[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5739-5744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-3379]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service Modernization and Associated
Restructuring
ACTION: Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Weather Service (NWS) is publishing proposed
certifications for the proposed consolidations of:
(1) Residual Moline Weather Service Office (RWSO) into the future
Quad Cities WFO;
(2) Residual Raleigh WSO into the future Raleigh/Durham WFO;
(3) Hartford Weather Service Office (WSO) into the future Boston,
New York City and Albany Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
(4) Baltimore WSO into the future Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC;
Philadelphia; and Wakefield WFOs;
(5) Norfolk WSO into the future Wakefield WFO;
(6) Richmond WSO into the future Wakefield, Roanoke, and Baltimore,
MD/Washington, DC WFOs;
(7) Atlantic City WSO into the future Philadelphia WFO; and
(8) Wilmington (WSO) into the future Philadelphia WFO. In
accordance with Public Law 102-567, the public will have 60-days in
which to comment on these proposed consolidation certifications.
DATE: April 15, 1996.
ADDRESS: Requests for copies of the proposed consolidation packages
should be sent to Janet Gilmer, Room 12316, 1325 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910, telephone 301-713-0276. All comments should be
sent to Janet Gilmer at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Julie Scanlon at 301-713-1413.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NWS anticipates consolidating:
(1) The Residual Moline Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the
future Quad Cities WFO;
(2) The Residual Raleigh WSO with the future Raleigh/Durham WFO;
(3) The Hartford Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future
Boston, New York City and Albany Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
(4) The Baltimore WSO with the future Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC;
Philadelphia; and Wakefield WFOs;
(5) The Norfolk WSO with the future Wakefield WFO;
(6) The Richmond WSO with the future Wakefield, Roanoke, and
Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC WFOs;
(7) The Atlantic City WSO with the future Philadelphia WFO; and
(8) The Wilmington WSO with the future Philadelphia WFO.
In accordance with section 706 of Pub. L. 102-567, the Secretary of
Commerce must certify that these consolidations will not result in any
degradation of service to the affected areas of responsibility and must
publish the proposed consolidation certifications in the FR. The
documentation support each proposed certification includes the
following:
(1) A draft memorandum by the meteorologist-in-charge recommending
the certification, the final of which will be endorsed by the Regional
Director and the Assistant Administrator of the NWS if appropriate,
after consolidation of public comments and completion of
[[Page 5740]]
consultation with the Modernization Transition Committee (the
Committee);
(2) A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns which affect the weather services provided within the
service area;
(3) A comparison of the services provided within the service area
and the services to be provided after such action;
(4) A description of any recent or expected modernization of NWS
operation which will enhance services in the service area;
(5) An identification of any area within the affected service area
which would not receive coverage (at an elevation of 10,000 feet) by
the next generation weather radar network;
(6) Evidence, based upon operational demonstration of modernized
NWS operations, which was considered in reaching the conclusion that no
degration in service will result from such action including the WSR-88D
Radar Commissioning Report(s), User Confirmation of Services Report(s),
and the Decommissioning Readiness Report (as applicable); and
(7) A letter appointing the liaison officer.
These proposed certifications do not include any report of the
Committee which could be submitted in accordance with sections
706(b)(6) and 707(c) of Public Law 102-567. At their December 14, 1995
meeting the members ``* * * resolved that the MTC modify its procedure
to eliminate proposed certification consultations of noncontroversial
closings, consolidations, relocations, and automation certifications
but will provide final consultation on certifications after public
comment and before final submission to the Secretary of Commerce.''
Documentation supporting the proposed certifications is too
voluminous to publish in its entirety. Copies of the supporting
documentation can be obtained through the contact listed above.
Attached to this Notice are draft memoranda by the respective
meteorologists-in-charge recommending the certifications.
Once all public comments have been received and considered, the NWS
will complete consultation with the Committee and determine whether to
proceed with the final certifications. If decisions to certify are
made, the Secretary of Commerce must publish the final certifications
in the FR and transmit the certifications to the appropriate
Congressional committees prior to consolidating the offices.
Dated: February 9, 1996.
Louis J. Boezi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Modernization.
Memorandum For: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From: Charles T. Fenley, MIC, NWSO Quad Cities, Davenport, IA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
In February 1995, a change of operations occurred when most
personnel and most services provided by WSO Moline (located at the
Quad City Airport), were transferred to the future WFO site in
Davenport, Iowa. At that time, a Residual Weather Service Office
(RWSO) was left in Moline to continue the surface and radar
observational programs. Since that time, the Quad City Airport
(Moline) ASOS has been commissioned (July 1, 1995), the WSR-88D
radar has been commissioned (September 7, 1995), and the WSR-74C
radar has been decommissioned (January 19, 1996). Radar
observational services, and the responsibility thereof, that had
been provided from the Moline Office have been transferred to the
future Quad Cities WFO in Davenport, Iowa.
