96-3365. Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Merced, CA, Nonappropriated Fund Wage Area  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Page 5921]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-3365]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Rules and Regulations
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
    having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
    to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
    under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
    
    The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
    Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
    week.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 1996 / 
    Rules and Regulations
    
    [[Page 5921]]
    
    
    OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
    
    5 CFR Part 532
    
    RIN 3206-AH30
    
    
    Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Merced, CA, 
    Nonappropriated Fund Wage Area
    
    AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
    
    ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management is issuing an interim rule 
    to abolish the Merced, CA, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage 
    system (FWS) wage area and redefine the country having continuing FWS 
    employment (Fresno County) as an area of application to the Kern, CA, 
    NAF wage area for pay-setting purposes. The remaining Merced wage area 
    county (Merced County) has no FWS employees and is being deleted.
    
    DATES: This interim rule becomes effective on February 15, 1996. 
    Comments must be received by March 18, 1996. Employees currently paid 
    rates from the Merced, CA, NAF wage schedule will continue to be paid 
    from that schedule until conversion to the Kern, CA, NAF wage schedule 
    on April 4, 1996, 1 day before the effective date of the next Kern, CA, 
    wage schedule.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Donald J. Winstead, Assistant 
    Director for Compensation Policy, Human Resources Systems Service, 
    Office of Personnel Management, Room 6H31, 1900 E Street NW., 
    Washington, DC 20415, or FAX: (202) 606-0824.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Paul Shields, (202) 606-2848.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Defense recommended to the 
    Office of Personnel Management that the Merced, CA, FWS NAF wage area 
    be abolished and that the county having continuing FWS employment 
    (Fresno County) be added as an area of application to the Kern, CA, NAF 
    wage area. The remaining Merced wage area county (Merced County) is 
    being deleted because it has no FWS employment. This change is 
    necessary because the closing of the wage area host activity, Castle 
    Air Force Base, leaves the Merced wage area without an activity having 
    the capability to conduct a wage survey.
    
        As required in regulation, 5 CFR 532.219, the following criteria 
    were considered in redefining these wage areas:
        (1) Proximity of largest activity in each county;
        (2) Transportation facilities and commuting patterns; and
        (3) Similarities of the counties in:
        (i) Overall population;
        (ii) Private employment in major industry categories; and
        (iii) Kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments.
        Proximity favors redefining Fresno County to the San Joaquin wage 
    area. However, because of declining employment in the wage area and a 
    limited capability for conducting a wage survey, the possible 
    abolishment of the San Joaquin wage area is currently under study. The 
    second and third criteria favor redefinition to the Kern wage area. An 
    additional consideration favoring redefinition of Fresno County to the 
    Kern wage area is the fact that Fresno County is contiguous to Kings 
    County, an area of application to the Kern wage area. On balance, the 
    recommended redefinition of Fresno County to the Kern wage area is 
    supported.
        The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee reviewed this 
    recommendation and by consensus recommended approval.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), I find that good cause exists 
    for waiving the general notice of proposed rulemaking. Also, pursuant 
    to section 553(d)(3) of title 5, United States Code, I find that good 
    cause exists for making this rule effective in less than 30 days. The 
    notice is being waived and the regulation is being made effective in 
    less than 30 days because preparations for the 1996 Merced, CA, NAF 
    wage area survey must otherwise being immediately.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        I certify that these regulations will not have a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they 
    affect only Federal agencies and employees.
    
    List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, 
    Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
    
    Office of Personnel Management.
    Lorraine A. Green,
    Deputy Director.
    
        Accordingly, OPM is amending 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
    
    PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under 5 
    U.S.C. 552.
    
    Appendix B to Subpart B of Part 532 [Amended]
    
        2. In appendix B to subpart B, the listing for the State of 
    California is amended by removing the entry for Merced.
        3. Appendix D to subpart B is amended by removing the wage area 
    listing for Merced, California, and by revising the listing for Kern, 
    California, to read as follows:
    
    Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532--Nonappropriated Fund Wage and 
    Survey Areas
    
    * * * * *
    California
    * * * * *
    Kern
    
    Survey Area
    
    California: Kern
    
    Area of Application. Survey Area Plus
    
    California
    Fresno (Effective date April 4, 1996)
    Kings
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 96-3365 Filed 2-14-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/15/1996
Published:
02/15/1996
Department:
Personnel Management Office
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
96-3365
Dates:
This interim rule becomes effective on February 15, 1996. Comments must be received by March 18, 1996. Employees currently paid rates from the Merced, CA, NAF wage schedule will continue to be paid from that schedule until conversion to the Kern, CA, NAF wage schedule on April 4, 1996, 1 day before the effective date of the next Kern, CA, wage schedule.
Pages:
5921-5921 (1 pages)
RINs:
3206-AH30
PDF File:
96-3365.pdf
CFR: (1)
5 CFR 532