96-3450. Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph-Sheppard Act  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 5992-5993]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-3450]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
    
    Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph-Sheppard Act
    
    AGENCY: Department of Education.
    
    ACTION: Notice of arbitration panel decision under the Randolph-
    Sheppard Act.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that on April 13, 1994, an arbitration 
    panel rendered a decision in the matter of Betty Moffitt v. Tennessee 
    Department of Human Services, (Docket No. R-S/92-8). This panel was 
    convened by the U.S. Department of Education pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 
    107d-2, upon receipt of a complaint filed by Betty Moffitt.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of the full text of the 
    arbitration panel decision may be obtained from George F. Arsnow, U. S. 
    Department of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 3230, 
    Switzer Building, Washington, DC 20202-2738. Telephone: (202) 205-9317. 
    Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may 
    call the TDD number at (202) 205-8298.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Randolph-Sheppard Act (20 
    U.S.C. 107d-2(c)), the Secretary publishes a synopsis of arbitration 
    panel decisions affecting the administration of vending facilities on 
    Federal and other property.
    
    Background
    
        The complainant, Betty Moffitt, became a licensed manager in the 
    Tennessee Business Enterprise Program on September 1, 1976, and was 
    eventually assigned to Facility #299 at the Tennessee Valley Authority 
    (TVA) Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant on September 1, 1982. The Tennessee 
    Department of Human Services (TDHS) is the designated State licensing 
    agency (SLA) charged with the administration and operation of the 
    Tennessee Vending Facility program. The Division of Internal Audit for 
    TDHS conducted an in-depth examination and audit of Facility #299 for 
    the calendar year 1987. TDHS found substantial and compelling 
    discrepancies between the amounts of purchases and sales reported by 
    the complainant and amounts of purchases and sales obtained by the 
    auditors from independent sources.
        After a thorough analysis of all information, including an 
    independent audit conducted by the Tennessee Department of Revenue that 
    also demonstrated major inconsistencies, TDHS issued a letter to the 
    complainant terminating her license effective February 9, 1991. 
    Complainant allegedly violated Tennessee Rule 1240-6-6.3 (4), which 
    mandates termination of license for falsification of records.
        The complainant appealed her termination of license by requesting 
    and receiving a State fair hearing held on July 25 and 26, 1991. An 
    opinion was issued by the hearing officer on January 31, 1992. The 
    hearing officer sustained TDHS's termination of Ms. Moffitt's license 
    based upon the evidence presented at the hearing. Specifically, the 
    hearing officer ruled that the evidence substantiated the falsification 
    allegations made by the SLA. Subsequently, the complainant filed a 
    petition for reconsideration of the hearing officer's decision, which 
    was denied in a written opinion on February 12, 1992. A notice of 
    appeal was filed by the complainant, and on March 2, 1992, the hearing 
    officer issued a final order adopting the earlier opinion of January 
    31, 1992.
        The complainant applied for and received reconsideration of the 
    final order on March 6, 1992, which was denied by the Director of 
    Appeals on March 10, 1992.
        On May 13, 1992, Ms. Moffitt filed a request with the Secretary of 
    the U.S. Department of Education to convene an arbitration panel to 
    review the final order of the hearing officer. A hearing by a Federal 
    arbitration panel was held on September 3, 1993.
    
    Arbitration Panel Decision
    
        The arbitration panel reviewed the audit findings of TDHS's 
    Division of Internal Audit of the complainant's Facility #299. The 
    panel concluded that, while the findings of the audit were not 
    conclusive, they were extraordinarily persuasive and were not 
    satisfactorily rebutted. Further, the complainant's testimony and 
    presentation of evidence did not satisfactorily rebut the evidence 
    presented by TDHS. Accordingly, the panel found that in 1987 at 
    Facility #299 the complainant underreported merchandise purchased by at 
    least $58,000 and underreported sales by approximately $140,000 (this 
    was a projected figure accepted by the panel). The panel further found 
    that the underreporting was so significant that it could not be 
    attributed to errors of negligence or inadvertence.
        The panel found that TDHS had demonstrated by a preponderance of 
    
    [[Page 5993]]
        evidence that the complainant knowingly and intentionally filed false 
    reports with the SLA that were misleading and that misrepresented the 
    true financial status of Facility #299. The panel found that by doing 
    so, the complainant avoided the payment of set-aside assessments on 
    tens of thousands of dollars for 1987. The panel estimated that the 
    actions of the complainant resulted in TDHS being deprived of 
    approximately sixteen thousand dollars in fees for the year 1987, after 
    considering allowances for legitimate losses in business and the set-
    aside fees paid by the complainant.
        Therefore, the panel concluded that the maintenance of financial 
    accountability among the TDHS's licensed managers is vital to protect 
    the stability, integrity, and future growth of the vending facility 
    program. The panel considered that the SLA must have the authority to 
    take extreme measures in those cases that threaten to undermine the 
    basic principles on which the program operates. The panel ruled that 
    the actions of TDHS were proper and appropriate in terminating the 
    license of the complainant for violation of the State rule 1240-6-6.03 
    (4). The views and opinions expressed by the panel do not necessarily 
    represent the views and opinions of the U.S. Department of Education.
    
        Dated: February 12, 1996.
    Howard R. Moses,
    Acting Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative 
    Services.
    [FR Doc. 96-3450 Filed 2-14-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/15/1996
Department:
Education Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of arbitration panel decision under the Randolph- Sheppard Act.
Document Number:
96-3450
Pages:
5992-5993 (2 pages)
PDF File:
96-3450.pdf