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Moline, Illinois
Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the future Quad Cities
(Davenport, Iowa) Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in
any degradation in weather services to the Moline, Illinois service
area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward certification
to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided to the pre-
modernized Moline, Illinois service area is included as Attachment
A. As discussed below, I find that providing the services which
address these characteristics and concerns from the future Quad
Cities (Davenport, Iowa) WFO will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided, within
the Moline, Illinois service area from the Moline, Illinois RWSO
location and a list of services to be provided from the future Quad
Cities (Davenport, Iowa) WFO location after the proposed
consolidation is included as Attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map
shows the RWSO Moline, Illinois Area of Responsibility (i.e.
``Affected Service Area'') and the future Quad Cities (Davenport,
Iowa) WFO Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of those services as a
result of consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the RWSO Moline, Illinois service area is included as
Attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has
or will be installed, and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for southeast, east central Iowa, and northwest Illinois
is included as Attachment D. NWS operation radar coverage for the
RWSO Moline, Illinois service area will be increased.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Quad Cities
(Davenport, Iowa), Attachment E, validate that the WSR-88D meets
technical specifications (acceptance test); is fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. A full compliment of spares is on-
station, but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the Quad Cities
(Davenport, Iowa), Attachment F, document that no negative comments
were received.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, validates
that the old WSR-74C radar at Moline, Illinois is no longer needed
to support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Moline,
Illinois service area is included as Attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (Attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (Attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend
certification.
Endorsement
I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
Richard P. Augulis,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Stephen Harned, AM/MIC NWSFO Raleigh/Durham, NC
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
[[Page 5741]]
A change of operations occurred at the Raleigh Weather Service
Forecast Office (WSFO), located at the Raleigh Airport, in January
1994 when most personnel were transferred to the facility of the
future Raleigh/Durham Weather Forecast Office (WFO) on the campus of
North Carolina State University in Raleigh to operate the WSR-88D
and assume forecast and warning responsibility for the Raleigh
service area. At the same time the Raleigh Airport (RDU) location
was designated a Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) to continue
operating the existing WSR-74C radar and taking surface airways
observations.
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the RWSO RDU with the
future Raleigh/Durham Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result
in any degradation in weather services to the Raleigh service area.
This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Raleigh service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Raleigh/Durham WFO will
not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Raleigh service area from the RSWO RDU location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Raleigh area WFO location
after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the RWSO RDU Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Raleigh Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a
result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the RWSO RDU service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOC, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
1,000 feet for North Carolina and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Raleigh service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Raleigh
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interface and satisfactory support
of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service backup
capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of operations and
maintenance documentation is available; and spare parts and test
equipment and trained operations and maintenance personnel are
available on site. Training was completed but two national work-
arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Raleigh attachment F,
document that three negative comments were received. All negative
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as
reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Raleigh WSR-74C radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Raleigh
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
Robert M. Thompson, AM/MIC NWSFO Boston, MA
Michael E. Wyllies, AM/MIC NWSFO New York City, NY
Warren Snyder, Acting MIC NWSFO Albany, NY
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgement, consolidation of the Hartford Weather
Service Office (WSO BDL) with the future Boston, New York City and
Albany Weather Forecast Office (WFOs) will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the Hartford service area. This
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Hartford service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Boston, New York City
and Albany WFOs, will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Hartford service area from the WSO BDL location and list of services
to be provided from the future Boston Area, New York City Area and
Albany Area WFOs locations after the proposed consolidation is
included as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that
all services currently provided will continue to be provided after
the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO BDL
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the
future WFO Boston Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services
as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO BBL service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Connecticut and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Hartford service area will be increased and no area will be missed
in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from the Boston, New
York City and Albany areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds
meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Boston, New
York City and Albany WFOs areas, attachment F, document that a total
of seven comments required follow-up.
