doctor.
    
    [[Page 5919]]
    
        The agency is including this new warning in proposed 
    Sec. 333.150(c)(3) under the heading For any product containing 
    bacitracin, bacitracin zinc, neomycin, neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B, 
    and/or polymyxin B sulfate. The agency is retaining the current warning 
    in Sec. 333.150(c)(2) for products containing chlortetracycline 
    hydrochloride and tetracycline hydrochloride and is adding the heading 
    For products containing chlortetracycline hydrochloride or tetracycline 
    hydrochloride to Sec. 333.150(c)(2). Combinations containing 
    oxytetracycline hydrochloride and polymyxin B sulfate in 
    Sec. 333.120(a)(11) and (a)(12) would use the new warning in proposed 
    Sec. 333.150(c)(3).
        Manufacturers of OTC topical first aid antibiotic drug products 
    containing bacitracin, bacitracin zinc, neomycin, neomycin sulfate, 
    and/or polymyxin or polymyxin B sulfate are encouraged to voluntarily 
    implement this labeling addition as of the date of publication of this 
    proposal, subject to the possibility that FDA may change the wording of 
    the warning statement as a result of comments filed in response to this 
    proposal. Manufacturers may include this labeling under the heading 
    ``FDA APPROVED INFORMATION'' in accord with Sec. 330.1(c)(2) (21 CFR 
    330.1(c)(2)) if that heading is used in product labeling. Because FDA 
    is encouraging that the proposed additional warning statement be used 
    on a voluntary basis at this time, the agency advises that 
    manufacturers doing so will be given ample time after publication of a 
    final rule to use up any labeling implemented in conformance with this 
    proposal.
    
    III. References
    
        The following references have been placed on display in the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) and may be seen by interested persons 
    between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
        (1) Letter dated June 20, 1992, from R. W. Soller, 
    Nonprescription Drug Manufacturers Association, to W. E. Gilbertson, 
    FDA, in OTC Vol. 190036, Docket No. 95N-0062, Dockets Management 
    Branch.
        (2) Letter dated July 22, 1992, from W. E. Gilbertson, FDA, to 
    R. W. Soller, Nonprescription Drug Manufacturers Association, in OTC 
    Vol. 190036, Docket No. 95N-0062, Dockets Management Branch.
        (3) Letter dated October 7, 1992, from R. W. Soller, 
    Nonprescription Drug Manufacturers Association, to W. E. Gilbertson, 
    FDA, in OTC Vol. 190036, Docket No. 95N-0062, Dockets Management 
    Branch.
        (4) Physicians' Desk Reference, 48th ed., Medical Economics Co., 
    Montvale, NJ, p. 738, 1994.
    
    IV. Analysis of Impacts
    
        FDA has examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive 
    Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354). 
    Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits 
    of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, 
    to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including 
    potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other 
    advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that 
    this proposed rule is consistent with the regulatory philosophy and 
    principles identified in the Executive Order. In addition, the proposed 
    rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by the Executive 
    Order and, thus, is not subject to review under the Executive Order.
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze 
    regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule 
    on small entities. The proposed rule is estimated to generate a one-
    time label modification, the cost of which will not be significant. 
    Similarly, the costs incurred by small businesses are estimated to be 
    insufficient to warrant a regulatory flexibility analysis. FDA believes 
    that small marketers use relatively simple and inexpensive packaging 
    and labeling. Hence, labeling change costs (for one warning) to small 
    firms are not expected to be substantial. Accordingly, the agency 
    certifies that the proposed rule will not have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, under the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act, no further analysis is required.
        The agency invites public comment regarding any substantial or 
    significant economic impact that this rulemaking would have on 
    manufacturers of OTC first aid antibiotic drug products that contain 
    bacitracin (zinc), neomycin (sulfate), and/or polymyxin B (sulfate). 
    Comments regarding the impact of this rulemaking on such manufacturers 
    should be accompanied by appropriate documentation. The agency is 
    providing a period of 90 days from the date of publication of this 
    proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register for comments to be 
    developed and submitted. The agency will evaluate any comments and 
    supporting data that are received and will reassess the economic impact 
    of this rulemaking in the preamble to the final rule.
    
    V. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
    
        FDA tentatively concludes that the labeling requirement proposed in 
    this document is not subject to review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget because it does not constitute a ``collection of information'' 
    under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 
    Rather, the proposed warning statement is a ``public disclosure of 
    information originally supplied by the Federal government to the 
    recipient for the purpose of disclosure to the public'' (5 CFR 
    1320.3(c)(2)).
    
    VI. Environmental Impact
    
        The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.24(c)(6) that this action 
    is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
    significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
    environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
    required.
        Interested persons may, on or before May 14, 1996, submit written 
    comments to the Dockets Management Branch (address above). Written 
    comments on the agency's economic impact determination may be submitted 
    on or before May 14, 1996. Three copies of all comments are to be 
    submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to 
    be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading 
    of this document and may be accompanied by a supporting memorandum or 
    brief. Received comments may be seen in the office above between 9 a.m. 
    and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
    List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 333
    
        Labeling, Over-the-counter drugs.
        Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
    authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, it is 
    proposed that 21 CFR part 333 be amended as follows:
    
    PART 333--TOPICAL ANTIMICROBIAL DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER 
    HUMAN USE
    
        1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 333 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 201, 501, 502, 503, 505, 510, 701 of the 
    Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321, 351, 352, 353, 
    355, 360, 371), unless otherwise noted.
    
        2. Section 333.150 is amended by adding a heading to paragraph 
    (c)(2) and by adding new paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
    
    Sec. 333.150  Labeling of first aid antibiotic drug products.
    
    * * * * *
    
    [[Page 5920]]
    
        (c) * * *
        (2) For products containing chlortetracycline hydrochloride or 
    tetracycline hydrochloride. * * *
        (3) For any product containing bacitracin, bacitracin zinc, 
    neomycin, neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B and/or polymyxin B sulfate. 
    ``Stop use and consult a doctor if the condition persists or gets 
    worse, or if a rash or other allergic reaction develops. Do not use 
    this product if you are allergic to any of the ingredients. Do not use 
    longer than 1 week unless directed by a doctor.''
    * * * * *
    
        Dated: February 6, 1996.
    William K. Hubbard,
    Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
    [FR Doc. 96-3325 Filed 2-13-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/14/1996
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
96-3325
Dates:
Written comments on the proposed regulation by May 14, 1996; written comments on the agency's economic impact determination by May 14, 1996. FDA is proposing that any final rule based on this proposal become effective 12 months after its date of publication in the Federal Register.
Pages:
5918-5920 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95N-0062
RINs:
0910-AA01: Over-the-Counter (OTC) Drug Review
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/0910-AA01/over-the-counter-otc-drug-review
PDF File:
96-3325.pdf
CFR: (3)
21 CFR 333.120(a)(11)
21 CFR 333.150(c)(3)
21 CFR 333.150