[[Page 5742]]
All negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the
users as reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Hartford local warning radar, WSR-74C, is no
longer needed to support services or products for local office
operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Hartford
service area is included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
James Travers, AM/MIC NWSFO Baltimore/Washington
G.C. Henricksen, AM/MIC NWSFO Philadelphia, PA
Anthony Siebers, MIC NWSO Wakefield, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Baltimore Weather
Service Office (WSO BWI) with the future Wakefield, Baltimore/
Washington and Philadelphia Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not
result in any degradation in weather services to the Baltimore
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Baltimore service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Wakefield, Baltimore/
Washington and Philadelphia WFOs, will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Baltimore service area from the WSO BWI location and list of
services to be provided from the future Wakefield, Baltimore/
Washington and Philadelphia WFO locations after the proposed
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map
shows the WSO BWI Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service
Area'') and the future WFO Baltimore/Washington Area of
Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO BWI service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Maryland and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Baltimore service area will be increased and no area will be missed
in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Wakefield,
Baltimore/Washington and Philadelphia areas, attachment E, validate
that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test);
are fully operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces
and satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Wakefield,
Baltimore/Washington and Philadelphia WFO areas, attachment F,
document that a total of six comments required follow-up. All
negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the
users as reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
necessary since WSO BWI does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Baltimore
service area is included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Anthony L. Siebers, MIC NWSO Wakefield, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Norfolk Weather
Service Office (WSO ORF) with the future Wakefield Weather Forecast
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services
to the Norfolk service area. This proposed certification is in
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Norfolk service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Wakefield WFO will not
degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Norfolk service area from the WSO ORF location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Wakefield WFO location after
the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison
of these services shows that all services currently provided will
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the
enclosed map shows the WSO ORF Area of Responsibility (i.e.
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Wakefield Area of
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO ORF service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Norfolk service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
[[Page 5743]]
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Wakefield
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Wakefield, attachment
F, document that three responses required follow-up. All negative
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as
reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
needed as WSO ORF does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Norfolk
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
Anthony Siebers, MIC NWSO Wakefield, VA
James Travers, AM/MIC NWSFO Baltimore/Washington
John V. Wright, MIC NWSO Roanoke, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Richmond Weather
Service Office (WSO RIC) with the future Wakefield, Baltimore/
Washington and Roanoke Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not
result in any degradation in weather services to the Richmond
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Richmond service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Wakefield, Baltimore/
Washington and Roanoke WFOs, will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Richmond service area from the WSO RIC location and list of services
to be provided from the future Wakefield, Baltimore/Washington and
Roanoke WFOs locations after the proposed consolidation is included
as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all
services currently provided will continue to be provided after the
proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO RIC
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the
future WFO Wakefield Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we
find that there will be no degradation in the quality of these
services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO RIC service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Richmond service area will be increased and no area will be missed
in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Wakefield,
Baltimore/Washington and Roanoke areas, attachment E, validate that
the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are
fully operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Wakefield,
Baltimore/Washington and Roanoke WFO areas, attachment F, document
that a total of 13 comments required follow-up. All negative
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as
reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
necessary since WSO RIC does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Richmond
service area is included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Chet Henricksen, AM/MIC NWSFO Philadelphia, PA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Weather Service
Office (WSO) Atlantic City, NJ with the Philadelphia Weather
Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather
services to the Atlantic City service area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Atlantic City service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Philadelphia WFO will
not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Atlantic City service area from WSO Atlantic City location and a
list of services to be provided from the future Philadelphia WFO
location after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment
B. Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Atlantic City
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the
future WFO Philadelphia Area of Responsibility. As discussed below,
I find that there will be no degradation in the
[[Page 5744]]
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Atlantic City service area is included as
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has
or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for New Jersey and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Atlantic City service area will be increased and no area will be
missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from Philadelphia,
attachment E validate that the WSR-88D meet technical specifications
(acceptance test); are fully operational (satisfactory operation of
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Philadelphia,
attachment F, document that no negative comments were received for
the Philadelphia NWSFO area related.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Atlantic City WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Atlantic
City service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Chet Henricksen, AM/MIC NWSFO Philadelphia, PA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached document, I have determined, in my
professional judgement, consolidation of the Weather Service Office
(WSO) Wilmington, DE with the future Philadelphia Weather Forecast
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services
to the Wilmington service area. This proposed certification is in
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Wilmington service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Philadelphia WFO will
not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Wilmington service area from WSO Wilmington location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Philadelphia WFO location
after the proposed consolidation is included in attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Wilmington Area
of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future
WFO Philadelphia Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services
as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Wilmington service area is included as
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has
or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Delaware and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Delaware service area will be increased and no area will be missed
in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from Philadelphia,
attachment E validate that the WSR-88D meet technical specifications
(acceptance test); are fully operational (satisfactory operation of
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Philadelphia,
attachment F, document that no negative comments were received for
the Philadelphia NWSFO area related.
C. WSO Wilmington does not have a radar, therefore, the
Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not necessary for
this report.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Wilmington
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
[FR Doc. 96-3379 Filed 2-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M
